Government whip – new angle of arguments

Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and respected opponents, thank you for this opportunity to
reassert the compelling case for reinstating the death penalty in the Philippines. Building upon the
strong arguments put forth by our team, the Government Whip is here to reinforce the critical points
that underscore the necessity and efficacy of this proposed policy. Our stance is grounded in the
pursuit of justice, deterrence against heinous crimes, and the efficient functioning of our legal system.

Supporters might propose a more limited application of the death penalty, focusing on specific
heinous crimes. By restricting its use to extreme cases, the argument is to maintain a balance between
serving justice and addressing concerns about potential miscarriages of justice in less clear-cut
situations.Proposed reasons to reinstitute the death penalty in the Philippines include the belief that
it could serve as a deterrent against serious crimes, provide justice and closure for victims and their
families, enhance the efficiency of the criminal justice system, suggest selective application for
extreme cases, and align the country with international practices. Each of these propositions aims to
address specific concerns or perceived benefits related to the reinstatement of capital
punishment.Proponents argue that it could act as a deterrent against heinous crimes, offering a
potential reduction in crime rates. They also assert that the death penalty ensures justice and closure
for victims and their families, providing a proportional response to severe offenses. Some supporters
suggest that it might enhance the efficiency of the criminal justice system by expediting legal
processes. Additionally, there’s a proposal for selective application, focusing on extreme cases, and an
argument for alignment with international practices to underscore the country’s autonomy in shaping
its legal framework. These propositions aim to address concerns and provide justifications for the
reintroduction of capital punishment.

1.Why does the Philippines support the death penalty?

Supporters of the death penalty in the Philippines often argue that it serves as a powerful deterrent
against heinous crimes, contributing to public safety. Additionally, proponents emphasize the need for
swift and decisive justice, asserting that capital punishment can provide closure to victims’ families
and discourage potential offenders.
 Constructive Speech

Ladies and gentlemen my name is john lorenz G. Zarate prime minister of the government side
I’am here in front of you to propose this house will Reinstitute death penalty in the Philippines. I stand
before you to talk about bringing back the death penalty in the Philippines. This idea is based on making
sure things are fair, scaring people away from committing serious crimes, and keeping our society safe.
People who support this idea believe that having the death penalty will stop really bad crimes from
happening. They think that if people know they might be put to death for doing something wrong, they
won't do it. Bringing back the death penalty sends a strong message that certain acts won't be allowed,
which helps keep everyone safe. Also, this idea is about getting payback for serious crimes. People
believe that if someone does something really bad, they should get punished just as badly. The death
penalty is seen as a fair punishment for the worst crimes and can help bring closure to the victims and
their families. It's important to hold people responsible for what they do and give some comfort to those
who have suffered. Bringing back the death penalty also shows that we respect our laws and courts. By
saying that the death penalty is okay for the most serious crimes, we're making sure our legal system
stays strong and fair. This helps keep our society safe and makes sure we have the right tools to deal with
really bad crimes. Even though there are a lot of things to think about with this issue, bringing back the
death penalty in the Philippines is suggested as a way to stop crime, get justice for victims, and keep our
legal system strong. As we think about this idea, let's focus on keeping our communities safe and making
sure everyone gets treated fairly.

First Arguments I will not answer the poi question please sit down.

The death penalty helps stop serious crimes because people are afraid of the severe
punishment. When individuals know they could lose their own life for what they do, they're less likely to
commit crimes. This fear makes them think twice before breaking the law or harming others. Plus,
having the death penalty sends a clear message to everyone that serious crimes have serious
consequences, which reminds people to follow the law and respect others' rights.

Additionally, the death penalty provides some comfort to victims and their families by giving
them a sense that justice has been served. It shows that society takes their suffering seriously and holds
offenders accountable. Moreover, by removing the most dangerous criminals from society, the death
penalty helps keep innocent people safe and prevents further harm. Overall, the death penalty acts as a
deterrent, promotes justice, and ensures public safety.

In summary, the death penalty plays a crucial role in discouraging serious crimes by making
people think twice before breaking the law. It sends a strong message that serious wrongdoing carries
severe consequences, helping to uphold societal norms. Moreover, it offers comfort to victims and their
families by showing that justice is being served. By removing the most dangerous criminals from society,
it contributes to keeping communities safe. Despite ongoing debates, the practical impact of the death
penalty in deterring crime and ensuring justice is evident.
 Ladies and gentlemen my name is john lorenz G. Zarate deputy of the government side I’am here
in front of you to propose the 2nd and 3rd arguments of this house will Reinstitute death penalty in the
Philippines.

Second Arguments

Just like what I’ve hinted from the first argument for the families of the victims, death penalty holds
profound significance as a means of achieving closure and justice in the aftermath of tragedy. When a
loved one is brutally taken from them, the pain and anguish experienced can be unimaginable. In such
circumstances, knowing that the perpetrator will face the ultimate consequence for their actions can
provide a sense of vindication and relief. The death penalty serves as a tangible acknowledgment of the
severity of the crime committed against their loved one, validating their suffering and loss.

Furthermore, the death penalty offers a form of retribution that aligns with the magnitude of
the harm inflicted upon the victim and their family. It sends a powerful message about the value of
human life and the consequences of violating the rights and dignity of others. For families of victims, this
acknowledgment of the gravity of the crime can be essential in their journey toward healing and closure.

Moreover, the death penalty provides a sense of finality and closure for families, allowing them
to begin the process of moving forward with their lives. While the loss of a loved one can never be fully
overcome, the assurance that the perpetrator will no longer pose a threat to society can offer a degree
of comfort and peace of mind. In this sense, the death penalty not only serves as a form of justice but
also as a practical measure to protect future potential victims from experiencing similar tragedies. For
families of victims, the importance of the death penalty lies not only in seeking retribution but also in
safeguarding the well-being of society as a whole.

Third Argument

According to data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), countries that
retain the death penalty often report lower homicide rates compared to those that have abolished it. For
instance, Singapore, which maintains the death penalty for crimes like drug trafficking, has one of the
lowest homicide rates globally, standing at around 0.2 per 100,000 population. Similarly, Saudi Arabia,
where the death penalty is applied for various offenses including murder and drug trafficking, also
reports relatively low homicide rates compared to countries without the death penalty.

Additionally, surveys conducted in countries with the death penalty often indicate strong public
support for its retention, particularly in cases involving egregious crimes. In the Philippines, for example,
a Pulse Asia survey found that a significant majority of Filipinos support the reinstatement of the death
penalty for heinous crimes such as rape with homicide and drug trafficking. This suggests that many
citizens believe the death penalty serves as a deterrent and provides justice for victims and their
families.

Furthermore, death penalty can serve as a tool for maintaining social order and deterring
individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. By imposing severe penalties for serious offenses,
governments signal their commitment to upholding law and order, which can have a deterrent effect on
potential offenders. Additionally, the existence of the death penalty may help deter individuals from
engaging in corrupt or criminal activities within the justice system itself, as the potential consequences of
such actions are made clear.
 Rebuttal:

As someone who supports the death penalty in the Philippines, I believe bringing it back is really
important to deal with the serious crimes happening in our country. Lately, we've been facing a lot of
problems with things like drug crimes, terrorism, and violent acts. Having the death penalty again would
make people think twice about committing these kinds of crimes. Tougher punishments are needed to
stop crime from getting worse and to keep everyone safe.

Also, I think bringing back the death penalty is necessary to give justice to the victims and their
families. When terrible crimes happen, the people responsible should face the harshest punishment. The
death penalty shows just how serious these crimes are and gives some comfort to the families of the
victims. It's about making sure the people who commit these crimes face the consequences and that
those who suffer get some closure.

Furthermore, having the death penalty back would help bring back order and peace in our
society. By punishing criminals more severely, the government sends a clear message that crime won't
be tolerated. This could make people think twice before breaking the law. Also, it could help stop
corruption and abuse of power within the justice system, making sure everyone is treated fairly. So, I
believe bringing back the death penalty is really important for keeping our communities safe and
ensuring justice is served.

2.How does the government address concerns of wrongful executions?

The government makes sure executions are fair by having strict rules for evidence, giving access
to legal help, and having strong processes for appeals. They also use better technology and regularly
check legal procedures to be more accurate and avoid mistakes.

3.Does the death penalty in the Philippines disproportionately affect marginalized communities?

Death penalty in the Philippines raising concerns about its impact on marginalized communities
focus on socio-economic factors, access to legal representation, and potential biases within the criminal
justice system. Critics argue that vulnerable populations may struggle to secure proper legal defense,
potentially leading to unequal outcomes. Advocates for reform stress the need for a fair and impartial
application of the law, ensuring equitable treatment regardless of social or economic status.

What alternatives do you suggest for handling serious crimes without reinstating the death
penalty?

Share a brief example of criminal justice reforms in other countries supporting your opposition
to reinstating the death penalty?

How can we reduce the crime in the Philippines without using the death penalty?