Box 7a.
Combined generic checklists for project identification and design
Done?
(col. 2) Score for an Gender
Element and item/question item/ issues
(col.1) No Partl Yes element* identified
(2a y (2c (col. 3) (col. 4)
) (2b) )
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for each
item, 1)
1.1 Participation of women and men in beneficiary groups in
identification of the problem (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
1.2 Participation of women and men in beneficiary groups in project
design (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated data and gender-related
information (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and identification of gender
issues (max score: 2; for each item, 1)
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities related to gender
roles, perspectives and needs, or access to and control of
resources
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
3.2 Analysis of constraints and opportunities related to women and
men’s participation in the project (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes, and outputs (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project have clearly-stated gender equality goals,
objectives, outcomes or outputs?
5.0 Matching of strategies with gender issues (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Do the strategies and activities match the gender issues and
gender equality goals identified?
6.0 Gender analysis of likely impacts of the project (max
score: 2; for each item, 0.67)
6.1 Are women and girl children among the direct or indirect
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
6.2 Has the project considered its long-term impact on women’s
socioeconomic status and empowerment? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67)
6.3 Has the project included strategies for avoiding or minimizing
negative impacts on women’s status and welfare? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0)
Does the project include gender equality targets and indicators
to measure gender equality outputs and outcomes?
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible
scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0)
Does the project M&E system require the collection of sex-
disaggregated data?
9.0 Resources (max score: 2; for each question, 1)
9.1 Is the budget allotted by the project sufficient for gender
equality promotion or integration? OR, will the project tap
counterpart funds from LGUs/partners for its GAD efforts?
(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
9.2 Does the project have the expertise to promote gender
equality and women’s empowerment? OR, is the project
committing itself to invest project staff time in building
capacities within the project to integrate GAD or promote
gender equality? (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0)
10 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (max score:
2; for each question or item, 0.67)
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the agency/NCRFW/
government’s commitment to the empowerment of women?
(possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD PLAN: Will the project help
towards the formulation of the implementing agency’s GAD
plan?
10.2 Will it build on the initiatives or actions of other organizations
in the area? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
Done?
(col. 2) Score for an Gender
Element and item/question item/ issues
10.3 Does the project have an (col.1)
exit plan that will ensure the element* identified
sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible scores: 0, (col. 3) (col. 4)
0.33, 0.67)
TOTAL GAD SCORE FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STAGE
Philippine Commission on Women Guide for Accomplishing Box 7a Page 2
