Scribd
Upload
27 views1 page

Writ of Habeas Corpus Case Analysis

The document discusses the petition for a writ of habeas corpus involving Camilo L. Sabio and various Senate officials, stemming from an investigation into alleged irregularities in Philippine telecommunications corporations. The court ruled that Section 4 of Executive Order No. 1, which protects certain officials from testifying, is unconstitutional as it conflicts with Congress's investigative authority and the public's right to information. The ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency in government operations and the public's access to information on matters of public concern.

Uploaded by

lumina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views1 page

Writ of Habeas Corpus Case Analysis

The document discusses the petition for a writ of habeas corpus involving Camilo L. Sabio and various Senate officials, stemming from an investigation into alleged irregularities in Philippine telecommunications corporations. The court ruled that Section 4 of Executive Order No. 1, which protects certain officials from testifying, is unconstitutional as it conflicts with Congress's investigative authority and the public's right to information. The ruling emphasizes the importance of transparency in government operations and the public's access to information on matters of public concern.

Uploaded by

lumina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS OF CAMILO

L. SABIO, J. ERMIN ERNEST LOUIE R. MIGUEL vs. HONORABLE SENATOR RICHARD


GORDON, in his capacity as Chairman, and the HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE
ON GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS AND PUBLIC ENTERPRISES and THE COMMITTEE ON
PUBLIC SERVICES of the Senate, HONORABLE SENATOR JUAN PONCE-ENRILE, in his official
capacity as Member, HONORABLE MANUEL VILLAR, Senate President, SENATE SERGEANT-
AT-ARMS, and the SENATE OF THE PHILIPPINES
G.R. No. 174340 October 17, 2006

FACTS OF THE CASE:


Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago introduced Senate Resolution on February 20, 2006. No. 455 calling
for an investigation to support legislation into the anomalous losses suffered by the Philippine
Communications Satellite Corporation (PHILCOMSAT), Philippine Overseas Telecommunications
Corporation (POTC), and Philippine Communications Satellite Holdings Corporation (PHC) as a result of
alleged irregularities in their operations by their respective Boards of Directors. As a result, on May 8,
2006, Senator Richard Gordon sent a letter to PCGG Chairman Camilo Sabio requesting him to serve as
one of the resource people at the public hearing that the Committee on Public Services and the Committee
on Government Corporations and Public Enterprises were hosting together. Due to a prior commitment,
Chairman Sabio declined the offer. He also used E.O. Section 4(b) at the same time. No. 1 - "No member
or staff of the Commission shall be required to testify or produce evidence in any judicial, legislative or
administrative proceeding concerning matters within its official cognizance." Apparently, this is done to
ensure that PCGG can carry out its duties without interference. Sabio consistently disregarded Gordon's
Subpoena Ad Testificandum; as a result, Gordon threatened to prosecute Sabio for contempt.

ISSUE:
Whether or not Section 4 of EO No. 1 is constitutional.

RULING:
No. It may be claimed that the investigative authority of the Congress has expanded and solidified.
Indeed, the Court reaffirmed the doctrine in Arnault that "the operation of government, being a legitimate
subject for legislation, is a proper subject for investigation" and that "the power of inquiry is co-extensive
with the power to legislate," making the Court's high regard for such power even clearer in Senate v.
Ermita, where it categorically ruled that "the power of inquiry is broad enough to cover officials of the
executive branch." The State adopts and puts into practice a policy of full public disclosure of all its
transactions affecting public interest, subject to reasonable limits set forth by law.
Article III, Section 7
- The right of the people to information on matters of public concern shall be recognized. Access to
official records, and to documents, and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, or
decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development, shall be
afforded the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.
These two constitutional clauses aim to increase openness in government operations and policymaking
while also giving the populace the information they need to successfully exercise their rights under the
constitution. Citizens who are properly informed can take part in debates that result in the creation of
public policies and their successful execution.

You might also like