0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views108 pages

Summary Judgment Motion Appendix

This document is an appendix to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in the case ROI Developers, Inc. vs. Athena Bitcoin, Inc. It includes various exhibits such as a Term Sheet, Non-Disclosure Agreement, and deposition transcripts that support the Defendant's motion. The document was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on October 4, 2022.

Uploaded by

Suek Bana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views108 pages

Summary Judgment Motion Appendix

This document is an appendix to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in the case ROI Developers, Inc. vs. Athena Bitcoin, Inc. It includes various exhibits such as a Term Sheet, Non-Disclosure Agreement, and deposition transcripts that support the Defendant's motion. The document was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on October 4, 2022.

Uploaded by

Suek Bana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 1 of 108 PageID 92

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
(FORT WORTH DIVISION)

ROI DEVELOPERS, INC. d/b/a § Case No. 4:22-cv-00073-O


ACCRUVIA §
§ (Formerly in the 96th District Court of Tarrant
Plaintiff § County, Texas
§ Cause No. 096-331099-21
VS. §
§
ATHENA BITCOIN, INC. d/b/a §
ATHENA BITCOIN GLOBAL §
§
Defendant §

APPENDIX TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

This Appendix to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support contains

the following evidence in support of the Defendant’s motion that is attached hereto and fully

incorporated herein by reference thereto:

a. Exhibit 1: The Term Sheet signed and entered by and between ABIT and
Accruvia on September 22, 2021 (“Term Sheet” herein) which was marked
as Exhibit 3 to the oral deposition of Eric Gravengaard taken on August 17,
2022 in this case;

b. Exhibit 2: Certified copy of the translated Non-Disclosure Agreement


signed and entered into by Shaun Overton for the benefit of AHES;

c. Exhibit 3: Oral Deposition of Accruvia’s corporate representative, Shaun


Overton (“Accruvia Deposition”) taken on August 16, 2022 in this case;

d. Exhibit 4: Oral Deposition of Athena’s corporate representative, Eric


Gravengaard (“Athena Deposition”) taken on August 17, 2022 in this case;

e. Exhibit 5: Letter with Demand for Payment on behalf of Accruvia to ABIT


dated December 14, 2021; and

f. Exhibit 6: Affidavit of Larry L. Fowler, Jr. dated October 4, 2022.

PAGE 1

1
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 2 of 108 PageID 93

Respectfully submitted,

___/s/ Larry L. Fowler, Jr.__________________


LARRY L. FOWLER, JR.
State Bar No. 07321900

HARRIS COOK, L.L.P.


1309-A West Abram
Arlington, Texas 76013
817/299-2841 – Telephone
817/460-8060 – Facsimile
Email: [email protected]
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ATHENA BITCOIN, INC.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 4, 2022, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

document has been served on all counsel of record listed below via email through the PACER

system.

Kelly Stewart
K Stewart Law, P.C.
5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75225
[email protected]
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Larry L. Fowler, Jr.


LARRY L. FOWLER, JR.

PAGE 2

2
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 3 of 108 PageID 94

ATHENA 000003
Exhibit 1 3
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 4 of 108 PageID 95

ATHENA 000004
4
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 5 of 108 PageID 96

ATHENA 000005 5
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 6 of 108 PageID 97

Exhibit 2 6
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 7 of 108 PageID 98

7
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 8 of 108 PageID 99

8
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 9 of 108 PageID 100

9
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 10 of 108 PageID 101

10
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 11 of 108 PageID 102

11
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 12 of 108 PageID 103

12
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 13 of 108 PageID 104

13
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 14 of 108 PageID 105

14
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 15 of 108 PageID 106

15
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 16 of 108 PageID 107

16
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 17 of 108 PageID 108

17
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 18 of 108 PageID 109

Exhibit 3
18
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 19 of 108 PageID 110

19
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 20 of 108 PageID 111

20
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 21 of 108 PageID 112

21
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 22 of 108 PageID 113

22
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 23 of 108 PageID 114

23
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 24 of 108 PageID 115

24
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 25 of 108 PageID 116

25
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 26 of 108 PageID 117

26
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 27 of 108 PageID 118

27
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 28 of 108 PageID 119

28
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 29 of 108 PageID 120

29
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 30 of 108 PageID 121

30
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 31 of 108 PageID 122

31
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 32 of 108 PageID 123

32
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 33 of 108 PageID 124

33
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 34 of 108 PageID 125

34
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 35 of 108 PageID 126

35
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 36 of 108 PageID 127

36
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 37 of 108 PageID 128

37
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 38 of 108 PageID 129

38
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 39 of 108 PageID 130

39
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 40 of 108 PageID 131

40
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 41 of 108 PageID 132

41
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 42 of 108 PageID 133

42
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 43 of 108 PageID 134

43
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 44 of 108 PageID 135

44
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 45 of 108 PageID 136

45
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 46 of 108 PageID 137

46
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 47 of 108 PageID 138

47
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 48 of 108 PageID 139

48
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 49 of 108 PageID 140

49
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 50 of 108 PageID 141

50
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 51 of 108 PageID 142

51
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 52 of 108 PageID 143

52
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 53 of 108 PageID 144

53
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 54 of 108 PageID 145

54
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 55 of 108 PageID 146

55
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 56 of 108 PageID 147

56
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 57 of 108 PageID 148

57
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 58 of 108 PageID 149

Exhibit 4 58
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 59 of 108 PageID 150

59
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 60 of 108 PageID 151

60
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 61 of 108 PageID 152

61
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 62 of 108 PageID 153

62
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 63 of 108 PageID 154

63
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 64 of 108 PageID 155

64
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 65 of 108 PageID 156

65
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 66 of 108 PageID 157

66
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 67 of 108 PageID 158

67
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 68 of 108 PageID 159

68
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 69 of 108 PageID 160

69
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 70 of 108 PageID 161

70
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 71 of 108 PageID 162

71
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 72 of 108 PageID 163

72
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 73 of 108 PageID 164

73
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 74 of 108 PageID 165

74
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 75 of 108 PageID 166

75
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 76 of 108 PageID 167

76
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 77 of 108 PageID 168

77
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 78 of 108 PageID 169

78
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 79 of 108 PageID 170

79
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 80 of 108 PageID 171

80
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 81 of 108 PageID 172

81
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 82 of 108 PageID 173

82
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 83 of 108 PageID 174

83
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 84 of 108 PageID 175

84
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 85 of 108 PageID 176

85
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 86 of 108 PageID 177

86
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 87 of 108 PageID 178

87
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 88 of 108 PageID 179

88
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 89 of 108 PageID 180

89
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 90 of 108 PageID 181

90
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 91 of 108 PageID 182

91
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 92 of 108 PageID 183

92
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 93 of 108 PageID 184

93
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 94 of 108 PageID 185

94
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 95 of 108 PageID 186

95
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 96 of 108 PageID 187

Exhibit 5 96
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 97 of 108 PageID 188

97
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 98 of 108 PageID 189

98
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 99 of 108 PageID 190

99
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 100 of 108 PageID 191

100
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 101 of 108 PageID 192

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
(FORT WORTH DIVISION)

ROI DEVELOPERS, INC. dtbt a$ Case No. 4:22-cv-00073-O


ACCRUVIA $
$ (Formerly in the 96th District Court of Tarrant
Plaintiff $ County, Texas
$ Cause No. 096-331099-21
vs. $
$
ATI{ENA BITCOIN, INC. dlb/ a$
ATHENA BITCOIN GLOBAL $
$
Defendant $

AFFIDAVIT OF LARRY L. FOWLER. JR.

STATE OF TEXAS s
s
COUNTY OF TARRANT $

Before me, the undersigned Notary Public on this day personally appeared LARRY L

FOWLER, JR., who upon his oath stated

I "My name is Larry L. Fowler, Jr. I am over 18 years ofage and I am competent
to make and give this affidavit. The facts stated in this affidavit are within my
personal knowledge and are all true and correct. I am an attomey of record for the
Defendant in this proceeding.

2 The document that is attached as Exhibit 2 to the Appendix to the Defendant's


Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support is a certified copy of the
translated Non-Disclosure Agreement signed and entered into by Shaun Overton
for the benefit of Athena Holdings El Salvador, S.A. de C.V. which was discussed
with Mr. Gravengaard at his deposition. See Oral Deposition of Eric Gravengaard
at pages 112-l13,lines 23-25 and l-9, respectively.

The document that is attached as Exhibit 5 to the Appendix to the Defendant's


Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support is a copy of the December 14,
2021 demand letter on behalf of Accruvia sent to Athena Bitcoin Global which was
discussed with Mr. Overton at his deposition. See Oral Deposition of Shaun
Overton at pages 97-99, lines 4-25,1-25,1-19, respectively.

AFFIDAVIT OF LARRY L. FOWLER, JR PAGE 1

Exhibit 6 101
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 102 of 108 PageID 193

1. Attached hereto as Exhibil I are the Plaintiffs Responses to Defendant's First Set
of Personal Jurisdiction Discovery, Requests for Admissions which were served in
response to the Defendant's discovery requests by the Plaintiff ROI Developers,
Inc. d/b/a Accruvia in the above-referenced case.

5. Further affiant sayeth naught."

Jr

SWORN to and SUBSCRIBED belore me, authoritl', on this the 4s day


of October, 2022 by Larry L. Fowler, Jr.

4ru/,b 4rz,-
Notary Public, State of Texas
M E L s SA R 0 MAN
Nota Publi c, St6t6
of T€xa s
Comm Expiros 092 $2026
Notsry l0 t2 997'930

AFFIDAVIT OF LARRY L. FOWLER, JR. PAGE 2

102
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 103 of 108 PageID 194

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DI\'ISION

ROI DE\'ELOPERS, INC., $


d/b/a ACCRUVIA, $
$
Plaintift s
s
s Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00073-O
s
ATHENA BITCOIN, INC,, s
s
Defendant. $

PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S


ET OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION DISCOVE

Plaintiff ROI Developers, Inc., d,/b/a./ Accruvia ("Accruvia") responds to Defendant's

First Set ofPersonal Jurisdiction Discovery as follows:

OBJECTIONS TO ALL REOUESTS

1. Accruvia objects to the definition ofAccruvia because it includes independent

contractors, over whom it does not exercise control. Accruvia also objects to this definition

because it includes "other related parties retained or otherwise controlled by Accruvia." As

wdtten, in includes Accruvia's attomeys, making it seek privileged information, and it is unclear

what "otherwise controlled by Accruvia" means. Accruvia will respond to the discovery

requests on behalf of itself and in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. Accruvia objects to the instruction regarding identifying or describing a person

because, by requiring the person's present or last-known office address, work-related telephone

number, occupation,.iob title, employer, and employer's contact information, it is overly broad

and imposes a burden on Accruvia not required by the Federal Rules of Civil procedure.

Accruvia, to the extent necessary to respond to the discovery requests by identifying a person,

will provide the person's name and last-known phone number/email


E)(HIBIT

1--

103
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 104 of 108 PageID 195

.8: Any documents evidencing that Athena made


ruvia within the State of Texas, including phone records, notes from phone gso f
conne s to wireless networks. or WLAN report.

RESPON cruvia will produce responsive documents, if any, at a mutu venient


time and I

UEST FOR PR TI NN .9: All documents inc but not limited to the
employment or independe tractor agreement or the like, i lng the location or residence
of any employee or subcon of Accruvia who perform for Athena.

RESPONSE: Accruvia o bj ects to request because i erly broad and seeks irrelevant
information because the actual resi of the in contractors, ifthey are not Texas
residents, is not at issue. Accruvia has ided in to Interrogatory No. l0 the names of
independent contractors and has stated tha v and Jarrell are or were Texas residents.
'en
With respect to Jarrell, who was a T exas resl she was an Accruvia employee, she now
works for Athena (or one of its related comp Accruvia further objects to this request
because, by seeking "all documents . . . e location or residence," it is further overly
broad, vague and ambiguous.

PRODU NO. l0: All documen idenci ng a request for Accruvia to


perform any work for At in or from the State of Tex

RESPONSE: Accruv produce responsive documents, if an a mutualll convenient


time and location.

UES R PRODUCTI NN All documents evidencing a alid and exi sting


agreem Accruvia and Athena that provides that Athena will p ccruvia for the
SO lopment and support services work it performed for Athena."

: Accruvia will produce responsive documents, ifany, at a mutually conv t


and location
Reouests for Admission

REOU EST FORADMISSION NO. 1: Admit that the work you allege was performed for Athena
did not have to be performed in Texas.

RESPONSE: Admitted.

104
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 105 of 108 PageID 196

RE T FOR ADMISSION NO.2: Admi t that the work you allege was p r Athena
was not telated to the ATMs owned and/or operated by Athena in T

ITESI'ONSE: D en

FOR ADMISSION NO. t that Athena's actions in breach ofthe terms ofthe
alleged agreernent that you ln your r to Interro gatory No. 6 were not performed
within the State of Texas.

RESPONSE:

REOUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.4: Admit that no in-person meeting between Accruvia and
Athena ever took place in Texas.

RESPONSE: Admitted.

RE UE ADMISSION NO. Admit that a majority oIAccruvi INCSS takes place


in El Salvador.

RESPONSE: Accruvia obj this re quest bec an admission on a fact that is not
relevant-i.e., where Accruvia's ' S ace. " The issue lor personal jurisdiction is
Athena's contacts with Texas, not A tacts elsewhere. Where Accruvia's "business
takes place" is also undefined, va amb lguo Accruvia o bjects to this request on that
ground too. Regardless ofi evance. based on Acc ru tanding ofthe phase "where
business takes place, via denies this request.

REOUEST FOR ADMISSION NO.6: Admit that your familiarity with Athena arose from work
you were conducting in El Salvador.

RESPONSE: Admitted.

T FOR ADMISSI NO. 7: Admit th


the only employee of Accruvia who was a
Texas resident between August Novemb was Shaun Overton and admit that Shaun
Overton worked mostly if not entire Salvad or.

105
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 106 of 108 PageID 197

SE: This request constitutes tlvo requests for ad ml ing it improper. With
respect of Accruvia who resident between August and
November 202I ," Accruvia ES ect to whether "Shaun Overton worked
mostly if not entircly from El Salv ccruvla o tly if not
entirely" is vague and ambi less, based on Accruvia's unders tly if
not entirely," Accru at request.

RE UES ION NO. 8: Admit never sent any payment,


corresponden ce or use ices for of any communications to Accruvia in
Texas.

RESPONSE: Denied

Rf,QUEST FOII ADMISSION NO. 9: Admit that Accru\,ia did not enter into a Term Sheet
Agreement with Athena on September 22,2021. Term Sheet Agreement is defined as the
document produced to Accruvia Bates labeled 000003-000005.

RESPONSE: Accruvia admits that the Term Sheet is between Accruvia and "Athena Bitcoin
Global Inc." Accruvia otherwise denies this request.

Dated this 13th day ofJune, 2022.

Respectfully submitted,

isl Kell Stewart


Kelly Stewart
Texas Bar No. 19221600
K STEWART LAw, P.C.
5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 900
Dallas, Texas 75225
972.308.6168
[email protected]

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

106
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 107 of 108 PageID 198

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This certifies that copy ofthis document was served on counsel for Defendant on June

13,2022, via email.

/s/ Kellv Stewart

10

107
Case 4:22-cv-00073-O Document 15 Filed 10/04/22 Page 108 of 108 PageID 199

[I]{ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DI\'ISION

ROI DEVELOPERS, INC., $


d/b/a ACCRU!'IA, $
$
Plaintiff, $
$
$ Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-00073-O
$
ATIIENA BITCOIN, INC,, s
s
Defendant $

VI'RIFICAI'ION

STATEOFTEXAS $

couNrvor'6fani S

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Shaun Overton,
known to me to be the person whose signature appears below, and upon his oath duly deposed and
said:

My name is Shaun Overton. I am the President of ROI Developers, Inc. d/b/a Accruvia

("Accruvia"). As such, I have personal knowledge ofthe facts in this Verification. I hereby verify

that Accruvia's factual responses to the interrogatories in Defendant's First Set of Personal

Jurisdiction Discovery are true and correct.

,,) This instrument was personally acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me on the
L/ day of Jrne,2022, by Shaun Overton.

oE{E lx{EAsE C"rmB OTARY PUBLIC. in and for the State ofTexas
yNoAyD lSAi0S
Exphs,uy A,2m5 My Commission Expires: dl LOL,{

108

You might also like