0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

XI - Maths - Module - 5 - Reasoning (Solution)

The document provides exercises and solutions related to mathematical reasoning, focusing on logical statements and their truth values. It includes various examples of tautologies, contradictions, and logical equivalences, along with truth tables to illustrate the concepts. The exercises are designed for students preparing for competitive exams like JEE Mains and Advanced.

Uploaded by

msnavya1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

XI - Maths - Module - 5 - Reasoning (Solution)

The document provides exercises and solutions related to mathematical reasoning, focusing on logical statements and their truth values. It includes various examples of tautologies, contradictions, and logical equivalences, along with truth tables to illustrate the concepts. The exercises are designed for students preparing for competitive exams like JEE Mains and Advanced.

Uploaded by

msnavya1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

MATHEMATICAL REASONING

HINTS & SOLUTIONS


EXERCISE - 1 17.  (p  q)  (q  r) is false
Single Choice
 (p  q) and (q  r) both are false
6.  p and r both are false or q is false.
otherwise (p  q)  (q  r) is true
p q ~p p q ~(p q) ~p q
T T F T F F
18. The negation of ‘’Everyone in Germany speaks German’’
T F F F T T
F T T F T T is - there is at least one person in Germany who does not
F F T T F F
speak German.
7. Both statements p and q are true 20. ~(p  (q  r))  p  ~(q  r)
so p q and q p ( ~(p  q)  p  ~q)
 p q  p  (~q  ~r)

8. When p and q both are true then 21.  ~q ~p  ~(~q)~p ( p  q  ~ p  q)


~(p  q) and (~p  ~q) both are false q~p
i.e. ~(p  q)  (~p  ~q) is true ~pq (by commutative law)
pq ( p  q = ~p  q)
when p and q both are false then
Hence pq~q~p
~(p  q) is false and (~p  ~q) is true
i.e. ~(p  q)  (~p  ~q) is false 26. Let p, q, r three statement defined as

Hence ~(p  q)  (~p  ~q) is neither tautology nor p : a number N is divisible by 15


contradiction. q : number N is divisible by 5
r : number N is divisible by 3
10.  p  (q  r) is false Here given statement is p  (q  r)
 p is true and (q  r) is false Here negative of above statement is
 p is true, q and r both are false ~(p (q  r))  p (~(q r)
i.e. p  (q  r) is false when truth values of p, q, r are p (~ q  ~ r)
T, F, F resp. otherwise it is true. i.e. A number is divisible by 15 and it is not divisible by
5 and 3.
11. Let p, q, r be the three statements such that
31. (~ T  F)  ~T  T
p : x = 5, q : y = –2 and r : x – 2y = 9  (F  F)  F  T
Here given statement is (p  q)  r and its contrapositive  FF  T
is ~r  ~(p  q)  F  T
i.e. ~r  (~p  ~q) i.e. if x – 2y  9 then x  5 35.  (~p  ~q)  (p  ~q)
or y  –2  (~p  ~q)  (~q  p) (by commutative law)
 ~p  [~q  (~q  p)] (by Associative law)
12. Let S(p, q)  (p  ~q)  ~p
 ~p  [(~q  ~q)  p] (by Associative law)
 S(~p, ~q)  (~p  q)  p  ~p  (~q  p) ( p  p = p)
Now S*(~p, ~q)  (~p  q)  p  ~p  (p  ~q) (by commutative law)
and ~S(p, q)  ~[(p  ~q)  ~p]  ~(p  ~q)  p  (~p  p)  ~q (by Associative law)
 (~p  q)  p  t  ~q  t t is a tautology
Hence (~p  ~q)  (p  ~q) is a tautology.
Hence S*(~p, ~q)  ~S(p, q)

63
MATHS FOR JEE MAINS & ADVANCED

37.  (p  q)  p is false p q r (p  q)  r

 (p  q) is true and p is false T T T T


T T F F
which is not possible p q (i) (ii) T F T T
T T F T F T T T
so (p  q)  p is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
(iv) T F T T (v) T F F T
F T T T F T F F
39.  [(pp)  q] p (pq)p ( p p  p)
F F T T F F T T
when p is false and q is true (or false) then F F F F

(p  q) is true i.e. (p  q)  p is false


p q r (p  q)  r
Hence [(p  p)  q]  p is not a tautology.
T T T T
T T F F
EXERCISE - 2 T F T T
Part # II : Comprehension F T T T
(vi) T F F F
1. If p then q means p only if q
F T F F
2. If p then q  p is sufficient for q F F T F
3. p is false, q is false so p  q is true. F F F T

4. Fallacy
EXERCISE - 3
Subjective Type 5. Let p be the statement “Traders do not reduce the prices”
and q be the statement “Government takes action against
them”
p q (i) (ii) p q (i) (ii) The first statement in symbolic form is p  q and the
T T T T T T T F second statement is ~(p  ~q).
T F F F T F F F In order to check the equivalence of the above state-
2. (i) (ii)
F T T F F T F F ments let us prepare the following truth table.
F F T F F F T T
p q ~ q p  ~ q ~ (p  ~ q) p  q
T T F F T T
p q r (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) T F T T F F
F T F F T T
T T T T F F F
F F T F T T
T T F F T T F
T F T T F F T Clearly, ~ q  ~p and ~(p  ~q) have same truth values
F T T T T F T for all the values of p and q. Hence, the two
(iii) T F F T F T F statements are equivalent.
F T F F T T F Aliter : We have, ~(p  ~q)  (~p  q)  (p  q)
F F T T T T T Hence the two statements are equivalent.
F F F F T T F
6. True

64
MATHEMATICAL REASONING

7.
13. p : it rains tomorrow
p q ~p ~q ~q  p p ~p (~q  p) (p ~p)
T T F F F T T
q : I shall carry my umbrella
T F F T T T T r : cloth is mended
F T T F F T T
F F T T F T T P : p  (r  q)
Q : p  ~r
8. Given Statement is
S : ~q
(ABC is right angled at B)  (AB2 + BC2 = AC2)
P : T, Q : T S:T
(A) Its converse is :
 S not valid
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2 = AC2)  ABC is right
angled at B. p q r P Q S
T T T T F F
(B) Its contradiction is : T T F T T F
T F T F F T
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2 = AC2)  ABC is not
T F F T T T
right angled at B. F T T T F F
F T F T F F
(C) Its contrapositive is :
F F T T F T
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2  AC2)  ABC is not F F F T F T

right angled at B. 14. Consider the following statements :


10. The compound statement is : p : Hema is not in team A
“25 is a multiple of 5 or 8” q : Rita is not in team B.
Let us assume that the statement q is false i.e. 25 is r : Mamta is in team A.
not a multiple of 8. Clearly, p is true. We have, S1 : p  ~q, S2 : q  r, S : r  q
Thus, if we assume that q is false, then p is true. In order to test the validity of the given argument,
Hence, the compound statement is true i.e. valid. let us first prepare the truth table for S1  S2  S as
given below.
11. Let q and r be the statements given by
Truth table for S1  S2  S
q : If x is an integer and x2 is even
r : x is an even integer p q r ~q S1 :p~q S2 :qr S1  S2 S:q r S1  S2 S

then p : “If q, then r” T T T F F T F T T


If possible, let r be false then r is false T T F F F F F T T
 x is not an even integer T F T T T T T T T

 x is an odd integer T F F T T T T F F

 x = (2n + 1) for some integer n F T T F T T T T T

 x2 = 4n2 + 4n + 1 F T F F T F F T T

 2
x = 4n(n + 1) + 1 F F T T T T T T T

 x2 is an odd integer F F F T T T T F F

 q is false We observe that the last column of the truth table


[ 4n(n + 1) is even] contains F also. Thus S1 S2  S is not a tautol-
ogy hence argument is invalid.
Thus, r is false  q is false
Hence, p : “If q, then r” is a true statement.

12. (p  q)  [~ p  (p  ~ q)]
= (p  q)  [(~ p  p)  (~ p  ~ q)] = (p  q) 
[t  (~ p  ~ q)] = (p  q)  (~ p  ~ q)
= (p  q)  [ ~ ( p  q)] = t
also (~p  q)  t = t

65
MATHS FOR JEE MAINS & ADVANCED

15. The truth table showing the truth values of hypoth- EXERCISE - 4
eses and conclusion is as given below : Part # I : AIEEE/JEE-MAIN

Hypothes es Conclus ion 1.  p  (q  p) is false


p q r ~q p ~q S1 S2 S3 S  p is true and (q  p) is false. which is not
(p ~q) r p q q p r possible.
T T T F F T T T T  So p  (q  p) is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
T T F F F T T T F  Critical
again p  (p  q) is false
T F T T T T T T T  Rows
T F F T T F T T F p is true and (p  q) is false. Which is not
F T T F F T T F T possible.
F T F F F T T F F So p  (p  q) is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
F F T T F T F T T
F F F T F T F T F Hence p  (q  p)  p  (p  q)

2. Given r : ~p  q
statement-I rqp
We observe that there are three critical rows, namely
statement-II r  (p  ~q)
I, II, & III such that the conclusion is not true in the
IInd row. Hence the given argument is invalid.
p q ~ p ~ q ( ~ p  q) q  p (p  ~ q)
T T F F F T F
T F F T T T T
F T T F T T T
F F T T F F F

Hence Statement-I is false and Statement-II is true.

3. statement-I : ~(p ~q) is equivalent to pq


statement-II : ~(p ~q) is a tautology.

p q ~ q (p  q) (p  ~ q) ~ (p  ~ q)
T T F T F T
T F T F T F
F T F F T F
F F T T F T

Hence statement-1 is true, statement-2 is false.

4. Given S  R and

p = There is a rational number x S such that x > 0


then ~p : Any rational number x S such that x  0
i.e. ~p : Every rational number x S satisfy x  0
5. Given Statement :

66
MATHEMATICAL REASONING

(p  ~ r)  q
Negations of p  q are
~ (p q), ~ (q p),
~ p q and ~ q p
Hence negations of given statement
are ~(q  (p  ~ r)) and ~ (p  ~ r) q

6. [p  (p  q)]  q
[p  (~p  q)]  q
[(p ~p) (p  q)]  q
[c  (p  q)]  q

p  ~ p  c  contradiction
 (p q)  q 
 c  p p
 ~(p q) q
 (~p ~q) q
 ~p (q ~ q)
 ~p(t)  tautology

9. ~ S (~ r S)

S r ~r ~r S ~ S ~ S  (~ r  S) ~ (~ S  (~ r  S))
T T F F F F T
T F T T F T F
F T F F T T F
F F T F T T F

10. (p~ q) q(~ p q)


= [(p q) (~ q q)] (~ p q)
= [(p q) t](~p q)
= (p q) (~p q)
= [(p q ~p) (p q q)]
= (t q) (p q) = t (p q) = p q

67

You might also like