TiO2 Energy Levels via UPS and UV-Vis
TiO2 Energy Levels via UPS and UV-Vis
View Journal
PCCP
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: C. Maheu, L.
Cardenas, E. Puzenat , P. Afanasiev and C. GEANTET, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, DOI:
10.1039/C8CP04614J.
Volume 18 Number 1 7 January 2016 Pages 1–636 This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the
Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
accepted for publication.
PCCP
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after
[Link]/pccp
[Link]/pccp
Page 1 of 10 Physical
PleaseChemistry Chemical
do not adjust Physics
margins
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04614J
Journal Name
Introduction
During the last decades, extensive efforts were made to
determine precisely the energy levels and band structure of
titania (TiO2).1 Titanium oxide is used in many areas as
memresistors, optoelectronics, photovoltaics or
photocatalysis.2–4 Determination of electronic structures and Figure 1: Possible cases of relative positions of rutile and anatase energy levels.
carriers transport properties is crucial for these applications. Type I, included; Type II, staggered with energy levels of anatase above or reverse
Regarding photocatalysis, titania powders is the most widely case.
studied class of materials to the present day.5 In the 70s,
The relative positions of the energy levels determines the
Teichner discovered and conceptualized heterogeneous
direction of the electronic transfer of a photocatalytic material
photocatalysis with TiO2.6,7 Since, a tremendous amount of
based on a heterojunction between TiO2 and a metal11 or a
studies have been devoted to this oxide and its photocatalytic
semiconductor.12 A particular interest is also devoted to the
properties.7,8
materials composed of different titania phases. The most known
Among the many polymorphs of TiO2, rutile and anatase are
one is Degussa P25 titania which is a mixture of rutile and
the most studied.2 For the photocatalytic applications of these
anatase.13 The exact nature of its high photocatalytic activity
crystalline structures, determination of the position of the
still remains not completely understood, but the energy
energy levels is essential. Position of the valence band (VB), of
diagrams are obviously crucial to explain its properties.14 The
the conduction band (CB) and the size of the optical band gap
bands alignment between the two phases in Degussa P25 was
(Eg) are dependent of the crystalline phase. These parameters
claimed to enhance the charge careers separation.15 However,
influence the amount of photons absorbed upon illumination
there is a controversy in the literature concerning this band
and the respective oxidation and reduction potentials of holes
alignment. The band gaps of rutile and anatase TiO2
and electrons, generated by light. Presence of defects or
polymorphs are of 3.0 and 3.2 eV, respectively. However, their
dopants as well as the particle size may also play a key role and
relative position is still under debate. Three possibilities are
allow tuning the electronic properties of titania materials.10
generally discussed (Figure 1). The energy levels of both
phases can be included as the Eg,rutile < Eg,anatase (type I).15 It can
Université de Lyon, Institut de Recherches sur la Catalyse et l'Environnement de also be staggered alignment with the CB and the VB of anatase
Lyon - IRCELYON - UMR 5256, CNRS-UCB Lyon 1, 2 avenue Albert Einstein 69626 lying above those of rutile (type II-anatase) or with the CB and
Villeurbanne cedex, France.
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: XRD pattern of TiO2
the VB of rutile lying above those of anatase (type II-rutile).16
powders. Methodology of UPS calibration, background subtraction and absolute As the bands are close, Mi et al. proposed two additional
UPS measurement. UPS spectra of conducting substrates and of the different TiO2 particular cases with the VB or the CB of the two phases being
layers (rutile and anatase with various preparation methods). UV-vis diffuse
reflectance spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x aligned at the same value.17 However, there are no physical
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 1
methods accurate enough to prove the exact match of the materials, prepared under controlled atmosphere and the true
energy levels. electronic structure of powdered samples.
The bands positioning of type II-rutile or of type I should In this paper we introduce a new methodology to study
induce an electronic transfer from anatase to rutile.18–21 For a photocatalytic powders, in our case titania, with UPS and
type II-anatase, the charge transfer is in the opposite provide a combined UPS-UV-vis spectroscopic study of rutile
2 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
electrons by primary electrons. It also considers the secondary- Then, a constant voltage of 14.9 V was applied during 1 min
electron cascade process, i.e. that secondary electrons can in with a stabilized power supply (type elc AL 936N).
turn generate other secondary electrons. The latter induces an
exponential shape which is not represented by standard core- UV-Vis absorption Spectroscopy
level background. Comparison of the Li background with a
proposed to use the second derivative of the spectrum acquired transmitted and the Kubelka-Munk (KM) function F KM can be
at low binding energy. EVB is the energy for which the first applied. The KM equation is valid for weakly absorbing
electron is photogenerated. Therefore, the EVB and the inflexion material, whereas for the values of reflectance R ∞ < 0.6,
point should match. It provides similar results as the method deviations from the theory occur. Therefore, highly diluted
proposed by Sayan et al.46 samples are required for eliminating the specular reflection and
minimizing the grain size effects.57 To prepare highly diluted
UPS sample Preparation samples, the standard procedure was to mix 30 mg of TiO2
Two different types of substrates and two sample powder with 1200 mg of BaSO4 (mass ratio of 1:40). Then 30
preparation methods were used. The first substrate is a mg of the latter mixture was again mixed with 1200 mg of
commercial conducting ITO layer on glass with RS=30-60Ω/sq, BaSO4 to get a 1:1600 ratio (625 ppm). This iterative procedure
purchased from Sigma. The second is an Ag foil purchased was repeated to get samples with a mass weight of 0.39 ppm.
from Alfa Aesar, previously cleaned with Ar ion sputtering. Such a procedure allows obtaining high quality UV-vis spectra.
The UP spectra for both substrates were acquired as references Additionally, dilution of the sample permits to approximate
(Figure S2 and S3). The Ecut-off measured at 17.0 eV for the ITO the scattering coefficient by that of BaSO4. The absorption
agrees with the one reported by Beerbom et al.47 It confirms the coefficient is then easily obtained from reflectance
accurate calibration of the analytic system. ITO is a suitable measurement (See SI). The latter is used to obtain the band gap
system for UPS measurements since there is no major of both anatase and rutile using Tauc’s relationship58 as
electronic contribution in the range of 10-0 eV which is our recommended by López et al.59. A further decomposition of a
area of interest. On the contrary, the d bands of Ag are located UV spectrum (FKM(hν)) can be obtained after normalization
in this energy range, but Ag foil permits an absolute according to the equation:
measurement of EVB. ఔାௗఔ
The samples for UPS measurements must be thin in order to ఔିௗఔ ܨெ ሺℎߥሻ݀ℎߥ
ݐሺℎߥሻ = ஶ
minimize the charging effects. For the first preparation method, ܨெ ሺℎߥሻ݀ℎߥ
the powders were ultrasonically dispersed in heptane or in
pentane (4 g/L). Then, several drops were deposited on the This new t(hν) function can be decomposed with several
conducting ITO substrate. This preparation method was Gaussian contributions. Details of the fitting parameters are
proposed for zeolites48 and further applied to other oxides such reported in the SI.
as V2O5 or bismuth molybdate.49 For the second preparation
method, a homogeneous thin film of TiO2 powder was prepared
by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). This technique was first Results and Discussion
used to prepare samples of dye-sensitized solar cells.50 The Valence Band Maximum (EVB): UPS
particles of a stable suspension were deposited applying a DC
While UPS allows getting a higher resolution and better
electric field.51 EPD duration, electrode distances, and
sensitivity than XPS, the sample preparation in case of non-
composition of the solution can influence the thickness and the
conductive powders is more demanding as concerns the layer
morphology of the film.52 Because of the key role of the
homogeneity and its electric contact with the conducting
charging solution, several solvents were tested.53–55 One of the
support. Two different preparation methods of samples for UPS
most efficient systems is a mixture of iodine, acetone and
measurements are compared in the present study. In the first
water.56 Therefore, EPD technique enables the preparation of a
approach, a suspension of TiO2-anatase in alkanes was dropped
homogeneous, pure and well-controlled TiO2 layers on a
on ITO substrate. Pentane and heptane suspensions were
conducting substrate.
studied. As UPS is sensitive to impurities, the first has the
To prepare the samples by EPD, 50 mg of iodine was
advantage to be easily removed. In the second approach TiO2-
dissolved in 100 ml acetone upon stirring. Then, a suspension
anatase was deposited by electrophoresis. All the UPS spectra
of titania powder (2-3 g/L concentration) was added, the
are reported in the SI. They have similar shape at low BE, as
suspension was sonicated for 10 min and leaved for
the occupied bonding and non-bonding states due to TiO2 are
approximately 1 hr. It was poured in a glass vessel containing
observed.2,57 At higher BE, the secondary edge is observed and
two parallel ITO/glass substrate bars, separated by ca. 1 cm.
corresponds to the Ecut-off.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
values are 2.9 eV for anatase and 2.5 eV for rutile. This
difference of 0.4 ± 0.2 eV agrees with the previous result Figure 3: He I UP background subtracted spectra of the anatase/ITO (drop
reported by Scanlon et al. and Pfeifer et al.23,24 However, it is method) (A) and of the rutile/ITO (EPD method) (B) and their decomposition into
the first time that this difference is measured on powdered four asymmetric contributions.
titania with UPS method. Note that a same band offset between band is composed of energy levels, due only to the non-bonding
the two polymorphs was obtained with the method determining (π) O 2p orbitals (t1g and t2u levels). Then, the hybridization
EVB as the intersection point between the zero-intensity between the Ti orbitals with the O 2p orbitals forms, depending
constant backgrounds and a linear extrapolation of the valence of their respective orientation, non-bonding orbitals (3t1u and
band decay (Table S1).61,62 (1t2g) and deeper in energy, bonding orbitals (σ) (2t1 u, 2eg and
2a1g).64
Experimental DOS feature More recently, Van de Krol for the rutile65 and Asahi et al.
To have a better understanding of the valence band from an for the anatase66 used the MO theory to build an energy band
experimental point of view, the low BE range was studied in diagram. The latter decomposed the VB in three main regions:
more detail. In both spectra baseline was corrected (see SI for the first one attributed to the O 2p π orbitals whereas π-
background treatment) using the background function hybridized and π-hybridized orbitals contribute to the second
developed by Li et al.45 As proposed by Fleming et al.40, from and the third regions. It was also correlated with DOS
empirical reasons, the resulting spectra can be fitted with four calculations. Indeed, UPS probes the DOS below the Fermi
components (Figure 3). Fleming’s interpretation was deduced level and a better understanding can be obtained from the
from UPS analysis on TiO2/Si (100) grown by molecular beam partial density of states (PDOS) description reported for
deposition.40 anatase66,67 rutile55, both23,24 or specific planes of titania.70
The state observed at BE = 11 eV (IV) is assigned to Recently, DFT calculations on TiO2 nanospheres corroborated
surface OH groups.60 Above this first contribution, the three states decomposition of UPS spectra.71
decomposition to the remaining three states can be qualitatively In the range between 0 and -6 eV, below the valence band
explained on the basis of localized molecular orbital (MO) maximum, DOS calculations predict three bands with a major
models63, The local electronic structure was associated with the contribution of O 2p orbitals. PDOS calculations clearly
MO-like state contributions composed from the Ti 3d and O 2p evidence that the contribution located at -1 eV below the EVB
orbitals. (sate I) is due to O 2p π orbitals. Below this feature, the PDOS
For titania, molecular energy-level diagram of the valence of Ti 3d increases with the decrease of energy (bonding states).
The state I is consequently due to a contribution from the
hybridized non-bonding orbitals and the state II is due to the
hybridized bonding orbitals.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Figure 4: t(hν) versus energy spectra of TiO2-anatase (A) and TiO2-rutile (B) diluted with BaSO4 (dilution of 0.39 ppm) (black dots). Violet curve is the fitting result and
bell shape curves are the different contributions (α, β, γ, δ, ε).
diluted sample whereas for a more concentrated sample and using the two Eg values determined by UV-vis absorption,
(16 ppm) this feature is hidden by peak broadening (Figure S8). the ECB levels were deduced. The absolute electronic structure
The decomposition of t(hν) spectrum is illustrated by for both rutile and anatase is shown on Figure 5. To the best of
Figure Figure 4. Four contributions are observed for the anatase our knowledge, for the first time, the band positions and shape
sample and five for the rutile. For the anatase sample, an of the VB of two powder photocatalysts were determined with
additional small sharp peak, probably related to excitons, at such accuracy. A band offset of 0.4 eV for the valence band and
3.25 eV is observed (insert of Figure 4A, obtained with a of 0.25 eV for the conduction band was determined between the
dilution of 9.8 ppb). two phases.
The four contributions around 4.2 eV (α), 4.5 eV (β), 5.0 eV The reasons of this offset between the two polymorphs are
(γ) and 5.5 eV (δ) are common to the two phases. A peak at due to both a shift of the different contributions and also a
lower energy is observed at 3.7 eV for the rutile (ε). It may be broadening of the O 2p state. Indeed there is a 0.2 eV shift
due to a state near the EVB of the rutile and nonexistent in the between the VB states of the rutile and of the anatase (See
anatase. For the two polymorphs the optical band gap was Table S4) In addition, the full width at half maximum for the
measured, Eg,anatase = 3.15 eV and Eg,rutile = 3.00 eV (See Figure contribution I is of 1.3 eV for anatase and 1.6 eV for rutile. To
S9). The error is estimated at 0.05 eV. achieve the MO-like description of UPS spectra, it was argued
that close to the VB and CB edges, the local structure
Absolute Electronic structure of anatase and rutile dominates over the effects of periodicity in determining the
The relative positions of VB determined from UPS and the optical properties of TiO2.40 Such analysis allows a qualitative
Eg value from UV-visible spectra give the overall picture of attribution of the corresponding components in the UP spectra
bands positions corresponding to the staggered alignment in of the valence band. However, it cannot be applied to explain
which anatase bands are lower than rutile ones (type II- the VB offset. Indeed, the local environment of Ti atoms in
anatase), in agreement with the previous findings.16,22,23 It must anatase and rutile is very similar and cannot account for the
be noted that their EVB was determined separately, so a band 0.4 eV differences of the bands positions. Obviously, structure
alignment between the two contacting phases may shift those and symmetry related differences in the VB and CB bands
values. shape explain this energy offset. Due to such symmetry
To properly describe the electronic structure of both rutile differences, rutile is a direct semiconductor with a transition at
and anatase, an absolute measurement of their energy levels the G-point, whereas anatase is an indirect one.72 The
was done. Dropping suspension of TiO2 in alkane on a silver distribution of projected DOS in anatase and rutile VB is
substrate allowed measuring a UPS spectrum with both similar. However, a simple qualitative interpretation of their
contributions of Ag and of TiO2 (Figure S7). Thus, on the same band structure difference can be given. The valence bands
spectrum we observed the Fermi edge of Ag foil and some primarily consist of O 2p states and a small Ti 3d contribution,
contributions of its d-states as well as characteristic peaks indicating the presence of some p–d hybridization (which
belonging to TiO2. corresponds to the component I in Figure 3). Hence, the
The VB maximum for the anatase phase is measured 2.9 eV difference between anatase and rutile is related to the O 2p –
below the Fermi level of the silver. Additionally, work function like states at the VB edge. Among two phases, rutile is a stable
of this Ag foil was measured at 4.2 eV. As a result, EVB for polymorph with a higher density and therefore a higher overall
TiO2 is -7.1 eV below the vacuum level. Using the offset interaction between the Ti and O valent electronic manifolds.
between the EVB of the two polymorphs, determined by UPS Due to that, the topmost VB band related to the O 2p states is
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Figure 5: Electronic structure of the two TiO2 anatase and rutile. Ethr corresponds to the deepest state that can be excited in a photocatalytic test (Ephotons ≤ 4.3 eV).
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
M. Giteau, B. Behaghel, A. Julian, C. Ibrahim, L. Tatry, H. dominant factor of photocatalytic activity, Chemical Physics
Wang, T. Kubo, S. Uchida, H. Segawa, N. Miyashita, R. Letters, 2004, 390, 399–402.
Tamaki, Y. Shoji, K. Yoshida, N. Ahsan, K. Watanabe, T. 20 J. Kang, F. Wu, S.-S. Li, J.-B. Xia and J. Li, Calculating
Inoue, M. Sugiyama, Y. Nakano, T. Hamamura, T. Toupance, Band Alignment between Materials with Different Structures:
C. Olivier, S. Chambon, L. Vignau, C. Geffroy, E. Cloutet, G. The Case of Anatase and Rutile Titanium Dioxide, The
Hadziioannou, N. Cavassilas, P. Rale, A. Cattoni, S. Collin, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116, 20765–20768.
F. Gibelli, M. Paire, L. Lombez, D. Aureau, M. Bouttemy, A. 21 S. Shen, X. Wang, T. Chen, Z. Feng and C. Li, Transfer of
Etcheberry, Y. Okada and J.-F. Guillemoles, Material Photoinduced Electrons in Anatase–Rutile TiO2 Determined
challenges for solar cells in the twenty-first century: by Time-Resolved Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy, The Journal
directions in emerging technologies, Science and Technology of Physical Chemistry C, 2014, 118, 12661–12668.
of Advanced Materials, 2018, 19, 336–369. 22 P. Deák, B. Aradi and T. Frauenheim, Band Lineup and
5 J. Schneider, M. Matsuoka, M. Takeuchi, J. Zhang, Y. Charge Carrier Separation in Mixed Rutile-Anatase Systems,
Horiuchi, M. Anpo and D. W. Bahnemann, Understanding The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115, 3443–3446.
TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials, Chem. Rev., 23 D. O. Scanlon, C. W. Dunnill, J. Buckeridge, S. A. Shevlin,
2014, 114, 9919–9986. A. J. Logsdail, S. M. Woodley, C. R. A. Catlow, M. J.
6 M. Formenti, F. Juillet and S. J. Teichner, Photooxydation Powell, R. G. Palgrave, I. P. Parkin, G. W. Watson, T. W.
ménagée des parafines et oléfines sur l’anatase à température Keal, P. Sherwood, A. Walsh and A. A. Sokol, Band
ambiante, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, 1970, 270, 138–141. alignment of rutile and anatase TiO2, Nature Materials, 2013,
7 N. Serpone, A. V. Emeline, S. Horikoshi, V. N. Kuznetsov 12, 798–801.
and V. K. Ryabchuk, On the genesis of heterogeneous 24 V. Pfeifer, P. Erhart, S. Li, K. Rachut, J. Morasch, J. Brötz, P.
photocatalysis: a brief historical perspective in the period Reckers, T. Mayer, S. Rühle, A. Zaban, I. Mora Seró, J.
1910 to the mid-1980s, Photochemical & Photobiological Bisquert, W. Jaegermann and A. Klein, Energy Band
Sciences, 2012, 11, 1121. Alignment between Anatase and Rutile TiO 2, The Journal of
8 M. Pelaez, N. T. Nolan, S. C. Pillai, M. K. Seery, P. Falaras, Physical Chemistry Letters, 2013, 4, 4182–4187.
A. G. Kontos, P. S. M. Dunlop, J. W. J. Hamilton, J. A. 25 J. Kullgren, B. Aradi, T. Frauenheim, L. Kavan and P. Deák,
Byrne, K. O’Shea, M. H. Entezari and D. D. Dionysiou, A Resolving the Controversy about the Band Alignment
review on the visible light active titanium dioxide between Rutile and Anatase: The Role of OH–/H+ Adsorption,
photocatalysts for environmental applications, Applied The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119, 21952–
Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 125, 331–349. 21958.
9 Y. Ma, X. Wang, Y. Jia, X. Chen, H. Han and C. Li, Titanium 26 Y. Gao, J. Zhu, H. An, P. Yan, B. Huang, R. Chen, F. Fan
Dioxide-Based Nanomaterials for Photocatalytic Fuel and C. Li, Directly Probing Charge Separation at Interface of
Generations, Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114, 9987–10043. TiO 2 Phase Junction, The Journal of Physical Chemistry
10 Z. Zhang, C.-C. Wang, R. Zakaria and J. Y. Ying, Role of Letters, 2017, 8, 1419–1423.
particle size in nanocrystalline TiO2-based photocatalysts, 27 Y.-Y. Zhang, L. Lang, H.-J. Gu, S. Chen, Z.-P. Liu, H. Xiang
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 1998, 102, 10871– and X.-G. Gong, Origin of the type-II band offset between
10878. rutile and anatase titanium dioxide: Classical and quantum-
11 J. M. Herrmann, From catalysis by metals to bifunctional mechanical interactions between O ions, Physical Review B, ,
photocatalysis, Topics in Catalysis, 2006, 39, 3–10. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.155308.
12 M. T. Uddin, Y. Nicolas, C. Olivier, W. Jaegermann, N. 28 K. C. Ko, S. T. Bromley, J. Y. Lee and F. Illas, Size-
Rockstroh, H. Junge and T. Toupance, Band alignment Dependent Level Alignment between Rutile and Anatase
investigations of heterostructure NiO/TiO2 nanomaterials TiO2 Nanoparticles: Implications for Photocatalysis, The
used as efficient heterojunction earth-abundant metal oxide Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2017, 8, 5593–5598.
photocatalysts for hydrogen production, Physical Chemistry 29 F. Reinert and S. Hüfner, Photoemission spectroscopy-from
Chemical Physics, 2017, 19, 19279–19288. early days to recent applications, New Journal of Physics,
13 A. Fujishima, X. Zhang and D. Tryk, TiO2 photocatalysis and 2005, 7, 1–34.
related surface phenomena, Surface Science Reports, 2008, 30 S. Hüfner, S. Schmidt and F. Reinert, Photoelectron
63, 515–582. spectroscopy - An overview, Nuclear Instruments and
14 Z. Zhang and J. T. Yates, Band Bending in Semiconductors: Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators,
Chemical and Physical Consequences at Surfaces and Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2005,
Interfaces, Chemical Reviews, 2012, 112, 5520–5551. 547, 8–23.
15 D. C. Hurum, A. G. Agrios, K. A. Gray, T. Rajh and M. C. 31 G. Liu, W. Jaegermann, J. He, V. Sundström and L. Sun, XPS
Thurnauer, Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity and UPS Characterization of the TiO2/ZnPcGly
of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR, The Journal Heterointerface: Alignment of Energy Levels, The Journal of
of Physical Chemistry B, 2003, 107, 4545–4549. Physical Chemistry B, 2002, 106, 5814–5819.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
32 V. E. Henrich and R. L. Kurtz, Surface electronic structure of 49 M. Heber and W. Grünert, Application of ultraviolet
TiO2: Atomic geometry, ligand coordination, and the effect of photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) in the surface
adsorbed hydrogen, Physical Review B, 23, 6280. characterisation of polycrystalline oxide catalysts. I.
33 A. Borodin and M. Reichling, Characterizing TiO2 (110) Methodics and analytical potential, Topics in Catalysis, 2001,
surface states by their work function, Physical Chemistry 15, 3–11.
Chemical Physics, 2011, 13, 15442. 50 D. Matthews, A. Kay and M. Gratzel, Electrophoretically
Letters, 2006, 96, 026103. 52 V. Jouenne, J.-L. Duvail, L. Brohan, E. Gautron and M.
36 G. Silversmit, H. Poelman, D. Depla, D. Poelman, N. Barrett, Richard-Plouet, Low-temperature synthesis and
G. B. Marin and R. D. Gryse, UPS study of the thermal electrophoretic deposition of shape-controlled titanium
reduction of fully oxidized V2O5/TiO2 (001)-anatase model dioxide nanocrystals, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 15118–15125.
catalysts, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related 53 J.-H. Yum, S.-S. Kim, D.-Y. Kim and Y.-E. Sung,
Phenomena, 2005, 144–147, 377–380. Electrophoretically deposited TiO2 photo-electrodes for use in
37 R. H. Williams, G. P. Srivastava and I. T. McGovern, flexible dye-sensitized solar cells, Journal of Photochemistry
Photoelectron spectroscopy of solids and their surfaces, and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2005, 173, 1–6.
Reports on Progress in Physics, 1980, 43, 1357–1414. 54 G.-S. Kim, H.-K. Seo, V. P. Godble, Y.-S. Kim, O.-B. Yang
38 A. W. Dweydari and C. H. B. Mee, Work function and H.-S. Shin, Electrophoretic deposition of titanate
measurements on (100) and (110) surfaces of silver, physica nanotubes from commercial titania nanoparticles: Application
status solidi (a), 1975, 27, 223–230. to dye-sensitized solar cells, Electrochemistry
39 R. Schlaf, P. G. Schroeder, M. W. Nelson, B. A. Parkinson, Communications, 2006, 8, 961–966.
C. D. Meritt, L. A. Crisafulli, H. Murata and Z. H. Kakafi, 55 S. Dor, S. Rühle, A. Ofir, M. Adler, L. Grinis and A. Zaban,
Determination of interface dipole and band bending at the The influence of suspension composition and deposition
Ag/tris (8-hydroxyquinolinato) gallium organic Schottky mode on the electrophoretic deposition of TiO2 nanoparticle
contact by ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy, Surface agglomerates, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and
Science, 2000, 450, 142–152. Engineering Aspects, 2009, 342, 70–75.
40 L. Fleming, C. C. Fulton, G. Lucovsky, J. E. Rowe, M. D. 56 N. Koura, T. Tsukamoto, HiromasaShoji and T. Hotta,
Ulrich and J. Lüning, Local bonding analysis of the valence Preparation of Various Oxide Films by an Electrophoretic
and conduction band features of TiO2, Journal of Applied Deposition Method: A Study of the Mechanism, Japanese
Physics, 2007, 102, 033707. Journal of Applied Physics, 1995, 34, 1643–1647.
41 N. Laidani, P. Cheyssac, J. Perrière, R. Bartali, G. Gottardi, I. 57 G. Kortüm, W. Braun and G. Herzog, Principles and
Luciu and V. Micheli, Intrinsic defects and their influence on Techniques of Diffuse-Reflectance Spectroscopy,
the chemical and optical properties of TiO2−x films, Journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1963, 2, 333–341.
of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2010, 43, 485402. 58 J. Tauc, R. Grigorovici and A. Vancu, Optical properties and
42 I. Luciu, R. Bartali and N. Laidani, Influence of hydrogen electronic structure of amorphous germanium, physica status
addition to an Ar plasma on the structural properties of TiO2−x solidi (b), 1966, 15, 627–637.
thin films deposited by RF sputtering, Journal of Physics D: 59 R. López and R. Gómez, Band-gap energy estimation from
Applied Physics, 2012, 45, 345302. diffuse reflectance measurements on sol–gel and commercial
43 P. Pu, H. Cachet, N. Laidani and E. M. M. Sutter, Influence TiO2: a comparative study, Journal of Sol-Gel Science and
of pH on Surface States Behavior in TiO2 Nanotubes, The Technology, 2012, 61, 1–7.
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116, 22139–22148. 60 R. Sanjinés, H. Tang, H. Berger, F. Gozzo, G. Margaritondo
44 D. T. Payne, Y. Zhang, C. L. Pang, H. H. Fielding and G. and F. Lévy, Electronic structure of anatase TiO 2 oxide,
Thornton, Coverage-dependent two-photon photoexcitation at Journal of Applied Physics, 1994, 75, 2945–2951.
the H2O/TiO2 interface, Surface Science, 2016, 652, 189–194. 61 S. A. Chambers, T. Droubay, T. C. Kaspar and M. Gutowski,
45 X. Li, Z. Zhang and V. E. Henrich, Inelastic electron Experimental determination of valence band maxima for
background function for ultraviolet photoelectron spectra, SrTiO3, TiO2, and SrO and the associated valence band
Journal of electron spectroscopy and related phenomena, offsets with Si (001), Journal of Vacuum Science &
1993, 63, 253–265. Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures,
46 S. Sayan, E. Garfunkel and S. Suzer, Soft x-ray 2004, 22, 2205.
photoemission studies of the HfO2/SiO2/Si system, Applied 62 A. Giampietri, G. Drera and L. Sangaletti, Band Alignment at
Physics Letters, 2002, 80, 2135–2137. Heteroepitaxial Perovskite Oxide Interfaces. Experiments,
47 M. M. Beerbom, B. Lägel, A. J. Cascio, B. V. Doran and R. Methods, and Perspectives, Advanced Materials Interfaces,
Schlaf, Direct comparison of photoemission spectroscopy and 2017, 4, 1700144.
in situ Kelvin probe work function measurements on indium 63 J. B. Goodenough, Metallic oxides, Progress in Solid State
tin oxide films, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Chemistry, 1971, 5, 145–399.
Phenomena, 2006, 152, 12–17. 64 D. W. Fischer, X-Ray Band Spectra and Molecular-Orbital
48 W. Grünert, R. Schloegl and H. G. Karge, Investigations of Structure of Rutile Ti O 2, Physical Review B, 1972, 5, 4219.
zeolites by photoelectron and ion scattering spectroscopy. 1. 65 R. Krol, in Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production, eds.
New applications of surface spectroscopic methods to zeolites R. van de Krol and M. Grätzel, Springer US, Boston, MA,
by a high-temperature measurement technique, The Journal 2012, vol. 102, pp. 13–67.
of Physical Chemistry, 1993, 97, 8638–8645. 66 R. Asahi, Y. Taga, W. Mannstadt and A. J. Freeman,
Electronic and optical properties of anatase TiO2, Physical
Review B, 2000, 61, 7459.
8 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
054503.
70 W. Chen, Q. Kuang, Q. Wang and Z. Xie, Engineering a high
energy surface of anatase TiO2 crystals towards enhanced
performance for energy conversion and environmental
applications, RSC Advances, 2015, 5, 20396–20409.
71 D. Selli, G. Fazio and C. Di Valentin, Modelling realistic
TiO2 nanospheres: A benchmark study of SCC-DFTB against
hybrid DFT, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2017, 147,
164701.
72 J. Zhang, P. Zhou, J. Liu and J. Yu, New understanding of the
difference of photocatalytic activity among anatase, rutile and
brookite TiO2, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 20382–
20386.
73 J.-M. Herrmann, Heterogeneous photocatalysis: state of the
art and present applications., Topics in Catalysis, 2005, 34,
49–65.
74 T. Luttrell, S. Halpegamage, J. Tao, A. Kramer, E. Sutter and
M. Batzill, Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile? -
Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films, Scientific Reports,
2015, 4, 1038.
75 A. Calloni, A. Ferrari, A. Brambilla, F. Ciccacci and L. Duò,
Growth of stoichiometric TiO2 thin films on Au(100)
substrates by molecular beam epitaxy, Thin Solid Films,
2012, 520, 3922–3926.
76 M. Kobielusz, K. Pilarczyk, E. Świętek, K. Szaciłowski and
W. Macyk, Spectroelectrochemical analysis of TiO2
electronic states – Implications for the photocatalytic activity
of anatase and rutile, Catalysis Today, 2018, 309, 35–42.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 9
Absolute energy levels position and quantitative description of occupied levels obtained for TiO2
nanopowders, combining UPS and UV-Vis spectroscopies.