RRL
According to Loveless (2024), the rising prevalence of bullying within school communities
has become a significant issue for students. Bullying is described as an epidemic—rampant,
widespread, and pervasive—with potentially catastrophic effects. It takes place not only in
schools but also in communities and, unfortunately, even in homes. The alarming statistics
surrounding bullying highlight the urgency for serious attention and immediate action. However,
the rapid growth of information and communication technology (ICT), such as smartphones and
social media, has introduced a new environment for bullying—the cyber world (Patchin, 2006).
The bullying cycle typically involves three primary roles: the bully, the victim, and the
bystanders. The bully is often the strongest among peers and driven by a desire for power. The
primary goal of bullying behavior is to diminish the victim's social status and sense of security
while simultaneously boosting the bully's self-esteem and social standing. As a result, bullying
often occurs in the presence of an audience. Bystanders may either support the bully, defend the
victim, or remain passive observers. In most cases, bystanders do not intervene but are still
considered a crucial part of the bullying dynamic. Victims, usually of lower status than their
aggressors, tend to isolate themselves due to bullying, appearing defenseless and in need of
protection.
Schools are commonly regarded as spaces where children learn and develop into the
individuals they aspire to become. However, they can also become arenas of struggle, where
survival becomes a challenge for some. In these environments, those who are popular and
admired often receive respect and recognition, while others, particularly the less privileged, may
face bullying (Enderez, 2014).
As noted by Dienlin (2020), students aged 13-17 are deeply engaged with digital technology,
utilizing it not only for academic purposes but also for socializing, which increases their
vulnerability to online risks such as cyberbullying. Research suggests that Grade 11 Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) students, in particular, are more likely to
use online platforms for academic collaboration, which makes them more susceptible to
cyberbullying (Struyf, 2019). Additionally, as these students face the pressures of adolescence
and academic demands, they are especially prone to the emotional and behavioral impacts of
cyberbullying, as evidenced in earlier studies. By focusing on Grade 11 STEM students, this
study aims to provide valuable insights into how this group experiences and responds to
cyberbullying, thereby assisting in the development of more focused interventions for this
specific population.
The purpose of this study is to address the negative behavioral effects of cyberbullying by
raising awareness among Grade 11 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics students
at Benigno V. Aldana National High School. By examining the prevalence and impact of
cyberbullying within this specific student population, the study aims to foster a deeper
understanding of its consequences and encourage proactive measures to mitigate its harmful
effects. Ultimately, this research seeks to empower students with the knowledge and tools
necessary to promote a safer and more inclusive digital environment.
While bullying typically happens at school, cyberbullying takes place over cyberspace. Because
of modern technology it easy to users to post a message destroying the reputation of other social
media users (Taboada, 2011). However, cyberbullying is covered by existing laws against
personal threats and harassment (Mahdavi, 2008). In some cases, it may be advisable to inform
the school principal or consult a legal counsel (Slonje, 2008). The law prohibits bullying,
including cyber-bullying that occurs inside or outside of school when it affects student life within
school, insist all schools to create anti-bullying policy, discipline bullying, and notify parents,
and local law enforcement when needed (Li, 2007). Cyberbullying is one of the top challenges
facing public schools. There are many recurring legal problems confronting public schools (Li,
2006). Educators are mostly challenged in developing policies and guidelines to prevent the
utilization of technology to bully other students. To raise awareness to students and school
personnel, educators establish systems for reporting and monitoring of students’ use of
technology within the campus (Bilić, 2014). Thus, these circumstances contribute to a wider
appreciation of cyberbullying experience of students within and outside the campus.
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
As the American University, 2020, stated that many of today’s high-demand jobs were created
in the last decade, according to the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). As
advances in technology drive globalization and digital transformation, teachers can help students
acquire the necessary skills to succeed in the careers of the future. The increasing integration of
technology and social media into daily life has brought about significant benefits but has also
introduced challenges, including the rise of cyberbullying. Teenagers, who frequently engage in
active online conversations, are especially concerned about this situation.
Cyberbullying involves the use of electronic communication methods, such as phone calls,
text messages, emails, instant messaging, websites, and multimedia content, to target individuals
while often concealing the perpetrator's identity. This anonymity can heighten the victim's
distress. According to Menesini et al. (2014), cyberbullying can manifest in various ways,
including:
Flaming: Hostile online exchanges using angry and offensive language.
Harassment: Persistent transmission of mean or insulting messages.
Cyberstalking: Repeated and intense harassment that includes threats or causes
significant fear.
Denigration: Spreading rumors or sharing gossip online to harm someone’s reputation or
relationships.
Impersonation: Pretending to be someone else to post or send harmful content, aiming to
damage the person's reputation or friendships.
Outing: Revealing private secrets or embarrassing information and images online.
Trickery: Deceiving someone into disclosing private or embarrassing details and then
sharing them online.
Exclusion: Intentionally excluding someone from an online group to cause emotional
harm.
At Benigno V. Aldana National High School, Grade 11 Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics (STEM) students face not only the rigorous demands of academic life but also the
emotional and psychological strain caused by cyberbullying. The negative behavioral effects of
cyberbullying, such as isolation, anxiety, aggression, and reduced academic performance, can
hinder students' overall growth and well-being. Despite its widespread occurrence, students,
parents, and educators still do not fully comprehend the negative effects of cyberbullying.
According to Cantone et al. (2015), the bullying cycle typically involves three key roles: the
bully, the victim, and the bystanders. The bully is often the most dominant among peers and
motivated by a desire for power. Their main objective is to undermine the victim's social status
and sense of safety while enhancing their own self-esteem and social position. Consequently,
bullying usually takes place in front of an audience. Bystanders may choose to support the bully,
stand up for the victim, or remain passive. In most cases, they do not intervene but still play a
significant role in the dynamics of bullying. Victims, who are often of lower social status than
the bully, tend to become isolated, appearing vulnerable and in need of protection.
According to a study conducted in the United States involving nearly 4000 students in grades
6 to 8, 11 percent of the students had been cyberbullied victims in the previous two months, 4%
had been cyberbully perpetrators, and 7% had been both a cyberbully and a cyberbully victim
(Kowalski & Limber, 2007). In a 2010 Canadian study involving over 2000 students in grades 6,
7, 10, and 11, 25% said they had been the victim of cyberbullying in the previous three months.
8% said they had been a cyberbully, and 25% said they had been both a cyberbully and a
cyberbully victim. The authors theorized that the rates were higher in their study because they
didn't refer to the activity as "cyberbullying," but rather asked about specific behaviors (calling
names, threatening, spreading rumors, and so on).
The Microsoft (2012) study showed that 58% of youth in Singapore reported cyberbullying
with the second highest reported incidence of cyber victimization in the world in compared with
a 25 country the average was 37%. The most frequent type of cyberbullying was “mean or
unfriendly treatment” (36%), followed by “made fun of or teased” (30%), and “called mean
names” (30%) in Singapore (Microsoft, 2012). In Malaysia, the same study reported that 33% of
youth faced cyberbullying. The most frequent type of cyberbullying was “mean or unfriendly
treatment” (20%), followed by “called mean names” (16 %), and “made fun of or teased” (11%)
in Malaysia (Microsoft, 2012). Similar studies conducted in other countries across Asia have
reported similar rates of cyberbullying among students. In South Korea the most common forms
of cyberbullying are verbal harassment and the spread of false rumors (Woochun, 2020). In
India, research has shown that cyberbullying is particularly prevalent among female students,
who are often targeted for their appearance or for speaking out on social issues.
There have been many news stories regarding incidences of cyber bullying in the Philippines;
however, research on the phenomenon in the Philippines is scarce. A study on text messaging
done by Roman (2005) among Catholic students aged 15-24 in the Manila area found that one
third of them subscribed to religious text message services, one third subscribed to mobile chat
services where strangers meet, met friends, and found romantic partners, and a full third of
students found sexual partners through these chat services. This study drew the attention of the
ministry. As a result, church ministers sent frequent Biblical and inspirational messages to teens
for evangelizing purposes. Sending text messages was found to be an effective channel of
communication to convey religious messages. It helped teens embrace the new technological
devices and remain conservative regarding media violence and nudity. A research study on
bullying conducted by Rudatsikira, et al. (2008) among 7,338 adolescents in the Philippines
found that there was an association between bullying victimization and physical fighting. They
suggested that adolescents who were bullied were less likely to attend school. Cyber bullying as
compared to traditional bullying, is more insidious due to the increasing online interaction. This
study examined the relationships of cyber bullying victimization and perpetration. So far, limited
studies on the interaction of cultural values in cyber bullying show that the relationship between
victimization and perpetration is inconclusive.
This study seeks to address this gap by exploring the behavioral impacts of cyberbullying and
promoting awareness, aiming to equip the school community with the knowledge and tools to
combat this issue effectively. The goal of this research is to lessen the negative impacts of
cyberbullying and assist students' overall development by creating a friendly atmosphere.
The Anti-Bullying Act of 2013, under the Philippine law, defines bullying as
“any severe, or repeated use by one or more students of a written, verbal, or
electronic expression, or a physical act or gesture, or any combination
thereof, directed at another student that has the effect of actually causing or
placing the latter in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm or
damage to his property; creating a hostile environment at school for the
other student; infringing on the rights of the other student at school”
(Republic Act No. 10627, 2013). This document, together with the other
literature on bullying, underscores direct or indirect aggression,
intentionality, repetition, and power imbalance as the underlying elements of
bullying.