Child Fatality Report
Report Identification Number: SV-24-037
Prepared by: New York State Office of Children & Family Services
Issue Date: Dec 31, 2024
This report, prepared pursuant to section 20(5) of the Social Services Law (SSL), concerns:
A report made to the New York Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR) involving the
death of a child.
The death of a child for whom child protective services had an open investigation or a CPS monitored services case.
The death of a child whose care and custody or custody and guardianship has been transferred to an authorized
agency.
The death of a child for whom the local department of social services has an open preventive service case.
The Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) is mandated by section 20 of the SSL to investigate or cause for the
investigation of the cause and circumstances surrounding the death, review such investigation, and prepare and issue a
fatality report in regard to the categories of deaths noted above involving a child, except where a local or regional fatality
review team issues a report, as authorized by law.
Such report must include: the cause of death; the identification of child protective or other services provided or actions
taken regard to such child and child’s family; any extraordinary or pertinent information concerning the circumstances of
the child’s death; whether the child or the child’s family received assistance, care or services from the social services
district prior to the child’s death; any action or further investigation undertaken by OCFS or the social services district
since the child’s death; and as appropriate, recommendations for local or state administrative or policy changes.
This report contains no information that would identify the deceased child, his or her siblings, the parent, parents, or other
persons legally responsible for the child, and any members of the deceased child’s household.
By statute, this report will be forwarded to the social services district, chief county executive officer, chairperson of the
local legislative body of the county where the child died and the social services district that had legal custody of the child,
if different. Notice of the issuance of this report will be sent to the Speaker of the Assembly and the Temporary President
of the Senate of the State of New York.
This report may only be disclosed to the public by OCFS pursuant to section 20(5) of the SSL. It may be released by
OCFS only after OCFS has determined that such disclosure is not contrary to the best interests of the deceased
child’s siblings or other children in the household.
OCFS’ review included an examination of actions taken by individual caseworkers and supervisors within the social
services district and agencies under contract with the social services district. The observations and recommendations
contained in this report reflect OCFS’ assessment and the performance of these agencies.
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 1 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Abbreviations
Relationships
BM-Biological Mother SM-Subject Mother SC-Subject Child
BF-Biological Father SF-Subject Father OC-Other Child
MGM-Maternal Grand Mother MGF-Maternal Grand Father FF-Foster Father
PGM-Paternal Grand Mother PGF-Paternal Grand Father DCP-Day Care Provider
MGGM-Maternal Great Grand Mother MGGF-Maternal Great Grand Father PGGF-Paternal Great Grand Father
PGGM-Paternal Great Grand Mother MA/MU-Maternal Aunt/Maternal Uncle PA/PU-Paternal Aunt/Paternal Uncle
FM-Foster Mother SS-Surviving Sibling PS-Parent Sub
CH/CHN-Child/Children OA-Other Adult
Contacts
LE-Law Enforcement CW-Case Worker CP-Case Planner
Dr.-Doctor ME-Medical Examiner EMS-Emergency Medical Services
DC-Day Care FD-Fire Department BM-Biological Mother
CPS-Child Protective Services DA-District Attorney
Allegations
FX-Fractures II-Internal Injuries L/B/W-Lacerations/Bruises/Welts
S/D/S-Swelling/Dislocation/Sprains C/T/S-Choking/Twisting/Shaking B/S-Burns/Scalding
P/Nx-Poisoning/ Noxious Substance XCP-Excessive Corporal Punishment PD/AM-Parent's Drug Alcohol Misuse
CD/A-Child's Drug/Alcohol Use LMC-Lack of Medical Care EdN-Educational Neglect
EN-Emotional Neglect SA-Sexual Abuse M/FTTH-Malnutrition/Failure-to-thrive
IF/C/S-Inadequate Food/ Clothing/
IG-Inadequate Guardianship LS-Lack of Supervision
Shelter
Ab-Abandonment OTH/COI-Other SXTF-Sex Trafficking
Miscellaneous
IND-Indicated UNF-Unfounded SO-Sexual Offender
Sub-Substantiated Unsub-Unsubstantiated DV-Domestic Violence
LDSS-Local Department of Social ACS-Administration for Children's NYPD-New York City Police
Service Services Department
PPRS-Purchased Preventive TANF-Temporary Assistance to Needy
FC-Foster Care
Rehabilitative Services Families
MH-Mental Health ER-Emergency Room COS-Court Ordered Services
OP-Order of Protection RAP-Risk Assessment Profile FASP-Family Assessment Plan
FAR-Family Assessment Response Hx-History Tx-Treatment
CAC-Child Advocacy Center PIP-Program Improvement Plan yo- year(s) old
CPR-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 2 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Case Information
Report Type: Child Deceased Jurisdiction: Suffolk Date of Death: 08/22/2024
Age: 9 year(s) Gender: Male Initial Date OCFS Notified: 08/26/2024
Presenting Information
On 8/22/24, at approximately 2:20AM, the mother was operating a vehicle while under the influence of
methamphetamines with the subject child present. The mother drove the wrong way on the highway which resulted in
a head-on, multi-car crash. In the accident, the subject child sustained blunt force trauma to the head and became
unresponsive. The subject child was transported to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services while life-saving
measures were performed. The subject child was pronounced deceased upon arrival at the hospital.
Executive Summary
This fatality report concerns the death of the 9-year-old subject child that occurred on 8/22/24. On 8/26/24, the Suffolk
County Department of Social Services (SCDSS) received a report regarding the fatality. At the time of death, the subject
child lived with the subject mother.
On 8/22/24, at approximately 8:30-9PM, the mother and subject child went for a ride to get food. The subject child fell
asleep in the back of the car, and due to a medical diagnosis preventing him from sleeping in the days leading up to the
accident, the mother drove around so he could continue to sleep. During the drive, the mother became disoriented and was
unable to find the correct route home. While driving, the mother became tired; she pulled over on a side road and slept for
an unknown amount of time before continuing the drive home. The mother stated the road was dark and she was
disoriented, so she did not know she was going the wrong way on the highway. The mother denied using any illegal
substances or misusing prescriptions.
Following the multi-vehicle car crash, the mother was taken to the hospital and cleared medically before being taken to
the police station for questioning. The mother was arrested and charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child, Murder,
Murder in 2nd degree, Vehicular Manslaughter, Driving a Vehicle while Impaired by Drugs, Criminal Possession of a
Controlled Substance, Fleeing an Officer, Aggravated DWI with a Child in the car, and multiple traffic violations.
SCDSS contacted the Medical Examiner who stated the subject child’s cause of death was multiple blunt force injuries,
including complete transection of lower cervical vertebrae with complete transection of the lower spinal cord in the
cervical spine. The manner of death was homicide.
SCDSS made the appropriate determination to substantiate allegations of DOA/Fatality, Inadequate Guardianship, Internal
Injuries, and Parents Drug/Alcohol Misuse against the subject mother.
SCDSS offered bereavement services and burial assistance to the father, the father's partner, maternal grandmother, and 2
adult siblings. SCDSS made diligent efforts to assist with facilitating bereavement and mental health services to the
mother who remained incarcerated after her arrest.
Findings Related to the CPS Investigation of the Fatality
Safety Assessment:
Was sufficient information gathered to make the decision recorded on
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 3 of 12
Child Fatality Report
the:
o Safety assessment due at the time of determination? N/A
Determination:
Was sufficient information gathered to make determination(s) for all Yes, sufficient information was
allegations as well as any others identified in the course of the gathered to determine all
investigation? allegations.
Was the determination made by the district to unfound or indicate Yes
appropriate?
Was the decision to close the case appropriate? Yes
Was casework activity commensurate with appropriate and relevant statutory Yes
or regulatory requirements?
Was there sufficient documentation of supervisory consultation? Yes, the case record has detail of the
consultation.
Explain:
There were no surviving siblings in the home, therefore, safety assessments were not required.
Required Actions Related to the Fatality
Are there Required Actions related to the compliance issue(s)? Yes No
Fatality-Related Information and Investigative Activities
Incident Information
Date of Death: 08/22/2024 Time of Death: 02:55 AM
Time of fatal incident, if different than time of death: 02:20 AM
County where fatality incident occurred: Suffolk
Was 911 or local emergency number called? Yes
Time of Call: Unknown
Did EMS respond to the scene? Yes
At time of incident leading to death, had child used and/or ingested alcohol or drugs? Unknown
Child's activity at time of incident:
Sleeping Working Driving / Vehicle occupant
Playing Eating Unknown
Other
Total number of deaths at incident event:
Children ages 0-18: 1
Adults: 0
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 4 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Household Composition at time of Fatality
Household Relationship Role Gender Age
Deceased Child's Household Deceased Child Alleged Victim Male 9 Year(s)
Deceased Child's Household Mother Alleged Perpetrator Female 32 Year(s)
LDSS Response
On 8/26/24, SCDSS received an SCR report regarding the death of the SC. SCDSS initiated the investigation within 24hrs
and coordinated efforts with LE. The source was spoken to, the DA was contacted, and all relevant collateral contacts were
made. There were no surviving siblings in the home.
The SM was interviewed and stated that on 8/22/24, she and the SC had left the home to get food around 8:30-9PM. The
SM stated the SC had not been sleeping well the days leading up to the incident, so when he fell asleep in the back seat of
the car, she drove around for over an hour to allow him time to sleep. While driving, the SM stated a white van began to
follow her closely, and she believed the vehicle was trying to drive her off the road. At approximately 9:30PM, the SM
called 911 to report the incident and was instructed to pull over and wait for a patrol car. The SM was too afraid to pull
over and declined the dispatchers offer of assistance. The SM started driving towards the maternal grandmother’s
residence; however, she was tired, so she pulled over and slept in the vehicle for an unknown amount of time. The SM
stated she was disoriented upon waking; however, she began the drive home. The SM stated her GPS was not working, so
she could not get directions. The SM stated she drove for a couple of hours and began to feel tired but was too afraid to
pull over, and there were cars beeping at her because “she was going so slow in the right lane.” The SM stated she did not
remember much other than a police car coming up behind her vehicle and hitting her back bumper. The SM became
panicked when her left leg became stiff, and she was unable to move it off the gas pedal. The SM did not recall if she was
driving the wrong way, and stated “the road was very dark, and the exits were confusing even with the red wrong way
signs.”
SCDSS interviewed the BF who stated he had not seen the SC since he was 3yo. The BF was unable to see the SC due to a
full order of protection in place until 3/25/31; the result of a domestic violence incident between the BF and the SM, which
he said did not happen. The BF stated he had filed a petition for custody and visitation in 2020 as he did not feel the SC
was safe with the SM. The BF stated the case was postponed due to the pandemic and was closed without a resolution. The
BF stated that he expressed concerns regarding the SM’s mental health and substance misuse to CPS during previous
investigations. The BF’s family was interviewed, a 1-month-old half-sibling was assessed as safe, and the family accepted
referrals for bereavement services.
SCDSS interviewed LE who were at the scene of the accident. LE reported that on arrival, the SM was observed standing
next to the driver’s side door and the SC was in the back seat with his seat belt on. Responding officers stated they
immediately attended to the SC, removing him from the back seat and placing him in front of the vehicle. The SC had a
large laceration on the left side of his forehead; he was unconscious, unresponsive, and did not have a pulse. LE started
CPR and continued until EMS arrived approximately 8 minutes later and transported the SC to the hospital. LE stated the
SM displayed no emotion at the scene; she exhibited a dull, flat affect. The SM failed the field sobriety test; however, had
a 0.0 blood alcohol level. LE described the SM as “delusional,” and reported she was “making comments that made no
sense.” A prescription bottle was found at the scene with 4.4mg of amphetamines. The SM was taken to the hospital and
assessed by a Drug Recognition Expert who informed LE the SM was under the influence of “some type of stimulant.” At
the hospital, the SM stated, “Jeffrey Epstein was trying to kidnap me and [the subject child].” Once medically cleared the
SM was taken in for questioning and arrested. The case record indicated the SM signed releases for her mental health
providers; however, the information had not been received by the time the case closed.
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 5 of 12
Child Fatality Report
SCDSS contacted relevant collateral sources, and medical documentation was requested from the pediatrician; however,
records had not been received when the case closed. Bereavement services and burial assistance were offered to the family,
but it was unknown if they were used. The BF declined additional services, the case was indicated and closed.
Official Manner and Cause of Death
Official Manner: Homicide
Primary Cause of Death: From an injury - external cause
Person Declaring Official Manner and Cause of Death: Medical Examiner
Multidisciplinary Investigation/Review
Was the fatality investigation conducted by a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)?Yes
Was the fatality referred to an OCFS approved Child Fatality Review Team?No
SCR Fatality Report Summary
Alleged Victim(s) Alleged Perpetrator(s) Allegation(s) Allegation
Outcome
068481 - Deceased Child, Male, 9 069573 - Mother, Female, 32 DOA / Fatality Substantiated
Year(s) Year(s)
068481 - Deceased Child, Male, 9 069573 - Mother, Female, 32 Inadequate Guardianship Substantiated
Year(s) Year(s)
068481 - Deceased Child, Male, 9 069573 - Mother, Female, 32 Internal Injuries Substantiated
Year(s) Year(s)
068481 - Deceased Child, Male, 9 069573 - Mother, Female, 32 Parents Drug / Alcohol Substantiated
Year(s) Year(s) Misuse
CPS Fatality Casework/Investigative Activities
Unable to
Yes No N/A
Determine
All children observed?
When appropriate, children were interviewed?
Alleged subject(s) interviewed face-to-face?
All 'other persons named' interviewed face-to-face?
Contact with source?
All appropriate Collaterals contacted?
Emergency Room Personnel
School
Pediatrician
Was a death-scene investigation performed?
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 6 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Was there discussion with all parties (youth, other household members,
and staff) who were present that day (if nonverbal, observation and
comments in case notes)?
Coordination of investigation with law enforcement?
Was there timely entry of progress notes and other required
documentation?
Fatality Safety Assessment Activities
Unable to
Yes No N/A
Determine
Were there any surviving siblings or other children in the household?
Legal Activity Related to the Fatality
Was there legal activity as a result of the fatality investigation?
Family Court Criminal Court Order of Protection
Criminal Charge: Murder Degree: 2
Date Against Whom? Date of Disposition: Disposition:
Charges
Filed:
Unknown Mother Unknown Unknown
Comments: As a result of the fatality, the mother was charged with Murder, Murder in the 2nd, Endangering the
Welfare of a Child, Vehicular Manslaughter, Operating a Vehicle while Impaired by Drugs, Criminal
Possession of a Controlled Substances, Fleeing an Officer, Aggravated DWI with a Child in the Car, and
multiple traffic violations.
Services at the Time of and/or in Response to the Fatality
Offered, Offered, Needed
Not
Services Received but Unknown but N/A
Offered
Refused if Used Unavailable
Bereavement counseling
Economic support
Funeral arrangements
Housing assistance
Mental health services
Foster care
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 7 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Health care
Legal services
Family planning
Homemaking Services
Parenting Skills
Domestic Violence Services
Early Intervention
Alcohol/Substance abuse
Child Care
Intensive case management
Family or others as safety resources
Preventive Services
Other
Additional information, if necessary:
The mother was arrested following the fatal incident and remained incarcerated when the investigation closed. There
were no surviving siblings in the home.
Were services offered to and/or received by siblings or other children in the household at the time of and/or in
response to the fatality? N/A
Explain:
There were no surviving siblings in the household.
Were services offered to and/or received by parent(s) and other care givers at the time of and/or in response to the
fatality? Yes
Explain:
The father, the father's partner, the 2 adult siblings, and the maternal grandmother were offered referrals for bereavement
services. SCDSS made efforts to arrange bereavement and mental health services for the mother while she was
incarcerated.
History Prior to the Fatality
Child Information
Did the child have a history of alleged child abuse/maltreatment? Yes
Was the child acutely ill during the two weeks before death? No
CPS - Investigative History Three Years Prior to the Fatality
Date of
Alleged Alleged Allegation Compliance
SCR Allegation(s)
Victim(s) Perpetrator(s) Outcome Issue(s)
Report
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 8 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Deceased Child, Male, 7 Mother, Female, 31
05/09/2023 Inadequate Guardianship Unsubstantiated No
Years Years
Deceased Child, Male, 7 Mother, Female, 31 Lacerations / Bruises /
Unsubstantiated
Years Years Welts
Report Summary:
The SM used physical discipline on the SC for several years resulting in the SC obtaining bruises and feeling unsafe in
the home.
Report Determination: Unfounded Date of Determination: 06/05/2023
Basis for Determination:
The case was unfounded due to the lack of a fair preponderance of evidence. The SM and SC both denied the use of
physical discipline. During an interview, the SC reported he felt safe in the home and was observed to be free of any
marks and bruises.
OCFS Review Results:
Diligent efforts were made to interview the SM, BF, and SC. SCDSS documented concerns in the case record regarding
the SM's mental health; however, these concerns were not reflected in the Risk Assessment Profile. This change would
not affect the final risk rating.
Are there Required Actions related to the compliance issue(s)? Yes No
Date of
Alleged Alleged Allegation Compliance
SCR Allegation(s)
Victim(s) Perpetrator(s) Outcome Issue(s)
Report
Deceased Child, Male, 7 Mother, Female, 30 Inadequate
01/13/2023 Unsubstantiated Yes
Years Years Guardianship
Report Summary:
The SM was experiencing serious mental health concerns while acting as the sole caretaker of the then 7yo SC. On
1/12/23, the SM was wandering the streets, experiencing auditory hallucinations, paranoia, and delusions. The SM
experienced rage, and was unable to provide adequate care of the SC. The SM was unemployed, unable to maintain the
home, and it was unknown if she was receiving any assistance.
Report Determination: Unfounded Date of Determination: 04/17/2023
Basis for Determination:
The SM was taken to the hospital where she received a mental health diagnosis. While there, it was proposed an infection
was also a possible cause of the behavioral changes. SCDSS determined there was not a fair preponderance of evidence
to support the allegations, and the SC was not placed in physical, emotional, or mental harm. The SC stayed with the
MGM temporarily while the SM was hospitalized and was returned to the SM’s care upon her discharge. Furthermore,
the MGM and MGF had a planned vacation which prevented the SC from remaining in their care, which was the original
safety plan documented in the case record. The case was closed when SCDSS concluded CPS was no longer needed.
OCFS Review Results:
Upon receipt of the report, SCDSS made diligent efforts to establish face-to-face contact with the SC to assess safety.
Despite SCDSS having created a safety plan with the maternal grandparents, it was not documented in the safety
assessment, nor were any safety factors marked as present. There was no documentation in the case record of SCDSS
attempting to contact the fire station that the SM reportedly wandered into. There was no documentation in the case
record of casework contacts with the family from 2/23/23-3/30/23. During the initial interview with the SC, he expressed
he, "kind of, a little bit feels safe," and reported that the SM sometimes hears voices. The case record did not reflect that
the SC was asked about the events of the night, and if he had been with her when she was reported to be walking in the
road and into a fire station.
Are there Required Actions related to the compliance issue(s)? Yes No
Issue:
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 9 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Adequacy of Documentation of Safety Assessments
Summary:
The safety assessment completed by SCDSS did not accurately reflect the safety factors present. SCDSS marked there
were no safety factors present in the initial assessment, despite the SM being hospitalized for mental health concerns, and
collateral sources reporting the SM was not safe for discharge. The safety plan was not documented in the initial
assessment. Additionally, the final safety assessment was scored for having no safety factors, despite the SM
discontinuing medication against medical advice, and not engaging in mental health services which contradicted the
hospital's discharge plan.
Legal Reference:
18 NYCRR432.2(b)(3)(ii)(c)&(iii)(b)
Action:
The results for each Safety Assessment will be accurately documented in the case record to reflect case circumstances
regarding safety.
Issue:
Adequacy of Risk Assessment Profile (RAP)
Summary:
The RAP was scored that the SM did not have mental health concerns, despite having been hospitalized, receiving a
diagnosis, and being prescribed medications. Additionally, the RAP was scored 'no' for issues with housing, despite the
home being in foreclosure, and 'yes' for understanding the seriousness of the current/potential harm and willing to address
any areas of concern.
Legal Reference:
18 NYCRR 432.2(d)
Action:
SCDSS will consider all elements identified throughout the course of the investigation and accurately document such
elements into the Risk Assessment Profile.
Issue:
Overall Completeness and Adequacy of Investigations
Summary:
The case record did not reflect casework contact between 2/23/23-3/30/23. The family accepted bereavement referrals on
2/23/23; however, SCDSS did not provide the information until 4/4/23. SCDSS missed opportunities to gather additional
information from collaterals, such as the fire station the SM had 'wandered into.' Despite prior plans and directives for the
SM to follow MH recommendations and engage in medication management, the case was closed and unfounded without
confirmation of the SM's engagement in services. There was no follow up with the SC regarding his initial comments
about "bad people doing bad stuff" in the home.
Legal Reference:
SSL 424.6 and 18 NYCRR 432.2(b)(3)
Action:
SCDSS will document all applicable actions and considerations with respect to safety planning, including but not limited
to including all family members when devising the plan, adequately monitoring the plan, and consulting with the legal
department if there is a reason to believe the safety plan may not be sufficient to protect the children.
Issue:
Pre-Determination/Assessment of Current Safety/Risk
Summary:
The case record does not reflect the SC was asked if he was with the SM the night of the alleged incident, and if so, his
description of what transpired. There were no follow up interviews that included questions regarding the voices the SC
reported he hears, the SM hearing voices, or clarification regarding the SC feeling safe. The SC reported "bad things"
happen in the family home; however, there were no follow up discussions in regard to this statement.
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 10 of 12
Child Fatality Report
Legal Reference:
18 NYCRR 432.2 (b)(3)(iii)(b)
Action:
In addition to the conditions enumerated in the report, CPS is required to determine any other condition that may
constitute abuse or maltreatment. SCDSS will address new concerns as they arise with all applicable caregivers, in an
effort to determine whether the action(s)/inaction(s) constitute as abuse or maltreatment.
Issue:
Failure to Offer Appropriate Services
Summary:
SCDSS did not offer services to the SM despite ongoing mental health concerns. Additionally, the SM expressed having
difficulty obtaining a different provider and displayed erratic behavior during casework contacts.
Legal Reference:
SSL §424(10);18 NYCRR 432.3(p)
Action:
When service needs are identified, SCDSS will make the appropriate referral to Preventive Services in an effort to
determine whether there are services that can benefit the family.
Date of
Alleged Alleged Allegation Compliance
SCR Allegation(s)
Victim(s) Perpetrator(s) Outcome Issue(s)
Report
Deceased Child, Male, 6 Mother, Female, 30 Inadequate Food / Clothing /
04/11/2022 Unsubstantiated No
Years Years Shelter
Deceased Child, Male, 6 Mother, Female, 30
Inadequate Guardianship Unsubstantiated
Years Years
Deceased Child, Male, 6 Mother, Female, 30
Lack of Supervision Unsubstantiated
Years Years
Deceased Child, Male, 6 Mother, Female, 30 Parents Drug / Alcohol
Unsubstantiated
Years Years Misuse
Report Summary:
The SM was using an illegal substance to impairment on a daily basis while acting as the sole caregiver of the SC. While
misusing substances, the SM became delusional and paranoid and left the then 6yo SC unsupervised. Due to this the SC
missed meals and was regularly hungry.
Report Determination: Unfounded Date of Determination: 05/27/2022
Basis for Determination:
There was not a fair preponderance of evidence to support the allegations of IG, IF/C/S, PD/AM and LS against the SM.
The SC was interviewed and denied being left alone, not eating regularly, and observing the SM using any substances.
The SM stated there was a friend staying temporarily in the garage who was found to be using illegal and selling illegal
substances from the home. An Order of Protection was obtained against the friend.
OCFS Review Results:
SCDSS made efforts to contact the BF, and made adequate contacts with the SM and SC. Safety assessments were
adequate; however, the RAP was incorrectly scored 'no' for caretaker having been a victim or perpetrator of abusive or
threatening incidents with partners or other adults/family in the neighborhood. This error would not impact the final risk
rating. The case was appropriately closed and unfounded.
Are there Required Actions related to the compliance issue(s)? Yes No
CPS - Investigative History More Than Three Years Prior to the Fatality
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 11 of 12
Child Fatality Report
5/30/18-7/10/18 Investigation included allegations of Inadequate Guardianship (IG) against the SM was unfounded (UNF).
1/21/19-2/15/19 Allegations included IG against the SM and BF, and Parent Drug/ Alcohol Misuse against the BF. A
neglect petition was filed against the BF in family court and a complete stay away Order of Protection was obtained by the
SM, expiring in 2030. Preventive Services case was opened, and the SC was released to the SM. The investigation was
Indicated.
1/4/21-2/26/21 Investigation included allegations of IG against the SM was UNF.
10/5/21-12/06/21 Investigation included allegations of IG and Lack of Supervision against the SM and her boyfriend. The
SCR report included allegations the SM and her boyfriend were selling methamphetamines in the presence of the SC and
misusing substances to impairment while acting as sole caregivers. The case was UNF.
Known CPS History Outside of NYS
There was no known CPS history outside of NYS.
Preventive Services History
A Preventive Services case was open from 1/31/19 to 9/26/19. The case was opened after a physical altercation occurred
between the parents. The BF returned to the home intoxicated and hit the SM while she was holding the SC, and the SM
threw items at the BF. The BF was arrested and charged, and a full stay away Order of Protection was issued. The SC was
released to the SM with court ordered supervision. SCDSS provided Preventive Services. The SM engaged in
recommended services and the BF was incarcerated. The BF stipulated to neglect, which was vacated when the BF
consented to the SM's custody petition. The case was closed when custody was established.
Legal History Within Three Years Prior to the Fatality
Was there any legal activity within three years prior to the fatality investigation? There was no legal activity.
Recommended Action(s)
Are there any recommended actions for local or state administrative or policy changes? Yes No
Are there any recommended prevention activities resulting from the review? Yes No
SV-24-037 FINAL Page 12 of 12
