100% found this document useful (1 vote)
86 views34 pages

DOBLE

The presentation discusses the impact of tap changer position on Frequency Response Analysis (FRA) results for assessing the mechanical condition of transformers. It highlights the advantages of using Sweep Frequency Response Analysis (SFRA) over traditional FRA methods, detailing the testing preparations, techniques, and evaluation of results. The M5100 testing device is introduced as a reliable tool for confirming transformer integrity.

Uploaded by

jorge_moralesm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
86 views34 pages

DOBLE

The presentation discusses the impact of tap changer position on Frequency Response Analysis (FRA) results for assessing the mechanical condition of transformers. It highlights the advantages of using Sweep Frequency Response Analysis (SFRA) over traditional FRA methods, detailing the testing preparations, techniques, and evaluation of results. The M5100 testing device is introduced as a reliable tool for confirming transformer integrity.

Uploaded by

jorge_moralesm
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

Tony McGrail

Doble Engineering

This presentation shows the effects of


tap changer position on FRA results.

Version 1.0 April 2003

1
Purpose

• Assess Mechanical Condition of Transformers


(Mechanical Distortions)
• Detect Core and Winding Movement Due to
– Large Electromagnetic Forces From Fault
Currents
– Winding Shrinkage Causing Release of
Clamping Pressure
– Transformer Relocation or Shipping

Version 1.0 April 2003

2
Available Techniques

• Frequency Response Analysis (FRA)


• Leakage Reactance
• Capacitance
• Excitation Current
• These Independent Diagnostic Methods Have
Their Place in Ascertaining Transformer
Condition

Version 1.0 April 2003

3
Why SFRA and not FRA?

• To distinguish the Doble product which uses a


SWEEP approach

• Some inferior products use an impulse technique

• Impulse results have poor resolution, lack the


range required for good diagnosis and are usually
unrepeatable

Version 1.0 April 2003

4
Use of SFRA

• Measure the Frequency Response of Passive


Elements (RLC) for Various Types of Power
Apparatus
• The Result is a Transfer Function Which Produces
a Fingerprint Related to the Mechanical Geometry
for a Given Type of Apparatus

Version 1.0 April 2003

5
Are Baseline Results Necessary?

• Not always - but they are preferable


• Phase-to-phase comparisons
• Comparison with sister units
• Comparison with units from the same
manufacturer
• Results have a generally predictable shape

Version 1.0 April 2003

6
Modeling a transformer

• A transformer may be modeled using lumped


parameters
• A simple model is a parallel RLC circuit
• This has a predictable response

Version 1.0 April 2003

7
Parallel RLC Circuit

Version 1.0 April 2003

8
Response of the RLC Circuit

Capacitive
response

Inductive Resonance
response

Version 1.0 April 2003

9
Capacitor & Inductor

Capacitance

Inductance

Combined Capacitance & Inductance: Resonance


Version 1.0 April 2003

10
Typical Transformer Results

Three LV Phases

Three HV Phases

Three Phases Interwinding

Version 1.0 April 2003

11
Results

• Amplitude Change and Phase Shifts Are Measured


from 10 Hz to 10 MHz
• 1250 points are used to record data on a log scale
• Amplitude results are used in interpretation
• Phase results are rarely used

Version 1.0 April 2003

12
Frequency Sensitivity
• Experience: Certain Frequency Bands
Indicate Different Problem Conditions
< 2kHz: Core Deformation, Open Circuits,
Shorted Turns & Residual Magnetism
< 20kHz: Bulk Winding Movement Relative to
Each Other, clamping structure
< 200kHz: Deformation Within the main and tap
windings
< 2MHz: Movement of main and tap winding
Leads

Version 1.0 April 2003

13
Frequency Sensitivity
• Generally...

< Larger objects respond at lower frequencies


< Smaller objects respond at higher frequencies
< Responses of different objects may overlap
substantially

Version 1.0 April 2003

14
Testing Preparations

• Transformer Should be Disconnected From


System
• Transformer Should be in Normal Service
Condition (Assembled, Oil-Filled)
• Make Connections as Determined by Winding
Configuration
– Phases Not Under Test Are Left Floating

Version 1.0 April 2003

15
Testing Preparations

• Where tap windings are present, two sets of results


are needed for that winding
– with all tap winding included
– with no tap winding included

• Record tap positions; at neutral tap, record


previous tap position also
• Record red and black clip locations e.g. H1-H2
• Do a general inspection of the transformer; record
any variations e.g. replaced bushings
Version 1.0 April 2003

16
Test Set Preparation

• Follow the user guide


• If cold - let test set warm up for 15 minutes
• Calibrate after switching on before each test
session
• Perform a leads check
• Check the waveform at start of each trace

Version 1.0 April 2003

17
M5100B
• Comes in Rugged Package
• All Connections Accessible From Front
• Intuitive Software for Data Collection and Display
• High-Intensity Color Monitor - Full Sun Viewable
• Data Media Options
– Internal hard drive
– USB to external device
• Ethernet Connection
• Printer Port

Version 1.0 April 2003

18
M5100B

Version 1.0 April 2003

19
M5100 Connections
• At Test Set - color coded leads
– Yellow - Signal (Gives Vin)
– Red - Reference (Measures Vin)
– Black - Test (Measure Vout)

• At Transformer
– Red => Vin
– Black => Vout
– Lead grounds to base of bushings
– Safety Ground - Twist Lock to Transformer

Version 1.0 April 2003

20
Typical Test Connections
Delta-Wye
• H1-H2 } HV Winding Tests
• H2-H3
• H3-H1
• X1-X0 } LV Winding Tests
• X2-X0
• X3-X0
• H1-X1 } Inter-Winding Tests
• H2-X2
• H3-X3
• It is possible to do additional tests - e.g. various tap
positions, short circuit tests, tertiary tests etc.
Version 1.0 April 2003

21
Eg:Wye-Delta Transformer

Version 1.0 April 2003

22
Test Connections Per Previous Nameplate

Test consistently: in this case, energize top of winding


(red), measure at bottom (black)
Red Black
H1 H0
H2 H0
H3 H0
X1 X2
X2 X3
X3 X1
H1 X1
H2 X2
H3 X3

Version 1.0 April 2003

23
Connections

ALWAYS CHECK THE NAMEPLATE!!!

Version 1.0 April 2003

24
M5100 Connections

Test
lead

Signal &
Reference
Leads
M5100

Shield
Ground

Version 1.0 April 2003

25
Open Circuits

• Open circuits caused by faulty test leads produce


an obvious sign,which is best described as an
unstable resistive trace.
• Open circuits that occur within the test specimen
have a tendency to be more stable than open
circuits within test leads, because additional
distributive RLC elements within the test
specimen provide alternative distributive return
paths, thus creating a different stable transfer
function.

Version 1.0 April 2003

26
Open Circuit Traces

-4 0

-5 0
Open
-6 0 Circuit
inside test
-7 0
specimen
-8 0
dB

-9 0

-1 0 0

Open
-1 1 0

Circuit
-1 2 0
2 3 4 5 6

within test 10 10 10
F re q u e n c y - H z
10 10

leads
Version 1.0 April 2003

27
Poor Grounding

• The trend of poor grounding causes the SFRA


scan to shift in the 300 kHz – 500 kHz range.

• Since winding scans are collected in groups of


three, poor grounding is easily identified if one of
the traces behaves as described above.

• Check test lead ground connections first, then


investigate the bushing flange if necessary.

Version 1.0 April 2003

28
Poor Grounding (Staged)

-5 3 traces
-1 0
with good
grounds
-1 5

-2 0 1 traces
dB

with poor
-2 5
ground
-3 0

-3 5

-4 0
5 6
10 10
F re q u e n c y - H z

Version 1.0 April 2003

29
Transformer Relocation (Normal)

HV Tap 1

0
This graph contains 6 traces: A, B and C
-10
before and after relocation
-20
Amplitude in dB

-30

-40

-50

-60
Phase to phase variations:
-70
A to B to C
-80
0 50 100 150 200

No identifiable
Frequency in kHz
differences after
relocation
Version 1.0 April 2003

30
Transformer Relocation (Problem)

B phase HV to LV

-10
Frequency shift compared to
-20
reference
Amplitude in dB

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80
0 5 10 in kHz
Frequency 15 20

Version 1.0 April 2003

31
Example: Faulted Transformer
HV Tap 9 6/5/98

0
-10 Phase with
-20 shorted turn
-30
Amplitude in dB

-40
-50
-60
-70
-80
-90
-100
0 500 1000 1500 2000

Good phases Frequency in kHz

Version 1.0 April 2003

32
Evaluation of Results

• Compare Signatures of corresponding tests and


Look For Deviations
• Compare Signatures From Previous Tests and
Look for Deviations From Benchmark
– SFRA Provides Excellent Repeatability
• Compare Signatures With Similar or Sister Unit
Transformers

Version 1.0 April 2003

33
Conclusions

• SFRA is a powerful and reliable tool for use in


confirming mechanical integrity of transformers
• The M5100 is robust, easy to use and supports
decision making

Version 1.0 April 2003

34

You might also like