0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Tutorial10 Solutions

The document provides solutions to various problems related to signals and systems, focusing on the stability and causality of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems based on their pole-zero configurations. It discusses the conditions for BIBO stability, the region of convergence (ROC), and the implications of the ROC on system behavior. Additionally, it includes Laplace transform applications and examples demonstrating the analysis of system responses.

Uploaded by

amanreddych
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views4 pages

Tutorial10 Solutions

The document provides solutions to various problems related to signals and systems, focusing on the stability and causality of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems based on their pole-zero configurations. It discusses the conditions for BIBO stability, the region of convergence (ROC), and the implications of the ROC on system behavior. Additionally, it includes Laplace transform applications and examples demonstrating the analysis of system responses.

Uploaded by

amanreddych
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

EE1101: Signals and Systems JAN — MAY 2020

Tutorial 10 Solutions

Solution 1 (d) Poles at s = -2, +j, +j, -j, -j


Zeros at s = -0.5
For a causal system, the ROC is towards the right The system is not BIBO stable, as there are
of the rightmost pole in the pole-zero plot. Also for poles are at +j and -j.
a system to be stable, the ROC should include the
imaginary axis.
=(s)
(a) Poles at s = -5, -3
Zero at s = 2
The system is BIBO stable, as all the poles are
×
×j
in the left half plane.
× ◦
-2 -0.5 <(s)
=(s) ×−j
×

× × ◦
-5 -3 2 <(s)

Solution 2
(b) Poles at s = -3, -2, -2 Stability: An LTI system is stable iff the ROC of its
Zeros at s = -1 system function H(s) includes the jω−axis.
The system is BIBO stable, as all the poles are
in the left half plane. Causality:

• If an LTI system is causal (with a right sided


=(s) impulse response function h(t) = 0 for t < 0),
then the ROC of its transfer function H(s) is a
right sided plane.

× ×× ◦ • When H(s) is rational, then the system is causal


-3 -2 -1 <(s)
if and only if its ROC is the right half plane to
the right of the rightmost pole, and the order of
numerator is no greater than that of the denom-
inator.
(c) Poles at s = -2, 0
Zeros at s = -0.25 + j0.66, -0.25 - j0.66 a) Non-causal as the ROC is not to the right to
The system is not BIBO stable, as there is a the rightmost pole s = −2, BIBO unstable as
pole at origin. the ROC does not include the jω−axis.

=(s)
=(s) ROC
× ◦ ×
-3 -2.5 -2 <(s)
◦ j0.66

× × <(s)
-2 -0.25
◦ −j0.66 b) Non-causal as the ROC is not to the right to
the rightmost pole s = 3, BIBO unstable as the
ROC does not include the jω−axis.

1
=(s) We know the following:
ROC
× ◦ × 1
2 2.5 3 <(s) L(u(t)) =
s
L(f (t)e−at ) = F (s + a)
dF (s)
L(tf (t)) = −
ds
c) Causal as the ROC is to the right to the right-
most pole s = −1, BIBO stable as ROC in-
where L(f (t) = F (s)
cludes the jω−axis.
Therefore , the impulse response h(t) is
=(s)
t2 −2t
h(t) = te−2t u(t) + e u(t)
× ◦ × 2
-2 -1.5 -1 <(s)
ROC
(b) The Laplace transform of the output y(t) of the
system to the input x(t) can be expressed as

d) Non-causal as the ROC is not to the right to Y (s) = H(s)X(s)


the rightmost pole s = −1, BIBO unstable as
the ROC does not include the jω−axis. 10
Given x(t) = 10u(t) =⇒ X(s) =
s
=(s) 10(s + 3)
ROC =⇒ Y (s) =
s(s + 2)3
× ◦ ×
-2 -1.5 -1 <(s)
Using the final value theorem, the final value of
y(t) would be

lim y(t) = lim sY (s)


NOTE: Here we describe an example of a right sided t→∞ s→0

ROC for a H(s) which is not causal.


10(s + 3)
=⇒ lim y(t) = lim = 3.75
Consider H(s) = es
with the ROC as Re(s) > −1. t→∞ s→0 (s + 2)3
s+1
1
We know that L(e−t u(t)) = . Also, the es causes To verify this, let us compute the signal y(t) and
s+1
a time shift giving h(t) = e−(t+1) u(t + 1). This is not then evaluating at the limit t tends to ∞. First
causal as h(t) 6= 0 when −1 < t < 0. However, the we need to evaluate partical fractions of Y (s).
ROC is a right half plane.

Only if H(s) is a rational function with the order 10(s + 3) A Bs2 + Cs + D


Y (s) = 3
= +
of denominator greater than the order of the numera- s(s + 2) s (s + 2)3
tor, will the ROC being a right-half plane imply that =⇒ 10s + 30 = A(s + 2)3 + (Bs3 + Cs2 + Ds)
the system is causal. =⇒ 10s + 30 = (A + B)s3 + (6A + C)s2
+(12A + D)s + 8A

Solution 3
30
(a) Applying partial fractions to H(s), Solving we get A = 8 ,B = − 30
8 ,C =
− 180
8 , D = −15

Bs2 + Cs + D 30 s2 + 6s + 5
s+3 A B C Now 3
= − =
H(s) = = + +  2 (s + 2) 8 (s + 2)3 
(s + 2) 3 s + 2 (s + 2) 2 (s + 2)3 30 s + 4s + 4 2s + 4 1
− + − =
=⇒ s + 3 = A(s2 + 4s + 4) + B(s + 2) + C 8  (s + 2)3 (s + 2)3 (s + 2)3
30 1 2 1
− + 2

8 s + 2 (s + 2) (s + 2)3
Solving we get A = 0, B = 1 and C = 1 
30 30 1 2
Alternatively we can observe that H(s) = Thus, Y (s) = − + −
s+3 s+2+1 1 1  8s 8 s + 2 (s + 2)2
3
= 3
= 2
+ . 1
(s + 2) (s + 2) (s + 2) (s + 2)3
(s + 2)3

2
30 30 60
Thus, y(t) = u(t) − e−2t u(t) − te−2t u(t) + Since the system is causal, the ROC will be the half
8 8 8 plane right of the right most pole of H(s). Since the
30 t2 −2t poles of H(s) are −1 ± j, ROC is Re(s) > −1.
e u(t)
8 2 Z ∞
30 X(s) = x(t)e−st dt
lim y(t) = = 3.75 −∞
t→∞ 8 Z 0 Z ∞
As = et e−st dt + e−t e−st dt
−∞ 0

lim e−t = 0, lim te−t = 0, lim t2 e−t = 0
Z 0 Z
t→∞ t→∞ t→∞ = et−st dt + e−t−st dt
−∞ 0
1 1
Solution 4 = + ; Re{s} < 1 ∩ Re{s} > −1
1−s 1+s
−2
(a) = ROC : −1 < Re{s} < 1
(s − 1)(s + 1)
s2 Y (s) − sY (s) − 2Y (s) = X(s)
1 1 Y (s) = H(s)X(s)
H(s) = 2 =
s −s−2 (s − 2)(s + 1) s+1
= 2 X(s)
s + 2s + 2
−2
={s} =
(s − 1)(s2 + 2s + 2)
Taking partial fraction decomposition,
× × <{s}
−1 2 −2 A Bs + C
2
= + 2
(s − 1)(s + 2s + 2) s − 1 s + 2s + 2
−2 = A(s2 + 2s + 2) + (Bs + C)(s − 1)
(b) The possible ROC’s for the above system are = (A + B)s2 + (2A − B + C)s + (2A − C)

I. Re{s} < −1 Solving for A,B,C we get

II. −1 < Re{s} < 2 0 = A + B =⇒ B = −A


III. Re{s} > 2 0 = 2A − B + C =⇒ C = −3A
−2 = 2A − C =⇒ 5A = −2
1 1 1
H(s) = = − −2 2 6
(s − 2)(s + 1) 3(s − 2) 3(s + 1) A= , B= , C= .
5 5 5
(a) System is stable =⇒ The ROC should Hence
contain the jω axis. −2 2s + 6
Y (s) = + 2
∴ ROC : −1 < Re{s} < 2 5(s − 1) 5(s + 2s + 2)
1 2t 1 −t
h(t) = − 3 e u(−t) − 3 e u(t) −2 2(s + 1) 4
= + +
5(s − 1) 5((s + 1) + 1)) 5((s + 1)2 + 1))
2
(b) System is causal =⇒ The ROC should be
to the right of the rightmost pole ROC : −1 < Re{s} < 1
∴ ROC : Re{s} > 2 Notice that the pole at s = −1 in the ROC of Y(s)
h(t) = 31 e2t u(t) − 31 e−t u(t) = 31 (e2t − got cancelled with the zero at the same position, and
e−t )u(t) the left limit of ROC at s = −1 came from the poles
at −1 ± j.
(c) System is neither causal nor stable =⇒
We know the following:
ROC : Re{s} < −1
h(t) = − 13 e2t u(−t) + 31 e−t u(−t) = 13 (e−t − s+a
L(e−at cos ωt · u(t)) =
2t
e )u(−t) (s + a)2 + ω 2
ω
L(e−at sin ωt · u(t)) =
(s + a)2 + ω 2
Solution 5 Therefore, in time domain:
Given that x(t) = e−|t| ,−∞ < t < ∞ 2 t 2 −t 4
y(t) = e u(−t) + e cos tu(t) + e−t sin tu(t)
Since the system is LTI, the output is x(t) ∗ h(t) or in 5 5 5
s-domain, by L.T properties 2 2 −t
= et u(−t) + e (cos t + 2 sin t)u(t)
5 5
Y (s) = X(s)H(s)

3
Solution 6 Solution 7
Taking unilateral Laplace transform of the given dif-
Given that H(s) is a rational function, we may take
a(s) ferential equation we get,
it to be H(s) = , where a(s) and b(s) are polyno-
b(s) s3 Y (s) − s2 y(0− ) − sy 0 (0− ) − y 00 (0− )
mials in s.
+6s2 Y (s) − 6sy(0− ) − 6y 0 (0− )
+11sY (s) − 11y(0− ) + 6Y (s) = X(s)
(a) The response is absolutely integrable for the sig-
1 (a) For zero state response all the initial conditions
nal u(t), whose Laplace transform is . Therefore, are assumed to be zero. Laplace transform of
s
H(s) x(t) is given by,
has no poles at Re(s) ≥ 0. Therefore, s = 0
s
must be a root of a(s), which cancels the s in the 1
X(s) = , Re(s) > −4
denominator. Take a(s) = sa1 (s). s+4
Using above equation we get,

1 1
(b) The response to tu(t) (Laplace transform 2 ) is Y (s)(s3 + 6s2 + 11s + 6) =
s s+4
not absolutely integrable. This implies, there can-
not be a repeated root for a(s) at s = 0. Therefore,
1
Y (s) =
(s3+ 6s2
+ 11s + 6)(s + 4)
(c) If a signal with a rational Laplace transform is of 1
=
finite duration, then its denominator is a constant (s + 1)(s + 2)(s + 3)(s + 4)
polynomial. The Laplace transform of the signal 1/6 1/2 1/2 1/6
d2 h dh = − + −
+2 + 2h(t) is (s2 + 2s + 2)H(s). This s+1 s+2 s+3 s+4
dt2 dt
is given to be of finite duration in time domain. Taking inverse unilateral Laplace Transform we
1 get,
Hence, b(s) = (s2 +2s+2) for some constant K.
K
1 −t 1 1 1
y(t) = e u(t) − e−2t u(t) + e−3t u(t) − e−4t u(t)
6 2 2 6
(d) The number of zeros at infinity is deg(b(s)) −
deg(a(s)) = 1. Since deg(b(s)) = 2, deg(a(s)) = 1. (b) For zero input response, we assume that X(s) =
Therefore a(s) = K1 s. 0, Substituting the initial conditions in the main
s equation 1 we get,
Therefore H(s) = KK1 2 .
s + 2s + 2
s2 + 5s + 6 1
Y (s) = =
s3 + 6s2 + 11s + 6 s+1
(e) Using the fact that H(1) = 0.2, we find that
KK1 = 1. Taking the unilateral Laplace transform of above
equation we get,
The required impulse response is
y(t) = e−t u(t)
s
H(s) = (c) The total response is the sum of zero state re-
s2 + 2s + 2
sponse and the zero input response.
The poles of the system are −1 ± j. Since the system 7 −t 1 1 1
is causal, the region of convergence is Re(s) > −1. y(t) = e u(t) − e−2t u(t) + e−3t u(t) − e−4t u(t)
6 2 2 6

You might also like