Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VII-Central Visyas
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF BOHOL

WEEKLY LESSON PLAN

(DepEd Order 42, s 2016)

Teachers Name: _______________ Quarter: Fourth Quarter

Subject and Grade Level: English 9 Week: 6

Most General Objective:

Essential React to lay value judgment on critical issues that demand sound analysis and call for prompt
Learning action.
Competency
- (MELC)
Specific Objectives: At the end the lesson the learners are expected to;
A. Knowledge: Identify message presented in the text.

B. Psychomotor: Take a stand on the critical issues presented in the

text.

C. Affective: Express ideas on the issue presented through talk show.

Content Conducting a Talk show

Learning A Journey Through Anglo-American Literature (Learner’s Manual), pages: 607-624
Resources [Link]
[Link]
https;//[Link]
Procedures A. Preparation
● Opening Prayer.
● Setting the classroom environment (arranging the chairs, checking if the
classroom is clean and orderly).
● Ensuring a safe learning environment for everyone. Giving of New Normal
classroom rules.
● Checking of attendance and uniform.
● Stating the objectives of the lesson.
● Activating Prior Knowledge:
● Using Meta Cards ask students to post on the board the different expressions
under Disagreements and Agreements.

That’s true. You’re absolutely right.

Exactly! No doubt about it.
I couldn’t agree with you more. You have a point.
I don’t think so. No way.
I’m afraid I disagree. I totally disagree.
I beg to disagree. I’d say the exact opposite.

[Link]
1. A. Drills/Activity:
Directions: Let the students arrange the jumbled letters and match its meaning.

UTLIFE - OCEPHIS-
ALMSITIENIFINI - AZME-
IONIILTTAG -

Ask students to use the words in the sentence.

 B. Let the class read the selection and answer the comprehension question.

Medical Overtreatment: A Broken System

[Link]
How has it come to this- the doctors administer so much care that they wouldn’t
want for themselves? The simple, or not-so-simple, answer is this: patients, doctors,
and the system.

To see how patients play a role, imagine a scenario in which someone has lost
consciousness and been admitted to an emergency room. And is so often the case, no
one has made a plan for this situation, and scared family members find themselves
caught up in a maze of choices. When doctors ask if they want “everything” done, they
answer yes, often meaning “do everything that’s reasonable,” The problem is that they
may not know what’s reasonable. For their part, who are told to do “everything” will do
it, whether it is reasonable or not.

This scenario is a common one. Feeding into the problem are unrealistic
expectations of what doctors can accomplish. Many people think of CPR as a reliable
lifesaver when, in fact, the results are usually poor. If a patient suffers from severe
illness, old age, or a terminal disease, the odds of a good outcome from CPR are
infinitesimal, while the odds of suffering are overwhelming. Poor knowledge and
misguided expectations lead to a lot of bad decisions.

But of course it’s not just patients making these things happen. Doctors play an
enabling role, too. The trouble is that even doctors who hate to administer futile care
must find a way to address the wishes of patients and families. Imagine once again, the
emergency room with those grieving family members. They do not know the doctor.
Establishing trust under such circumstances is a very delicate thing. People are
prepared to think the doctor is acting out of base motives, trying to save time, or
money, or effort, especially if the doctor is advising against further treatment.

In many ways, doctors and patients are simply victims of a larger system that
encourages excessive treatment. In some unfortunate cases, doctors use the fee-to-
service to do everything they can, no matter how pointless, to make money. More
commonly, though, doctors fear litigation and do whatever they’re asked, with little
feedback, to avoid getting into trouble.

Even when the right preparations have been made, the system can still swallow
people up. One of my patient was a man named Jack, a 78-year-old who had been ill for
years and undergone about 15 major surgical procedures. He explained to me that he
never, under any circumstances, wanted to be placed on life support machines again.
One Saturday, however, Jack suffered a massive stroke and got admitted to the
emergency room unconscious, without his wife. Doctors did everything to resuscitate
him and put him on life support in the ICU. This was Jack’s worst nightmare. When I
arrived at the hospital and took over Jack’s care, I spoke to his wife and to hospital staff
about his care preferences. Then I turned off the life support machines and sat with
him. He died two hours later.

Although he had thoroughly documented his wishes, Jack hadn’t died as he’d hoped.
The system had intervened. One of the nurses, I later found out, even reported my
actions as possible homicide. Nothing came of it, of course; Jack’s wishes had been
spelled out explicitly, and he’d left a paperwork to prove it.
But the prospect of a police investigation is terrifying for any physician, I could far more
easily have left Jack on life support, prolonging his life, and his suffering, a few more
weeks. I would have made a little more money, and medicine would have ended up
with an additional $500,000 bill. It’s no wonder many doctors err on the side of
overtreatment.
 But doctors still don’t over treat themselves. Almost anyone can find a way to die in
peace at home, and pain can be managed better than ever. Hospice care, which focuses
on providing terminally ill patients with comfort and dignity, provides most people with
much better final days, Amazingly, studies have found that people placed in hospice
care often live longer than people seeking active cures.

2. Analysis: Digesting the Text

 What do the patients’ relatives usually ask doctors to do when the former
is taken to a hospital unconscious?
 What is CPR? How do physician perceive it?
 What is the usual reaction of the patients’ relatives if doctors advise
against further medical treatment?
 What values does the text want to in still in us? Do you agree that these
values are to be retained or preserved among others? Why?

[Link] Proper
[Link]

Talk Show- it is television programming or radio programming genre structured around

the act of spontaneous [Link] most cases it involves well known personalities
and guests.

How to conduct a talk show

1. Select a theme for your show.
2. Research and determine your audience.
3. Define the concept of your show.
4. Consider your set of topics.
5. Decide on your performance style.
6. Plan and script ahead.
7. If possible, consider finding a co-host.

E. Problem

Divide the class into four groups and decide topic to focus in conducting a talk show. It will
be video recorded and present to the class.
 Effects of ML to High School students.
 Social media creates gap among family members.
 Education as the key to success.
 Sangguniang Kabataan: The Training Ground for Future Politicians
 Oral Communication : A Rampant Problem Among High School Students

Rubrics for Assessing Talk Show Presentation

[Link]
Grading Criteria Very Satisfactory (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
Satisfactory (4)
Preparation Gathers Gathers Gathers Gathers
information information information information
from varied from three or from one or from only one
sources: four sources; two sources; source; may not
prepares note prepares notes writes be able to
cards to use as to use during presentation complete task
cues during presentation accurately because of
presentation Lack of
preparation
Content Used an Used adequate Used some Used
abundance of information information not information
materials about the topic; connected to that has little
clearly related made good the topic connection to
to topic; Made points topic
points clearly.
Organization Organized Presented most Presented Did not use a
information and information in a loosely logical order in
ordered ideas logical order; connected presentation
 logically; Presented ideas;
Presented easy- generally clear Presented a
to-follow and easy-to- choppy and
argument; follow difficult-to-
Stated a clear arguments follow
conclusion organization
Presentation/ Well-poised, Engaged during Had little or no Appeared
Speaking Skill enthusiastic, presentation; expression; Did disinterested
and confident the not enunciate during
during the review/critique clearly; the presentation;
presentation; was well presenter spoke the
enunciated presented. The clearly once in a task/activity
clearly; the presenter spoke while; The was not clearly
review/critique clearly. review/ critique presented
was presented was presented
very well. The clearly.
presenter
presented the
topic
confidently.
Pros and The group The group The group The group
Costume presenters are presenters used presenters used presenters did
complete with props, costume a few props, not use any
creative props, and others that costume and props, costume
costume and made the others. and others.
others that presentation
made the realistic.
presentation
more realistic.

F. Generalization

Give insights on any of the topics discussed on the talk show.

G. Evaluation
1. What makes talk show informative?
2. Why is it important that a talk show personalities must be expert individuals
on the topic?

H. Closing

Knowledge is power, Power provides Information, information leads to

education, Education breeds Wisdom; Wisdom is Liberation. People are not liberated
because of lack of knowledge.

Remarks

Reflection

Prepared by:

DAISY D. ESTOSE,MT-I
Prototype Lesson Plan Writer

ARNEL B. QUINO, PhD

TWG

PABLITO D. VILLALON
EPSvr- English
Answer Key:
Activity 1: Activating Prior Knowledge

Agreement Disagreement
That’s true. No way.
Exactly! . I’m afraid I disagree.
I couldn’t agree with you more. I beg to disagree.
You’re absolutely right. I totally disagree.
No doubt about it I’d say the exact opposite
You have a point.

Presentation

A. Drills/Activity

UTLIFE (FUTILE)- OCEPHIS (HOSPICE)-

ALMSITIENIFINI (INFINITESIMAL)- AZME (MAZE)-

IONIILTTAG (LITIGATION)-

B. Digesting the Text

[Link] will ask the doctor to do everything to save the patient.

[Link] is understood to be a life saver procedure by most people while a poor result in conducting CPR is seen by
doctors.

3. When the doctor is advising against further treatment people think the doctor is acting out of base motives, trying
to save time, or money, or effort, especially if the doctor is advising against further treatment.

[Link] may vary.

Evaluation:

[Link] may vary.

[Link] may vary.