Middleware Use & Operation Learning Guide
Middleware Use & Operation Learning Guide
MIDDLEWARE
USE AND
OPERATION
SECTION 1
MIDDLEWARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
SECTION 2
TEST MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
SECTION 3
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
SECTION 4
EXPERT DECISION RULES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
SECTION 5
QUALIT Y MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
SECTION 6
ANALYZER AND L ABORATORY AUTOMATION
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
SECTION 7
REPORTS AND ANALY TICS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
APPENDIX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
L E A RNING GUIDE
Middleware has played a critical role in helping to support the efficiency of clinical laboratories for several
years. When it first emerged, the primary value was in connectivity, simply enabling transmission of orders
and results between automated analyzers and the Laboratory Information System. Middleware platforms
have since transformed to expand their value and support the needs of the clinical laboratory in response to
the evolving healthcare landscape.
Diverse and changing demands, including increasing workload, faster turnaround times for patient results,
and regulatory and financial constraints, have created an opportunity for holistic solutions that optimize
clinical laboratory operations. For laboratories to adapt and succeed, they need to understand the capabilities
of Information Technology and explore the role of Middleware in addressing the many challenges of the
modern clinical laboratory.
Each section provides information on different middleware solutions for laboratory workflow and
operations. Middleware platforms vary in their capabilities. The main solutions presented in this learning
guide are advanced options.
SECTION 1 introduces middleware, its fit in the hierarchy of different information systems that support the
management of patient tests, and outlines its capabilities.
SECTION 2 reviews the laboratory test management process and the associated data managed by middleware.
Although test management is discussed in all sections, it’s important to look at this topic independently to
understand middleware’s role in this critical task.
SECTION 3 provides an overview of sample management and some of the main middleware solutions
available to help laboratories better navigate sample logistics and workflow.
SECTION 4 details a fundamental solution offered by middleware – expert decision rules. Key concepts are
defined, approaches to rules, variables to consider and their impact on laboratory workflow are summarized.
SECTION 5 focuses on the role of middleware in quality management, including quality control and moving
average monitoring.
SECTION 6 discusses equipment management solutions for automated analyzers, highlighting Laboratory
Automation Management systems and their interactions with middleware.
SECTION 7 summarizes some of the analytics and reporting capabilities that can be provided by middleware
to help present and make sense of the data processed by laboratories.
At the end of each section, you will find a short quiz to help reinforce and test your knowledge of the
information covered in the section.
MIDDL E WA RE
WHAT IS MIDDLEWARE?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
MIDDLEWARE AND INTEROPERABILITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
MIDDLEWARE AND THE HIERARCHY OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
MIDDLEWARE CAPABILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
MIDDLEWARE OVERVIEW
WHAT IS MIDDLEWARE?
In the clinical laboratory environment, Middleware is defined as software that sits between automated
analyzers and the Laboratory Information System (LIS), enabling transmission and integration of test orders
and results between these systems.1 Middleware was initially developed to manage laboratory connectivity
by supporting seamless integration and communication between instruments and the LIS. However, more
features were added to middleware, and today, middleware can further enhance the capability of analyzers,
as well as optimize the performance of the LIS.2 Advanced middleware solutions have the potential to
significantly improve laboratory operations with multidimensional capabilities. Major middleware functions
include automated test order management, automatic results validation and reporting, and quality control
management that enable laboratories to more easily comply with local and international regulatory
requirements. With these capabilities, middleware has quickly become a central information solution in
laboratories, transforming the complex information business of the modern clinical laboratories into a
scalable, highly efficient and highly productive operation.3
Interoperability is the ability to share data automatically and seamlessly among devices and information
systems.4 Middleware enables a single point of communication with the laboratory’s main information
system, the Laboratory Information System, supporting centralized management and monitoring of
instruments.
A Hospital Information System is a computer-based medical record system that organizes inpatient health
care records. It is a central repository for patient information from ancillary systems, including the LIS and
pharmacy, within a health system.6 The HIS manages tasks and activities such as order entry for lab tests
and medications, as well as operating room and diagnostic imaging schedules. The HIS stores health care
records such as lab results, pre- and post-operative reports, nursing observations and reports, as well as
prescriptions.
An Electronic Medical Record System is a computer-based patient record system that manages patient
health records for a single physician office or a multi-disciplinary outpatient clinic that is affiliated with a
larger inpatient health system.6 The EMR maintains patient demographics, diagnostic information from the
LIS and medication history.
Orders
Results
Outpatients EMR
Orders Orders
Results Results
Results
Inpatients HIS
Figure 1.1 Communication diagram showing orders and results flow between middleware, LIS, instruments, EMR and HIS
MIDDLEWARE CAPABILITIES
There are several providers offering a variety of middleware applications; however, they vary in functionality.
Some middleware applications offer a wide range of solutions to address the diverse and complex data
management and workflow challenges of the core laboratory.7 Every core laboratory will have different needs
and gaps that may be addressed by middleware. There are also instrument vendors that offer middleware
solutions. Abbott’s AlinIQ Analyzer Management System (AMS) offers a middleware solution with open
connectivity that enables integration with different analyzers.
Middleware applications host a variety of capabilities to assist the Hematology laboratory and other
disciplines with the management of data, tasks and processes. These capabilities can be categorized into six
main groups:
1.
EXPERT DECISION RULES
- Automate workflow and data management processes without the need for manual
intervention
2. TEST MANAGEMENT
- Automates the analysis of patient test orders and results
3. SAMPLE MANAGEMENT
- Manages sample workflow, logistics and archiving to optimize sample processing
4. QUALIT Y MANAGEMENT
- Monitors assay and instrument quality performance to help ensure accurate results
6. REPORTS
- Track and summarize data from connected analyzers
1. Middleware is defined as software that sits between automated analyzers and the Laboratory Information
System, enabling transmission and integration of test orders and results between these systems.
A True
B False
2. Which of the following health care information system communicates directly with middleware?
A Automates the analysis of patient test orders and results _____ 1. Expert Decision Rules
D Track and summarize data from connected analyzers _____ 4. Test Management
F Manages sample workflow, logistics, and archiving to optimize 6. Analyzer and Automation
sample processing _____ Management
T ES T M A N AG E MEN T
THE BASICS OF TEST MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
MAJOR TEST MANAGEMENT MIDDLEWARE CAPABILITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
KEY TEST MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
TEST MANAGEMENT
The primary purpose of the clinical laboratory is to manage the translation of physician test orders into
accurate and precise test results. This requires the coordination of staff, automated analyzers, patient
specimens, supplies and various procedures needed for the processing of test orders and results.8 With this
coordination comes the generation and exchange of a vast amount of data. Implementation of middleware
can help consolidate and manage this data.
Test management is one of the main capabilities of middleware applications. The test management feature
coordinates the tasks required to translate test orders to patient results. Extended capabilities include:
A robust middleware solution can automate pre- and post-analytical manual tasks and processes, which
reduces hands-on time with samples, analyzers and software interfaces.9 Automated test management
capabilities for ordering, processing and reviewing patient tests and results include:
• Order entry and reporting – enables entry of new patient orders, as a backup to the
Laboratory Information System.
• Test results autoverification – automates the review and release of test results according to
standardized rules.
• Manual test results review – provides a centralized workspace for the laboratory staff to
review and release patient results.
Advanced test management middleware solutions can provide the laboratory staff with actionable
information on patient results. Some benefits include:
• Dynamic worklists with up-to-date information on required activities for pending test orders
and results. A worklist is a list of open or incomplete orders or results that is pending further
action prior to release to the LIS. Worklists can also filter test orders and results by analyzer,
test, quality control or by department, such as Hematology, Chemistry, Immunoassay
or Serology.
• Alerts to draw attention to data that may impact result quality, such as quality control results.
Middleware can streamline the complexity of Hematology workflow. One of the advanced middleware
solutions for the review and release of Hematology results brings all the relevant information to the
laboratory staff on one screen, including:
Figure 2.1 Profile View from Abbott’s AlinIQ Analyzer Management System (AMS) showing consolidated Hematology results. For
illustrative purposes only.
While some middleware applications provide a variety of test management options, highly customizable
solutions offer flexibility to support the unique needs of the laboratory.2 A properly utilized middleware
solution allows users to customize their own views or workspaces to display relevant information, including
specimen and patient information, tests held for manual review or results status for one or multiple analyzers.
1. The test management feature coordinates the tasks required to translate test orders to patient results.
A True
B False
C Automates the review and release of test results according to 3. Results Review
standardized rules _____
3. Which of the following information can be included with results for Hematology samples?
A Patient demographics
B Sample information
S A MPL E M A N AG E MEN T
DEFINITION OF SAMPLE MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
THE IMPORTANCE OF AUTOMATED SAMPLE MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
THE MAIN SAMPLE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT
Ensuring patient safety through accurate accessioning, coordination and processing of specimens is a priority
for clinical laboratories. Laboratory staff operate in a very dynamic and distracting environment. Mistakes
can lead to adverse events, such as patient sample mismatch, inaccurate testing and incomplete results.
These mistakes can further impact patient care by delaying diagnosis and treatment decisions. Middleware
can help reduce the risk of human error by automating the coordination and tracking of patient samples, and
improving sample traceability through advanced sample management solutions.
The process of tracking and handling information associated to samples such as patient, specimen and
test information, is referred to as sample management.10 Middleware can provide automated and highly
customizable end-to-end solutions that allow laboratories to display, track and manage samples or specimens
across the health system. A comprehensive sample tracking solution can streamline the entire sample
management workflow, including:
1. SAMPLE LOGISTICS
Track samples at a single laboratory location or between sites for health systems
that transport samples between sites. Advanced middleware solutions use sensors
to monitor sample container temperature during shipment. This can enable
laboratories to ensure sample quality and integrity by tracking sample transport
times and temperatures between sites.
2. SAMPLE WORKFLOW
Monitors sample movement throughout the entire workflow process and between
instruments. This can help the laboratory staff determine where a sample is located
and what work remains, which also helps to monitor results turnaround time.
3. SAMPLE STORAGE
Records storage location of samples in refrigerators or cold rooms for future
retrieval if needed. Some middleware solutions can provide alerts to the laboratory
staff if they are attempting to store a sample that has incomplete tests or additional
testing is required.
With advanced middleware solutions, laboratories can streamline the tasks and processes involved in test
order and specimen management, reduce the risk of human error and even monitor sample traceability in
real time.
1. Sample management is the process of tracking and handling information associated to a sample such as
patient, specimen and test information.
A True
B False
A Misidentification of samples
B Inaccurate testing
C Incomplete testing
3. The ability to track the location of a sample is considered a sample logistics middleware capability.
A True
B False
Rules can be applied to different data elements and processes in the sample testing process, such as orders,
results, and specimen processing status (e.g., specimen received).
The expert rules found in middleware essentially emulate advice that the Technologist would provide,
enabling automation of manual tasks and processes associated with the laboratory workflow. In the
Hematology laboratory environment, these processes include managing CBC and differential test results,
from reviewing results to determine if they can be released to the LIS or further action is needed, to
reviewing results against established laboratory guidelines to determine if it’s clinically necessary to perform
a slide review or manual differential.
Perhaps the most common uses of rules in middleware is for autoverification and autovalidation.
Autoverification is the process where test results are automatically reviewed and released to the LIS or
held for manual review based on a predetermined set of rules established by the laboratory. Autoverification
eliminates the need for human intervention.11 As results are filed into the middleware from the analyzer, they
are automatically reviewed against predefined conditions (rules), and either automatically released to the
LIS or held for manual review by the Technologists if there are exceptions.
Compare with
previous; release Is this
if within YES a rerun?
acceptable limits
NO
YES
Hold for
manual review; Does result
add additional have instrument flags
YES
autoverification (or those deemed Round result to
actions here relevant?) the correct
based on flag decimal place
NO
YES
Does the Does the Is the Are previous
result exceed result exceed result Is this the first result and current
NO NO analysis on this NO
high AMR low AMR numerical? result within
(“>#.##”)? (“<#.##”)? patient? acceptable
limits?
Parameter- Parameter-
dependent dependent
options (hold for Is this result Hold for
options (hold for within the
manual review, NO manual review
review, rerun, verification
rerun, dilute, or release)
or release) range?
YES
Does the
result compare
well with other NO Hold all related YES
related assays for
parameters? manual review
YES
Result autoverified
Figure 4.1 An example of a sequential set of autoverification rules for Hematology results release.11 Although multiple results are
transmitted from the instrument as part of the CBC results for each sample, middleware evaluates each result independently as shown
here. Advanced middleware decision rules can manage this evaluation and complex combination of steps.
Action
Hold sample results (for manual review)
Figure 4.2 Example of an autoverification rule. There are 3 conditions within this rule. Condition 1 and condition 2 are evaluated
first; these conditions look at the absolute value for the Neutrophil result and whether the result is less than 1 or greater than 20. If
condition 1 or condition 2 is true, then condition 3 is evaluated to determine if this is the first occurrence of the Neutrophil result for
the patient. The rule will perform both action (hold sample results) if condition 1 OR condition 2 is TRUE, and condition 3 is TRUE.
Autovalidation is the process whereby sample results are validated automatically based on a predetermined
set of conditions. These conditions may be established by a combination of laboratory standard operating
procedures, instrument vendor recommendations and/or published guidelines, such as the 41 Consensus
Rules developed by the International Society for Laboratory Hematology (ISLH).12 These rules automatically
review and validate CBC and differential results to take actions that might include:
• Ordering a rerun
• Reflexing to a slide review
• Adding comments to notify the laboratory and/or clinical staff
Middleware platforms with sophisticated rules-based solutions, offer the ISLH Consensus Rules as a
predefined rules package for Hematology laboratories. This rules package is typically preloaded with the 41
Consensus Rules and are often configurable so that laboratories may customize parameters and values to
meet their operating procedures and patient population needs. Some of the criteria evaluated in the rules set
include:
• Analytical measurement ranges
• First time events
• Patient age
• Sample age
• Various instrument and morphological flags
• Delta checks
Actions
Hold sample results + Order slide review
Figure 4.3 Example of an autovalidation rule. There are 3 conditions within this rule. Condition 1 and condition 2 are evaluated first;
these conditions look at the value for the WBC result and whether the result is less than 4 or greater than 30. If condition 1 or
condition 2 is true, then condition 3 is evaluated to determine if this is the first occurrence of the WBC result for the patient. The rule
will perform both actions (hold sample results and order slide review) if condition 1 OR condition 2 is TRUE, and condition 3 is TRUE
1. Automation of the results review process can significantly improve results turnaround
time.
2. Elimination of the review of routine, manual results can improve productivity by allowing
the laboratory staff to focus on actual sample exceptions.
Advanced rules solutions are typically customizable and can be adapted and revised as the workflow of the
laboratory evolves.
1. Rules are logic statements that take the form: IF some condition is TRUE, THEN perform a certain
ACTION
A True
B False
3. Autoverification is the process where test results are automatically released to the LIS or held for manual
review, without the need for human intervention, based on a predetermined set of rules established by the
laboratory.
A True
B False
4. Autovalidation is the process where sample results are automatically validated based on a predetermined
set of conditions. These conditions may be established by a combination of laboratory standard operating
procedures, instrument vendor recommendations and/or published guidelines, and direct actions that
may include rerunning a sample or reflexing to a slide review.
A True
B False
5. From the list below, please select some of the key benefits of implementing rules in the Hematology
laboratory.
QUA L I T Y M A N AG E MEN T
QUALITY MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
PATIENT MOVING AVERAGES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
QUALIT Y MANAGEMENT
International regulatory organizations that govern clinical laboratory accreditation require laboratories to
maintain quality management programs.14 These programs, which ensure that quality and safety standards
are upheld, are carefully managed and kept up-to-date to monitor the performance of integrated processes,
procedures, test data and automated analyzers in the laboratory. Middleware can help laboratories with their
quality management programs through the automation and integration of the following functions:
Quality control (QC) helps ensure that the desired level of integrity, precision and accuracy is achieved in
patient test results.14 Middleware can enable the integration of QC data from connected analyzers, allowing
for centralized management. Automated QC solutions provided by middleware are designed to compensate
for deficiencies in a laboratory’s quality control process and reduce associated risk. For example, they
can consolidate monitoring of QC data and automatically change the analytical workflow to prevent the
automatic release of results and block new testing, in the event of a QC rule failure.
The moving averages function in some middleware solutions has the potential to offer a robust approach to
a laboratory’s QC program. In the typical setup of a middleware application, the user establishes different
protocols for test runs for a defined analyzer and then configures target means. Target means are used as
the baseline to create alerts. The flow of analyzer data into middleware allows for continuous monitoring of
moving averages trends and alerts, as well as comparison of CBC results from multiple Hematology analyzers.
These capabilities enable real-time monitoring of patient results and support the laboratory with achieving its
desired level of sample testing quality.
Middleware solutions designed with moving average capabilities enable the laboratory to more seamlessly
assess when the analyzers are performing correctly. The following are some of the benefits of middleware to
optimize laboratories’ quality management program.
• Provide alerts to operators when unexpected performance shifts occur
• Enable preemptive intervention between periodic QC testing
• Automatically disable an analyzer or assay generating QC errors
• Provide notifications based on predetermined errors and warnings
The QC program in the core laboratory requires a comprehensive management of not just the analytic process
of testing materials with a known value. A solid QC program also requires a broader view that encompasses
every task associated to testing, from test requisition to the final report.15 A comprehensive and properly
utilized middleware solution can help streamline these complex processes over the entire testing process.
A True
B False
A N A LY ZER A ND
L A B OR ATO RY
AU TOM AT ION S YS T E M
M A N AG E MEN T
ANALYZER AND LABORATORY AUTOMATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT . . . . . . . . 29
LABORATORY AUTOMATION SYSTEM DEFINITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
MIDDLEWARE INTEGRATION AND COMMUNICATION WITH
LABORATORY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
THE BENEFITS OF LABORATORY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Middleware with robust analyzer management capabilities enables the laboratory to manage and monitor
performance of analyzer systems from a central location. For example:
• Provides readiness status and lists current work in progress of connected analyzers.
• Provides insights into connected analyzers enabling access to actionable information for
real-time management of performance.
• Enables remote access to analyzers to allow for the enabling or disabling of specific analyzers.
• Schedules maintenance tasks for laboratory equipment such as calibration, preventative
maintenance or other user-defined events per the laboratory’s or equipment manufacturer’s
standard operating procedures.
In addition to providing a wide range of analyzer management capabilities, some middleware providers
offer more comprehensive solutions that can integrate and manage Laboratory Automation Systems (LAS)
or automation track systems. A Laboratory Automation System is designed to automate pre-analytical and
post-analytical processing and sample handling, consolidating multiple analyzers and sample processing
equipment into a unified system in the clinical laboratory.16 LAS offer productivity gains through flexibility
and efficiency in sample management that can help laboratories adapt to changing demands in sample
throughput.
The implementation of a LAS with a robust middleware solution can help laboratories achieve their
operational productivity goals. Considering the total testing process, an efficient automation system offers
increased testing capacity, improved turnaround time and reduction in human error.17
Integration of a LAS, middleware and automated Hematology analyzers can help the laboratory realize
significant cost savings while enabling the staff to focus on the true exceptions and more complex tasks that
will ultimately improve the quality of patient care and lead to faster, more actionable results.
In addition to managing the processing of orders and returning results received from the connected
instruments through the LIS, the middleware controls the routing of tubes or samples to the various modules
of the LAS. The sample routing capability provides instructions to the LAS to determine the path a sample
must follow as it travels around the track. The routing of samples on a LAS track is managed by rules defined
in the middleware. Typically, a laboratory provides inputs to a middleware Informatics Specialist to define
routing rules consistent with the laboratory’s needs. The middleware can also handle load balancing to ensure
sample processing and testing are managed efficiently at the different modules on the track, including the
connected analyzers. A comprehensive LAS may include the following sample processing modules in addition
to the connected analytical instruments:
• Input Output Module – provides a loading and unloading point for samples using racks
• Centrifuge Module – automates centrifugation of samples
• Decapper Module – removes tube caps
• Sealer Module – seals tubes after analytical processing
• Storage and Retrieval Module – stores sample tubes in a temperature-controlled, protected
environment
• Desealer Module – removes the seal from sample tubes
• Track Module – controls the movement of sample tubes in their individual sample carriers; sample
carriers transport tubes around the track to the different modules
• Interface to connected analytical instruments – provides the path to move the tubes to the analyzer
• Aliquoter Module – generates secondary tubes from primary sample tubes
Results Results
Sample Status Sample Status
LIS Middleware Laboratory Automation System
Figure 6.1 Communication diagram showing orders and results flow between middleware and the Laboratory Automation System
B To the middleware
C To the EMR
D To the HIS
3. Middleware provides routing information to the LAS to determine where to send sample tubes
on the track.
A True
B False
REP ORT S A ND A N A LY T IC S
REPORTS AND ANALYTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
TYPES OF MIDDLEWARE REPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
THE VALUE OF AVAILABLE MANAGEMENT REPORTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
THE KEY METRICS THAT LABORATORIES USE TO TRACK PERFORMANCE. . . . . 34
During the processing of one patient sample, hundreds of data points may be generated. This information is
used to not only direct patient care decisions, but also to monitor the laboratory’s performance against internal
and external benchmarks. Hematology laboratories, for example, generate a tremendous volume of test results
data from automated analyzers, including CBCs. Unique aspects of Hematology are the CBC scatterplots as
well as morphological images from slide review which are linked to each patient sample. There are multiple
reporting and analytics functionality that can help the laboratories track and visualize these data.
The different reports and statistics offered by middleware can be extensive. The following is a list of some of
the popular management reports provided by middleware.
• Turnaround time (TAT) analysis – tracks the time it takes for the lab to process a patient test
request from sample receipt in the laboratory to results reported to the clinical staff. The timeliness
of laboratories to report final test results is expressed as the turnaround time, and often used as a key
effectiveness metric to measure laboratory performance.
Figure 7.1 Turnaround time (TAT) report from Abbott’s AlinIQ Analyzer Management System (AMS).
For illustrative purposes only.
Figure 7.2 Workload report from Abbott’s AlinIQ Analyzer Management System (AMS). For illustrative purposes only.
• Analyzer utilization – tracks volumes, shifts and trends in test runs and analyzer performance.
Figure 7.3 Analyzer utilization report from Abbott’s AlinIQ Analyzer Management System (AMS). For illustrative purposes only.
With these metrics readily available, laboratories can more easily derive actionable insights from their
test results and associated activities to achieve their efficiency and performance goals.18 The automated
analytics and reports provided by middleware offer essential tools to monitor and improve quality assurance
processes. By tracking, monitoring, verifying and improving the standard of performance of all the different
processes in sample testing operations, errors can be reduced, which can invariably lead to improved staff,
test and analyzer utilization.
1. The metrics provided by middleware reports can help laboratories better monitor performance.
A True
B False
2. Paxton, A. Beyond Connectivity: Middleware’s Shifting Shape. Cap Today 2016; Available at: [Link]
[Link]/beyond-connectivity-middlewares-shifting-shape/. Accessed February 10, 2020.
3. Paxton, A. Broadening the Productivity Spectrum with Middleware. Cap Today 2016; Available at: [Link]
[Link]/broadening-productivity-spectrum-middleware/. Accessed February 10, 2020.
4. Strengthening the Chain of Interoperability. CLN Stat. 2019; Available at: [Link]
stat/2019/february/21/strengthening-the-chain-of-interoperability. Accessed on February 10, 2020.
5. Laboratory Information System (LIS): Definition & Functions. [Link] 2018; Available at [Link]/academy/
lesson/[Link]. Accessed February 10, 2020..
6. Giokas D. EMR, EHR and PHR – and Now aEMR and H/HIS – What’s with these Systems? Canada Health Infoway
2016; Available at: [Link]
phr-and-now-aemr-and-h-his-what-s-with-these-systems. Accessed on February 12, 2020.
7. Levy G. Use of Middleware to Increase Clinical Laboratory Efficiency. LabThruPut 2012; Available at: https://
[Link]/use-of-middleware-to-increase-clinical-laboratory-efficiency/. Accessed February 14, 2020.
8. Selmyer J and Cloutier B. Interfacing the Clinical Laboratory: A Primer for LIS Managers. Med TechNet 1996.
9. Clifford LJ. Leveraging Automation and Middleware. Elite Healthcare 2012; Available at: [Link]
resource-center/laboratory/leveraging-automation-and-middleware/. Accessed February 17, 2020.
10. Best Practices for Sample Management. FreeLims 2019; Available at: [Link]
[Link]. Accessed March 2, 2020
11. Marquardt W. AUTO15: Autoverification of Medical Laboratory Results for Specific Disciplines. In. Vol 2019. 1st
edition ed: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2019.
12. Tate A. Autovalidation: What’s your number? Medical Laboratory Observer 2011; Available at: [Link]
[Link]/home/article/13004255/autovalidation-whats-your-number. Accessed on March 5, 2020.
13. Barnes P.W. et al. The International Consensus Group for Hematology Review: Suggested Criteria for Action
Following Automated CBC and WBC Differential Analysis. Carden Jennings Publishing Co., Ltd 2005. Laboratory
Hematology 11:83-90.
14. Valenstein P. Quality Management in Clinical Laboratories: Promoting Patient Safety Through Error Reduction and
Continuous Improvement. College of American Pathologists 2005.
15. MacCormack J. Laboratory Quality Control – From Error Reduction to Risk Management. Medical Laboratory
Observer 2019; Available at: [Link]
control-from-error-detection-to-risk-management. Accessed March 6, 2020.
16. Riben M. Laboratory Automation and Middleware. Surg Pathol Clin. 2015;8(2):175-186.
17. Ching Yaur J. Automated Testing in Hematology: The Role of Rules in Setting a Standard. Medical Laboratory
Observer 2015; Available at: [Link]
testing-in-hematology-the-role-of-rules-in-setting-a-standard. Accessed March 9, 2020.
18. Ziaugra K et al. Using Analytics to manage QA and reduce laboratory errors. Medical Laboratory Observer 2019;
Available at: [Link]
qa-and-reduce-laboratory-errors. Accessed March 17, 2020.
© 2023 Abbott. All rights reserved. All trademarks referenced are trademarks of either the Abbott group of
companies or their respective owners.
Alinity h-series is available in select countries, not including the US. Alinty hq is a Class I laser product.
For in vitro diagnostic use only. Refer to the Operations Manual for operational precautions, limitations, and
hazards. Alinity and related brand marks are trademarks of Abbott.
ADD-118411-GBL-EN 03/23.