MATHEMATICAL REASONING
HINTS & SOLUTIONS
EXERCISE - 1 17. (p q) (q r) is false
Single Choice
(p q) and (q r) both are false
6. p and r both are false or q is false.
otherwise (p q) (q r) is true
p q ~p p q ~(p q) ~p q
T T F T F F
18. The negation of ‘’Everyone in Germany speaks German’’
T F F F T T
F T T F T T is - there is at least one person in Germany who does not
F F T T F F
speak German.
7. Both statements p and q are true 20. ~(p (q r)) p ~(q r)
so p q and q p ( ~(p q) p ~q)
p q p (~q ~r)
8. When p and q both are true then 21. ~q ~p ~(~q)~p ( p q ~ p q)
~(p q) and (~p ~q) both are false q~p
i.e. ~(p q) (~p ~q) is true ~pq (by commutative law)
pq ( p q = ~p q)
when p and q both are false then
Hence pq~q~p
~(p q) is false and (~p ~q) is true
i.e. ~(p q) (~p ~q) is false 26. Let p, q, r three statement defined as
Hence ~(p q) (~p ~q) is neither tautology nor p : a number N is divisible by 15
contradiction. q : number N is divisible by 5
r : number N is divisible by 3
10. p (q r) is false Here given statement is p (q r)
p is true and (q r) is false Here negative of above statement is
p is true, q and r both are false ~(p (q r)) p (~(q r)
i.e. p (q r) is false when truth values of p, q, r are p (~ q ~ r)
T, F, F resp. otherwise it is true. i.e. A number is divisible by 15 and it is not divisible by
5 and 3.
11. Let p, q, r be the three statements such that
31. (~ T F) ~T T
p : x = 5, q : y = –2 and r : x – 2y = 9 (F F) F T
Here given statement is (p q) r and its contrapositive FF T
is ~r ~(p q) F T
i.e. ~r (~p ~q) i.e. if x – 2y 9 then x 5 35. (~p ~q) (p ~q)
or y –2 (~p ~q) (~q p) (by commutative law)
~p [~q (~q p)] (by Associative law)
12. Let S(p, q) (p ~q) ~p
~p [(~q ~q) p] (by Associative law)
S(~p, ~q) (~p q) p ~p (~q p) ( p p = p)
Now S*(~p, ~q) (~p q) p ~p (p ~q) (by commutative law)
and ~S(p, q) ~[(p ~q) ~p] ~(p ~q) p (~p p) ~q (by Associative law)
(~p q) p t ~q t t is a tautology
Hence (~p ~q) (p ~q) is a tautology.
Hence S*(~p, ~q) ~S(p, q)
63
MATHS FOR JEE MAINS & ADVANCED
37. (p q) p is false p q r (p q) r
(p q) is true and p is false T T T T
T T F F
which is not possible p q (i) (ii) T F T T
T T F T F T T T
so (p q) p is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
(iv) T F T T (v) T F F T
F T T T F T F F
39. [(pp) q] p (pq)p ( p p p)
F F T T F F T T
when p is false and q is true (or false) then F F F F
(p q) is true i.e. (p q) p is false
p q r (p q) r
Hence [(p p) q] p is not a tautology.
T T T T
T T F F
EXERCISE - 2 T F T T
Part # II : Comprehension F T T T
(vi) T F F F
1. If p then q means p only if q
F T F F
2. If p then q p is sufficient for q F F T F
3. p is false, q is false so p q is true. F F F T
4. Fallacy
EXERCISE - 3
Subjective Type 5. Let p be the statement “Traders do not reduce the prices”
and q be the statement “Government takes action against
them”
p q (i) (ii) p q (i) (ii) The first statement in symbolic form is p q and the
T T T T T T T F second statement is ~(p ~q).
T F F F T F F F In order to check the equivalence of the above state-
2. (i) (ii)
F T T F F T F F ments let us prepare the following truth table.
F F T F F F T T
p q ~ q p ~ q ~ (p ~ q) p q
T T F F T T
p q r (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) T F T T F F
F T F F T T
T T T T F F F
F F T F T T
T T F F T T F
T F T T F F T Clearly, ~ q ~p and ~(p ~q) have same truth values
F T T T T F T for all the values of p and q. Hence, the two
(iii) T F F T F T F statements are equivalent.
F T F F T T F Aliter : We have, ~(p ~q) (~p q) (p q)
F F T T T T T Hence the two statements are equivalent.
F F F F T T F
6. True
64
MATHEMATICAL REASONING
7.
13. p : it rains tomorrow
p q ~p ~q ~q p p ~p (~q p) (p ~p)
T T F F F T T
q : I shall carry my umbrella
T F F T T T T r : cloth is mended
F T T F F T T
F F T T F T T P : p (r q)
Q : p ~r
8. Given Statement is
S : ~q
(ABC is right angled at B) (AB2 + BC2 = AC2)
P : T, Q : T S:T
(A) Its converse is :
S not valid
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2 = AC2) ABC is right
angled at B. p q r P Q S
T T T T F F
(B) Its contradiction is : T T F T T F
T F T F F T
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2 = AC2) ABC is not
T F F T T T
right angled at B. F T T T F F
F T F T F F
(C) Its contrapositive is :
F F T T F T
(In ABC, AB2 + BC2 AC2) ABC is not F F F T F T
right angled at B. 14. Consider the following statements :
10. The compound statement is : p : Hema is not in team A
“25 is a multiple of 5 or 8” q : Rita is not in team B.
Let us assume that the statement q is false i.e. 25 is r : Mamta is in team A.
not a multiple of 8. Clearly, p is true. We have, S1 : p ~q, S2 : q r, S : r q
Thus, if we assume that q is false, then p is true. In order to test the validity of the given argument,
Hence, the compound statement is true i.e. valid. let us first prepare the truth table for S1 S2 S as
given below.
11. Let q and r be the statements given by
Truth table for S1 S2 S
q : If x is an integer and x2 is even
r : x is an even integer p q r ~q S1 :p~q S2 :qr S1 S2 S:q r S1 S2 S
then p : “If q, then r” T T T F F T F T T
If possible, let r be false then r is false T T F F F F F T T
x is not an even integer T F T T T T T T T
x is an odd integer T F F T T T T F F
x = (2n + 1) for some integer n F T T F T T T T T
x2 = 4n2 + 4n + 1 F T F F T F F T T
2
x = 4n(n + 1) + 1 F F T T T T T T T
x2 is an odd integer F F F T T T T F F
q is false We observe that the last column of the truth table
[ 4n(n + 1) is even] contains F also. Thus S1 S2 S is not a tautol-
ogy hence argument is invalid.
Thus, r is false q is false
Hence, p : “If q, then r” is a true statement.
12. (p q) [~ p (p ~ q)]
= (p q) [(~ p p) (~ p ~ q)] = (p q)
[t (~ p ~ q)] = (p q) (~ p ~ q)
= (p q) [ ~ ( p q)] = t
also (~p q) t = t
65
MATHS FOR JEE MAINS & ADVANCED
15. The truth table showing the truth values of hypoth- EXERCISE - 4
eses and conclusion is as given below : Part # I : AIEEE/JEE-MAIN
Hypothes es Conclus ion 1. p (q p) is false
p q r ~q p ~q S1 S2 S3 S p is true and (q p) is false. which is not
(p ~q) r p q q p r possible.
T T T F F T T T T So p (q p) is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
T T F F F T T T F Critical
again p (p q) is false
T F T T T T T T T Rows
T F F T T F T T F p is true and (p q) is false. Which is not
F T T F F T T F T possible.
F T F F F T T F F So p (p q) is always true i.e. it is a tautology.
F F T T F T F T T
F F F T F T F T F Hence p (q p) p (p q)
2. Given r : ~p q
statement-I rqp
We observe that there are three critical rows, namely
statement-II r (p ~q)
I, II, & III such that the conclusion is not true in the
IInd row. Hence the given argument is invalid.
p q ~ p ~ q ( ~ p q) q p (p ~ q)
T T F F F T F
T F F T T T T
F T T F T T T
F F T T F F F
Hence Statement-I is false and Statement-II is true.
3. statement-I : ~(p ~q) is equivalent to pq
statement-II : ~(p ~q) is a tautology.
p q ~ q (p q) (p ~ q) ~ (p ~ q)
T T F T F T
T F T F T F
F T F F T F
F F T T F T
Hence statement-1 is true, statement-2 is false.
4. Given S R and
p = There is a rational number x S such that x > 0
then ~p : Any rational number x S such that x 0
i.e. ~p : Every rational number x S satisfy x 0
5. Given Statement :
66
MATHEMATICAL REASONING
(p ~ r) q
Negations of p q are
~ (p q), ~ (q p),
~ p q and ~ q p
Hence negations of given statement
are ~(q (p ~ r)) and ~ (p ~ r) q
6. [p (p q)] q
[p (~p q)] q
[(p ~p) (p q)] q
[c (p q)] q
p ~ p c contradiction
(p q) q
c p p
~(p q) q
(~p ~q) q
~p (q ~ q)
~p(t) tautology
9. ~ S (~ r S)
S r ~r ~r S ~ S ~ S (~ r S) ~ (~ S (~ r S))
T T F F F F T
T F T T F T F
F T F F T T F
F F T F T T F
10. (p~ q) q(~ p q)
= [(p q) (~ q q)] (~ p q)
= [(p q) t](~p q)
= (p q) (~p q)
= [(p q ~p) (p q q)]
= (t q) (p q) = t (p q) = p q
67