References 331
2 Anlauf, H. (2015). Fest/Flüssig-Trennung auf der ACHEMA. Chemie Ingenieur
Technik 85 (9): 1134–1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201500102.
3 Sun, D. and Stylios, G.K. (2006). Fabric surface properties affected by low
temperature plasma treatment. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 173
(2): 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.022.
4 Morent, R., De Geyter, N., Verschuren, J. et al. (2008). Non-thermal plasma
treatment of textiles. Surface and Coatings Technology 202 (14): 3427–3449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.027.
5 Anlauf, H. (2006). Fest/Flüssig-Trennung. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 78 (10):
1492–1499.
6 Anovitz, L.M. and Cole, D.R. (2015). Characterization and analysis of poros-
ity and pore structures. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 80: 61–164.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2015.80.04.
7 Landis, E.N. and Keane, D.T. (2010). X-ray microtomography. Materials Char-
acterization 61 (12): 1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.012.
8 Rideal, G.R. and Sorey, J. (2002). A new high precision method of calibrating
filters. Journal of the Filtration Society 2 (3): 18–20.
9 Rideal, G.R. (2006). Analysis and monitoring: how to improve precision pore
size measurement. Filtration & Separation 43 (3): 28–29.
10 Gupta, J.K. (2002). Characterization of pore structure of filtration media.
Fluid/Particle Separation Journal 3: 227–241.
11 ASTM F316-3 (2003). Standard Test Method for Pore Size Characteristics
of Membrane Filters by Bubble Point and Mean Flow Pore Test. West Con-
shohocken, PA: ASTM International.
12 Li, D., Frey, M.F., and Joo, Y.L. (2006). Characterization of nanofibrous mem-
branes with capillary flow porometry. Journal of Membrane Science 286 (1–2):
104–114.
13 Hernández, A., Calvo, J.I., Prádanos, P., and Tejerina, F. (1996). Pore size dis-
tributions in microporous membranes. A critical analysis of the bubble point
extended method. Journal of Membrane Science 112 (1): 1–12.
14 Kolb, H.E., Schmitt, R., Dittler, A., and Kasper, G. (2018). On the accuracy of
capillary flow porometry for fibrous filter media. Separation and Purification
Technology 199: 198–205.
15 Herper, D. (2016). Verbesserung des Bubble-Point-Messverfahrens an
Drahtgeweben mit Hilfe numerischer Berechnungsmodelle. Filtrieren und
Separieren 30 (6): 389–392.
16 Tittel, R. and Berndt, R. (1973). Zur Bestimmung er Trennteilchengröße von
Filtergeweben. Faserforschung und Textiltechnik 24 (12): 505–510.
17 Heidenreich, E., Tittel, R., and Nerndt, R. (1977). Zur Charakterisierung von
Tressengeweben als Filtermitel. Aufbereitungstechnik 18 (7): 353–357.
18 Anlauf, H. (1996). Bestimmung der größten Pore in Filtermedien unter-
schiedlicher Struktur durch Messung des kapillaren Eintrittsdrucks. Chemie
Ingenieur Technik 68 (11): 1476–1479.
19 Ekberg, B. and Woitkowitz, S. (1988). Cake-forming wet filtration without gas
throughput with the new Ecosuc disc filters. Aufbereitungstechnik/Mineral
Processing 29 (4): 193–196.
332 9 Selected Aspects of Filter Media for Cake Filtration
20 Woitkowitz, S. (1988). Ceramics fill a filter vacuum – theory and practice
concerning cake-forming filtration without gas throughput. Aufbereitungstech-
nik/Mineral Processing 29 (10): 594–602.
21 Anlauf, H. (1990). Vakuum- und Druckfilter ohne Gasverbrauch. F&S Filtri-
eren und Separieren 4 (3): 135–145.
333
Nomenclature
Unless otherwise defined in the text, the symbols have the following meanings:
Latin Letters
a acceleration m s−2
a length m
A area m2
b length m
B width m
B liquid–solid volume ratio —
Bo Bond number —
c concentration —
c specific heat J kg−1 K−1
c length m
cw drag coefficient —
C centrifugal number —
CL consolidation level —
d diameter, length m
D diffusion constant m2 s−1
D3,2 Sauter mean diameter (no spheres) m
DS dry substance —
e pore number —
e elementary charge C
E elasticity modulus N m−2
E electrical field strength V m−1
Eu Euler number —
f relative quantity of fine particles
Wet Cake Filtration: Fundamentals, Equipment, and Strategies, First Edition. Harald Anlauf.
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2019 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
