Acute Cardiac Tamponade
Acute Cardiac Tamponade
review article
current concepts
Pressure
tamponade tamponade
ing osmotic effects of fragmenting intrapericardial
clots, or inflammatory stiffening of the pericardi-
um.1,17,18 Finally, although coronary blood flow is
reduced in tamponade, there is no ischemic compo- Limit of pericardial stretch
clinical findings
Figure 1. Cardiac Tamponade.
Critical tamponade is a form of cardiogenic shock, Pericardial pressure–volume (or strain–stress) curves are shown in which the
volume increases slowly or rapidly over time. In the left-hand panel, rapidly in-
and the differential diagnosis may initially be elu-
creasing pericardial fluid first reaches the limit of the pericardial reserve vol-
sive. Since most symptoms are nonspecific, tam- ume (the initial flat segment) and then quickly exceeds the limit of parietal
ponade must be suspected in many contexts — for pericardial stretch, causing a steep rise in pressure, which becomes even
example, in patients who have wounds of the chest steeper as smaller increments in fluid cause a disproportionate increase in
or upper abdomen and hypotension or in those who the pericardial pressure. In the right-hand panel, a slower rate of pericardial
filling takes longer to exceed the limit of pericardial stretch, because there is
have hypotension preceded by symptoms of an in-
more time for the pericardium to stretch and for compensatory mechanisms
citing pericardial disease, such as chest discomfort to become activated.
and pleuritic pain. Tachypnea and dyspnea on exer-
tion that progresses to air hunger at rest are the key
symptoms, but it may not be possible to obtain such
information from patients who are unconscious or cyanosis. Jugular venous distention is the rule, with
obtunded or who have convulsions at presentation. peripheral venous distention in the forehead, scalp,
Most patients are weak and faint at presentation and and ocular fundi unless the patient has hypovolemia.
can have vague symptoms such as anorexia, dyspha- Thus, rapid tamponade, especially acute hemoperi-
gia, and cough.1 The initial symptom may also be cardium, may produce exaggerated jugular pulsa-
one of the complications of tamponade, such as re- tions without distention, because there is insuffi-
nal failure.19 cient time for blood volume to increase. Venous
Most physical findings are equally nonspecif- waves usually lack the normal early diastolic y de-
ic.1,19 Tachycardia (a heart rate of more than 90 beats scent. In compressive pericardial disease (tampon-
per minute) is the rule. Exceptions include patients ade and constriction), venous waves are not out-
with bradycardia during uremia and patients with ward pulsations; rather, x and y collapse from a high
hypothyroidism. Contrary to common belief, a peri- standing pressure level.1
cardial rub is a frequent finding in patients with A key diagnostic finding, pulsus paradoxus21 —
inflammatory effusions.20 Heart sounds may be at- conventionally defined as an inspiratory systolic fall
tenuated owing to the insulating effects of the peri- in arterial pressure of 10 mm Hg or more during
cardial fluid and to reduced cardiac function. Al- normal breathing — is often palpable in muscular
though the precordium may seem quiet, an apical arteries. With very low cardiac output, however, a
beat is frequently palpable, and patients with preex- catheter is needed to identify pulsus paradoxus.
isting cardiomegaly or anterior and apical pericar- Other conditions causing pulsus paradoxus include
dial adhesions may have active pulsations. massive pulmonary embolism, profound hemor-
Clinically significant tamponade usually produc- rhagic shock, other forms of severe hypotension,
es absolute or relative hypotension; in rapid tam- and obstructive lung disease. Moreover, certain con-
ponade, patients are often in shock, with cool arms ditions can impede the identification of tamponade
and legs, nose, and ears and sometimes peripheral by making pulsus paradoxus undetectable (Table 1).
A B
P
P
PE
PE
LV
LV
Figure 2. Swinging of the Heart with a Large Pericardial Effusion (PE), Causing Electrical Alternation and Consequent
Tamponade.
Apical four-chamber two-dimensional echocardiograms show the extremes of oscillation and the resultant effect on the
QRS complex. In Panel A, the heart swings to the right, and lead II shows a small QRS complex. In Panel B, the heart
swings to the left, and the QRS complex is larger. P denotes pericardium, and LV left ventricle.
pericardiocentesis
Needle drainage of pericardial fluid, whether or not
it is done on an emergency basis (e.g., in a patient
in rapidly worsening hemodynamic condition), re-
quires the clinician to select a point on the patient’s
chest or epigastrium to insert the needle. This is best
done with imaging, as already discussed, to deter-
mine which anterior landmarks, usually paraxiphoid
or apical, are closest to the fluid. The paraxiphoid
Hub of needle
approach is also most often used for pericardiocen- angled approximately
tesis that is performed without imaging.1 Common 15 degrees above skin Apical
points of access are illustrated in Figure 3. The nee- area
dle is usually inserted between the xiphoid process
and the left costal margin; in patients with tough Paraxiphoid
skin, a small nick may be made first with a scalpel. area
The needle is inserted at a 15-degree angle to bypass
the costal margin, and then its hub is depressed so
that the point is aimed toward the left shoulder. The
needle is then advanced slowly, until the pericar-
dium is pierced and fluid is aspirated. Electrocar- Figure 3. Most Common Sites of Blind and Image-Guided Insertion
diography should not be used to monitor the pa- of the Needle for Pericardiocentesis.
tient’s condition, since attaching an electrode to the In the paraxiphoid approach, the needle should be aimed toward the left
shoulder. In the apical approach, the needle is aimed internally.
needle may provide misleading results.1 The use of
a 16-gauge to 18-gauge polytetrafluoroethylene-
sheathed needle facilitates the process, since its
steel core can be withdrawn once the pericardium use of Doppler echocardiography to ensure that
has been breached, leaving only the sheath in the the pericardial space has been adequately drained
pericardial space. For prolonged drainage, a guide and to avert a recurrence. When the amount of
wire passed through the sheath will facilitate the fluid drained is less than 50 ml a day, the catheter
introduction of a pigtail angiographic catheter. may be withdrawn; the patient should continue to
Thereafter, patients should be followed with the be observed.
references
1. Spodick DH. Pericardial diseases. In: 7. Cogswell TL, Bernath GA, Keelan MH ber RE. Comparative effects of catechola-
Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, eds. Heart Jr, Wann LS, Klopfenstein HS. The shift in mines in cardiac tamponade: experimental
disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medi- the relationship between intrapericardial flu- and clinical studies. Am J Cardiol 1980;46:
cine. 6th ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: W.B. Saun- id pressure and volume induced by acute left 59-66.
ders, 2001:1823-76. ventricular pressure overload during cardiac 12. Klopfenstein HS, Mathias DW. Influence
2. Shabetai R. Diseases of the pericardium. tamponade. Circulation 1986;74:173-80. of naloxone on response to acute cardiac
In: Schlant RC, Alexander RW, eds. Hurst’s 8. Grose R, Greenberg MA, Yipintsoi T, tamponade in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol
the heart: arteries and veins. 6th ed. Vol. 1. Cohen MV. Cardiac tamponade in dogs with 1990;259:H512-H517.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994:1647-74. normal coronary arteries. I. Effect of chang- 13. Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, O’Toole JD, Shaver
3. Reddy PS, Curtiss EI, Uretsky BF. Spec- ing intravascular volume on hemodynamics JA. Cardiac tamponade: hemodynamic ob-
trum of hemodynamic changes in cardiac and myocardial blood flow. Basic Res Cardiol servations in man. Circulation 1978;58:265-
tamponade. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:1487-91. 1984;79:531-41. 72.
4. Beloucif S, Takata M, Shimada M, Ro- 9. Hurrell DG, Symanski JD, Chaliki HP, 14. Boltwood CM Jr. Ventricular perform-
botham JL. Influence of pericardial constraint Klarich KW, Pascoe RD, Nishimura RA. As- ance related to transmural filling pressure
on atrioventricular interactions. Am J Physi- sessment of right atrial pressure by hepatic in clinical cardiac tamponade. Circulation
ol 1992;263:H125-H134. vein Doppler echocardiography: a simulta- 1987;75:941-55.
5. Friedman HS, Lajam F, Zaman Q, et al. neous catheterization/Doppler echocardio- 15. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones
Effect of autonomic blockade on the hemo- graphic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27: and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J
dynamic findings in acute cardiac tampon- Suppl A:212A. abstract. Med 1999;341:577-85.
ade. Am J Physiol 1977;232:H5-H11. 10. Santamore WP, Li KS, Nakamoto T, 16. Spodick DH. Low atrial natriuretic fac-
6. Spodick DH. Threshold of pericardial Johnston WE. Effects of increased pericar- tor levels and absent pulmonary edema in
constraint: the pericardial reserve volume and dial pressure on the coupling between the pericardial compression of the heart. Am
auxiliary pericardial functions. J Am Coll Car- ventricles. Cardiovasc Res 1990;24:768-76. J Cardiol 1989;63:1271-2.
diol 1985;6:296-7. 11. Martins JB, Manuel WJ, Marcus ML, Ker- 17. Gascho JA, Martins JB, Marcus ML, Ker-
ber RE. Effects of volume expansion and in pericardial disease. Echocardiography 30. Spodick DH, Kumar R. Subacute con-
vasodilators in acute pericardial tamponade. 1997;14:207-14. strictive pericarditis with cardiac tamponade.
Am J Physiol 1981;240:H49-H53. 25. Reydel B, Spodick DH. Frequency and Dis Chest 1968;54:62-6.
18. Spodick DH. The normal and diseased significance of chamber collapses during 31. Hancock EW. Subacute effusive-constric-
pericardium: current concepts of pericardial cardiac tamponade. Am Heart J 1990;119: tive pericarditis. Circulation 1971;43:183-92.
physiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Am 1160-3. 32. Pepi M, Muratori M, Barbier P, et al. Peri-
Coll Cardiol 1983;1:240-51. 26. Angel J, Anivarro I, Domingo E, Soler- cardial effusion after cardiac surgery: inci-
19. Cooper JP, Oliver RM, Currie P, Walker Soler J. Cardiac tamponade: risk and benefit dence, site, size, and haemodynamic conse-
JM, Swanton RH. How do the clinical find- of fluid challenge performed while waiting quences. Br Heart J 1994;72:327-31.
ings in patients with pericardial effusions in- for pericardiocentesis. Circulation 1997;96: 33. Callahan JA, Seward JB. Pericardiocente-
fluence the success of aspiration? Br Heart Suppl I:I-30. abstract. sis guided by two-dimensional echocardiog-
J 1995;73:351-4. 27. Ramsaran EK, Benotti JR, Spodick DH. raphy. Echocardiography 1997;14:497-504.
20. Spodick DH. Pericardial rub: prospec- Exacerbated tamponade: deterioration of car- 34. Merce J, Sagrista-Sauleda J, Permany-
tive, multiple observer investigation of peri- diac function by lowering excessive arterial er-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Should pericar-
cardial friction in 100 patients. Am J Cardiol pressure in hypertensive cardiac tamponade. dial drainage be performed routinely in pa-
1975;35:357-62. Cardiology 1995;86:77-9. tients who have a large pericardial effusion
21. Shabetai R. Pericardial and cardiac pres- 28. Bommer WJ, Follette D, Pollock M, Are- without tamponade? Am J Med 1998;105:
sure. Circulation 1988;77:1-5. na F, Bognar M, Berkoff H. Tamponade in 106-9.
22. Spodick DH. Truly total electric alterna- patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a clini- 35. Spodick DH. Medical treatment of car-
tion of the heart. Clin Cardiol 1998;21:427-8. cal-echocardiographic diagnosis. Am Heart diac tamponade. In: Caturelli G, ed. Cura
23. Idem. Electric alternation of the heart: its J 1995;130:1216-23. intensiva cardiologica. Rome: TIPAR Poli-
relation to the kinetics and physiology of the 29. Thompson RC, Finck SJ, Leventhal JP, grafica, 1991:265-8.
heart during cardiac tamponade. Am J Car- Safford RE. Right-to-left shunt across a patent 36. Hashim R, Frankel H, Tandon M, Rab-
diol 1962;10:155-65. foramen ovale caused by cardiac tampon- inovici R. Fluid resuscitation-induced car-
24. D’Cruz I, Rehman AU, Hancock HI. ade: diagnosis by transesophageal echocar- diac tamponade. Trauma 2002;53:1183-4.
Quantitative echocardiographic assessment diography. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66:391-4. Copyright © 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society.