0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views4 pages

Video Interview Rubric

The document outlines an analytic rubric for evaluating video interviews based on five criteria: Content & Responses, Clarity & Organization, Professionalism & Demeanor, Communication Skills, and Technical Quality. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 4, with descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to provide a structured assessment of interview quality and effectiveness.

Uploaded by

cristal asuncion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views4 pages

Video Interview Rubric

The document outlines an analytic rubric for evaluating video interviews based on five criteria: Content & Responses, Clarity & Organization, Professionalism & Demeanor, Communication Skills, and Technical Quality. Each criterion is rated on a scale from 1 to 4, with descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to provide a structured assessment of interview quality and effectiveness.

Uploaded by

cristal asuncion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Analytic Rubric for a Video Interview

Criteria Excellent (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Needs Improvement (1)

Content & Responses Well-developed, insightful,

and fully address all

questions with relevant

examples.

Clear and mostly

complete, with relevant

examples but lacking

depth.

Somewhat clear but may

lack detail, depth, or

relevant examples.

Vague, off-topic, or

missing key details.

Clarity & Organization Logically organized and

easy to follow; responses

flow smoothly.

Mostly organized and easy

to understand with minor

lapses in flow.

Some disorganization

makes responses difficult

to follow at times.

Disorganized and difficult


to understand.

Professionalism & DemeanorConfident, professional,

and enthusiastic;

maintains appropriate tone

and posture.

Professional and confident

with minor lapses in

enthusiasm or posture.

Somewhat unsure or

unprofessional in tone,

body language, or

engagement.

Lacks professionalism,

confidence, or enthusiasm;

poor posture and tone.

Communication Skills Speaks clearly with

appropriate pace, volume,

and minimal filler words.

Speaks clearly with minor

issues in pacing, volume,

or filler words.

Sometimes unclear, too

fast/slow, or uses frequent

fillers.

Difficult to understand due


to volume, pacing, or

excessive fillers.

Technical Quality Video and audio are clear,

well-lit, and free of

distractions or background

noise.

Minor technical issues, but

video and audio remain

understandable.

Noticeable technical

problems that somewhat

impact the viewing

experience.

Poor video/audio quality,

making it hard to follow the

interview.

Engagement & Eye Contact Strong eye contact and

engagement with the

camera, appearing natural

and attentive.

Maintains eye contact and

engagement with minor

lapses.

Inconsistent eye contact

and engagement; may


appear distracted.

Rarely maintains eye

contact, appears

disengaged or distracted.

You might also like