Oral Presentation Rubric: (you need to cite the source when using)
Category 1-2 3-4 5-6
●Grammatical errors led to many minor difficulties or ●A few minor difficulties arose from not using ●Grammar was used to communicate effectively
Grammar, one major breakdown in communication proper grammar ●Vocabulary was used to express ideas eloquently
Vocabulary, & ●Some difficulties arose due to limited vocabulary ●Appropriate vocabulary was used with few minor ●Word choice and style showed highly effective for audience,
words choices
and/or bad diction difficulties purpose, & context
●Word choice and style was largely irrelevant to ● Word choice and style was generally appropriate
audience, purpose, context for audience, purpose, context
●Some effort was required to maintain fluency. There ●Some minor difficulties maintaining fluency were ●Student was fully fluent
Fluency, may have been a few long pauses evident ●Pronunciation was clear and inflection and expressions were used
Voice, & Timing ●Some communication problems arose due to ●No serious problems arose, but better to enhance communication
unclear pronunciation and/or lack of inflection, pronunciation, inflection, and/or non-verbal ●Speech was well-timed and at a rate that was easy to understand
and/or expression. communication could have made
●Rate was too fast; student was difficult to follow communication more efficient
and/or understand ●Rate was generally appropriate, causing only
minor difficulties in communication
●Body language, facial expressions and gestures lack ●Body language, gestures, and facial expressions ●Body language, gestures, and facial expressions add greatly to the
Body Language, variety and spontaneity compliment message message
Eye Contact, & ●Eye contact with audience less than 50% of the time ●Eye contact with audience less than 75% of the ●Eye contact with audience virtually all the time (except for brief
Oral Presentation Skills
●Somewhat polished presentations that was time glances at notes)
somewhat ineffective at engaging the audience ●Polished presentation that was generally able to ●Well-rehearsed, highly polished presentation that maintained
but reliance on notes was evident maintain audience engagement audience engagement throughout
and little reliance on notes
Content ●Vague or undeveloped comparison of ideas. ●Solid explanation that clearly compares the ideas ● Exceptional explanation that thoroughly compares ideas
●Unclear description of the complex ideas and ●Adequately describes the complex ideas and ●Thoroughly describes the complex ideas and perspectives in
perspectives in selected items.. perspectives in selected items.. selected items.
●Below-average or non-specific application of ●Adequate, clear application of knowledge, skills ●Sophisticated application of knowledge, skills and understanding
knowledge, skills and understanding of and understanding of concepts. of concepts
concepts.
Please circle only one number per category
Tam dear: Kindly simplify your evaluation rubric: 50% related to lesson plan/presentation and 50% related to you
as presentator. Mira has an easy to use evaluation, ask her. ^_^
