Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)

RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-178

Trident II (D-5) Sea-Launched Ballistic Missile UGM 133A (Trident II

Missile)
As of FY 2017 President's Budget

Defense Acquisition Management

Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Table of Contents

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs 3

Program Information 5
Responsible Office 5
References 5
Mission and Description 6
Executive Summary 7
Threshold Breaches 8
Schedule 9
Performance 11
Track to Budget 12
Cost and Funding 14
Low Rate Initial Production 28
Foreign Military Sales 29
Nuclear Costs 29
Unit Cost 30
Cost Variance 33
Contracts 36
Deliveries and Expenditures 48
Operating and Support Cost 49

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 2
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Common Acronyms and Abbreviations for MDAP Programs

Acq O&M - Acquisition-Related Operations and Maintenance

ACAT - Acquisition Category
ADM - Acquisition Decision Memorandum
APB - Acquisition Program Baseline
APPN - Appropriation
APUC - Average Procurement Unit Cost
$B - Billions of Dollars
BA - Budget Authority/Budget Activity
Blk - Block
BY - Base Year
CAPE - Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation
CARD - Cost Analysis Requirements Description
CDD - Capability Development Document
CLIN - Contract Line Item Number
CPD - Capability Production Document
CY - Calendar Year
DAB - Defense Acquisition Board
DAE - Defense Acquisition Executive
DAMIR - Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
DoD - Department of Defense
DSN - Defense Switched Network
EMD - Engineering and Manufacturing Development
EVM - Earned Value Management
FOC - Full Operational Capability
FMS - Foreign Military Sales
FRP - Full Rate Production
FY - Fiscal Year
FYDP - Future Years Defense Program
ICE - Independent Cost Estimate
IOC - Initial Operational Capability
Inc - Increment
JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council
$K - Thousands of Dollars
KPP - Key Performance Parameter
LRIP - Low Rate Initial Production
$M - Millions of Dollars
MDA - Milestone Decision Authority
MDAP - Major Defense Acquisition Program
MILCON - Military Construction
N/A - Not Applicable
O&M - Operations and Maintenance
ORD - Operational Requirements Document
OSD - Office of the Secretary of Defense
O&S - Operating and Support
PAUC - Program Acquisition Unit Cost

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 3
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

PB - President’s Budget
PE - Program Element
PEO - Program Executive Officer
PM - Program Manager
POE - Program Office Estimate
RDT&E - Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation
SAR - Selected Acquisition Report
SCP - Service Cost Position
TBD - To Be Determined
TY - Then Year
UCR - Unit Cost Reporting
U.S. - United States
USD(AT&L) - Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and Logistics)

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 4
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Program Information

Program Name
Trident II (D-5) Sea-Launched Ballistic Missile UGM 133A (Trident II Missile)

DoD Component
Navy

Responsible Office

VADM Terry Benedict Phone: 202-433-7001

Strategic Systems Programs Fax: 202-433-5326
1250-10th Street, SE
Suite 3600; Washington Navy Yard DSN Phone: 288-7001
Washington, DC 20374-5127 DSN Fax: 288-5326
Date Assigned: May 7, 2010

[email protected]

References

SAR Baseline (Production Estimate)

Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated July 15, 1987

Approved APB
Navy Acquisition Executive (NAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated September 10, 2011

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 5
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Mission and Description

The TRIDENT II (D5) Sea-Launched Ballistic Missile UGM 133A (TRIDENT II (D5) missile) developed an improved
Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile with greater accuracy and payload capability at equivalent ranges as compared to the
TRIDENT I (C4) system. TRIDENT II (D5) enhances United States (U.S.) strategic deterrence by providing a survivable sea-
based system capable of engaging the full spectrum of potential targets. It enhances the U.S. position in strategic arms
negotiation by providing a weapon system with performance and payload flexibility that accommodates various treaty
initiatives. The TRIDENT II (D5) missile's increased payload allows the deterrent mission to be achieved with fewer
submarines.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 6
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Executive Summary

On November 2, 2015, SSP completed a Demonstration and Shakedown Operation flight operation with a fully configured
D5 Life Extension (LE) missile involving all of the LE missile electronics packages and the Guidance LE subsystem. This
flight test was a critical milestone as D5 LE remains on track for initial fleet introduction (IFI) in FY 2017. The operation was
the first flight test for two fully configured D5 LE missiles with all LE missiles electronics packages and the Guidance LE
subsystem.

In the area of rocket motors and post boost control system gas generators, the TRIDENT II (D5) missile program has
maintained the solid rocket motor unit cost from FY 2014 PB, however, the Navy is actively engaged with Lockheed Martin
and Orbital ATK to aggressively lower their respective overheads as the industrial base shrinks. The Navy is cautiously
watching the industrial base as the decreasing demand is expected to continue and will accelerate downward as both the
Air Force and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) reduce their procurements,increasing the risk of
future unit costs. NASA is expected to make a decision whether to switch from solid to liquid propulsion systems for the
next generation Space Launch Vehicles in the coming years. If NASA were to decide upon the liquid propulsion options,
costs could significantly increase for the TRIDENT II (D5) missile. The current budget maintains buying 12 rocket motor
sets per year through FY 2017 and increases to 14 sets in FY 2018 in order to address age out concerns. Due to the high
rate of TRIDENT II (D5) missile production in the early years of the program, a significant portion of the inventory will age out
in the near term driving the quantities to increase in FY 2018.

T
​ here are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 7
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Threshold Breaches

APB Breaches Explanation of Breach

Schedule This schedule breach was previously reported in the December 2014
Performance SAR.
Cost RDT&E
Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and
Procurement Acquisition (RDA)) agreed at the November 2012 Program Executive
MILCON Office Quarterly Review that no Program Deviation Report was
Acq O&M required by the Program Manager as a result of the delay of
O&S Cost Demonstration and Shakedown Operation-24.
Unit Cost PAUC
APUC

Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline
PAUC None
APUC None
Original UCR Baseline
PAUC None
APUC None

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 8
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Schedule

Schedule Events
SAR Baseline Current APB
Current
Events Production Production
Estimate
Estimate Objective/Threshold
Milestone I (Initiate Concept Definition) Oct 1977 Oct 1977 Apr 1978 Oct 1977
Commence Advanced Dev Phase Oct 1980 Oct 1980 Apr 1981 Oct 1980
Milestone II (Commence FSD) Oct 1983 Oct 1983 Apr 1984 Oct 1983
First Development Flight Test Jan 1987 Jan 1987 Jul 1987 Jan 1987
Milestone III (Production Approval)/ Award Initial Missile Apr 1987 Apr 1987 Oct 1987 Apr 1987
Production
IOC (may be less than full msl outload) Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Jun 1990 Mar 1990
D5 LE System CDR N/A Feb 2011 Aug 2011 Jan 2011
First Guidance Only Flight Test (DASO-23) N/A Feb 2012 Aug 2012 Feb 2012
Second Guidance Only Flight Test (DASO-24) N/A Aug 2012 Feb 2013 Apr 20131
First Missile Electronics Flight Test (PTM-1/DASO-25) N/A Sep 2013 Mar 2014 Apr 2013
IFI for FCEA/Interlocks N/A Apr 2017 Oct 2017 Apr 2017
EHW#2 at Bangor IOC N/A Oct 2017 Apr 2018 Oct 2017
First Operational Flight Test (CET) N/A Oct 2018 Apr 2019 Oct 2018
1
APB Breach

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 9
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Change Explanations
None

Acronyms and Abbreviations

CDR - Critical Design Review
CET - Commander Evaluation Test
D5 LE - D5 Life Extension
DASO - Demonstration and Shakedown Operation
Dev - Development
EHW - Explosive Handling Wharf
FCEA - Flight Control Electronics Assembly
FSD - Full Scale Development
IFI - Initial Fleet Introduction
MSL - missile
PTM - Proofing Test Missile

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 10
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Performance

Classified Performance information is provided in the classified annex to this submission.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 11
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Track to Budget

RDT&E

Appn BA PE
Navy 1319 07 0101221N
Project Name
0951 JOINT WARHEAD FUZE SUSTAINMENT
PROGRAM
Navy 1319 04 0603371N
Project Name
0951 TRIDENT II/TRIDENT II (Sunk)
Navy 1319 04 0604327N
Project Name
9611 HARD AND DEEPLY BURIED TARGET (Sunk)
DEFEAT SYSTEM/Advanced Conventional
Strike Capability Demonstration
Navy 1319 04 0604363N
Project Name
0951 TRIDENT II/TRIDENT II (Sunk)

Procurement

Appn BA PE
Navy 1507 01 0101228N
Line Item Name
1150 TRIDENT II (D-5) Missile (Sunk)
1250 TRIDENT MODS (Shared)
Notes
The funding profile for Proc (Weapons Proc, Navy (WPN)) does not match that found in the FY 2017 PB controls for WPN
after FY 2011. Beginning in FY 2012, WPN funding is shared between Acquisition and O&S costs in the SAR and,
hence, the O&S costs are not reflected in the TRIDENT II (D5) missile acquisition.

MILCON

Appn BA PE
Navy 1205 01 0202576N
Project Name
Facilities Restoration and MOD- Grounds (Shared) (Sunk)
Navy 1205 01 0203176N
Project Name
Facilities Restoration and MOD- Fleet Ops (Shared) (Sunk)
Navy 1205 01 0212176N
Project Name

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 12
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

68436990 Fleet Ballistic Missile

Navy 1205 01 0212576N
Project Name
Facilities New Footprint (Shared) (Sunk)
Navy 1205 01 0703676N
Project Name
Facility Restoration and MOD - Maint and Prod (Shared) (Sunk)
Navy 1205 01 0712876N
Project Name
60495822 Facilities - New Footprint- Main and Production
Navy 1205 01 0805976N
Project Name
Facility Restoration and MOD - Training (Shared) (Sunk)

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 13
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Cost and Funding

Cost Summary

Total Acquisition Cost

BY 1983 $M BY 1983 $M TY $M

Appropriation SAR Baseline Current APB SAR Baseline Current APB

Current Current
Production Production Production Production
Estimate Estimate
Estimate Objective/Threshold Estimate Objective
RDT&E 8434.9 8783.9 9662.3 8806.3 9453.2 10126.0 10184.7
Procurement 17588.5 18406.7 20247.4 18261.7 25396.9 30643.5 30547.3
Flyaway -- -- -- 14077.6 -- -- 23668.7
Recurring -- -- -- 14077.6 -- -- 23668.7
Non Recurring -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- 0.0
Support -- -- -- 4184.1 -- -- 6878.6
Other Support -- -- -- 4160.5 -- -- 6843.2
Initial Spares -- -- -- 23.6 -- -- 35.4
MILCON 532.9 757.6 833.4 636.3 668.4 1220.3 991.4
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 26556.3 27948.2 N/A 27704.3 35518.5 41989.8 41723.4

Confidence Level
Confidence Level of cost estimate for current APB: 50%

TRIDENT II D-5 is currently in the process of reconciling the program office estimate with our Internal Independent Cost
Estimate (IICE). Costs are being compared at the point estimate which is approximately 17 to 18% and are making a
comparison at the 50% estimate. The plan is to have this reconciliation completed in the near future.

Total Quantity
SAR Baseline
Current APB
Quantity Production Current Estimate
Production
Estimate
RDT&E 30 28 28
Procurement 815 533 533
Total 845 561 561

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 14
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Cost and Funding

Funding Summary

Appropriation Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
To
Appropriation Prior FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
Complete
RDT&E 9729.6 84.8 111.9 108.8 63.6 65.2 20.8 0.0 10184.7
Procurement 26214.6 603.1 614.1 615.7 658.4 704.0 616.1 521.3 30547.3
MILCON 926.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 991.4
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PB 2017 Total 36870.3 687.9 726.0 724.5 787.3 769.2 636.9 521.3 41723.4
PB 2016 Total 36868.7 708.5 769.5 739.8 804.1 784.4 462.0 521.3 41658.3
Delta 1.6 -20.6 -43.5 -15.3 -16.8 -15.2 174.9 0.0 65.1

Quantity Summary
FY 2017 President's Budget / December 2015 SAR (TY$ M)
FY FY FY FY FY FY To
Quantity Undistributed Prior Total
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Complete
Development 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
Production 0 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 533
PB 2017 Total 28 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 561
PB 2016 Total 28 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 561
Delta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 15
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Cost and Funding

Annual Funding By Appropriation

Annual Funding
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
TY $M

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
1978 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0
1979 -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.0
1980 -- -- -- -- -- -- 25.6
1981 -- -- -- -- -- -- 96.7
1982 -- -- -- -- -- -- 198.4
1983 -- -- -- -- -- -- 351.0
1984 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1447.3
1985 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1982.6
1986 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1942.3
1987 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1565.3
1988 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1029.7
1989 -- -- -- -- -- -- 546.5
1990 -- -- -- -- -- -- 169.5
1991 -- -- -- -- -- -- 43.0
1992 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.2
1993 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.4
1994 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1995 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.5
1996 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.3
1997 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1999 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2001 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2002 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2003 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 19.4
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 14.0
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 21.7
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 41.5

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 16
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 56.2
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 83.8
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 81.7
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 84.8
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 111.9
2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 108.8
2019 -- -- -- -- -- -- 63.6
2020 -- -- -- -- -- -- 65.2
2021 -- -- -- -- -- -- 20.8
Subtotal 28 -- -- -- -- -- 10184.7

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 17
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual Funding
1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
BY 1983 $M

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
1978 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7.2
1979 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.5
1980 -- -- -- -- -- -- 30.1
1981 -- -- -- -- -- -- 104.2
1982 -- -- -- -- -- -- 203.1
1983 -- -- -- -- -- -- 343.9
1984 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1368.5
1985 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1818.1
1986 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1731.2
1987 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1355.1
1988 -- -- -- -- -- -- 862.6
1989 -- -- -- -- -- -- 439.3
1990 -- -- -- -- -- -- 130.9
1991 -- -- -- -- -- -- 32.1
1992 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.6
1993 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.3
1994 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1995 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.3
1996 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.2
1997 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1998 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1999 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2000 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2001 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2002 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2003 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 10.7
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7.4
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 11.2
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 21.1
2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 28.2
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 41.5
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 39.9
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 40.8
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 52.9

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 18
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 50.4
2019 -- -- -- -- -- -- 28.9
2020 -- -- -- -- -- -- 29.0
2021 -- -- -- -- -- -- 9.1
Subtotal 28 -- -- -- -- -- 8806.3

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 19
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual Funding
1507 | Procurement | Weapons Procurement, Navy
TY $M

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
1985 -- -- -- -- -- 160.8 160.8
1986 -- -- -- -- -- 508.4 508.4
1987 21 1051.6 -- -- 1051.6 295.2 1346.8
1988 66 1710.0 -- -- 1710.0 323.5 2033.5
1989 66 1586.8 -- -- 1586.8 252.2 1839.0
1990 41 1114.2 -- -- 1114.2 286.4 1400.6
1991 52 1242.9 -- -- 1242.9 269.5 1512.4
1992 28 817.6 -- -- 817.6 279.3 1096.9
1993 21 719.6 -- -- 719.6 258.5 978.1
1994 24 989.2 -- -- 989.2 111.5 1100.7
1995 18 606.5 -- -- 606.5 58.9 665.4
1996 6 186.5 -- -- 186.5 324.2 510.7
1997 7 209.1 -- -- 209.1 108.1 317.2
1998 5 150.8 -- -- 150.8 117.7 268.5
1999 5 189.3 -- -- 189.3 126.4 315.7
2000 12 362.7 -- -- 362.7 122.7 485.4
2001 12 355.2 -- -- 355.2 81.9 437.1
2002 12 378.8 -- -- 378.8 154.0 532.8
2003 12 553.5 -- -- 553.5 19.5 573.0
2004 12 640.0 -- -- 640.0 0.9 640.9
2005 5 612.9 -- -- 612.9 102.4 715.3
2006 -- 708.9 -- -- 708.9 196.3 905.2
2007 -- 766.7 -- -- 766.7 147.4 914.1
2008 12 862.6 -- -- 862.6 179.2 1041.8
2009 24 889.2 -- -- 889.2 178.9 1068.1
2010 24 867.8 -- -- 867.8 184.4 1052.2
2011 24 935.7 -- -- 935.7 177.5 1113.2
2012 24 624.7 -- -- 624.7 131.8 756.5
2013 -- 420.7 -- -- 420.7 180.7 601.4
2014 -- 463.1 -- -- 463.1 202.5 665.6
2015 -- 454.0 -- -- 454.0 203.3 657.3
2016 -- 396.9 -- -- 396.9 206.2 603.1
2017 -- 403.9 -- -- 403.9 210.2 614.1
2018 -- 422.1 -- -- 422.1 193.6 615.7
2019 -- 461.8 -- -- 461.8 196.6 658.4
2020 -- 508.2 -- -- 508.2 195.8 704.0
2021 -- 483.9 -- -- 483.9 132.2 616.1
2022 -- 333.6 -- -- 333.6 -- 333.6
2023 -- 150.0 -- -- 150.0 -- 150.0
2024 -- 37.7 -- -- 37.7 -- 37.7

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 20
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Subtotal 533 23668.7 -- -- 23668.7 6878.6 30547.3

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 21
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual Funding
1507 | Procurement | Weapons Procurement, Navy
BY 1983 $M

Fiscal Non End

Quantity End Item Non
Year Item Total Total Total
Recurring Recurring
Recurring Flyaway Support Program
Flyaway Flyaway
Flyaway
1985 -- -- -- -- -- 137.7 137.7
1986 -- -- -- -- -- 420.7 420.7
1987 21 839.8 -- -- 839.8 235.8 1075.6
1988 66 1314.1 -- -- 1314.1 248.6 1562.7
1989 66 1173.3 -- -- 1173.3 186.5 1359.8
1990 41 796.4 -- -- 796.4 204.7 1001.1
1991 52 866.5 -- -- 866.5 187.8 1054.3
1992 28 555.9 -- -- 555.9 189.9 745.8
1993 21 480.5 -- -- 480.5 172.6 653.1
1994 24 647.8 -- -- 647.8 73.0 720.8
1995 18 390.9 -- -- 390.9 38.0 428.9
1996 6 118.7 -- -- 118.7 206.5 325.2
1997 7 131.8 -- -- 131.8 68.2 200.0
1998 5 94.0 -- -- 94.0 73.3 167.3
1999 5 116.5 -- -- 116.5 77.8 194.3
2000 12 220.2 -- -- 220.2 74.6 294.8
2001 12 213.0 -- -- 213.0 49.1 262.1
2002 12 224.7 -- -- 224.7 91.4 316.1
2003 12 321.8 -- -- 321.8 11.3 333.1
2004 12 361.3 -- -- 361.3 0.5 361.8
2005 5 336.7 -- -- 336.7 56.3 393.0
2006 -- 379.9 -- -- 379.9 105.2 485.1
2007 -- 402.2 -- -- 402.2 77.3 479.5
2008 12 445.4 -- -- 445.4 92.5 537.9
2009 24 452.6 -- -- 452.6 91.1 543.7
2010 24 434.3 -- -- 434.3 92.3 526.6
2011 24 459.5 -- -- 459.5 87.2 546.7
2012 24 302.2 -- -- 302.2 63.8 366.0
2013 -- 200.7 -- -- 200.7 86.2 286.9
2014 -- 217.9 -- -- 217.9 95.3 313.2
2015 -- 210.4 -- -- 210.4 94.3 304.7
2016 -- 180.8 -- -- 180.8 94.0 274.8
2017 -- 180.6 -- -- 180.6 94.0 274.6
2018 -- 185.1 -- -- 185.1 84.9 270.0
2019 -- 198.5 -- -- 198.5 84.6 283.1
2020 -- 214.2 -- -- 214.2 82.5 296.7
2021 -- 200.0 -- -- 200.0 54.6 254.6
2022 -- 135.1 -- -- 135.1 -- 135.1
2023 -- 59.6 -- -- 59.6 -- 59.6
2024 -- 14.7 -- -- 14.7 -- 14.7

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 22
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Subtotal 533 14077.6 -- -- 14077.6 4184.1 18261.7

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 23
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Cost Quantity Information

1507 | Procurement | Weapons Procurement, Navy
End Item
Recurring
Fiscal Flyaway
Quantity
Year (Aligned With
Quantity)
BY 1983 $M
1985 -- --
1986 -- --
1987 21 737.5
1988 66 1068.2
1989 66 941.3
1990 41 796.4
1991 52 901.9
1992 28 541.8
1993 21 480.5
1994 24 647.8
1995 18 390.9
1996 6 118.7
1997 7 131.9
1998 5 94.0
1999 5 116.5
2000 12 220.4
2001 12 213.1
2002 12 224.7
2003 12 321.8
2004 12 779.6
2005 5 827.3
2006 -- --
2007 -- --
2008 12 628.9
2009 24 1015.2
2010 24 1163.1
2011 24 997.5
2012 24 718.6
2013 -- --
2014 -- --
2015 -- --
2016 -- --
2017 -- --
2018 -- --
2019 -- --
2020 -- --
2021 -- --
2022 -- --
2023 -- --

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 24
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

2024 -- --
Subtotal 533 14077.6

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 25
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual Funding
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine
Corps
TY $M
Fiscal
Year Total
Program
1984 79.3
1985 82.4
1986 126.3
1987 21.0
1988 18.1
1989 15.4
1990 7.6
1991 70.5
1992 --
1993 --
1994 --
1995 --
1996 --
1997 --
1998 --
1999 --
2000 5.7
2001 1.1
2002 4.2
2003 7.2
2004 --
2005 --
2006 2.8
2007 --
2008 28.7
2009 --
2010 --
2011 --
2012 78.0
2013 264.4
2014 24.9
2015 88.5
2016 --
2017 --
2018 --
2019 65.3
Subtotal 991.4

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 26
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual Funding
1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine
Corps
BY 1983 $M
Fiscal
Year Total
Program
1984 72.8
1985 73.4
1986 109.3
1987 17.6
1988 14.6
1989 12.0
1990 5.7
1991 51.3
1992 --
1993 --
1994 --
1995 --
1996 --
1997 --
1998 --
1999 --
2000 3.6
2001 0.7
2002 2.6
2003 4.3
2004 --
2005 --
2006 1.6
2007 --
2008 15.4
2009 --
2010 --
2011 --
2012 38.8
2013 129.7
2014 12.0
2015 42.1
2016 --
2017 --
2018 --
2019 28.8
Subtotal 636.3

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 27
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Low Rate Initial Production

Item Initial LRIP Decision Current Total LRIP

Approval Date 10/30/1983 10/30/1983
Approved Quantity 21 21
Reference Milestone II ADM Milestone II ADM
Start Year 1983 1983
End Year 1987 1987

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 28
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Foreign Military Sales

None

Nuclear Costs

Classified Nuclear Cost information is provided in the classified annex to this submission.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 29
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Unit Cost

Unit Cost Report

BY 1983 $M BY 1983 $M

Item Current UCR % Change

Current Estimate
Baseline
(Dec 2015 SAR)
(Sep 2011 APB)
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 27948.2 27704.3
Quantity 561 561
Unit Cost 49.819 49.384 -0.87
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 18406.7 18261.7
Quantity 533 533
Unit Cost 34.534 34.262 -0.79

BY 1983 $M BY 1983 $M
Revised
Item Original UCR Current Estimate % Change
Baseline (Dec 2015 SAR)
(Jun 2002 APB)
Program Acquisition Unit Cost
Cost 25943.7 27704.3
Quantity 568 561
Unit Cost 45.676 49.384 +8.12
Average Procurement Unit Cost
Cost 17155.2 18261.7
Quantity 540 533
Unit Cost 31.769 34.262 +7.85

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 30
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Unit Cost History

BY 1983 $M TY $M
Item Date
PAUC APUC PAUC APUC
Original APB Jul 1987 31.428 21.581 42.034 31.162
APB as of January 2006 Jun 2002 45.676 31.769 66.098 51.266
Revised Original APB Jun 2002 45.676 31.769 66.098 51.266
Prior APB Jun 2002 45.676 31.769 66.098 51.266
Current APB Sep 2011 49.819 34.534 74.848 57.492
Prior Annual SAR Dec 2014 49.303 34.166 74.257 57.156
Current Estimate Dec 2015 49.384 34.262 74.373 57.312

SAR Unit Cost History

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial PAUC Changes PAUC
Production Current
Estimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total Estimate
42.034 -0.760 9.301 3.381 0.180 15.663 0.000 4.574 32.339 74.373

Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)

Initial APUC Changes APUC
Production Current
Estimate Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total Estimate
31.162 -0.733 3.971 3.215 0.175 14.708 0.000 4.814 26.150 57.312

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 31
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

SAR Baseline History

SAR SAR SAR
Current
Item Planning Development Production
Estimate
Estimate Estimate Estimate
Milestone I N/A Oct 1977 Oct 1977 Oct 1977
Milestone II N/A Oct 1983 Oct 1983 Oct 1983
Milestone III N/A Mar 1987 Apr 1987 Apr 1987
IOC N/A Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Mar 1990
Total Cost (TY $M) N/A 37645.1 35518.5 41723.4
Total Quantity N/A 740 845 561
PAUC N/A 50.872 42.034 74.373

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 32
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Cost Variance

Summary TY $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total
SAR Baseline (Production 9453.2 25396.9 668.4 35518.5
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic -34.6 -347.3 +4.5 -377.4
Quantity -48.0 -6671.1 -- -6719.1
Schedule +75.3 +1713.6 +108.0 +1896.9
Engineering -0.8 +93.1 +8.5 +100.8
Estimating +761.4 +7681.9 +198.3 +8641.6
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- +2597.0 -- +2597.0
Subtotal +753.3 +5067.2 +319.3 +6139.8
Current Changes
Economic -3.7 -43.2 -2.3 -49.2
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
Engineering -- -- -- --
Estimating -18.1 +157.4 +6.0 +145.3
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- -31.0 -- -31.0
Subtotal -21.8 +83.2 +3.7 +65.1
Total Changes +731.5 +5150.4 +323.0 +6204.9
CE - Cost Variance 10184.7 30547.3 991.4 41723.4
CE - Cost & Funding 10184.7 30547.3 991.4 41723.4

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 33
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Summary BY 1983 $M
Item RDT&E Procurement MILCON Total
SAR Baseline (Production 8434.9 17588.5 532.9 26556.3
Estimate)
Previous Changes
Economic -- -- -- --
Quantity -40.0 -3930.8 -- -3970.8
Schedule +32.7 -32.2 +35.1 +35.6
Engineering +1.3 +50.4 +4.2 +55.9
Estimating +385.9 +3453.6 +61.2 +3900.7
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- +1081.1 -- +1081.1
Subtotal +379.9 +622.1 +100.5 +1102.5
Current Changes
Economic -- -- -- --
Quantity -- -- -- --
Schedule -- -- -- --
Engineering -- -- -- --
Estimating -8.5 +65.4 +2.9 +59.8
Other -- -- -- --
Support -- -14.3 -- -14.3
Subtotal -8.5 +51.1 +2.9 +45.5
Total Changes +371.4 +673.2 +103.4 +1148.0
CE - Cost Variance 8806.3 18261.7 636.3 27704.3
CE - Cost & Funding 8806.3 18261.7 636.3 27704.3

Previous Estimate: December 2014

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 34
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

RDT&E $M
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -3.7
Congressional reductions FY 2016 which resulted in Mk5A funding decreases. (Estimating) -6.7 -13.9
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +0.7 +1.4
Decreases due to revised estimates. (Estimating) -2.5 -5.6
RDT&E Subtotal -8.5 -21.8

Procurement $M
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -43.2
Congressional reductions FY 2016 which resulted in Mk5A funding decrease. (Estimating) -4.4 -10.0
Revised funding due to the Balanced Budget Amendment. (Estimating) -2.7 -6.0
Increases due to revised estimates for Strategic Programs Alteration Kits (Flight Control +67.8 +162.9
Electronics Assembly, Interlocks, Command Sequencer, and Missile Inverter).
(Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +4.7 +10.5
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) +2.3 +4.5
Decrease in Other Support due to realignment from Other Weapons Support to O&S for -16.6 -35.5
refresh and replacement of Extended Navy Test Beds necessary to support life of the
program. (Support)
Procurement Subtotal +51.1 +83.2

MILCON $M
Base Then
Current Change Explanations
Year Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A -2.3
Revised Project Estimates for the Motor Transfer Facility project at the Utah Test and +2.0 +4.2
Training Range. (Estimating)
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) +0.9 +1.8
MILCON Subtotal +2.9 +3.7

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 35
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contracts

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Guidance FY 11 Production
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-11-C-0014
Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Plus Incentive Fee
(CPIF)
Award Date: February 10, 2011
Definitization Date: June 22, 2011

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
178.5 181.9 N/A 178.5 181.9 N/A 178.5 178.5

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +1.5 -1.4
Previous Cumulative Variances +1.8 -1.3
Net Change -0.3 -0.1

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to greater than planned Program Management activities required to
address a delay in parts deliveries. The cumulative cost variance remains favorable and is comparable to the slightly
unfavorable schedule variance, which it will be used to recover.

The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to completion of deliverables as this contract comes to a close,
but for which performance has not yet been recorded.

Notes
Current Contract Ceiling Price contains the CPIF, FFP efforts and FPIF. FFP efforts are not included in the variance data
reported above.

This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 36
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Guidance FY11 Omnibus
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-11-C-0005
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
Award Date: December 28, 2010
Definitization Date: December 28, 2010

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
142.9 N/A N/A 494.3 N/A N/A 476.6 476.6

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
modifications which exercised the FY 2012, FY 2013, and FY 2014 option CLINs.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +3.5 -2.9
Previous Cumulative Variances +5.7 -1.5
Net Change -2.2 -1.4

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to technical issues with the Interferometric Fiber-Optic Gyro and
Alternate Pendulous Integrating Gyro Accelerometer. The cumulative cost variance remains favorable and is greater than
the slightly unfavorable schedule variance, which it will be used to recover.

The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to completion of deliverables as this contract comes to a close,
but for which performance has not yet been recorded.

Notes
This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 37
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Guidance FY12 Production
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-12-C-0005
Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF), Firm Fixed Price (FFP)
Award Date: May 04, 2012
Definitization Date: May 04, 2012

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
236.7 35.7 651 236.7 35.7 651 236.7 236.7

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) 0.0 -2.7
Previous Cumulative Variances -1.1 -7.4
Net Change +1.1 +4.7

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to

The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to accelerometer sensor production and corrections to
performance data with minimal impact to performance analysis. Materials that were originally delayed in receipt at the time
of the last SAR submission were delivered over the course of FY 2015 leading to a large positive change in schedule
variance.

Notes
Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Ceiling Price change due to correction of data.

This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 38
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: TRIDENT II FY12 P&DSS
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Contractor Location: 1111 Lockheed Martin Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Contract Number: N00030-12-C-0100
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Fixed Price Incentive(Firm
Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: October 01, 2011
Definitization Date: December 16, 2011

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
334.7 590.7 N/A 1134.9 590.7 N/A 1134.9 1134.9

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
definitization and the exercising of options.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +23.9 -11.8
Previous Cumulative Variances +34.1 -13.5
Net Change -10.2 +1.7

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to 1) Increased labor volume resulting from quality surveillance
activities for the first stage, second stage, and common stage motor areas; 2) Missile Body production final year efforts, and
3) More support than planned for several key electronics packages. The cumulative cost variance remains very favorable
and is expected to be sufficient to achieve schedule recovery.

The favorable net change in the schedule variance is due to 1) Schedule recovery for a Circuit Card Assembly milestone; 2)
Partial schedule recovery on the Flight Control and Interlocks Chassis builds at the Missile Integrated Support Facility; and
3) Schedule recovery for the delivery of Thruster Assemblies and Thruster Cartridges.

Notes
Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Production and Deployed System Support = P&DSS

This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 39
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: Guidance FY13 SPALT
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-13-C-0007
Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: March 08, 2013
Definitization Date: March 08, 2013

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
252.8 28.9 651 257.8 28.9 651 257.8 257.8

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to last year's data only
reflected only Cost for all CLINs when, in fact, the data should have reflected Cost plus Fee. This year the data is reflecting
Cost plus Fee.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +0.3 -3.6
Previous Cumulative Variances -0.3 -1.9
Net Change +0.6 -1.7

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to work associated with the builds which was pushed back to focus on
quality assurance of needed production parts. Since many of these pushed tasks were level of effort, performance was
taken on quality assurance time spent and not actual builds.

The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to delays caused by the late receipt of SPALT materials. These
materials used to produce accelerometers have seen ongoing delays for over a year which is an issue affecting Guidance
subsystem contracts in multiple fiscal years. Another issue has been delays in circuit card assemblies and component
production due to a brief factory shutdown due to quality management issues are also contributing to the variance. The
factory is now functioning at full capacity with maximum efficiency.

Notes
Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Ceiling Price change due to correction of data.

Strategic Programs Alteration = SPALT

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 40
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: TRIDENT II FY13 P&DSS
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Contractor Location: 1111 Lockheed Martin Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Contract Number: N00030-12-C-0101
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Fixed Price Incentive(Firm
Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: October 01, 2012
Definitization Date: December 20, 2012

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
592.2 516.7 N/A 1661.9 516.7 N/A 1661.9 1661.9

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
definitization and the exercising of options.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +20.7 -13.5
Previous Cumulative Variances +32.0 -9.3
Net Change -11.3 -4.2

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to 1) Power Supply Modules labor ramp up to recover schedule and
sub-contractor rework of accelerometers along with increased shifts to support a revised schedule; 2) Survivability Efforts-
a) hardware deliveries were delayed for components needed for the cable builds, which extended the overall time required
for build/test, and b) unplanned work was required during the Burn-In Console Critical Design Review; and 3) Increased
System Engineering support for the First Article Compatibility Testing on Missile Railcar Support Equipment along with
Loading Tube pads. The cumulative variance remains favorable and is expected to be sufficient to recover the schedule
variance.

The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to 1) Schedule delay in second tier subcontractors for circuit
card assembly; 2) Re-test and rework of accelerometer components due to subcontractor quality control, and 3) First,
Second, and Third Stage rocket motors production delays due to focus on quality training and unscheduled down time on
the rocket motor precision drilling machine.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 41
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Notes
Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Prices will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Production and Deployed System Support = P&DSS

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 42
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: TRIDENT II FY14 P&DSS
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Contractor Location: 1111 Lockheed Martin Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Contract Number: N00030-13-C-0100
Contract Type: Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: September 17, 2013
Definitization Date: November 05, 2013

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
98.0 529.5 N/A 756.2 529.5 N/A 756.2 756.2

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
definitization and the exercising of options.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +23.0 -9.2
Previous Cumulative Variances +17.7 -6.3
Net Change +5.3 -2.9

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable net change in the cost variance is due to 1) Life Extension (LE) Production - Program Management Integrator
Disciplines personnel are being leveraged across multiple open production contracts, reducing labor costs; 2) Production -
Planned material deliveries are delayed; however, when material deliveries are made this will reduce the cost variance; 3)
Lower support required for the procurement and receipt of non-LE electronic parts material; and 4) The Test Missile Kit
antenna manufacturing area improvements due to process efficiencies utilizing batch assembly and test.

The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to 1) First article inspection quality management activities and
reprioritization to meet Strategic Weapons Facility, Atlantic cable demand; and 2) Delay in delivery of second stage igniter
Strategic Systems Program Alteration conversions. Schedule recovery is expected without program impacts.

Notes
Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Production and Deployed System Support = P&DSS

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 43
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: TRIDENT II FY 15 P&DSS
Contractor: Lockheed Martin and Space
Contractor Location: 1111 Lockheed Martin Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Contract Number: N00030-14-C-0100
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: July 07, 2014
Definitization Date: August 19, 2014

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
146.3 549.6 N/A 786.7 549.6 N/A 786.7 786.7

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
definitization and the exercise of options as funding becomes available.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +14.9 +3.4
Previous Cumulative Variances -- --
Net Change +14.9 +3.4

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable cumulative cost variance is due to 1) Labor efficiencies across multiple engineering and program
management disciplines resulting from a) less system engineering support than planned; b) successful integration testing
led to less trouble shooting on the Simulated Flight Test Equipment; and c) favorable rates resulting from hiring of junior
personnel to replenish personnel retiring; and 2) Delays in low dollar value material deliveries, however when material
deliveries are made this will reduce the cost variance.

The favorable cumulative schedule variance is due to 1) Supplier is ahead of schedule on producing the First Stage and
Second Stage motor chocks, Third Stage (TS) dollies and TS Motor Supports and completion of machining and welding for
Aerospike Protective Caps; 2) Early delivery of Integrated Valve Assembly Current Monitor Assembly, Preamplifier L Band,
and Source Controlled Drawing Low Cost Test Missile Kit Telemetry Transmitter; and 3) Early delivery of Source Controlled
Drawings of a required Pressure Transducer.

Notes
This is the first time this contract is being reported.

Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Production and Deployed System Support = P&DSS

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 44
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: FY 14 Guidance SPALT
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-14-C-0001
Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: March 01, 2014
Definitization Date: April 28, 2014

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
283.2 40.0 750 283.2 40.0 750 283.2 283.2

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +2.7 -8.0
Previous Cumulative Variances -- --
Net Change +2.7 -8.0

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable cumulative cost variance is due to delayed contractor billing which is expected to recover.

The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to 1) Delayed receipt of accelerometer materials. This slip in delivery
will not affect the timeline of the overall guidance system; 2) Delays on sensors on previous contracts contributing to delays
in gyroscope production; and 3) Delays in circuit card assemblies and component production due to a brief factory
shutdown due to quality management issues. The factory is now functioning at full capacity with maximum efficiency.

Notes
This is the first time this contract is being reported.

Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Strategic Programs Alterations = SPALT

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 45
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: FY 15 Guidance SPALT
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-15-C-0003
Contract Type: Fixed Price Incentive(Firm Target) (FPIF)
Award Date: February 02, 2015
Definitization Date: February 02, 2015

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
302.4 41.0 869 302.4 41.0 869 302.4 302.4

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +0.9 -2.2
Previous Cumulative Variances -- --
Net Change +0.9 -2.2

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable cumulative cost variance is due to delays on the FY 2014 Guidance SPALT contract which delayed the start
of FY 2015 SPALT work. Now that production is back to full capacity this variance will start to erode once prior year work is
completed. The current delays on this contract are in the areas of production, infrastructure support, and program
management.

The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to an extended delay in subcontractor billing receipts that has
prevented the recording of performance. This variance will correct once invoiced are received.

Notes
This is the first time this contract is being reported.

Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract values. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

Strategic Programs Alteration = SPALT

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 46
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Contract Identification
Appropriation: Procurement
Contract Name: FY 15 Guidance Omnibus Life Extension
Contractor: Charles Stark Draper Laboratory
Contractor Location: 55 Technology Square
Cambridge, MA 02139
Contract Number: N00030-14-C-0054
Contract Type: Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF)
Award Date: September 30, 2014
Definitization Date: September 30, 2014

Contract Price
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M)
Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
10.0 N/A 1 49.7 N/A 1 49.7 49.7

Target Price Change Explanation

The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to contract
modifications which exercised and funded the FY 2015 option CLINs.

Contract Variance
Item Cost Variance Schedule Variance
Cumulative Variances To Date (12/31/2015) +2.5 -0.6
Previous Cumulative Variances -- --
Net Change +2.5 -0.6

Cost and Schedule Variance Explanations

The favorable cumulative cost variance is due to technical system performance utilizing fewer hours than planned.

The unfavorable cumulative schedule variance is due to delays in completing system qualification testing due to system test
issues.

Notes
This is the first time this contract is being reported.

Initial Target Price and Current Target Price represent the total contract value. Ceiling Prices reflect the value of the FFP
CLINs, which are the only CLINs with ceilings. Therefore, Ceiling Price will be lower than Target Price for this contract.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 47
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Deliveries and Expenditures

Deliveries
Percent
Delivered to Date Planned to Date Actual to Date Total Quantity
Delivered
Development 28 28 28 100.00%
Production 425 425 533 79.74%
Total Program Quantity Delivered 453 453 561 80.75%

Expended and Appropriated (TY $M)

Total Acquisition Cost 41723.4 Years Appropriated 39
Expended to Date 35732.8 Percent Years Appropriated 82.98%
Percent Expended 85.64% Appropriated to Date 37558.2
Total Funding Years 47 Percent Appropriated 90.02%

The above data is current as of February 09, 2016.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 48
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Operating and Support Cost

Cost Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: February 11, 2016
Source of Estimate: POE
Quantity to Sustain: 533
Unit of Measure: Missile
Service Life per Unit: 43.00 Years
Fiscal Years in Service: FY 2000 - FY 2042

Total missiles procured for the TRIDENT II (D5) missile program is 561. Of that number, 28 of those missiles were
RDT&E missiles, with the remainder of 533 to be procured using Weapons Procurement, Navy (WPN) funding. Strategic
Systems Programs (SSP) uses the number of 533 as O&S costs began in FY 2000 and end in FY 2042. That time
period would only cover the 533 procured missiles and would not support the 28 RDT&E missiles which were procured in
the late 1980s prior to IOC in 1990.

The costs reflected in this section are for FYs 2000-2042. This is due to the fact that TRIDENT II (D5) missile did not
have to establish an O&S APB or report O&S costs. FY 2000 was the first year that SSP was required to begin showing
O&S costs for TRIDENT II (D5) missile in its SAR.

Sustainment Strategy
With the collaboration of SSP and its industry partners, life cycle sustainment is the basic premise of the TRIDENT II (D5)
missile program and its life extension. The strategy is to reduce O&S costs, provide a full range of logistics support,
maintain critical reliability and accuracy requirements and implement the Shipboard Systems Integration (SSI) refresh
schedule. A total of 533 TRIDENT II (D5) missiles will be procured for this program that will support the OHIO-Class
submarine through FY 2042. The TRIDENT II (D5) missile will be the initial strategic weapon system (SWS) for the OHIO
-Class Replacement Program (ORP).

The TRIDENT II (D5) missile SWS is completing its 26th year of deployment and has reached its original design life goal.
Like any other aging weapon system, increased maintenance and repair will be required to sustain a safe, reliable, and
accurate SWS. SSP's "Cradle to Grave" responsibility requires a broad range of engineering knowledge and unique skill
sets to support the Navy's primary nuclear deterrent system. As such, engineering support spanning all phases of the
weapon system life cycle is provided by one organization (SSP). Operational Engineering Support (OES) is required for
the establishment of a "closed loop" system which includes the following: 1) collecting data from the Fleet; 2) measuring
weapons system performance; 3) analyzing the data collected to identify performance deficiencies; 4) investigating
problems identified; 5) developing solutions to resolve the deficiencies and problems; and 6) implementing corrective
actions to the Fleet. The SSP life cycle budget maintains the industrial base and expertise in the workforce and ensures
that those skill sets will be available for the follow-on ORP.

The TRIDENT II (D5) missile SWS achieved Milestone I in October 1977; Milestone II in October 1983; and Milestone III in
April 1987. At that time, program life cycle cost estimates and service cost positions were not required. At the request of
the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (ASN) (Research, Development & Acquisition (RDA)), SSP submitted an Internal ICE
for only the acquisition portion of the TRIDENT II (D5) Life Extension Program, therefore no O&S cost estimate is
available. ASN (RDA) has determined that the current APB is to remain open.

Antecedent Information
The TRIDENT II (D5) weapon system replaced the TRIDENT I (C4) weapon system. O&S costs and assumptions for
the TRIDENT I (C4) system are not available.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 49
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

Annual O&S Costs BY1983 $M

Trident II Missile TRIDENT I (C-4) (Antecedent)
Cost Element
Average Annual Cost Per Missile N/A
Unit-Level Manpower -- --
Unit Operations -- --
Maintenance 0.231 --
Sustaining Support 0.940 --
Continuing System Improvements -- --
Indirect Support 0.003 --
Other -- --
Total 1.174 --

Total O&S Cost $M

Trident II Missile
Item TRIDENT I (C-4)
Current Production APB (Antecedent)
Current Estimate
Objective/Threshold
Base Year N/A N/A 26909.0 0.0
Then Year N/A N/A 65446.0 N/A

While the TRIDENT II (D5) missile program will procure 533 WPN missiles there will never be a time when SSP will
support a total of 533 missiles in a given year. This is due to the flight test program as ever year a certain number of
missiles are tested for reliability and accuracy.

Annual O&S Costs are broken down into these categories:

Maintenance: Provides for the repair, overhaul, and missile processing of the TRIDENT II (D5) missiles' SWS at the
Strategic Weapons Facilities (SWFs).

Sustaining Support: Provides for the sustainment of the TRIDENT II (D5) missiles' SWS to include SSI efforts,
replacement of aging rocket motors, tooling and test equipment, modifications required for treaty obligations, SWS
training at the SWFs, and salaries and benefits for the SSP employees.

Indirect Support: Provides for real property maintenance including funding for recurring maintenance, major repair
projects, and minor construction in support of the Fleet Ballistic Missiles and TRIDENT II (D5) facilities. The last year
of funding for these efforts was FY 2003.

Equation to Translate Annual Cost to Total Cost

$1.1741M is the average O&S cost per missile per year (in BY $).

$1.1741M x 533 missiles = $625.795M as the average O&S costs for all missiles per year (in BY $).

$625.795M x 43 years = $26,909M as the cost of O&S costs for all missiles from FY 2000-FY 2042 (in BY $).

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 50
12:10:33
Trident II Missile December 2015 SAR

O&S Cost Variance

BY 1983
Category Change Explanations
$M
Prior SAR Total O&S Estimates - Dec 26769.0
2014 SAR
Programmatic/Planning Factors 140.0 Procurement, Navy O&S sustaining support increases due
to keeping Ship Submersible Ballistic Navy (SSBN) 730
and SSBN 731 in operational service, and a technical
correction to the SSI program as well as a realignment of
the refresh and replacement of Extended Navy Test Beds
which are necessary to support life of the program.
Operations and Maintenance, Navy sustaining support and
maintenance increases are due to OES increases in the
areas of performance evaluation, reliability maintenance,
and accuracy thus ensuring the necessary technical
expertise and industrial base in order to maintain the sea
based strategic deterrent demonstrated safety, reliability,
and accuracy and its unique technologies through the
entire life of the OHIO Class and as the initial payload for
the ORP. Missile Processing operations also increased as
a result of the National Threat Capability Assessment,
Force Restructure, and New Strategic Arms Reduction
Treaty implementation.
Cost Estimating Methodology 0.0
Cost Data Update 0.0
Labor Rate 0.0
Energy Rate 0.0
Technical Input 0.0
Other 0.0
Total Changes 140.0
Current Estimate 26909.0

Disposal Estimate Details

Date of Estimate: February 04, 2016
Source of Estimate: POE
Disposal/Demilitarization Total Cost (BY 1983 $M): Total costs for disposal of all Missile are 124.7

O&S Costs for TRIDENT II (D5) missile include 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage rocket motor disposal. At this time, these are the
only disposal/demilitarization costs anticipated for the TRIDENT II (D5) missile. Any further disposal/demilitarization
costs will be determined once final decisions have been made in regards to the OHIO-Class Replacement
Program. The costs displayed in this section reflect infrastructure costs required for maintaining a disposal program.

March 17, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED 51
12:10:33