World of Streaming.

Motivation
and Gratification on Twitch

Daniel Gros(&), Brigitta Wanner, Anna Hackenholt, Piotr Zawadzki,

and Kathrin Knautz

Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany

{daniel.gros,brigitta.wanner,anna.hackenholt,
piotr.zawadzki,kathrin.knautz}@hhu.de

Abstract. Within the gaming industry, live-streaming is becoming very pop-

ular as a form of online entertainment. Especially the so called social live
streaming services (SLSSs) as a new type of social media have established in the
last few years.
Subsequently a new web topic-specific live streaming service solely for
streaming video games has emerged. One of the most prominent and current
examples is Twitch.tv which provides the opportunity for streamers to broadcast
a game and react to viewers’ comments just-in-time. The viewers however
watch the stream with the option to communicate either with the streamer or
with other participants through a chat.
The main goal of this study is to determine the motivation and behavior of
Twitch users. Therefore, a research model including research questions has been
developed. This model contains the dimensions ‘Information’, ‘Entertainment’
and ‘Socialization’ which were investigated in relation to the average time spent
on Twitch as well as potential expenses. The data for the analysis originates
from a developed questionnaire (n = 791) and provides interesting results. One
of the key findings reveals a connection between the time and money users
spend on Twitch. Of particular note is also the significance of the dimension
‘Socialization’.

Keywords: Streaming
Social live streaming services
Twitch
Use

Gratification
Motivation
Money
Media usage

1 Introduction

One of the most prominent examples for social live streaming services is Twitch with
collectively more than 459,000 years-worth of video [1]. These streams mainly deal
with video games that are broadcasted.
Nowadays, more and more internet users not only consume information but also
actively produce it. Toffler characterized this type of user as “prosumers” [2]. Con-
sumers, producers and prosumers use streaming platforms. Concerning Twitch, con-
sumers only watch streams, producers solely stream and prosumers do both. Users who
only watch streams are called viewers and users who stream and sometimes also watch
streams are streamers. Besides streaming, a major part is real-time communication

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

G. Meiselwitz (Ed.): SCSM 2017, Part I, LNCS 10282, pp. 44–57, 2017.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58559-8_5
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 45

through chatting. Twitch has become an integral component of the viewers’ life as they
are watching it progressively on a daily basis. In 2015, 421,6 min were monthly
watched per viewer (for comparison, YouTube 291 min.) and users who watch Twitch
on their smartphone make up 35% of all users every month [1, 3]. The usage of Twitch
is free of charge; however, viewers have the possibility to subscribe to a specific
streamer, to donate to a streamer or a good cause. Over $17,400,000 were raised for
different charities in 2015 [1]. The popularity of Twitch has risen not only in the United
States but also in Germany. Twitch is ranked on place 48 of the most visited websites
in Germany1.
With growing usage of streaming platforms like Twitch, the motivation of this
paper is to look closer at the reasons why and how Twitch is used in Germany and why
some of the users spend money on it even though it is free of charge in general. Since
Twitch and other streaming platforms are a rather new phenomenon for the gaming
industry, research is still sparsely conducted. This paper will explore the motivation for
using Twitch regarding the time and money spent on it.

2 Related Work

Along with the gaming industry, a new type of social media has been established in the
last few years. Social live streaming services (SLSSs) are defined by specific charac-
teristics: synchrony, real-time broadcasting of the users’ own program, usage of their
own devices, interactions between the audience and the broadcaster and lastly the
possibility of a gratification system [4]. This new form of online entertainment
developed into one of the main entertainment media [5, 6]. As Cheung and Huang [7]
point out, recent social studies reveal a considerable number of casual players who
favor watching games on a livestream rather than playing themselves. The popularity
of SLSSs and the growing gaming industry in general have been ascertained and
treated in previous studies [5, 8].
To determine the motivation of why people consume different types of media –
including SLSSs – is one of the biggest area in communication and media science [9].
One of the most prominent approach to answer this question is the Uses and Gratifi-
cation theoretical perspective [10–12]. This approach intents to answer which gratifi-
cations the audience gains by consuming a specific type of media [13]. The main
difference to other approaches is that the audience is not passively consuming the
media, but rather actively consuming it to satisfy one’s own needs [14]. In the
beginning of the seventies, McQuail et al. [15] established four usual motivations to
satisfy needs by using media: developing and portraying of individuality, seeking for
information, entertainment, and socialization. These motivations were adapted and
customized by other researches over the years. Hsu et al. [16] used these motivations to
explain the use for social media. Developing one’s own personality underlines the need
to self-portrayal and seeking of information forms the basis of requesting new infor-
mation, which can be satisfied by using social networks. The gratification of

1
www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitch.tv.
46 D. Gros et al.

entertainment belongs to the demand of joy by using the media and to fulfill the need of
socialization, social networks are used to be in touch with others.
Twitch in general, especially concrete influential factors considering the different
motivations to use it, is still a new area which needs to be explored further. Since
SLSSs are a new type of social networks, the motivations based on the Uses and
Gratification theory can be adapted and be further developed for Twitch as well.
The gratification of self-portrayal is the basis for the usage by streamers. One of the
main reasons to create content and the need to portray oneself is to entertain or inform
others, but mainly to evoke reactions [17]. The form of reactions differs from streamer
to streamer. Some want to build a community and enjoy the social interactions, some
want to get acknowledgment for what they are doing and be praised [8].
Viewers on Twitch can find new information about games, strategies and methods,
which can satisfy the need for seeking information [18]. Twitch offers different func-
tions for the user to seek out information: by viewing a stream and learning from the
streamer or by communicating with other viewers, as they may have new information
as well.
Along to watching the stream, the streamer himself can contribute to the enter-
tainment need of the viewer. This sort of entertainment can be compared to watching
TV shows or movies [19]. Furthermore, Twitch offers tournaments and other eSports
events, which can be compared to traditional sport events [20]. Along with positive
afflicted entertainment, there is also negative afflicted entertainment while watching
streams. To critize a streamer in a negative way or trolling him can also be described as
a form of entertainment for the troll [21].
Based on a multidisciplinary framework Gandolfi [24] identified different types of
streams, e.g. “the professional” which is reliant on the streamers performance skills and
contains partial interaction with viewers. Twitch is a platform where viewers can not
only interact with the streamer e.g. through the chat, but also with other viewers. These
interactions can fulfill the need of socialization by getting in touch with other users who
share the same interests. Although the communication takes place online, friendships
can develop between the viewers based on their shared opinion and likes [22]. In
addition to that, building of communities is also common. McMillan and Chavis [23]
described the feeling to belong to a community as a corporate feeling. Members of a
community share an abandonment and pursue similar objectives like the need for
affiliation, integration of new members, sharing of emotions and socialization [23].
The motivations based on the Uses and Gratification theory focus on satisfying the
needs of the viewer or user of the medium. But one of the characteristics of a SLSS is
that there is a possibility to reward the streamer as well [4]. There are different
approaches to reward a streamer. On the one hand a viewer can reward the streamer
simply by watching the stream, since the invested time is a resource as well. Twitch is
used approximately more than 20 h per week by half of its users [1, 25]. On the other
hand, a viewer can reward and support the streamer by spending money. Viewers have
the possibility to make a one-time donation where the amount of the money is not
determined or they can commit to a monthly subscription for $4.99. Most of the time,
the streamer acknowledges the support and mentions the viewers who just spend
money by name (Fig. 1).
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 47

Fig. 1. Screenshot of a Twitch channel

Therefore, not only the streamer is rewarded, but the viewer is also rewarded by the
interaction with the streamer. This leads to the question if the viewer’s action is selfless
and based on the goal to support the streamer or if the viewer wishes to receive a
reward in return. As of today, this study differs from others by combining the moti-
vations to use Twitch with the fact if money or time was already spent as a type of
gratification.

3 Methods

To investigate the success of Twitch about motivation, money and usage time, the
following research questions emerged from the previous literature and ideas.
RQ1: What are the most popular motivations to use Twitch?
RQ2a: How does the motivation differ if money was spent?
RQ2b: How does the motivation differ by analyzing the average usage time?
RQ3: Are usage time and money correlating with each other?
These questions have guided the development of the research model (Fig. 2). Based
on the model, a questionnaire was developed to answer the research questions. On the
one hand the questionnaire was distributed to measure why and how much Twitch is
used and on the other hand whether the participants already spent money on it. Results
are focusing on the exploration of the motivations of Twitch users who only use it as a
viewer.
To avoid an unequal distribution among different countries, only German indi-
viduals were asked to fill in the questionnaire. A pretest with ten German participants
was carried out. While answering the questions, problems could be found and
corrected.
48 D. Gros et al.

Fig. 2. Research model

The questionnaire was available online from December 30th, 2015 until February
15th, 2016, and was disseminated on the authors’ Facebook walls as well as in several
Facebook groups, forums – especially Reddit2 because of its wide scope among users –
and on Twitter through corresponding hashtags. Additionally, through the private
message function Twitch streamers were asked to distribute the questionnaire in their
stream and the chat. Answering the questionnaire took approximately 10 to 15 min.
The questionnaire is composed of 23 items in total.
To measure the time users spent on Twitch, the participants had to state the average
number of hours they use the platform every week. The information, if money was
already given in form of a donation or subscription, was part of the questionnaire.
In order to answer the research questions, the different reasons to use Twitch
regarding time and money spent on the platform are analyzed. Hence, all investigations
of this study are based on the viewers. In addition to that, chosen demographic facts are
considered.
The main part “Motivations to use Twitch” is separated into the three subparts,
based on the uses and gratification theory [16], namely Entertainment, Information and
Socialization (Fig. 2). Self-presentation as an aspect has been excluded, because this
study focuses solely on the viewers who cannot represent themselves like streamers. In
the questionnaire, the items in Information deal with different aspects as involving
information – e.g. getting or possessing information – including items like using

2
https://www.reddit.com/.
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 49

Twitch to have something to talk about with friends [7] or to learn new gaming
techniques [20, 26]. While the items in Entertainment include reasons for using Twitch
for pleasure, e.g. being entertained [5, 20] or to avoid boredom [27], but also negative
reasons like criticizing streamers [28]. The subpart Socialization consists of reasons
based on solidarity and getting in touch with others, for example, using the chat [8, 20,
26] or trolling other users [29]. However, Socialization also includes reasons to use
Twitch to get in touch with streamers.
For every item of the three categories, a five-point Likert scale was used. The
participants were informed that the answer options have the same distance on a scale of
sentiments: “Strongly Disagree” (1), “Disagree” (2), “Undecided” (3), “Agree” (4) and
“Strongly Agree” (5). To test the internal consistency of our 16 answer options, which
specify the reasons to use Twitch, Cronbach’s Alpha was calculated [30].
For further investigations, new variables were created by summing up every item
for each category. This means that Entertainment and Information can have a minimum
value of 5 and a maximum value of 25 as there are five items with values from 1 to 5,
while Socialization has a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 30 as there are six items. To
be able to compare the new variables with each category, the summed up values were
divided by the respective number of items.
By presenting the average values of the five-point Likert scale for the different
reasons for using Twitch, RQ1 can be answered. Important factors, like the usage time
of a user and the willingness to financially support a streamer may be an influential key
factor. Therefore, RQ2 focusses on the influence of the factor money (RQ2a) as well as
time (RQ2b) and is answered by investigating the resulting motivations. At last,
comparisons between usage time and money are made in order to answer RQ3.

4 Results

Overall, 791 people filled in the questionnaire. The first two questions intended to
investigate whether the participants know Twitch and if they use it. 695 (87.9%) are
acquainted with the live-streaming platform. Twitch is used by 603 (86.6%) of them.
Further results are all based on the Twitch users.
For all test items regarding the motivation to use Twitch Cronbach’s Alpha (a) was
0.770, which is an indicator for an “Acceptable” internal consistency and a
“mo-tivationable goal” [31].

4.1 Motivations of Twitch Users

To answer RQ1, the different motivations why people use Twitch are analyzed by
calculating the arithmetic mean (Table 1).
The highest arithmetic mean for the category Entertainment is the particular
motivation to be entertained with a value of 4.56. The next motivations in a descending
order are: to follow gaming events with a value of 3.95, to have an alternative for
television with 3.74 and to avoid boredom with 3.48. The only answer with an average
below 2 is criticizing a streamer in a negative way (1.19).
50 D. Gros et al.

Table 1. Motivations to use Twitch

I use Twitch… Average
Entertainment
to be entertained. (E) 4.56
to follow tournaments and events. (E) 3.95
as an alternative or addition for TV. (E) 3.74
to avoid boredom. (E) 3.48
to criticize a streamer in a negative way. (E) 1.19
Socialization
to communicate with other viewers through the chat. (S) 2.23
to play with other users. (S) 2.13
to be part of a community. (S) 2.10
to support a streamer financially. (S) 1.86
to get in touch with a streamer. (S) 1.80
to troll/annoy other users. (S) 1.35
Information
to learn new gaming strategies and techniques. (I) 3.46
to be up-to-date. (I) 2.57
to look up a walkthrough of a game. (I) 1.90
to be able to talk about it with my friends. (I) 1.60
to obtain information about hardware. (I) 1.52
(E) = Entertainment, (C) = Sozialization, (I) = Information; N = 603

For the category Socialization, there is no average higher than 3. The highest
arithmetic mean is 2.23 with the motivation to communicate with others. Using Twitch
to play together with other viewers (which has a mean of 2.13), and using it to be part
of a community (with 2.10) have an average above 2, while the remaining three
answers are below 2.
For the category Information the answer that is most agreed to is using Twitch for
learning new gaming strategies or techniques with an arithmetic mean of 3.46. Using
Twitch to be up-to-date is the second highest answer with an arithmetic mean of 2.57.
All of the remaining answers have an arithmetic mean below 2.
To see which category has the highest mean overall, three new variables are used.
Socialization has a mean of 1.91. Information has an average overall mean of 2.21
while Entertainment has the highest mean of 3.39.

4.2 Influence of Money and Usage Time Regarding Motivation

About one third of the participants (31.5%, n = 190) have already spent money on
Twitch. In addition to that, they were asked what kind of payment they made: donation,
subscription or both. While 22.6% (n = 43) donated to a streamer and 31.6% (n = 60)
subscribed, most of them did both (45.8%, n = 87). Apart from that, they were asked to
specify the motivations for their payment. With 92.1% (n = 175), the main motivation
is to support a streamer financially.
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 51

The next most common motivation is to have the advantages of a donation or

subscription (25.3%, n = 48). There are different advantages users could receive from
streamers, which were also noticed in the observations. Most of the advantages of a
donation or subscription reveal benefits for viewers, for example, the usage of the chat
or the communication with streamers. In most streams, the streamer mentions a viewer
who subscribed or made a donation during the stream. Some of the monitored strea-
mers even play a song to put focus on the new donation or subscription. Additionally,
most streamers express their gratitude verbally on stream immediately. Most of the
small streamers do not offer many advantages like mentioning the viewer who spends
money, while paying viewers from a mid-sized streamer also have influence on the
chat. Donors or subscribers of more popular streamers are not only mentioned, they
also have an influence on the current game and also the opportunity for exclusive chats.
Moreover, subscribers have the chance to get into an exclusive chat that is only
available for them. As a consequence, the chat for paying viewers is not spammed.
Nearly none of the participants are willing to pay for more or better prizes in draws
and contests (1.6%, n = 3). Motivations given via the free text field were mostly about
charity events. Furthermore, the new variables were utilized to see how the average
changes after selecting participants who already spend money from those who did not
(RQ2a). Entertainment has the highest mean of 3.56 for Twitch users who already
spend money on it. The motivation with the highest mean for participants who did not
spend money on Twitch is also Entertainment with 3.31. An overview of the different
arithmetic means is shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Average of the summed up variable regarding money

Information Entertainment Socialization
Money spent 2.25 3.56 2.45
No money spent 2.19 3.31 1.66
Difference (Δ) 0.06 0.25*** 0.79***
***p  .001, N = 603

As a result, the highest difference between the summed up variable regarding if

money was spent or not is for the category Socialization (Δ = 0.79). Due to the fact that
Socialization stood out the most, a closer look on the six items has been taken
(Table 3).
The biggest gap is 1.19 for supporting a streamer, followed by communicating with
others (0.96). Furthermore, the highest arithmetic mean for users who already spent
money is 2.89 (communicating with other viewers through the chat). For those who did
not spend money on Twitch, the highest arithmetic mean is 1.93 with the same
motivation.
Beside the money the users rated their average usage time of Twitch with a number
of hours. Participants were split up evenly into five groups regarding their average
usage time. The first group is based on those who spend 0 to 1 h (n = 100) per week on
Twitch, followed by 2 to 3 h (n = 123), 4 to 9 h (n = 138), 10 to 18 h (n = 121) and
more than 18 h (n = 121).
52 D. Gros et al.

Table 3. Mean of money spent on Twitch regarding Socialization motivations

Did you already spend
money on Twitch?
I use Twitch to… Yes No Difference
be part of a community 2.74 1.81 0.93***
communicate with other viewers through the chat 2.89 1.93 0.96***
troll/annoy other users 1.52 1.27 0.25***
support a streamer financially 2.67 1.48 1.19***
get in touch with a streamer/to get his attention 2.28 1.57 0.71***
play together with other users 2.62 1.91 0.71***
***p  .001, N = 603

To answer RQ2b ‘How does the average time spent on Twitch per week influence
the motivations to use it?’ the arithmetic means of the three superior motivations to
watch Twitch were compared in regard of the time the participants spend on Twitch per
week. For each of the five groups concerning the time, the most important motivation
to use Twitch is the Entertainment factor (Fig. 3). Socialization is the motivation with
the highest difference between the participants who spend only up to one hour a week
on Twitch and those who spent more than 18 h on the platform (1.35 to 2.27).

Fig. 3. Motivations to use Twitch by usage time

 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 53

For a better and more detailed investigation how the time spent on Twitch corre-
lates with the motivations to use it, further analysis was carried out. Through this, a
closer look at the single answer options of Socialization, Information and Entertain-
ment is taken.
Table 4 shows a more detailed view of the different motivations to use Twitch. In
this table, the correlations of the particular motivations and the usage time are repre-
sented. The main motivation to watch Twitch is to be entertained for most of the
participants. This is independent of the average time they spent on Twitch (Ø = 4.56).
Getting entertained is also represented in Table 4. The results of the correlation
between the named motivation and the usage time give: rs = 0.27. Thus, there is a
positive correlation between the time participants spend on the platform and the usage
motivation to be entertained. According to the Table 4, the highest correlation for the
Entertainment aspect is between the motivation to use Twitch as an alternative for
television and the usage time (rs = 0.38).

Table 4. Correlations between the usage time and the motivations to use Twitch
Motivations to use Twitch Spearman’s-Rho (rs)
Socialization
I use Twitch to be part of a community 0.35***
I use Twitch to communicate with other viewers through the chat 0.27***
I use Twitch to support a streamer financially 0.31***
I use Twitch to play with other users 0.22***
Entertainment Spearman’s Rho (rs)
I use Twitch as an alternative or addition for TV 0.38***
I use Twitch to be entertained 0.27***
***p  .001; **p  .01; *p  .05, N = 603

In regard to Socialization, more motivations show higher rank correlations with the
usage time. The correlation between the motivation to use Twitch to communicate with
others through the chat and the usage time is rs = 0.27, to use Twitch to support a
streamer financially (rs = 0.31) and to use Twitch to play with other users (rs = 0.22).
The strongest correlation is between usage time and the motivation to use Twitch to be
part of a community (rs = 0.35). These correlations show that the more hours the par-
ticipants spend on Twitch every week, the more Socialization-based the motivation is.

4.3 Correlation of Money and Usage Time

By comparing participants who spent money in combination with their stated time
spent on Twitch per week, RQ3 is answered (Fig. 2). Most of the donators and sub-
scribers are assigned to the groups that watch Twitch 10–18 h (30%, n = 57) or more
than 18 h (33%, n = 63). In comparison to that, participants who do not spend money
on Twitch use it infrequently on a weekly basis.
54 D. Gros et al.

In Fig. 4 a constant increase of users who already spent money on Twitch is noticed
depending on the time these users spent on the platform.

Fig. 4. Usage time and money spent

5 Discussion, Limitations and Outlook

The area of social live streaming services is a fast-growing domain and therefore deeply
interesting to investigate. Particularly Twitch has a high number of users who spend
time and money on the platform and produce content which leads to high traffic
numbers.
The main goal of this investigation was to identify the motivation for Twitch usage,
especially regarding the time and money aspect. The motivation to use Twitch has been
divided into the aspects of Socialization, Entertainment and Information whereby every
category contained multiple (motivation) items. The main purpose regarding the data of
the questionnaire was to compare the relative importance of the items and based on the
classification into the three mentioned categories some superior differences have been
determined. With the users’ feedback certain motivations appeared to be the most
approved, which afterwards have been analyzed in relation to the time and money
spent. As a consequence, it was possible to detect some correlations between the three
categories and the factors time and money.
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 55

The general motivations of Twitch usage are discussed in RQ1. Overall the
motivations of being entertained (Entertainment) and learning new gaming strategies or
techniques (Information) prove to have the highest approval. Taking a closer look at the
results, differences between people who spend money on Twitch by making a donation
or subscription and those who do not can be determined. Those differences give an
answer to RQ2a. Regardless of whether participants spent money on Twitch, the main
motivation for using the platform is Entertainment.
In contrast to Entertainment, the Socialization aspect seems to have an impact on
the decision to donate or subscribe on Twitch, as assumed in RQ2a. Most of the
advantages of donations and subscriptions are Socialization-based, for example,
exclusive emoticons for the chat, the possibilities to communicate with the streamer
through a donation message or exclusive chats and games. In addition to that, $17.4
million were collected for charity in 2015. Participants justify their payments mostly to
support the streamer or to do some charity. Self-interested reasons do not seem to be
important for the paying viewers. Reasons could be related to a study from Dunn et al.
about ‘Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness’. For example, viewers who
want to be in a community need to use the chat in order to socialize [32].
Analogous to the money aspect in RQ2a, the time spent on Twitch in particular is
analyzed through RQ2b. Moreover, the approval of motivations to use Twitch (in terms
of Socialization, Entertainment and Information) increase with the time spent on
Twitch. The Socialization aspect shows the most interesting outcomes, especially the
high difference between people who use Twitch excessively and those who use it rarely
(0.91). With those findings, RQ2b can be answered, as people who are part of a
community on Twitch need to spend more time on the platform in order to socialize or
in other words: the more hours the participants spend on Twitch, the more Social-
ization-based is the motivation.
RQ3 aims to investigate whether there are correlations between the factors money
and time. After analyzing the time and money separately (RQ2a & RQ2b), RQ3 aims to
reveal possible correlations between both factors. On the one hand a high ratio of the
participants who spent money on Twitch were assigned to groups with a high usage
time and on the other hand participants who did not spend money on Twitch used the
platform unfrequently on a weekly basis. Therefore, the more time a user spends on the
platform, the more likely money will be spent through a donation or a subscription.
During the development of the questionnaire only German participants and
streamers were chosen to avoid an unequal distribution among different countries.
Since solely German people were surveyed, it would be interesting to see if there are
differences in other countries.
In this study only 16.9% (n = 102) of the participants are female. As it may seem
imbalanced, this represents a realistic distribution of Twitch users [33, 34].
It is needed to be mentioned that only parts of the results of the questionnaire are
presented. For instance, questions about the importance of the interaction between
viewer and streamer or about the usability aspect are excluded in this study in order to
not exceed the given limits. Furthermore, some of the correlations are slight and should
therefore not be overestimated.
It would be of interest to do further research on Twitch and the impact on its users.
Our model could possibly be altered into different areas, such as the usability aspect of
56 D. Gros et al.

Twitch, to get more information about viewers’ and streamers’ behavior. Concerning
this, it would be interesting to analyze the results of the remaining questions which are
not included in this study. As the Socialization aspect seems to have a big influence on
Twitch users it would be interesting to investigate how users are interacting. In this
context, the role of the streamer needs to be examined, too. Since this paper only
investigates the motivations to use Twitch as a viewer it would be interesting to compare
these motivations with those of active players (and others, who do neither watch nor
stream through SLSSs). These findings could lead to a new model which could be either
compared or included into the current research model presented in this paper.
Lastly, a comparison between users of other existing platforms, like hitbox3 or
YouTube Gaming4, would be of interest to examine differences regarding the usage.

References
1. Twitch: Welcome Home: The 2015 Retrospective. https://www.twitch.tv/year/2015
2. Toffler, A.: The Third Wave. Bantam Books, New York (1981)
3. Twitch: Welcome Home: The 2014 Retroperspective. https://www.twitch.tv/year/2014
4. Scheibe, K., Fietkiewicz, K., Stock, W.G.: Information behavior on social live streaming
services. J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract. 4(2), 6–20 (2016)
5. Kaytoue, M., Silva, A., Cerf, L., Meira, W., Raïssi, C.: Watch me playing, i am a
professional: a first study on video game live streaming. In: Proceedings of the 21st
International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW 2012 Companion, pp. 1181–1188.
ACM Press, New York (2012)
6. Pires, K., Simon, G.: YouTube live and twitch : a tour of user-generated live streaming
systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference, pp. 225–230.
ACM Press, New York (2015)
7. Cheung, G., Huang, J.: Starcraft from the stands: understanding the game spectator. In:
Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -
CHI 2011, pp. 763–772. ACM Press, New York (2011)
8. Hamilton, W.A., Garretson, O., Kerne, A.: Streaming on twitch: fostering participatory
communities of play within live mixed media. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2014, pp. 1315–1324. ACM
Press, New York (2014)
9. Sjöblom, M., Hamari, J.: Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study
on the motivations of Twitch users. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2016, in press). http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.019
10. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., Gurevitch, M.: Utilization of mass communication by the individual.
In: The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratification Research,
pp. 19–32. Sage, Beverly Hills (1974)
11. Ruggiero, T.E.: Uses and gratification theory in the 21st century. Mass Commun. Soc. 3, 3–
37 (2000)
12. Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., Haas, H.: On the use of the mass media for important things. Am.
Sociol. Rev. 38, 164–181 (1973)

3
www.hitbox.tv.
4
https://gaming.youtube.com.
 World of Streaming. Motivation and Gratification on Twitch 57

13. Schenk, M.: Publikums- und Gratifikationsforschung. In: Medienwirkungsforschun,

pp. 651–753. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2007)
14. Meyen, M.: Mediennutzung: Mediaforschung, Medienfunktionen, Nutzungsmuster.
UTB/UVK, Stuttgart/Konstanz (2004)
15. McQuail, D., Blumler, J.G., Brown, J.R.: The television audience: a revised perspective. In:
Sociology of Mass Communications: Selected Readings, pp. 135–165. Penguin, Middlesex
(1972)
16. Hsu, M.-H., Chang, C.-M., Lin, H.-C., Lin, Y.-W.: Determinants of continued use of social
media: the perspectives of uses and gratifications theory and perceived interactivity. Inf. Res.
20, 1 (2015). Paper 671, http://www.informationr.net/ir/20-2/paper671.html
17. Bowmann, S., Willis, C.: We Media: How Audiences are shaping the Future of News and
Information. The Media Center at The American Press Institute, Reston (2003)
18. Foster, S.R., Esper, S., Griswold, W.G.: From competition to metacognition. In: Proceedings
of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2013, pp. 99–
108. ACM Press, New York (2013)
19. Smith, T., Obrist, M., Wright, P.: Live-streaming changes the (video) game. In: Proceedings
of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video - EuroITV 2013, pp. 131–
138. ACM Press, New York (2013)
20. Edge, N.: Evolution of the gaming experience: live video streaming and the emergence of a
new web community. Elon J. Undergrad. Res. Commun. 4(2), 33–39 (2013)
21. Hardaker, C.: Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user
discussions to academic definitions. J. Politeness Res. 6(2), 215–242 (2010)
22. Woermann, N., Kirschner, H.: Online livestreams, community practices, and assemblages.
Towards a site ontology of consumer community. Adv. Consum. Res. 43, 438–442 (2015)
23. McMillan, D.W., Chavis, D.M.: Sense of community: a definition and theory. J. Community
Psychol. 14, 6–23 (1986)
24. Gandolfi, E.: To watch or to play, it is in the game: the game culture on Twitch.tv among
performers, plays and audiences. J. Gaming Virtual Worlds 8(1), 63–82 (2016)
25. Twitch Advertising - Audience
26. Burroughs, B., Rama, P.: The eSports Trojan Horse: Twitch and streaming futures. J. Virtual
Worlds Res. 8(2), 1–5 (2015)
27. Heaven, D.: Dark cloud: how life online has changed ownership. New Sci. 217(2910), 34–
37 (2013)
28. Lange, P.G.: What is your claim to flame? First Monday 11(9) (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.
5210/fm.v11i9.1393
29. Raes, T.C.M.: Twitch TV: Motives and Interaction, A Consumer Perspective (Master
Thesis). Aalborg University/Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg/Denmark (2015)
30. Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–
334 (1951)
31. Gliem, J.A., Gliem, R.R.: Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha
reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: 2003 Midwest Research to Practice
Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, pp. 82–88. The Ohio State
University, Columbus (2003)
32. Dunn, E.W., Aknin, L.B., Norton, M.I.: Spending money on others promotes happiness.
Science 319(5870), 1687–1688 (2008)
33. Sundén, J., Malin, S.: Gender and Sexuality in Online Game Cultures: Passionate Play.
Routledgel, New York (2012)
34. Williams, D., Martins, N., Consalvo, M., Ivory, J.D.: The virtual census: representations of
gender, race and age in video games. New Media Soc. 11(5), 815–834 (2009)