Construction RESEARCH ARTICLE

Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Economics and
Building
Achieving Sustainable Procurement in
Construction Projects: The Pivotal Role of a
Vol. 21, No. 1
March 2021 Project Management Office
Mahmoud Ershadi1,*, Marcus Jefferies1, Peter Davis1, Mohammad Mojtahedi2
School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, University Drive,
1

Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia

Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
2

Corresponding author: Mahmoud Ershadi, School of Architecture and Built Environment,

University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia. [Link]@
© 2021 by the author(s). This
is an Open Access article [Link]
distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons DOI: [Link]
Attribution 4.0 International Article History: Received: 29/04/2020; Revised: 31/01/2021 & 30/10/2020; Accepted: 01/02/2021;
(CC BY 4.0) License (https://
Published: 15/03/2021
[Link]/licenses/
by/4.0/), allowing third parties
to copy and redistribute the
material in any medium
or format and to remix,
transform, and build upon the
Abstract
material for any purpose, even Environmental and ecological impacts associated with construction activities have
commercially, provided the
become an ever-increasing concern, especially the considerable amount of waste
original work is properly cited
and states its license.
generated on construction sites. Regulations and growing client pressure on meeting
environmental standards have led contractors to adopt sustainable practices and try to
Citation: Ershadi, M., Jefferies, embed this concept in their processes. Sustainable procurement management (SPM) as
M., Davis, P., and Mojtahedi, a potential solution takes the environmental consequences of procurement decisions into
M. 2021. Achieving Sustainable account and integrates sustainable practices into project procurement to bring positive
Procurement in Construction
environmental outcomes. Previous research has mainly focused on the public sector
Projects: The Pivotal Role of
a Project Management Office. in achieving green procurement, yet this study attempts to highlight internal capacities
Construction Economics and that help private organisations manage the requirements associated with practicing
Building, 21:1, 45–64. http:// sustainability. It is theorised that robust management structures, specifically project
[Link]/10.5130/AJCEB. management offices (PMOs), would enhance the oversight capabilities of contractors
v21i1.7170
in implementing the SPM process. The objectives of the current study are to (1) identify
ISSN 2204-9029 | Published by
the requirements of a sustainable project procurement process in construction sites
UTS ePRESS | [Link] based on a literature review, and (2) explore the facilitative role of PMO units in achieving
[Link]/journals/index. these requirements in the private sector. A literature review was conducted followed by
php/AJCEB a qualitative survey to solicit the viewpoints of construction professionals in principle

45 DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTEREST The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. FUNDING The author(s) received no
financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
 Ershadi, et al.

contracting firms. As a result of the study, we identified 17 sustainability requirements and found
that PMOs boost collaboration and improve the quality of decision making towards sustainable
procurement. The findings (1) explain how PMOs support sustainability, (2) provide insights on
implementing sustainable practices in project purchases, and (3) improve theoretical understanding of
the SPM principles.

Keywords
Construction Projects; Project Management Office; Sustainable Procurement

Introduction
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Sustainable procurement management (SPM) incorporates the environmental consequences of project

purchases. Sustainability can only be achieved by the commitment and close collaboration of various
businesses operating in a supply chain. In a circular industry, all parties involved in a supply chain should
take responsibility for the environmental impact of their activities. It is debated that enterprises in a
supply chain cannot be more sustainable than their suppliers as their business benefits are interrelated
(Krause, Vachon and Klassen, 2009). SPM brings noticeable benefits to construction businesses in terms
of increasing productivity, reducing overhead, controlling operational costs, enhancing compliance with
environmental regulations, minimising construction waste, and tackling environmental risks. Forward-
thinking companies invest more in technological advances necessary for achieving a sustainable supply chain
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

to maximise their business values in the long run.

Studies conducted so far revealed that the purchase of materials, equipment, machinery, and services
constitutes a significant portion of operations (more than half of the total activities) in a construction
project. Traditional procedures are no longer adequate for the efficient procurement of such large-scale
projects considering emerging complexities in dealing with sustainability risks (Ann and Shen, 2013).
Brammer and Walker (2011) found that sustainable procurement practices are more evident in the public
sector. However, the extent of application varies across different regions and is more prevalent in developed
counties. Previous studies contributed to the extant body of knowledge by analysing certain aspects of
sustainability such as social sustainability (Worthington, et al., 2008), waste reduction (Holt and Ghobadian,
2009), and safety (Nawaz, Linke and Koҫ, 2019).
From a procurement perspective, the main reason for the insufficient application of sustainability
principles in the private sector is the limited efforts to introduce management capacities essential to
boosting contractors’ potentials in embedding sustainability. In this regard, it is necessary to analyse this
concept from a broader view concerning key players that affect outcomes in the construction supply chain.
Although the concept of sustainability has been well introduced into the procurement management domain,
the findings need further elaboration to provide more consistent guidance to practitioners. Adopting a
theoretical view based on existing theories would constitute a solid basis for introducing interventions that
help contractors incorporate all necessary aspects to achieve greater levels of sustainability in construction
activities (Obicci, 2017).
Supplying construction material and equipment from sources outside of an organisation in a sustainable
way requires a clear overview of the procurement process. The literature gives an account of major stages
in the procurement process, which encompasses activities such as identifying sourcing opportunities,
information search, requisition requests, negotiation, contract approval, purchase order, delivery tracking,
and payment (Vaidya, 2005). However, practitioners commonly refer to the stages introduced by
international professional standards such as PMBOK (Project Management Institute, 2017) and PRINCE2
(Axelos, 2017), which present detailed tasks and responsibilities associated with the implementation of the
procurement process. The PMBOK guide emphasises the procurement steps while PRINCE2 focuses on

46 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

the corresponding roles and responsibilities. These two common sources are used in this paper to base the
sustainability analysis on a globally recognised procurement process.
Thus, theoretical concepts of procurement management and sustainability principles are borrowed to
map out a framework relating these domains together. We also theorise that the project management office
(PMO) structures can facilitate the SPM process by playing a coordinative role among senior management,
procurement team, and suppliers. PMO refers to an organisational entity for centralised coordination of
the parties involved in project activities and arrangements (Qi, et al., 2014). Employing this oversight
structure enables contractors to embed SPM practice in multiple projects in a standard manner. Therefore,
in the course of a qualitative-descriptive study, we introduce sustainability into project procurement
practice in light of the mediating role of PMO. The sustainability requirements are explained and then
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

discussed through the lenses of the procurement approach to be consolidated in the context of a theoretical
framework.

Literature review

THE PROJECT PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PROCESS

Construction projects are characterised by temporary activities, uniqueness, and resource limitation,
requiring their arrangements to be delivered on target. The first step in the study of sustainable procurement
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

is to highlight essential elements of the procurement process in construction organisations. The PRINCE2
guide provides a methodology for the management of projects regardless of their size, type, and
geographical distribution. The project management body of knowledge (PMBOK) is another standard that
provides valuable insights into the process and requirements of procurement management. The concepts in
this standard allow for the application of proper knowledge, processes, tools, and techniques, influencing the
successful delivery of projects. This standard comprises ten knowledge areas described based on initiating,
planning, monitoring and control, executing, and closing. This standard includes procedures and processes
that direct activities for optimal project procurement management (Project Management Institute, 2017).
On the other hand, the PRINCE2 guide has introduced both the procurement process and relevant roles,
which are used in this study to highlight key responsibilities for procurement management in construction
projects. The process aspect deals with procedures and steps necessary for accomplishing procurement
tasks from planning to contract closure (Axelos, 2017). We borrowed concepts from both PMBOK and
PRINCE2 to define the following steps as a basis for analysing relevant sustainability requirements:
1) Pre-procurement decisions: Once an outsourcing idea is raised, project leaders evaluate its positive and
negative aspects of possible scenarios. Risks and benefits of outsourcing scenarios are specifically analysed,
and different concerns associated with supplying specific equipment or material from a third party are
considered. Potential sellers are evaluated against a set of given criteria, and the decision-making board
decides the best outsourcing scenario. Responsibilities should be assigned to the procurement team so that
the selected scenario is implemented.
2) Plan procurement: In this step, the details of the project purchase should be specified and planned
properly in collaboration with stakeholders. This process is intended to clarify the extent and scope of
the work required for the delivery of supplies. This process identifies the requirements and corresponding
arrangements essential for supplying project items from outside of the project organisation. The preparation
of documents, their submission to potential sellers, and specifying the source selection criteria need to be
determined.
3) Conduct procurement: This stage ensures that the actions of the involved parties comply with the
predetermined specifications. This process includes receiving proposals, price declaration, and selecting

47 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

the best sellers. Supplier selection which is often referred to as source selection, includes an assessment of
plans proposed by sellers and choosing the best case. After negotiations and agreement over contract terms,
the contract is awarded to the selected seller. The contract becomes an important document for ensuring
whether the supplier adheres to all their responsibilities concerning the on-target delivery of supplies.
4) Control procurement: At this stage, it is necessary to evaluate the work performed by the supplier,
manage the interfaces of the procurement team with suppliers’ representatives, and take corrective actions.
The procurement team should provide project leaders with sufficient information and timely status reports
to make informed decisions on corrective actions. The process of supervising contract performance and
the incorporation of amendments help the procurement team to control deviation from the performance
baseline before the occurrence of any delay or error. They administer the procurement contract based on
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

predefined objectives to ensure that each party adheres to their contractual obligations. Any kind of issue
arising in relation to procurement contracts is to be negotiated through conflict resolution and arbitration
mechanisms.
5) Close procurement: This step includes the approval of procured products/services, carrying out
documentation, and formal closure of the contract if all obligations have been fulfilled properly as per
terms and conditions. The procurement team must assure that claims are finalized, and lessons learned are
documented for future use and implementation. Once the supplies are delivered, and project leaders are
satisfied with the output, final documentation is collated and archived.
As well as these five steps, several principles should be considered to ensure that the project procurement
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

process runs smoothly without major barriers. Important necessities to be considered for a more effective
procurement include (Axelos, 2017): (1) Tailoring the project procurement procedure based on the scale
and nature of projects allows adjustments in response to particular specifications and standards. (2) Roles
and responsibilities of the procurement team in planning, supervising, and controlling the activities should
be clarified. (3) Technical specifications and quality matters should be clarified in advance. (4) Potential
risks and uncertainties should be acknowledged in contract documents to account for any variation and
unexpected outcomes. (5) Controls are critical elements to support the execution of the procurement process
by identifying the deviations and taking timely actions to realign activities.

THE IMPORTANCE OF SUSTAINABILITY IN PROJECT PROCUREMENT

Construction enterprises need to integrate sustainability across all their functions towards achieving
sustainable growth in response to volatile economic variables (McMurray, et al., 2014). Creating
a sustainable industry requires close consideration of the long-term consequences associated with
construction procurement activities and deliverables. Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) supports this
view since contractors responsible for the delivery of multiple projects, construction enterprises need
to incorporate parameters related to the long-term operation of a facility to ensure optimal energy
consumption, minimum noise/air pollution, and high performance of the equipment. TCO incorporates all
the costs from idea inception to maintenance, which can be significantly optimised by adopting sustainable
methods. Embedding this concept in construction processes is still immature and needs more empirical
elaboration. Sustainable procurement seeks Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the domain of
project procurement (Walker, et al., 2012) and aims to address procurement needs in a way that value is
generated not only for a company but also for the whole industry and economy (Benchekroun, Benmamoun
and Hachimi, 2019).
The interest of suppliers is essential in practicing sustainable procurement since the sustainability level of
an enterprise is dependent upon the sustainability commitment of its suppliers in a supply chain (Krause,
Vachon and Klassen, 2009). Achieving higher maturity levels in sustainability hinges upon the work/items
delivered by suppliers, which implies the significance of procurement decisions in creating a sustainable

48 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

organisation. Principal contractors and project owners can minimise the environmental risk posed by
the involvement of third parties via encouraging their commitment to responsible project procurement
(Benchekroun, Benmamoun and Hachimi, 2019). Introducing sustainability in project purchasing requires
consideration of environmental, social, and economic aspects. The environmental perspective integrates
considerations such as minimising waste and pollutants. Social sustainability refers to the fact that firms’
performance and reputation are influenced by the services provided by their suppliers. This aspect also
focuses on equity, human rights, safety and wellbeing, and labour; while the economic dimension is more
concerned with financial outcomes such as the supply of the highest quality product/services with the
minimum price and considering the total cost of ownership (Benchekroun, Benmamoun and Hachimi,
2019). This paper takes these three aspects of sustainability into account to study SPM.
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUSTAINABLE PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT

This study reviewed the findings of both qualitative and quantitative studies on sustainable procurement.
Early research on sustainable procurement dates back to the late 1990s when Carter (1998) carried out a
hypothesis testing and developed an environmental purchasing model in which the influence of six factors
on environmental purchasing decisions was corroborated. These factors and their associated path coefficient
include regulatory sector (H1, 0.076), output sector (H2, 0.296), quality (H3, 0.045), vertical coordination
(H4, 0.606), supply uncertainty (H5, 0.023), and resource dependence (H6, 0.711). Carter and Jennings
(2004) identified the facets of purchasing’s involvement in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and found
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

that the scales of purchasing social responsibilities and their factor coefficients include the environment
(0.736), diversity (0.528), human rights (0.853), philanthropy (0.663), safety (0.793), ethics – deceitful
practices (0.12), and ethics – subtle practices (0.143). Preuss (2007) conducted a case study analysis to
explore the extent to which the local government in the United Kingdom utilises its procurement function
to foster sustainable development. It was found that “the local government has addressed environmental
sustainability standards by phasing out hazardous materials in procured products and services, requiring a
minimum recycled content for some goods, and insisting on lower energy or fuel consumption”.
Another quantitative study was conducted in the UK to obtain the viewpoints of 106 procurement
officers in the public sector based on an established questionnaire entitled “purchasing social responsibility”.
A cross-sector analysis based on a five-point Likert scale revealed that purchases from small suppliers (3.99),
purchases from local suppliers (3.81), the safe incoming movement of product to facilities (3.44), are the top
three influential sustainability procurement practices. Besides, the cost was found to be the leading barrier
to sustainable procurement (Lindgreen, et al., 2009). Two external and internal aspects of sustainability can
be highlighted in organisations; the external goals focus on equity, economy, and environment, while the
internal goals point to efficiency, business benefits, cost-effectiveness, fairness, and transparency (Nijaki and
Worrel, 2012).
Brammer and Walker (2011) examined the application of sustainable procurement practices within a
sample of over 280 public procurement practitioners from 20 countries. Their analysis indicated variation in
the adoption of such practices in the public sector. The findings also revealed the most prevalent practices
among sample organisations according to a five-point Lickert scale as follows: buying from Small and
Medium-Sized (SME) companies (3.73), purchasing from local suppliers (3.62), ensuring the safe incoming
movement of product to an organisation’s facilities (3.40), aiming to reduce packaging materials (3.21) and
asking suppliers to commit to waste reduction goals (3.06). McMurray, et al. (2014) explored the extent of
sustainable procurement practices amongst procurement managers in public and private sector organisations
in Malaysia. It was found that lack of awareness was the most significant barrier to SPM whereas improved
working conditions, public image, organisational efficiency, and transparency were found as facilitators. A
recent study also explored the barriers to sustainable procurement in a Brazilian context and, as a result
of factor analysis, it was found that organisational culture stands out as a particular barrier to sustainable

49 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

public procurement (Delmonico, et al., 2018). Overall, the findings of such studies were reviewed to
provide an overview of SPM concerning three areas of environmental, social, and economic sustainability
(Benchekroun, Benmamoun and Hachimi, 2019) (Table 1).

Table 1. The sustainability requirements from a procurement perspective

Stages of the Sustainability requirement in the Aspects of sustainability

procurement literature
Environmental Economic Social
process
Pre- Allocate adequate budget and resources   
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

procurement to implement SPM principles (Preuss,

decisions 2007).
Social responsibility and the 
commitment of senior managers to
incorporating sustainability in the
procurement process (Lindgreen, et al.,
2009).
Plan Follow a life-cycle analysis to evaluate 
procurement the environmental friendliness of
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

products and packaging supplied

by available suppliers in the market
(Carter and Carter, 1998).
Ensure endurance, stability, safety, and  
optimal performance of the equipment
to be installed towards delivering
a resilient facility/infrastructure
(Bocchini, et al., 2014)
Consideration of optimal energy/water 
consumption and minimum greenhouse
gas/toxic emissions in supplying project
equipment and material (Nijaki and
Worrel, 2012)
Avoid noise pollution by supplying the 
equipment that has minimum noise and
vibration (Shen, et al., 2007).
Give preference to local suppliers 
(support the local economy) (Brammer
and Walker, 2011).
Give precedence to small suppliers 
(Lindgreen, et al., 2009)
Conduct Close consideration of design features 
procurement in procurement to minimise waste
(McMurray, et al., 2014).
Ensure shortlisted suppliers comply 
with labour laws and regulations
(Carter and Jennings, 2004).

50 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Table 1. continued

Stages of the Sustainability requirement in the Aspects of sustainability

procurement literature
Environmental Economic Social
process
Oblige suppliers to adhere to waste 
reduction policies (Carter and Jennings,
2004).
Ensure safe operation and transfer of 
product to project facilities (Carter and
Jennings, 2004).
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Control Reduce packaging material (McMurray, 

procurement et al., 2014).
Waste recycling and reuse on the 
construction site (Carter and Jennings,
2004).
Awareness of sustainability objectives 
among people (Delmonico, et al., 2018).
Close Ensure meeting sustainability goals
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

  
procurement upon completion of the work package
(Carter and Jennings, 2004).
Site decontamination and waste 
removal after contract closure
(Cappuyns, 2016)

THE BENEFITS OF PMO STRUCTURES TO ACHIEVE SPM OBJECTIVES

Principal contractors establish long-term relations with original equipment manufacturers (OEM) to
benefit from their high-quality equipment and improve their brand recognition. Collaborating with capable
suppliers reduces the risk of capital investments in new markets. To take control of procurement activities
and arrange batch purchase orders, organisations have turned to centralised oversight mechanisms (Ward,
2016). In this regard, procurement teams are assigned to undertake tasks such as placing and handling
purchase orders, ensuring timely procurement, inspecting the quality of supplied goods, and following
up on the shipment of products from the manufacturing site to the project site. Such oversight functions
improve the capability of a company to select the best suppliers, negotiate the type and price of the contract,
and rigorously assess the risks of outsourcing specific parts of a project. However, undertaking these tasks
requires intensive planning and technical support.
In such a condition, adopting PMO structures benefit organisations to coordinate technical and
procurement teams and ensure that all deliverables will be completed based on the deadlines in the project
master schedule as promised with clients. These entities govern project activities and support executives
in managing interfaces with external partners. They are well aware of project needs and have access
to the knowledge base of projects, which capacitate them to suggest the best sourcing strategies. The
underlying benefit of PMO structures in SPM includes (1) insisting adherence of suppliers to sustainability
requirements and (2) minimising procurement risks emanating from a variety of technical and quality
matters (Mori, et al., 2013). These risks are closely interrelated and are likely to leave negative impacts on
sustainability objectives. Regarding the fact that PMOs govern project processes, they can address those

51 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

operational risks threatening sustainability through effective risk management to safeguard the environment,
society, and economy against the consequences of procurement decisions. PMOs can enhance both internal
and external communications to provide a nurturing environment in which all procurement parties
collaborate in an integrated manner. To ensure their commitment to sustainability objectives, a common
understanding of SPM principles should be developed within and outside of organisations.

Research Method
This qualitative-descriptive study reflects the perspective of principle contractors on SPM and is conducted
through three stages of (1) literature review, (2) the qualitative survey, and (3) group consensus. The first step
addresses the first research objective, and steps 2 to 3 are conducted to achieve the second research objective:
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

1) The literature review: First, a literature review was conducted to provide a theoretical understanding
concerning (1) the steps of the procurement process in construction projects, (2) potential sustainability
requirements from a procurement perspective. The purpose of this stage was to synthesise a rapidly growing
field of knowledge and specify the requirements of SPM from a theoretical viewpoint. The research
methodology in this stage was inspired by Tranfield, et al. (2003) on conducting reviews in the field of
management. One of the difficulties in conducting a review study in a field related to management is the
range of research design adopted by researchers ( Johnsen, Miemczyk and Macquet, 2012).
Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included in the span of the review. The Scopus, Web of
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

Science, and Google Scholar are the three main databases, and the keywords of “sustainability”, “supply
chains”, “procurement management”, and “project procurement” were considered simultaneously to retrieve
representative studies. As a result of the first step, the requirements of project procurement management
were identified by reviewing the findings of representative studies. Key aspects and elements for achieving
sustainable procurement management in construction projects were determined accordingly.
2) The qualitative survey: The second stage of the research involves a qualitative survey. This stage was
conducted in New South Wales, Australia, and a thematic analysis approach was adopted for drawing
conclusions based on empirical data by following a six-phase step-by-step guide introduced by Braun and
Clarke (2006). This stage aims to solicit expert opinion on the role of PMO as a centralised project oversight
mechanism towards embedding SPM. The participants were sourced from a group of principal contractors
in the private sector, and an online survey tool was used for obtaining their viewpoints. Qualitative surveys
provide a less structured way of gaining information about experts’ reasoning (Giles and Yates, 2014).
This strategy involves soliciting individual feedback through open-ended questions because the role of
PMO in embedding SPM should be described from an expert viewpoint. The questionnaire of the study
includes two sections (attachment 1); in the first section, demographic questions about qualification,
experience, and job position were asked. The second section incorporates five subsections related to the
stages of SRM. In each subsection, respondents were asked to explain the role of PMOs in embedding
respective SPM requirements. Seventy eligible staff received the invitations and twenty completed responses
were received (response rate of 28.5%). The sample size is acceptable since it ranges from 15 to 25 for
qualitative surveys (Trotter II, 2012).
The target population includes project management professionals in principle contracting organisations.
To ensure that the most suitable experts are selected, purposive sampling was adopted based on two criteria:
(1) the relevance of their expertise to the topic and (2) work experience in the principal contracting sector.
Forty per cent of professionals had a job tenure of more than 15 years, 40% with 11 to 15 years, and 20%
with 5 to 10 years. Thirty percentage had a postgraduate degree and the rest of them had a bachelor’s degree.
Fifty per cent of respondents were PMO leaders, 20% per cent project managers, 20% PMO analysts, and
10% per cent project planner.

52 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

3) Thematic Analysis: An integrative approach based on the thematic analysis was adopted to analyse,
consolidate, and interpret their suggestions. Adopting this approach is beneficial in searching across a data
set and putting similar ideas together to find repeated patterns of meaning. According to Braun and Clarke
(2006), the type of thematic analysis should be determined. In this paper, an inductive (bottom-up) thematic
analysis was conducted. This type of data-driven analysis ensures that themes are strongly linked to the data
without trying to fit it into a pre-existing theory. The six phases that were followed to thematically analyse
the data set include:
3.1. Phase 1. Familiarising with data: In this phase, the descriptive responses obtained from participants
were reviewed so that we can identify the depth and breadth of the data set before beginning the formal
coding process. As a result of this process, the main quotes in experts’ suggestions were extracted.
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

3.2. Phase 2. Generating initial codes: Codes represent short and most essential segments of raw data,
which initially group relevant ideas. Since each of the five questions refers to a separate domain of the
procurement process, the coding was conducted separately for all responses related to a specific question.
The coding was conducted using the NVivo software for facilitating this process. Working systematically
through the data set, codes were generated to collate similar suggestions together.
3.3. Phase 3. Searching for themes: Themes are broader than codes and are elicited as a result of further
interpretation of the data set. In this phase, we collated the codes to identify how they combine to form
overarching themes. After sorting the codes and analysing the relation between them, themes were
identified to represent the groups of relevant codes.
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

3.4. Phase 4. Reviewing themes: After devising the set of candidate themes, they were reviewed from a
systematic perspective to ensure their internal homogeneity and external heterogeneity. Further refinements
were made in the grouping of codes into clear themes.
3.5. Phase 5. Defining and naming themes: Reaching a satisfactory combination of themes, a concise label
was selected for each theme considering the aspects which are captured by them. The final labelled themes

questionnaire 20 responses
Literature review and
Data collection from Thematic analysis
designing the
the participants (Phase 1)
questionnaire

57 quotes

8 themes 23 codes
Thematic analysis Thematic analysis Thematic analysis
(Phase 4) (Phase 3) (Phase 2)

verified set of codes

and themes
Named themes Validated thematic
and codes structure
Sending the results to
Thematic analysis participants for Interpretation
(Phase 5 and 6) review (validation)

Figure 1. The research process

53 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

represent a set of consistent groups without overlap. It was checked using the 15-point checklist of criteria
for good thematic analysis as introduced by Braun and Clarke (2006).
3.6. Phase 6. Producing the report: The themes were interpreted and discussed in the paper to explain
the concepts that were identified in the data analysis process. We ensured that the research objectives are
addressed by the findings.
4) Validation: It is suggested in the literature that after consolidating the individual expert feedback,
the results can be sent to participants to review the consolidated outcomes and validate them (Aghimien,
Aigbavboa and Oke, 2020). Participants were invited via email to review the elicited codes and themes
representing essential roles that PMOs undertake to implement sustainability in the procurement process.
The validated thematic structure includes 23 codes collapsed into eight overarching themes (Table 3).
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Figure 1 provides an overview of the main stages of the present research.

Results
Participants explained the role of PMOs in supporting the SPM process for private contractors. Regarding
the qualitative nature of data obtained from experts, thematic analysis was conducted to capture the
similarities and differences in their viewpoints and provide an overview of responsibilities. The coding
process was conducted manually, and NVivo software was used to help organise data and identify codes. The
text obtained from the qualitative survey was imported to NVivo, and each feedback was closely reviewed
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

and summarised to identify the main points. The key points for each participant were elicited and then
compared in terms of their semantic relationship. Finally, relevant codes were extracted to represent the
role of PMO in SPM implementation. An example of the thematic analysis of expert suggestions for the
conduct procurement step has been provided in Table 2. This analysis was also conducted for the rest of the
procurement steps.

Table 2. Example of the thematic analysis (the conduct procurement step)

Participants
Quotes Codes Theme
No Position
2 Project “Screen potential suppliers Evaluate potential Tendering
Manager based on qualification related to vendors/suppliers against support
sustainability” sustainability-related source
selection criteria.
9 Project “Evaluate vendors in terms
Planner of their capability in meeting
requirements of sustainable
procurement management”
5 PMO “Screen out those suppliers
Analyst that cannot meet minimum
sustainability criteria”
15 Project “Achieve consensus with Create a common language
Planner suppliers on sustainability with selected suppliers on
controls throughout the sustainability objectives and
procurement process” controls.

54 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Table 2. continued

Participants
Quotes Codes Theme
No Position
18 PMO “Create a common language
Leader with suppliers on sustainability
objectives and how to achieve
them”
3 PMO “Support the procurement team Technical support of the
Leader in tender selection” procurement team in the
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

tender evaluation and

13 Project “Provide technical guidance
selection.
Manager on the evaluation of tender
proposals”

The sustainability requirements for each stage of the procurement process were elicited from the literature
and summarised in Table 1. In this section, we elaborated on the mediating role of PMO in embedding
the sustainability requirements. To benefit from a steadfast and comprehensive sustainable procurement
management, a framework was presented to account for the facilitative role of PMOs. In the expert
consensus stage, the codes and themes were reviewed and confirmed after making minor modifications
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

in the wording, constituting a validated framework of 23 codes and 8 themes. It can be implied from the
synthesised codes that these roles reflect the ability of PMO in the clarification of objectives, the suggestion
of effective strategies, the proposition of best solutions, facilitation of procurement steps, demarcation of role
boundaries, training the staff, and enforcement of controls. These are beneficial in tackling the sustainability
barriers previously asserted in construction research. Such obstacles include a lack of adequate coordination
arrangements and a lack of a clear understanding of sustainability and its economic benefits among
stakeholders (Chang, et al., 2015). Table 3 provides an overview of the role of PMO in embedding the
requirements of sustainable procurement management in construction projects.

Table 3. The role of PMOs in SPM

Stages of the SPM process The role of PMO in SPM

Codes Themes
Pre-procurement decisions • Conduct a strategic cost-benefit analysis • Strategic
(obtain the required of SPM. analysis
budget and management • Propose effective SPM strategies (delivery
commitment to sustainability method, source selection criteria, etc.)
objectives) • Incorporate sustainability into strategic
partnership decisions.
• Set SPM objectives • Goal
• Cascade SPM objectives into measurable setting
metrics and controls
• Reach consensus on the SPM objectives

55 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Table 3. continued

Stages of the SPM process The role of PMO in SPM

Codes Themes
Plan procurement • Assign the tasks of each party in • Task
(compliance with implementing the SPM process. assignment
environmental laws, • Document project-specific SPM tasks
evaluate the environmental to be tracked during the execution of a
friendliness of products/ contract.
packaging, and give
• Draw on lessons learned from previous • Planning
preference to local/small
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

projects to improve procurement planning support

suppliers)
outcomes
• Technical support of the procurement
team in analysing equipment/items that
are planned to be supplied considering the
sustainability criteria
Conduct procurement • Evaluate potential suppliers against • Tendering
(incorporate sustainability in sustainability source selection criteria. support
design features, supplier’s • Create a common language with selected
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

commitment, and safe vendors/suppliers on sustainability

operations) objectives and controls.
• Technical support of the procurement
team in tender evaluation and selection.
Control procurement (reduce • Monitor interphase dependencies to • Maintain
packaging material, waste ensure the incorporation of sustainability consistency
recycling and reuse, and from design to delivery in an integrated
sustainability training) manner.
• Track the realisation of SPM requirements
to detect deviations and incompliance.
• Enforce sustainability controls and
determine corrective actions
• Apply industry best practices to optimise
sustainability controls and outcomes
• Apply conflict resolution techniques in the • Operational
procurement process. support
• Offer the best solution to tackle
sustainability barriers
• Coordinate the SPM tasks among involved
parties
• Arrange necessary training of project staff
on SPM to improve their effectiveness in
operations.
Close procurement (ensure • Procurement post-review to ensure the • Post-review
meeting sustainability goals achievement of sustainability objectives.
and site decontamination) • Capture lessons learned obtained from
implementing the SPM process.

56 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

The eight themes elicited as a result of the six-phase thematic analysis present a consistent set of roles
that should be undertaken by PMOs in support of SPM objectives.
1. 
Strategic analysis: The critical role of PMO in incorporating sustainability becomes more evident
early in the procurement process when strategic decisions are made. The analysis revealed that this
contribution is made by demonstrating the benefits of sustainability to project leaders and investors
through cost-benefit analysis. SPM scenarios are to be analysed and the best strategies should be
proposed to ensure an effective project management approach.
2. 
Goal setting: Another major role to be undertaken by PMO is to set measurable SPM objectives and
translate them into metrics and controls. Stakeholders’ buy-in over such objectives and metrics pave
the way for a smoother implementation of the SPM requirements.
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

3. 
Task assignment: The evidence from the analysis indicates that PMO assigns and keeps track of the
tasks assumed by each party contributing to the sustainable procurement process. Role boundaries of
each team member are to be clarified to avoid any miscommunication, rework, and overlap.
4. 
Planning support: Achieving sustainability is not possible without proper planning and anticipating
the arrangements as set early in the SPM process. Regarding access to lessons learned from previous
projects, PMO decides on optimal planning arrangements and puts them into practice.
5. 
Tendering support: The results revealed that during the tendering process, further support is needed to
ensure that sustainability principles are properly integrated into the evaluation of potential suppliers
and tender selection. Those suppliers that cannot demonstrate their commitment to sustainability
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

(e.g., practising waste control systems) should be screened out, which is considered as a risk-
avoidance strategy for principal contractors.
6. 
Maintain consistency: Performing quality assurance (QA) from the perspective of sustainability
standards guarantee the achievement of SPM requirements throughout the procurement process. The
thematic analysis showed that PMO has information dominance on different phases of construction
projects and can handle interphase interfaces, manage transitions, detect noncompliance, and realign
activities with baseline performance targets.
7. 
Operational support: Effective execution of SPM plans requires a high level of coordination among
the teams involved in the process. Challenges and conflicts are likely to occur, which call for
operational support of the PMO team in terms of applying problem-solving techniques facilitating
and give consultation to the team in tackling operational issues and risks.
8. 
Post-review: Delivery of the supplies does not mean that the procurement process is completed since
the accomplishment of certain requirements such as site decontamination must be checked. The
procurement post-review helps to identify environmental concerns that have not been still addressed
and further actions that need to be taken by contractors.

Discussions
Embedding sustainability principles in the procurement process adds to its complexities and is more
challenging for contracting organisations that are coping with variations in today’s global economy.
Although contractors are extremely concerned with the timely delivery of their projects with a tight budget
and schedule, they should not neglect the importance of sustainability principles in their routine business
activities since it can become a competitive advantage over competitors. We conducted this study to
highlight the importance of sustainability in the procurement process through a research design including
three stages of (1) literature review, (2) opinion survey, and (3) expert consensus. As a result of the first stage,
it was found that although there are evident benefits for contractors both in the public and private sectors in
practicing sustainability, evidence from previous research shows that it has not still become a permanent part
of construction projects (Charmaz, 2014; Giles and Yates, 2014; Aghimien, Aigbavboa and Oke, 2020).

57 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

This study focuses on principle contractors as a key player in construction projects that are in a
proper position to encourage subcontractors, vendors, and suppliers in practicing sustainability. The
social responsibility of such contractors necessitates adhering to standards related to three aspects of (1)
environmental, (2) economic, and (3) social sustainability. As a link connecting clients’ requirements to
subcontractors’ work, they are responsible not only for the realisation of the technical specifications but also
for the enforcement of sustainability requirements in the procurement process.
While previous research sheds light on the importance of environmental, social, and economic
sustainability in the construction industry (Benchekroun, Benmamoun and Hachimi, 2019), we
consolidated the findings of independent studies and elaborated on the sustainability requirements from
a procurement perspective. It was found that prior research on environmental sustainability is more
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

concerned with construction waste, recyclability of construction materials, noise pollution, and natural
resource depletion. The social aspect is more related to social responsibility, safety and wellbeing of human
resources, public awareness, and labour laws. The economic aspect also concentrates on budget allocation to
sustainability, infrastructure resilience, and supporting local and small suppliers. Commitment to all these
requirements is quite challenging for private construction organisations due to posing further constraints.
However, it is their social responsibility to contribute to building a sustainable industry. The findings
revealed that employing centralised oversight structures (the most common name for which is PMO)
would significantly improve their capability in achieving business targets while adhering to sustainability
principles.
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

To provide a theoretical basis for the analysis of sustainability through the lenses of project procurement,
five main stages of the project procurement management were adopted from standards (Axelos, 2017;
Project Management Institute, 2017) and experts were asked to explain the role of PMO in embedding the
sustainability requirements associated with each stage of the procurement process. The procurement process
starts with strategic supply chain decisions that are made by senior managers. Such decisions are a critical
part of a company’s strategic direction since they determine long-term partnerships with original equipment
manufacturers (OEM), local businesses, and industry leaders.
The literature asserts the importance of business partnership instead of price and other operational
concerns at the stage of design and pre-procurement (Pesämaa, Eriksson and Hair, 2009). In line with this
tenet, this study found that PMO units support executives in making strategic partnership decisions to
ensure the achievement of business targets without compromising sustainability values. It was found that
undertaking a cost-benefit analysis of investments in sustainability would highlight long-term advantages
that can be gained in terms of brand image, tax incentives, positive social impact, and contribution to a more
resilient economy. Such an analysis provides a basis for defining SPM objectives and optimal outsourcing
strategies early in the procurement process.
The pre-procurement stage is followed by procurement planning which is debated to be underemphasised
at the initial stages of construction projects (Aliza, Stephen and Bambang, 2011). To cover this gap, we
asserted that PMOs must take action to ensure the incorporation of sustainability requirements by adopting
a collaborative implementation approach in which the role of each party/team in the sustainability practice
is determined, controls are in place, and the procurement team is technically supported to analyse the
potential equipment/services against the sustainability criteria.
At the third stage, conduct procurement involves tender preparation, receiving proposals, price
declaration, and tender evaluation, and selection. Previous research asserts that the tendering process is
of crucial significance in achieving green procurement (Leger, Oueslati and Salanié, 2013) and this study
confirms this finding since PMOs support the procurement team to evaluate and screen suppliers against
sustainability criteria. This is a key stage of the SPM process because those suppliers that cannot meet the
minimum sustainability requirements are disqualified, which means that a major sustainability risk is being

58 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

avoided. It was also found that PMO plays a facilitative role in creating a common language with suppliers
on sustainability targets and requires them to comply with relevant requirements.
The fourth stage is control procurement which reflects the key role of compliance with predefined
sustainability criteria in construction projects (Kasim, et al., 2013), which was confirmed in this study
by indicating that PMOs systematise the sustainability compliance and maintain the integration of
sustainability controls from design to delivery. SPM is a collaborative process that requires close intensive
interactions and coordination. This study highlighted the coordination role of PMOs to speed up SPM
tasks and keep track of their progress. These units take actions to train human resources on how to practice
sustainability in pursuit of green procurement goals.
The procurement process ends at the stage of close procurement when all supplies are delivered by the
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

supplier. Although the procurement team is responsible for finalising the project purchase documentations
and closing suppliers’ contracts, PMOs undertake post-delivery reviews to ensure that all necessary steps
have been completed and there are no outstanding payments or open claims. It should be confirmed that
all sustainability tasks have been accomplished as planned and SPM objectives are met with satisfactory
performance. The capability of PMO in knowledge management has been well discussed in previous
research (Martinez Sanz and Ortiz-Marcos, 2019), and the current research confirms this capacity in the
form of collating and archiving lessons learned in the organisation’s knowledge base.
This paper contributes to examining one of the applications of PMO units in sustainable procurement.
We extended the literature on what was already known on the sustainability requirements of the
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

project procurement process and explained how PMOs could be employed to enhance effectiveness and
coordination among stakeholders of an integrated supply chain towards meeting the SPM requirements.

Conclusion
The purpose of this study was to identify the sustainability requirements that need to be considered at
different stages of the project procurement process and to elucidate the role of PMO in achieving these
requirements. A qualitative survey was conducted among experts in Australian principal construction
companies and twenty individuals participated that shows a response rate of 28.5%. A majority of
participants were PMO leaders with over 15 years of job tenure in the construction industry. The results of
the survey revealed a significant contribution of PMO to the sustainable project procurement process in the
private sector. The most important contribution is made at the pre-procurement and planning stages since
sustainability begins with strategic business decisions such as long-term partnerships with those suppliers
that are committed to sustainability and social responsibility. Incorporation of sustainability in the source
selection criteria helps to avoid the involvement of suppliers that cannot meet minimum sustainability
requirements and are unlikely to address sustainability risks. We found that PMOs team up with consultants
and procurement teams to undertake market analysis in terms of potential suppliers and their products/
services, which is helpful to identify available environmentally friendly materials, goods, and equipment.
Procurement decision criteria should not be limited to price and technical specifications. However, they
must also include an analysis of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) to consider the long-term value of
a product as well as its impact on the environment and society. The literature review revealed that recent
research mainly emphasises sustainable procurement in the public sector while achieving sustainability is not
possible without the active engagement of the private sector. This study proposed that a cost-benefit analysis
should be conducted by PMO at the beginning of a project to convince key stakeholders and sponsors about
the budget allocation for the sustainability practice. Although practising sustainability imposes further costs
and constraints to private contractors, they can benefit from long-term competitive advantages such as tax
incentives and a stronger brand image.

59 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

The literature review indicated that some private organisations might be unwilling to practice
sustainability due to this assumption that further workload and constraints may be imposed on their routine
business activities. However, the empirical survey showed that adopting robust management structures (such
as PMO) would enable them to resolve the paradox of making a business profit and incurring overhead
costs associated with practicing sustainability. This study encouraged a long-term view of sustainability
practice in private organisations. In this regard, PMO adopts a systematic approach to project procurement
and puts arrangements in place to enhance intra- and inter-organisational collaboration for implementing
green procurement goals. In the collaborative SPM approach that was introduced in this paper, procurement
teams continuously cooperate with PMO, project leaders, and executives to build mutual trust with external
stakeholders (third parties) in addressing projects’ supply needs with a minimum negative impact on the
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

environment and society. The result of this study indicated that PMOs contribute to the execution of
sustainable procurement activities by cascading sustainability objectives into measurable controls to keep
track of actions, identify deviations from baseline targets, and suggest corrective actions to be performed
collaboratively. The findings of the opinion survey would encourage practitioners in private organisations
to approach sustainability differently by considering the positive consequences of implementing SPM
methods. For instance, applying lean construction techniques benefit them to utilise their resources more
optimally with minimum waste and environmental damage.
From the perspective of the research implications, we extended what is already known on SPM practices
by explaining the application of multi-project oversight structures in enabling private contractors to
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

balance their current business undertaking with their new commitment to sustainability. We explained
how PMO structures can be employed in response to the lack of integration and engagement which have
always been a barrier towards implementing collaborative approaches such as SPM in construction projects.
This paper extended the literature by providing an overview of the main sustainability requirements from
a procurement perspective and suggested the application of PMO to facilitate their realisation in the
private sector. The authors recognise the following limitations of the study. First, it is exploratory, which
means further quantitative research is needed to validate the proposed factors using a larger sample of
construction professionals. Regarding the exploratory nature of qualitative research, the generalizability of
findings, especially the statistical-probabilistic generalizability, has often been highlighted as a limitation of
qualitative research. This study also acknowledges this limitation and encourages a follow-up quantitative
survey to examine the statistical validity of the proposed framework using a large sample size.
This research also elaborated on PMO interventions in principle contracting firms to enforce SPM
principles in collaboration with several subcontractors and suppliers. However, a more comprehensive
understanding of sustainability in the procurement process is required by analysing the perspectives of
subcontractors and suppliers. Thus, it is recommended that future research attempts to extend the scope of
the current study by incorporating and comparing their views on necessary SPM methods and strategies.
This refers to an important gap in the literature yet to be addressed in future research since diverse
perspectives of stakeholders in construction projects lead to adopting SPM in a different way while it
requires a collaborative approach that coordinates all involved parties. The emphasis of previous research
on the public sector is also a subject that needs a paradigm shift in terms of finding solutions to enhance
the commitment of private sectors to sustainability objectives. The majority of construction activities are
executed by private companies and the public sector acts as a supervisory body. Ultimately, it is the private
sector that should adjust its practices to comply with sustainability requirements. Thus, we encourage future
research to focus on suggesting solutions for improving sustainability practice in the private sector.

60 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Attachment 1. Survey questionnaire

Section A. Demographic questions

1 Your job tenure in the construction industry.
2 Your current job position.
3 Your highest academic qualifications.
4 Email address:
Section B. Survey questions
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Please suggest the possible role of PMO concerning the sustainability requirements for each
stage of the procurement process.
1 What is the possible role of PMO in embedding the sustainability requirements associated
with the pre-procurement stage (1. allocate adequate budget and resources to implement
SPM principles in practice. 2. social responsibility and commitment of senior managers to
sustainability)?
2 What is the possible role of PMO in embedding the sustainability requirements
associated with the plan procurement stage (1. follow a life-cycle analysis to evaluate the
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

environmental friendliness of products and packaging supplied by available suppliers in

the market. 2. deliver a resilient infrastructure, 3. consideration of optimal energy/water
consumption and minimum greenhouse gas/toxic emissions 4. avoid noise pollution by
supplying the equipment that has minimum noise and vibration 5. give preference to local
suppliers. 6. give precedence to small suppliers)?
3 What is the possible role of PMO in embedding the sustainability requirements associated
with conduct procurement stage (1. close consideration of design features in procurement
to minimise waste, 2. ensure shortlisted suppliers comply with environmental laws
and regulations. 3. oblige suppliers to commit to waste reduction goals, 4. ensure safe
operation and transfer of product to project facilities)?
4 What is the possible role of PMO in embedding the sustainability requirements associated
with the control procurement stage (1. reduce packaging material. 2. waste recycling or
reuse on construction sites. 3. awareness of sustainability objectives among staff.)?
5 What is the possible role of PMO in embedding the sustainability requirements associated
with the close procurement stage (1. ensure meeting sustainability goals at the end of
the procurement process, 2. Site decontamination and waste removal after the contract
closure)?

References
Aghimien, D.O., Aigbavboa, C.O. and Oke, A.E., 2020. Critical success factors for digital partnering of construction
organisations–A Delphi study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), pp.3171-88. [Link]
org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2019-0602

Aliza, A.H., Stephen, K. and Bambang, T., 2011. The importance of project governance framework in project
procurement planning. Procedia Engineering, 14, pp.1929-37. [Link]

Ann, T. and Shen, G.Q., 2013. Problems and solutions of requirements management for construction projects under the
traditional procurement systems. Facilities, 31(5/6), pp.223-37. [Link]

61 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Axelos, 2017. Managing successful projects with PRINCE2. London,UK: The Stationery Office.

Benchekroun, H.T., Benmamoun, Z. and Hachimi, H., 2019. How to select suppliers when implementing a sustainable
procurement strategy. 5th International Conference on Optimisation and Applications (ICOA), Kenitra, Morocco, 2019,
pp.1-4. [Link]

Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D.M., Ummenhofer, T. and Zinke, T., 2014. Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure:
Toward a unified approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20(2), p.04014004. [Link]
IS.1943-555X.0000177

Brammer, S. and Walker, H., 2011. Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative
study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), pp.452-76. [Link]
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

org/10.1108/01443571111119551

Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2),
pp.77-101. [Link]

Cappuyns, V., 2016. Inclusion of social indicators in decision support tools for the selection of sustainable
site remediation options. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, pp.45-56. [Link]
jenvman.2016.07.035

Carter, C.R. and Carter, J.R., 1998. Interorganizational determinants of environmental purchasing: initial evidence
from the consumer products industries. Decision Sciences, 29(3), pp.659-84. [Link]
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

tb01358.x

Carter, C.R. and Jennings, M.M., 2004. The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation
analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), pp.145-86. [Link]

Chang, R., Zillante, G., Soebarto, V. and Zhao, Z., 2015. Transition to a sustainability-oriented construction
industry in China: a critical analysis from the multi-level perspective. In. ICCREM 2015. pp.361-68. [Link]
org/10.1061/9780784479377.042

Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.

Delmonico, D., Jabbour, C.J.C., Pereira, S.C.F., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Renwick, D.W.S. and Thomé, A.M.T., 2018.
Unveiling barriers to sustainable public procurement in emerging economies: Evidence from a leading sustainable
supply chain initiative in Latin America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, pp.70-79. [Link]
resconrec.2018.02.033

Giles, D. and Yates, R., 2014. Enabling educational leaders: Qualitatively surveying an organisation’s culture.
International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22(1), pp.94-106. [Link]

Holt, D. and Ghobadian, A., 2009. An empirical study of green supply chain management practices
amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), pp.933-56. [Link]
org/10.1108/17410380910984212

Johnsen, T., Miemczyk, J. and Macquet, M., 2012. Sustainable purchasing and supply management: a structured
literature review of definitions and measures at dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: an
International Journal, 17(5), pp.478-96. [Link]

Kasim, T., Li, H., Rezgui, Y. and Beach, T., 2013. Automated sustainability compliance checking process: proof of
concept. In: N. Dawood and M. Kassem, eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Construction Applications
of Virtual Reality, 30-31 October 2013, London, UK.

62 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Krause, D.R., Vachon, S. and Klassen, R.D., 2009. Special topic forum on sustainable supply chain management:
introduction and reflections on the role of purchasing management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), pp.18-
25. [Link]

Leger, A., Oueslati, W. and Salanié, J., 2013. Public tendering and green procurement as potential drivers for sustainable
urban development: Implications for landscape architecture and other urban design professions. Landscape and Urban
Planning, 116, pp.13-24. [Link]

Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Maon, F., Walker, H. and Brammer, S., 2009. Sustainable procurement in the United
Kingdom public sector. Supply Chain Management: an International Journal, 14(2), pp.128-37. [Link]
org/10.1108/13598540910941993
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.

Martinez Sanz, M.M. and Ortiz-Marcos, I., 2019. Dimensions of knowledge governance in a multi-PMO
project context. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(7), pp.1423-41. [Link]
IJMPB-11-2018-0244

McMurray, A.J., Islam, M.M., Siwar, C. and Fien, J., 2014. Sustainable procurement in Malaysian organisations:
Practices, barriers and opportunities. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 20(3), pp.195-207. [Link]
org/10.1016/[Link].2014.02.005

Mori, M., Kobayashi, R., Samejima, M. and Komoda, N., 2013. An evaluation method of reduced procurement risks
by decentralised ordering in supply chain. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN).
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

Bochum, Germany, 2013, pp.80-85, NY: IEEE. [Link]

Nawaz, W., Linke, P. and Koҫ, M., 2019. Safety and sustainability nexus: A review and appraisal. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 216, pp.74-87. [Link]

Nijaki, L.K. and Worrel, G., 2012. Procurement for sustainable local economic development. International Journal of
Public Sector Management, 25(2), pp.133-53. [Link]

Obicci, P.A., 2017. Trouncing Barriers to Sustainable Procurement Practices in Public Sector Organizations in Uganda.
International Journal of Research of Management, Social and Technology, 5(1), pp.64-74.

Pesämaa, O., Eriksson, P.E. and Hair, J.F., 2009. Validating a model of cooperative procurement in the construction
industry. International Journal of Project Management, 27(6), pp.552-59. [Link]

Preuss, L., 2007. Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Business Strategy and
the Environment, 16(5), pp.354-65. [Link]

Project Management Institute, 2017. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
Sixth ed. USA: Project Management Institute.

Qi, S., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, W. and Cai, J., 2014. Study on the Impact of PMO for Multi-Project Management of
Contracting Construction Enterprises Based on Structural Equation Model. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 584-586,
pp.2239-45. [Link]

Shen, L.Y., Li Hao, J., Tam, V.W.Y. and Yao, H., 2007. A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of
construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 13(4), pp.273-81. [Link]
0.2007.9636447

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P., 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed
management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), pp.207-22. [Link]
org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Trotter II, R.T., 2012. Qualitative research sample design and sample size: Resolving and unresolved issues and
inferential imperatives. Preventive medicine, 55(5), pp.398-400. [Link]

63 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021

 Ershadi, et al.

Vaidya, K., 2005. Diffusion of Innovation: An Investigation of e-Procurement Assimilation in the Australian Public
Sector. In: ICEB 2005 Proceedings. 53. [Link]

Walker, H., Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. and Spencer, R., 2012. Sustainable procurement: Past, present and future. Journal
of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), pp.201-06. [Link]

Ward, G., 2016. The Project Manager’s Guide to Purchasing: Contracting for Goods and Services, 1st ed. [e-book] London:
Routledge. [Link]

Worthington, I., Ram, M., Boyal, H. and Shah, M., 2008. Researching the drivers of socially responsible purchasing: a
cross-national study of supplier diversity initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), pp.319-31. [Link]
s10551-007-9400-x
Downloaded from [Link]/doi/10.3316/informit.747647989896066. on 01/16/2025 05:09 AM AEST; UTC+10:00. © Construction Economics and Building , 2021.
Available under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

64 Construction Economics and Building, Vol. 21, No. 1 March 2021