Pangalan: Richter George D.
Demayo MAT-FILIPINO
Gawain sa Istatitiks
1. Below, test scores of 20 students under two teachers and two kinds of textbooks
used to teaching English. Apply the F-test two-way-ANOVA, at .05 level of
significance.
TEACHERS
TEXTBOOKS A B TOTAL
5 8
6 9
A 2 3
3 9
4 8
SUB-TOTAL 20 37 57
6 8
3 7
B 9 8
1 9
2 5
SUB-TOTAL 21 37 58
Grand Total 41 74 115
SOLVING BY THE STEPWISE METHOD:
I. PROBLEM:
1. Is there a significant difference in the performance of students under the
two different teachers.?
2. Is there a significant difference in the performance of the students between
the two different textbooks.?
3. Is there an interaction effect between teacher and the textbooks factor?
HYPOTHESIS:
1. H o : There is no significant difference in the in the performance of the
students under the two different teachers.
H 1 : There is significant difference in the in the performance of the
students under the two different teachers.
2. H o : There is no significant difference in the in the performance of the
students between the two different textbooks.
H 1 : There is significant difference in the in the performance of the
students between the two different textbooks.
3. H o : Interaction effect are not present.
H 1 : Interaction effects are present.
SOLUTION:
2 2
115
CF = ¿ = =661.25
N 20
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
SST =5 +6 +2 +3 + 4 +8 +9 +3 + 9 + 8 +6 +3 +9 +1 +2 +8 +7 + 8 + 9 +5 −CF
¿ 803−661.25=141.75
( )
2 2 2 2
20 +37 +21 +37
SSW =803− =87.2
5
( )
2 2
41 +74
SSC = −CF=54.45
10
SS =(
10 )
2 2
57 + 5 8
R −CF=0.05
SSC . R=SS T −SS W −SSC −SS R =141.75−87.2−54.45−0.05=0.05
d f T =N −1=20−1=19
d f W =k (n−1)=4(5−1)=16
d f C =( c−1 )= ( 2−1 )=1
d f R= ( r−1 )= ( 2−1 )=1
d f C . R =( c−1 ) ( r−1 )=1
SOURCES
OF SS dF MS F-VALUE INTERPRETATION
VARIATION
COMPUTE TABULATED
D
Between 54.45 1 54.45 9.99 4.49 S
Columns
Rows 0.05 1 0.05 0.0092 4.49 NS
Interaction 0.05 1 0.05 0.0092 4.49 NS
Within 87.2 16 5.45
Total 141.75
SOLUTION:
F-VALUE COMPUTED:
MS C 54.45
COLUMNS= = =9.99
MSW 5.45
MS R 0.05
ROWS= = =0.0092
MSW 5.45
MS I 0.05
INTERACTION= = =0.0092
MSW 5.45
DECISION RULE:
If the computed F-value is greater than the tabulated F critical/tabular value,
disconfirm the H 0 .
CONCLUSION:
With the computed F-value (column) of 9.99 compared to the F-tabular value of
4.49 at 0.05 level of significance with 1 and 16 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis
is disconfirmed in favor of the research hypothesis, which means that there is a
significant difference in the performance of the two groups of students under two
different teachers and textbooks. It implies that teacher B is better than teacher A.
With regard to the F-value (row) and F-value (interaction), both having a value of
0.0092, which is lesser than F-tabular value of 4.49 at 0.05 level of significance with 1
and 16 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis of no significant difference in the
performance of the students under the two different teachers with two different
textbooks is confirmed.
2. The scores of two groups of students from the private and public schools were
take and two sets of attitudinal scales were administered. Perform the two-ways-
ANOVA at 0.5 level of significance to find out if there is significant difference
between the two groups of students coming from two different schools and two
groups of student given Set A and Set B on attitudinal scale?
SCHOOLS
ATTITUDINAL PRIVATE PUBLIC TOTAL
SCALE
22 15
18 18
SET A 10 8
8 6
8 4
10 20
SUB-TOTAL 76 61 137
22 24
21 26
SET B 19 24
17 18
18 16
12 12
SUB TOTAL 109 120 229
GRAND TOTAL 185 181 366
SOLVING BY THE STEPWISE METHOD:
I. PROBLEM:
1. Is there a significant difference in the two groups of students from the
private and public schools ?
2. Is there a significant difference in the two sets of attitudinal scales?
3. Is there an interaction effect between two groups of students from the
private and public schools and the two sets of attitudinal scales?
HYPOTHESIS:
1. H o : There is no significant difference in the in the performance of the
students between the different schools.
H 1 : There is significant difference in the in the performance of the students
between the different schools.
2. H o : There is no significant difference in the in the performance of the
students between the two different attitudinal test.
H 1 : There is significant difference in the in the performance of the students
between the two different attitudinal test.
3. H o : Interaction effect are not present.
H 1 : Interaction effects are present.
SOLUTION:
2 2
366
CF = ¿ = =5581.5
N 24
2 2 2 2 2
SST =22 +18 +10 +…+16 +12 −CF
¿ 6496−5581.5=914.5
( )
2 2 2 2
76 +109 +61 +120
SSW =6496− =533
6
( )
2 2
185 +181
SSC = −CF =0.667
12
SS =( )−CF =352.67
2 2
137 + 229
R
12
SSC . R=SS T −SS W −SSC −SS R =914.5−533−0.667−352.67=28.163
d f T =N −1=24−1=23
d f W =k (n−1)=4(6−1)=20
d f C =( c−1 )= ( 2−1 )=1
d f R= ( r−1 )= ( 2−1 )=1
d f C . R =( c−1 ) ( r−1 )=1
SOURCES
OF SS dF MS F-VALUE INTERPRETATION
VARIATION
COMPUTE TABULATED
D
Between 0.667 1 0.667 0.025 4.35 NS
Columns
Rows 352.67 1 352.67 13.23 4.35 S
Interaction 28.163 1 28.163 1.057 4.35 NS
Within 533 20 26.65
Total 914.5 23
SOLUTION:
F-VALUE COMPUTED:
MS C 0.667
COLUMNS= = =0.025
MSW 26.65
MS R 352.67
ROWS= = =13.23
MSW 26.65
MS I 28.163
INTERACTION= = =1.057
MSW 26.65
DECISION RULE:
If the computed F-value is greater than the tabulated F critical/tabular value,
disconfirm the H 0 .
CONCLUSION:
With the computed F-value (column) of 0.025 compared to the F-tabular
value of 4.35 at 0.05 level of significance with 1 and 20 degrees of freedom, the null
hypothesis is confirmed therefore there is no significant difference between the different
schools with two different attitudinal test.
With regard to the F-value (row) computed 13.23, which is greater than F-tabular
value of 4.35 at 0.05 level of significance with 1 and 20 degrees of freedom, , the null
hypothesis is disconfirmed in favor of the research hypothesis, which means that there
is a significant difference in the performance of the students between the different
schools with two different attitudinal test.
However, the F-value (interaction) of 1.057 is lesser than th F-tabular value of
4.35 at .05 level of significance with 1 and 20 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis is
confirmed therefore theres no interaction present between the different schools.
