Comparative Evaluation of
MongoDB and Redis: NoSQL
Databases
Abstract
This paper focuses on comparing two of the most popular
NoSQL databases, MongoDB and Redis – two databases, which,
despite belonging to the same category, are rather different
from each other in many ways. MongoDB is a document store,
NoSQL database featuring flexibility and scalability achieved
with the help of sharding and flexible query language. The use
of this data structure is perfect when handling large data
structures with multiple subordinate substructures. On the
other hand, Redis is an in-memory data structure store
designed to handle simple operations such as caching, session
management, and analytics in real-time data at high speed and
relativity low latency. Understanding their data modeling,
schema elasticity, speed, and recovery, this report identifies
and compares, the pro’s and con’s of the MS SQL and MySQL
databases in practical implement. The paper also also
investigates how these types of databases ensure high
availability and distinguishing between them according to their
application in various industries, with guidelines on how to
choose the right type of database for an application.
Introduction
Due to these problems the NoSQL database systems have
become important for managing the complexity and high
volume of contemporary data-centered applications. Unlike the
old school relational databases, new age databases, which are
called NoSQL databases like mongoDB and Redis etc offer less
structure when dealing with data and records. MongoDB is
another document store database, and can be commonly found
in industries where there is a need for, and the capability for
large flexibility in data modeling, along with strong query
power. Due to the fact that CouchDB supports JSON-like
documents, the system can be used in e-Commerce, content
management systems, and social networks. Conversely, Redis
is in-memory data structure store, which has high performance
and is easy to use. It outperforms other sessions in real-time
analytics, caching, and session management where the speed
of data access is desirable. The intention of this report is to
describe the capabilities, weaknesses and application scenarios
of MongoDB and Redis to make appropriate recommendations
for their usage depending on the particular requirements of a
business process.
Research and Evaluation of Document and
Key-Value Databases
Two types of NoSQL databases include document, and key-
value databases, and both vary in their features and uses.
Hibernate documents, such as MongoDB, use document data
structures that are in JSON forms and consist of documents
that are grouped hierarchically. These databases are schema-
less, and it implies that each document in the system can have
a distinct structure: this is particularly advantageous since no
modifications are required in the event that either the structure
of a document or the number of fields stated must be changed.
This flexibility make document databases suitable for
applications with complicated data schema, for example,
application like e-commerce or content management system
where documents may contain different fields.
On the other hand key-value databases, including Redis
utilizes a very simple model of storage with data stored in pairs
of key and value. The key is unmovable text name and it can
take in any string hash, list or any other basic data types. This
makes key-value databases exceptionally fast especially for
operations like getting or putting values because there are no
complex query or relation to solve. This makes Redis most
usable for scenarios such as caching, real time processing and
session handling where speed plays an important factor.
Comparing these two types of databases indicates that
document databases are most suitable in those applications
which include flexibility and structured data, while key value
databases boast of scenarios that call for fast data access and
less data interconnection.
Comparison of Document and Key-Value
Databases
It is important to clearly distinguish document databases like
MongoDB and key-value databased such as Redis by their data
models, querying capabilities and use cases are substantially
different. The structure of data in MongoDB is broader since
information is stored in form of documents that can have other
documents, fields as well as an array of fields which can have
different data types. As such, the data can be highly flexible
allowing each document type to meet the ever-changing
requirements of an application. Nonetheless, Redis employs
key-value model that is less complex than schema, but has an
advantage of access times hitting values directly, however, it is
not suitable for complex data structures.
Rad management also varies on the two with querying
capabilities also not being the same. MongoDB provides an
array of query operators that allow a developer to search, filter,
and grouping collections. It particularly supports indexing to
ease the search for data especially when dealing with the large
amount of data. Redis, in contrast, is designed as a fast simple
key-value storage, with only basic functionality of querying
added on top. Depending on the data type, Redis can be
extremely fast and latency can be measured in the single digits
of microseconds, this makes Redis perfect for real-time
applications like using it for storing the scores of a game, or
session management, where retrieving data can be fast and
comes with very low overhead.
As for the usage scenarios, it makes sense to highlight the
cases, when data is not too simple, but rather flexible and non-
standard: organizing product catalogues, storing user profiles,
and working with multimedia. Redis is preferred when data
retrieval rate is crucial, for instance, when one is storing
frequently used data, user sessions on web applications, or
real-time compute in high-load computing platforms.
Finally, document databases such as MongoDB deliver more
flexibility of schema and querying for intricate data structures
and for querying data comprehensively, but there is no match
for key-value databases like Redis for faster and precise data
handling in simple, real-time applications.
Comparative Analysis of MongoDB and Redis
While MongoDB and Redis are both NoSQL databases, they are
incredibly different as a result of the initial design choices made
for both technologies. MongoDB is a Document Store NoSQL
database used to handle the data that are strongly structured
in different forms of hierarchy. One of its main benefits is
schema versatility; documents within the same collection can
have different structures, and the change of the data model
doesn’t require changing the schema. Furthermore, it supports
a rich query interface for querying, indexing and aggregation
functionality which is essential for many application and use-
cases in today’s world. Though, there are times that MongoDB
suffers when it comes to real-time data processing compared
Redis.
While Redis is an in-memory key-value store it is optimized for
speed and simplicity as compared with other options. The
main strength is flexibility and its response time is below one
millisecond by design, so it is suitable to use in high-velocity
applications such as caching, session storage, and real-time
data processing. Redis supports data types such as string,
hash, list and set and it does not support the features that
similar to MySQL such as query functionality and flexibility
shown by MongoDB. An exploitable aspect of Redis is that it
uses in-memory storage which can be a problem given a large
dataset as it will take massive memory to store a large dataset
at a fast speed. What Redis lacks the ability to do is query or
analyze data when the data relationship is not straightforward,
or when high speed data access is not essential, which
MongoDB can do much better.
Therefore MongoDB is more suitable when there is a need to
implement data with less structure and when there is need to
perform very complex queries, On the other hand Redis is
appropriate in application that require very large data
processing in real time with not so much data structure
complexity.
Data Modeling in MongoDB
Basically MongoDB concerns data modeling in the way that
data is a series of JSON- similar documents with no predefined
structure as in case of SQL databases. This feature means
that you can easily change the structure of data which is quite
convenient especially for applications which are likely to have
changing data structures. For instance, in an e-commerce
application, the data about product description, price, and
rating may constitute a MongoDB document with all product
variants despite the fact that each product might have different
attributes or be in a different category. That flexibleness
minimizes the possibilities of pricey schema changes that are
typical of vast-dimensional relations databases.
MongoDB also contains concepts as embedded documents
and referencing. In an embedded model, every related data is
stored in one document and this make is possible for all related
data to be fetched in a single query. For instance, instead of
storing customer records separately, and linked as a foreign
key, order history could be stored as a nested data type.
Data Modeling and Usage Scenarios for Redis
Being a Scholars choice as an in-memory key-value database,
Redis is remarkably easy from the data modeling perspective
while possessing unmatched performance. Redis data
structure supports a large number of data types; all the data
stored in Redis are stored as keys and values, where keys are
unique and values can be either small strings, list, hash, set, or
sorted set. This simplicity makes Redis perform very well in
those use cases that require quick data retrieval and limited
data variety. Analytical applications, real time applications such
as session management, caching and real-time decision making
can well be served using its capability of sub-millisecond
response time achieved by using its in-memory storage model.
In session management, Redis will store the users’ sessions
and record their actions making it ideal for web applications
that need real-time and fast interactions. Similarly in caching
Redis acts as a cache layer in between that holds frequently
requested data in the form of web pages or even the results of
the queries on a specific database so as to minimize the
workforce on the actual databases as well as to improve
response time for end users. It is also used for real time
analytics where data has to be stored and queried in real time
such as purchases, scores of online games, or real-time
auctions in ad-tech bids.
In other words, Redis is suitable when speed is a considerable
concern, and the data structures do not have to be complex.
Because it can accommodate data of different types, it is ideal
for real-time applications requiring high speed at low latency.
Characteristics: Schema Flexibility, Scaling,
and High Availability of MongoDB and Redis
As it regards schema flexibility, it is crucial to mention that
MongoDB is one of the most flexible NoSQL databases.
Support of no-shema collections; every document in the
MongoDB collection may have a different structure based on a
document-based pattern. This allows real time updates should
one want to change the data model in use or if the application
is handling different data types.
Redis however, is a much simpler tool and follows the model of
keys and values. Flexible schema is its weakness, while the
well-structured schema is its strength if it comes to
performance and scalability. Redis is built for high LDAP
with low latency and has support vector machine capabilities.
With regard to scalability, it divides the data across multiple
servers, and is known as sharding. This allows MongoDB to
scale and at the same time continue serving query requests in
the most efficient way possible. On the other hand, there is the
notion of clustering and replication mechanisms that Redis uses
to make data fully distributed and fault tolerant to ensure high
availability.
Industry Use Cases for MongoDB and Redis
MongoDB and Redis are popular among different
industries because of their unique sh ability to manage
certain kinds of data and workloads.
MongoDB is very much appreciated in industries where flexible
operational schema design and complex hierarchical data
storage and retrieval are necessary. For example, in e-
commerce it is utilized to operate huge information
encompassing product logs, customers’ data, as well as
transactions’ documents. That is why the given solution is
suitable for platforms like eBay and Walmart, which work
with various and constantly developing product information.
Furthermore, the application server platforms like WordPress
and Joomla have found MongoDB’s flexibility suitable to
cope with the particular types of content including articles,
images, and user-generated contents.
However, Redis is efficient in the cases, where it is necessary to
work real-time data as soon as possible. It can be found in the
gaming industry for tracking of leaderboard scores, gaming
sessions, and game analytics. For example, the services of
PUBG or Fortnite cannot exist for their modern audience
without low-latency data acquisition from Redis. Also, Redis is
widely used in the financial services for real-time analytics and
transactions processing. Due to it speed it best used in fraud
detection and high frequency trading platforms where time or
data processing is a major factor.
MongoDB and Redis have certain versatility and are capable of
performing opposite sorts of tasks well: while MongoDB is ideal
for handling vast amounts of data, Redis is perfect for real-time
applications.
Conclusion
Hence, while MongoDB is good in handling large amounts of
data and performing complex queries, Redis is better suited for
handling simple key-value pairs, storing data across multiple
dimensions, and handling publishing/subscribing scenarios.
Through MongoDB’s flexible and completely schema-less
NoSQL document model these types of applications can fit
more complicated and adjust usages and structures often found
in e-commerce, healthcare, and content management
applications. because of its capability in handling all types of
data, the company is fit for industries that involve complex data
storage and analysis.
On the other hand, Redis ensures features of in-memory speed
and efficiency that make it highly relevant for real time
applications like caching, managing sessions, and real time
computing. It has a scalable key-value architecture that makes
it incredibly fast when the data retrieval is important.
Finally, the selection of MongoDB and Redis depends in the
essential need of the project and MongoDB is excellent for
sever and complex data schema while redis is excellent for
speed and basic requirement real time data solution.
References
There Angles, R., & Gutierrez, C. (2021). Modern NoSQL
systems: MongoDB, Cassandra, and Redis. ACM Computing
Surveys, 53(4), 1-38.
Chen, P., & Chiang, R. (2020). NoSQL databases: New
opportunities for data management and analysis. Journal of
Database Management, 31(4), 45-57.
Han, J., E, H., Leung, C., & Zhong, Z. (2019). Big data NoSQL
databases: A comparative study of document-based and key-
value databases. IEEE Access, 7, 115409-115423.
Pawar, N. K., & Ranjan, J. (2021). A study of NoSQL database
performance: MongoDB vs Redis. International Journal of Data
Science and Analytics, 10(3), 265-275.
Sakr, S., & Alomari, M. (2021). NoSQL systems: Survey on data
models, query languages, and performance benchmarking.
Data Science and Engineering, 6, 215-236.
Thakkar, H., & Bhansali, A. (2020). Comparative analysis of
MongoDB and Redis performance in distributed systems.
Journal of Cloud Computing, 9(1), 14-23.
Liang, Z., & Qu, L. (2020). Evaluation of NoSQL databases:
MongoDB vs Redis for IoT and web applications. IEEE
Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 9(2), 763-770.
