THE UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB,
QUAID-E-AZAM CAMPUS, LAHORE
SCHOOL OF CHEMISTRY
HINA SHAHZAD
ROLL NO; 69
BS CHEMISTRY 6TH SEMESTER (MORNING)
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY ASSIGNMENT
SUBMITTED TO: DR. ZAHOOR AHMED
FAROOQI
Kinetics and Mechanism of Catalytic
Reduction of CO2: A Review
1. Introduction:
Fossil fuels have been the primary source to produce energy for industrial applications and
human activities for decades leading to high concentration of atmospheric CO2 that create
serious environmental, ecological, and climate problems. It is now essential to find improved
catalysts to convert CO2 to useful chemicals. Indeed progress is being made in
electrochemical transformation of CO2 into chemical fuels, however, the extreme stability of
CO2 makes it inert for chemical reactions in aqueous solution, demanding a large
overpotential to overcome the high activation barrier. Moreover, the hydrogen evolution
reaction (HER) side reaction can easily dominate under the same conditions, diminishing
efficiency. Thus we want CO2 reduction catalysts with high faradic efficiency for CO but
negligible HER faradic efficiency.
Strategies are now being actively sought to mitigate CO2 emissions by improving fossil fuel
combustion efficiency or exploring clean and renewable energy sources (e.g., wind, tide, and
solar energy). Alternatively, great efforts are also being undertaken to develop carbon capture
and storage (CCS) techniques that fix atmospheric CO2 and store it underground in a
supercritical state. However, the CCS technique itself is energy-intensive and nonrenewable.
In nature, the photosynthesis of green plants plays an indispensable role in maintaining the
carbon/oxygen cycle which is vital for the maintenance of life on earth. It consists of two
sequential steps known as the light and dark reactions. In the light reaction, chlorophyll
absorbs sunlight, converts it to the chemical energy stored in adenosine triphosphate (ATP),
and meanwhile oxidizes water to O2. In the dark reaction, CO2 is fixed and reduced stepwise
to form carbohydrates using energy stored in ATP. The natural photosynthesis essentially
provides the energy needed for most lives on this planet and is the basis for the survival of
mankind.
For more than three decades, researchers have been ambitiously attempting to mimic what
Mother Nature does and pursuing artificial photosynthesis that aims at the spontaneous
transformation of atmospheric CO2 and water to chemical fuels using sunlight as the sole
energy input. Although still at very low efficiency currently, artificial photosynthesis is
believed to have the great potential to make a substantial contribution to our future energy
supply. It is now generally approached from two directions. As schematically illustrated in,
the first route uses photovoltaic (PV) cells to generate a sufficient photovoltage which is then
supplied to the cathode for the CO2 reduction and the anode for the water oxidation.
Proper electrocatalysts are employed on the two electrodes so as to expedite the reaction rate
and improve the reaction selectivity. The advantage of this route is the flexibility in the
design of PV and electrocatalyst pairs. Components can be individually optimized and then
combined together to enable the best overall performance. The second route is the direct
photocatalytic approach where light-absorbing semiconductor particles (photocatalysts)
decorated with suitable electrocatalysts (commonly referred as cocatalysts in photocatalysis)
are dispersed in an aqueous solution and achieve light harvesting, charge separation, and
interfacial charge transfer to drive corresponding reactions all within particles.
The merit of the second route is its wireless configuration which renders the device design
much more straightforward and compact. At this moment, it is too early to judge which route
will eventually dominate in the future. Their future success strongly relies on the
development of high-performance CO2 reduction electrocatalysts or photocatalysts. Since
CO2 is a thermodynamically stable molecule, its multistep reduction via the electrochemical
or photochemical approach is significantly more challenging than the splitting of water, and
confronted with many fundamental technical hurdles.The history of electrocatalytic CO2
reduction can be traced back to 19th century. In 1870, Royer first reported the reduction of
CO2 to formic acid on Zn electrodes.
Between 1970s and 1980s, a series of seminal works published by Japanese scientists marked
the advent of a new phase in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction research. Ito and Murata
examined the electrocatalytic performances of several metals such as In, Cd, Sn, Zn, and Pb
for reducing CO2 to formic acid. Hori et al. Discovered that polycrystalline Cu electrodes in
aqueous media could generate short-chain hydrocarbons with a promising activity. Studies on
photocatalytic CO2 reduction commenced in 1970s. In 1978, Halmannn first observed that
CO2 was reduced to CH3OH and CO on a p-type GaP electrode under light illumination. In
the year later, Inoue et al. Reported that formic acid, formaldehyde, and methyl alcohol were
produced from the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 in the aqueous suspensions of
semiconductors such as TiO2, ZnO, CdS, GaP, and SiC.
Following these pioneering works on electrocatalytic or photocatalytic CO2 reduction,
increasing attention has been attracted to this field, and many exciting progresses have been
made in recent years. An overview of the recent progress on electrocatalytic or photocatalytic
CO2 reduction. Several previous high-quality review articles on similar topics are
available.16-26 Given the recent heightened research activities and increasingly deepened
understanding of these two processes, we believe that an up-to-date account on their status
and existing challenges is necessary so as to provide readers with a current snapshot of this
rapidly evolving area.
Even though the two approaches involve dissimilar experimental techniques, their nature is
essentially identical—that is how to activate the chemically inert CO2 molecule and promote
its conversion under external energy stimuli. In addition, the surface charge transfer step in
photocatalysis is in fact an electrochemical process and can be enhanced via the incorporation
of proper cocatalysts. These are the reasons why we think electrocatalytic and photocatalytic
CO2 reduction are inherently connected and decided to discuss them together here. This
review starts with a brief description of the basic principles and important performance merits
of electrocatalytic and photocatalytic CO2 reduction.
2. Characterization of Catalytic systems used for
reduction of CO2
Catalytic systems play a pivotal role in the reduction of CO2, determining the efficiency,
selectivity, and sustainability of the process. The characterization of these catalysts provides
insights into their structure, functionality, and interaction with CO2 molecules.
Types of Catalytic Systems;
Catalytic systems for CO2 reduction are broadly classified into three categories:
1. Metal catalysts
2. Organometallic catalysts
3. Enzymatic catalysts.
1. Metal Catalysts;
Metal catalysts, such as copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), platinum (Pt), and ruthenium (Ru), are
highly effective in activating CO2 by facilitating electron transfer. They are extensively used
in electrochemical and thermochemical reduction processes.
● High thermal stability.
● Versatility in forming multiple products, e.g., methane, methanol.
● Mechanism: Metals activate CO2 by forming a CO2-metal complex, which lowers the
activation energy for bond cleavage.
Fig. Activation of CO2 by metal catalyst
2. Organometallic Catalysts;
Organometallic catalysts, particularly Ru and Fe complexes, provide high selectivity and
tunability. Ligands in these complexes influence the reactivity of the central metal atom,
enhancing catalytic performance.
Example Reaction;
Figure: Structure of a Ru-based Organometallic Catalyst for CO2 Reduction
3. Enzymatic Catalysts;
Enzymatic catalysts such as formate dehydrogenase and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase
mimic natural biological processes for CO2 reduction. These systems exhibit high selectivity
under mild reaction conditions.
● Environmentally benign.
● Operate at room temperature and pressure.
Characterization Techniques;
To evaluate the efficiency and functionality of catalysts, various advanced characterization
techniques are employed. These techniques reveal information about structural,
morphological, and electronic properties.
Structural Characterization;
1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD):
XRD is used to determine the crystal structure, phase composition, and crystallinity of
catalysts. By identifying the phases present, XRD can indicate how the structure
might affect catalytic performance and stability. Changes in diffraction patterns
before and after reactions can provide insight into phase changes and catalyst
stability.
2. Electron Microscopy (SEM, TEM, and HRTEM):
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Provides high-resolution images of catalyst
morphology and particle size distribution, which helps in understanding surface
structure and roughness. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and High-
Resolution TEM (HRTEM): Offer detailed, atomic-scale structural information on
catalyst nanoparticles and support materials. HRTEM reveals crystallographic details
and the distribution of active sites.
3. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS):
Often integrated with SEM or TEM, EDS maps the elemental composition and
distribution of components on the catalyst’s surface.
4. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM):
AFM creates high-resolution, three-dimensional surface images and provides
information on topography and surface roughness, essential for understanding the
active site exposure and nanoparticle distribution on the catalyst surface.
Surface and Electronic Characterization Techniques;
1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS):
XPS provides information on surface composition, chemical states, and oxidation
states of elements in the catalyst. This is particularly useful for studying how the
electronic structure of surface atoms changes during CO₂ adsorption and reduction.
By analyzing shifts in binding energy, XPS helps identify the nature of active sites
and any chemical modifications occurring during the reaction.
2. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES):
AES is used to analyze surface composition with high spatial resolution, detecting
elements on the surface of catalysts and tracking their changes under reaction
conditions.
3. Infrared Spectroscopy (IR) and Raman Spectroscopy:
Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): FTIR detects vibrational modes of
surface-bound species, providing information on adsorption and interaction with CO₂.
In-situ FTIR can monitor changes in real time, helping to identify reaction
intermediates.
4. X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS):
X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES) offers insights into the oxidation
state and local atomic structure of elements, helping to identify changes in the
electronic structure during the reaction.
5. Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS):
Provides details on the coordination environment and distances between atoms, which
is crucial for understanding active sites and metal-support interactions in
heterogeneous catalysts.
Kinetic and Mechanistic Characterization Techniques
1. Temperature-Programmed Desorption (TPD):
TPD measures the desorption of adsorbed species from a catalyst’s surface as
temperature increases, providing data on adsorption strength and active sites.
2. Temperature-Programmed Reduction (TPR) and Temperature-Programmed Oxidation
(TPO):
TPR and TPO reveal the reducibility and oxidation behavior of catalysts, which are
important for understanding catalyst stability and reaction conditions.
3. Mass Spectrometry (MS):
Often coupled with TPD or FTIR, MS identifies and quantifies gaseous products
during reactions, allowing for real-time analysis of reaction products and
intermediates.
4. Electrochemical Techniques (EIS and CV):
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS): Provides insights into electron
transfer properties and resistance in electrocatalytic systems, essential for
understanding charge transfer at the electrode-electrolyte interface.
5. Cyclic Voltammetry (CV):
Measures current response to a variable voltage, helping to study redox reactions and
adsorption-desorption behavior of catalysts under electrocatalytic conditions.
Additional Characterization Techniques
1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy:
NMR is useful for analyzing homogeneous catalysts and reaction intermediates in
solution, providing information on molecular structure, reaction pathways, and
catalyst-ligand interactions.
2. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR):
EPR detects unpaired electrons, which is useful for studying radicals and reaction
intermediates in catalytic systems, especially for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic
applications.
The characterization of catalytic systems is critical for optimizing CO2 reduction processes.
Techniques such as XRD, SEM, BET, and XPS provide valuable insights into the structure
and performance of catalysts. Metal and organometallic catalysts dominate industrial
applications due to their efficiency, while enzymatic catalysts offer eco-friendly alternatives.
3. Study of Catalytic Process
The catalytic reduction of CO2 involves intricate processes that depend on the type of
catalyst, reaction conditions, and the interaction between CO2 and the catalytic surface.
Reaction Pathway;
CO2 reduction can proceed through multiple pathways depending on the catalyst and
operating conditions. One of the primary pathways is;
● Electrochemical reduction
Electrochemical Reduction of CO2;
The electrolytic reduction of CO2, also known as electrochemical reduction, is a process
where CO2 is converted into value-added products such as formic acid, carbon monoxide,
methane, and methanol using electricity. This reaction occurs in an electrochemical cell and
involves multiple proton-electron transfer steps.
● Cathode: Reduction of CO2 occurs at this electrode. Common materials include
copper, silver, and gold.
● Anode: Oxygen evolution reaction occurs here, typically using platinum or iridium
oxide.
● Electrolyte: An aqueous or non-aqueous medium to facilitate ionic conductivity (e.g.,
KHCO3)
● Voltage: Depends on the product targeted (formate, CO, etc.).
● pH: Controls the availability of protons for the reaction.
● Catalyst: Determines product selectivity.
General Mechanistic Steps;
1. CO2 Adsorption: CO2 molecules are adsorbed onto the cathode surface, where they
interact with the catalyst.
2. Electron Transfer: The adsorbed CO2 molecule undergoes sequential electron-proton
transfer reactions, forming reactive intermediates.
3. Formation of Products: Depending on the pathway, intermediates stabilize into
specific products such as formate, methane, or methanol.
Fig; Electrolytic cell for the electrochemical reduction of CO2
The Mechanism of Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2;
The electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 often occurs at the interface between the electrode and
the electrolyte, and the electrolyte is usually an aqueous solution of potassium bicarbonate.
As shown in Figure, the multiphase catalytic process generally consists of four main steps:
(i) The CO2 in the solution diffuses to the surface of the working electrode.
(ii) The electrocatalyst adsorbs CO2 from the solution.
(iii) Electron transfer or proton migration is used to cleave C-O bonds or form C-H bonds.
(iv) The generated products are detached from the electrocatalyst surface and diffused into
the electrolyte.
The adsorption of CO2 on the electrocatalyst surface is an important step
in the whole reaction. During the adsorption process, the C=O bonding is
strongly perturbed by the substrate, and the electrons are shared
between the CO2 and the catalyst. A number of reaction mechanisms
have been proposed for the conversion of CO2. It is widely accepted that
the reactive species are the neutral hydrated CO2 molecules, and they will
convert into CO2•− in the adsorption process on most of the main-group
metal electrodes in aqueous media. Then the absorbed CO2•− reacts with
the H2O molecules to form HCO2•. The intermediate would convert into to
HCO2− because of its unstable unpaired electron, followed by the
desorption of HCO2− species
Reaction mechanism of electrochemical CO2 reduction
Reaction Pathways;
1. Single-Electron Reduction:
The initial reduction of CO2 involves a single-electron transfer to form a CO2 radical anion:
CO2+e−→CO2−
Proton-Electron Coupling Pathways:
1. Formic Acid Pathway;
CO2+2H++2e−→HCOOH
Common in catalysts like Sn, Pb, and In.
2. Carbon Monoxide Pathway:
CO2+2H++2e−→CO+H2O
Catalyzed by Ag, Au, and Zn.
3. Methane Pathway:
CO2+8H++8e−→CH4+2H2O
Occurs on copper electrodes under low overpotentials.
4. Methanol Pathway:
CO2+6H++6e−→CH3OH+H2O
Catalyzed by Cu or Ni complexes.
Energy Diagram;
Fig; Free energy diagram for the electrochemical reduction of CO 2 to CH 4 on Pt(111) using
the computational hydrogen electrode at 0 V vs. RHE. Each step along the horizontal axis
represents the transfer of a proton (from the solution) and an electron (from the electrode) to
the adsorbate. The present work focuses on the barriers for the first four numbered steps.
Catalyst Role in Pathways;
Copper:
● Versatile catalyst for producing CH4, C2H4, and CH3OH.
● Stabilizes multi-carbon intermediates.
Silver/Gold:
● Excellent for CO production due to low overpotentials.
Tin/Lead:
● Favor formic acid/formate formation under mild conditions.
4. Challenges and Future Directions
Despite significant advances, challenges remain in achieving high selectivity, efficiency, and
stability in CO₂ reduction catalysts. Future research directions include:
● Developing catalysts with higher selectivity and stability: Designing catalysts with
tailored active sites can improve selectivity towards specific products.
● Understanding the reaction mechanism in detail: In situ and operando techniques can
provide insights into intermediate species and reaction dynamics.
● Improving energy efficiency: For practical applications, reducing the energy input
required for CO₂ reduction is crucial.
● Scaling up: Moving from laboratory-scale experiments to industrial applications
requires catalysts that can operate efficiently at larger scales and in real-world
conditions.
5. Conclusions and Outlook
The study of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction is of great importance for spacecraft life support
systems and energy storage conversion. However, research on CO2 electrocatalytic reduction
is still at the laboratory stage due to the high overpotential of CO2 electrocatalytic reduction,
the low reduction yield, and the lack of in-depth research on the catalytic mechanism. In
order to solve these problems, researchers need to make continuous improvements in catalyst,
electrolyte, and reactor design, and explore efficient methods for the electrocatalytic
reduction of CO2.
(1) The core of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction is how to prepare efficient electrocatalysts that
can use their catalytic activity to reduce external electron energy input and energy
consumption, while improving the selectivity and controllability of the reduction products.
Meanwhile, the catalyst must be able to achieve multielectron and multiproton transfer to
enable efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 on the same surface.
(2) It is necessary to find new electrolyte systems that can synergize with the catalyst in
organic systems and to analyze the specific functions of the electrolyte in the electrocatalytic
reduction of CO2 and the mechanism of action in situ in order to better understand the
electrocatalytic reduction of CO2.
(3) Although the design of the reactor is still at a preliminary stage, the size, shape, and
structure of the reactor are of great importance to improve the efficiency and selectivity of
electrocatalytic CO2. Therefore, to further promote the practical application of CO2
electrocatalytic reduction, this research needs to be further strengthened.
In conclusion, as an effective means of CO2 recycling in space stations, the electrocatalytic
reduction of CO2 has bright research prospects, and this field can further enrich catalytic
science and catalytic technology, thus advancing the progress of scientific research in related
fields.
References;
P. M. Vitousek, H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, J. M. Melillo, Science 1997, 277, 494.
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/indicators.php
K Li, B Peng, T Peng – Acs Catalysis, 2016 – ACS Publications
Atkins, R. Grand Challenges for the Giant Screen. In Connecting Society with Science: The
Greater Potential of Giant Screen Experiences Symposium, September; 2008. Google Scholar
Davis, S.J.; Caldeira, K.; Matthews, H.D. Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from
Existing Energy Infrastructure. Science 2010, 329 (5997), 1330–1333.