Advances in Pediatric Movement Disorders
Advances in Pediatric Movement Disorders
Terence D. Sanger
Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Pediatric Movement Disorders The reason for the difference in epidemiology between
Clinic, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
child and adult disorders is likely to be due to the
Correspondence to Terence D. Sanger, Department of Neurology and Neurological different effects of injury on the developing compared
Sciences, Pediatric Movement Disorders Clinic, Stanford University Medical Center, with the adult brain. For example, hypoxic injury in the
300 Pasteur Drive, A345, Stanford, CA 94305-5235, USA
e-mail: sanger@[Link] prenatal period can have very different effects from
later hypoxic injury [8 . .]. As another example, de-
Current Opinion in Neurology 2003, 16:529–535
creased dopamine in children and young adults appears
# 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
to be able to cause either dystonia or parkinsonism
1350-7540 [9 .,10–17], whereas later in life primarily parkinsonism
occurs [18] with dystonia in parkinsonian adults existing
primarily as a symptom related to treatment with
dopaminergic medicines. An unchanging injury in
childhood can present with variable or progressive
symptoms due to effects of growth and development
[19], and the effect of a fixed injury may change over
time [14,15,20,21].
DOI: 10.1097/[Link].0000084233.82329.0e 529
530 Movement disorders
The lack of effective disease-specific treatments and the determine the effect of intervention and measure
similarity of symptoms caused by different childhood functional outcome [19].
diseases has led to a search for therapies that may be
symptom-specific rather than disease-specific. This effort Although not usually listed along with other movement
has been hampered by a lack of consistent definitions of disorders, the negative symptoms frequently present in
symptoms and a lack of quantifiable measures of the childhood motor disease may be a more significant
severity of symptoms. It has also been difficult to contributor to disability than the ‘positive symptoms’.
determine the extent to which any given symptom Negative symptoms are usually taken to indicate the
contributes to a child’s disability. In the subsequent lack of a particular function, rather than the addition of
sections, we will discuss the relationship between an excess or uncontrolled movement. In many situations,
specific impairments and disability, and we will review the distinction is difficult. Typical examples of negative
recent developments in definition, quantification, and symptoms include weakness, ataxia, apraxia, and poor
treatment of childhood motor disorders. differentiation of individual movements (this last cate-
gory may be better classified as an apraxia in some
Functional goals cases).
In the absence of effective and risk-free treatments for
many of the diseases that cause movement disorders in Types of childhood movement disorders
children, it becomes essential to categorize and prioritize Classically, the movement disorders have been consid-
goals for functional improvement [19]. The National ered to include ataxia, athetosis, chorea, dystonia,
Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR) myoclonus, bradykinesia, tics, and tremor (dystonia is
has recommended the use of a five-axis scale, in which recognized to have many different manifestations,
pathophysiology (the disease process), impairment (clin- including dystonic spasms, dystonic tremor, repetitive
ical signs and symptoms), functional limitation (specific movements, abnormal fixed postures, and hypertonia,
limitations of movement), disability (limitations in and it may well be that athetosis in children is a
particular tasks), and societal participation (ability to particular expression of dystonia). Although this termi-
participate in age-appropriate activities) are included as nology is prevalent in the adult movement disorders
separate elements describing the impact of disease literature, for children it is important to include the
[22,23]. This classification reminds us that treatment at negative symptoms as well. It is equally important to
one level does not necessarily lead to improvement at consider the role of spasticity, both as a diagnostic
other levels. For example, reduction of spasticity (an finding and as a potential cause of disability. It may be
impairment) does not necessarily lead to improvement in helpful to use the term ‘motor disorder’ to indicate any
an abnormal gait (a functional limitation) although it may impairment of movement, whether including positive or
contribute to ease of transfers to or from a wheelchair (a negative symptoms, and not limited to the ‘movement
disability) and ultimately to greater ability to get to and disorders’ that are more familiar to the adult neurology
from school (societal participation). community.
Selection of appropriate functional interventions for Research in human motor control suggests that voluntary
childhood movement disorders is complicated by the movement can be divided into a planning phase and an
observation that children frequently have more than one execution phase [25–28]. Therefore, when considering
type of symptom as a result of their underlying disease childhood movement disorders, it may be helpful to
[24]. Determining the relationship between particular consider whether a particular disorder is more likely to
symptoms and the child’s functional goals becomes relate to planning (e.g. apraxia) or execution (e.g.
important for determining which symptom to approach weakness). We must also consider disorders for which
first as a target for treatment. there is excessive movement that is not triggered by
volition (e.g. myoclonus). Finally, we must consider
The mixed symptoms in children also complicate the those disorders that are readily apparent to a clinician but
selection of subjects for clinical research trials. By far the which do not necessarily interfere with voluntary move-
largest single group of children is the group with cerebral ment (e.g. spasticity).
palsy. However, the variability of symptom type and
severity in this group makes it very difficult to obtain a Thus in some cases it may be helpful to separate
homogeneous sample, and research studies are often childhood movement disorders into four primary cate-
forced to confine subjects to a subset (such as hemiplegic gories: (1) disorders of tone, (2) disorders of inhibition of
cerebral palsy) or a related disorder with ‘pure’ forms of movement, (3) disorders of execution of movement or
particular symptoms (such as hereditary spastic para- posture, and (4) disorders of movement planning.
plegia). No matter what the difficulties, appropriate Disorders of tone are signs observed by the clinician
categorization of children is required in order to during a neurological examination. These disorders do
Pediatric movement disorders Sanger 531
not describe the results of voluntary movement, and multiple symptoms including weakness. Disorders of
they may be more important as diagnostic tools than as sensation can lead to many different abnormalities of
determinants of disability. Disorders of inhibition are planning or execution [34], and whether these should be
disorders in which movement is initiated without the considered separately should be investigated [35–37].
child’s intent. The result is extra movement that occurs
either at rest or associated with movement, but which is Advances in defining childhood movement
not closely linked to the particular movement being disorders
performed. Disorders of execution are disorders in which One of the most salient diagnostic features of many
the pattern or magnitude of muscle activation is not childhood motor disorders is the presence of increased
appropriate for the intended task. This will lead to a tone. There has been disagreement between practi-
movement which does not correspond to the child’s tioners of different fields concerning the appropriate
plan. Disorders of planning are disorders in which the labeling of different types of childhood hypertonia. A US
muscle activations are appropriate for the intended National Institutes of Health-sponsored taskforce re-
movement plan, but the movement does not accomplish cently proposed a set of consensus definitions for
the desired task. Under this taxonomy, it may not always spasticity, dystonia, and rigidity as they apply to child-
be possible to assign a particular disorder to a single hood hypertonia [19]:
category. For example, ataxia is likely to be a disorder
both of execution and planning. Dystonia may cause an ‘Spasticity is defined as hypertonia in which one or both
abnormality of tone, but it also affects movement of the following signs are present: (1) resistance to
execution, and hypertonic dystonia could be due to a externally imposed movement increases with increasing
lack of inhibition of antagonist muscle activity. In young speed of stretch and varies with the direction of joint
children or in children with cognitive deficits it may be movement; (2) resistance to externally imposed move-
difficult to distinguish between disorders of planning ment rises rapidly above a threshold speed or joint angle.’
and execution. To illustrate the categories, in Table 1
we have attempted to place examples of specific ‘Dystonia is defined as a movement disorder in which
disorders within the category that best describes the involuntary sustained or intermittent muscle contractions
effects of the disorder. cause twisting and repetitive movements, abnormal
postures, or both.’
The last category in Table 1, disorders of planning, is
perhaps the least well-understood of the childhood ‘Rigidity is defined as hypertonia in which all of the
motor disorders. It is not known whether the adult following are true: (1) the resistance to externally
classification of apraxia (ideational, ideomotor, and limb- imposed joint movement is present at very low speeds
kinetic [29,30]) applies to children. It is not known of movement, does not depend on imposed speed, and
whether speech apraxia [31–33] is related to apraxia does not exhibit a speed or angle threshold; (2)
involving arm or hand movements. Furthermore, it is not simultaneous co-contraction of agonists and antagonists
known whether developmental coordination disorder may occur, and this is reflected in an immediate
[34] is a separate entity from apraxia. Finally, it is not resistance to a reversal of the direction of movement
known whether poorly differentiated control is due to about a joint; (3) the limb does not tend to return toward
apraxia, ataxia, dystonia, or possibly a combination of a particular fixed posture or extreme joint angle; (4)
voluntary activity in distant muscle groups does not lead
to involuntary movements about the rigid joints,
Table 1. Categorization of specific childhood movement disorders
although rigidity may worsen.’
Category Disorder
Disorders of tone Spasticity and clonus It is expected that the consensus definitions will evolve
Dystonia with time as further information becomes available from
Rigidity basic science and clinical research trials. The existence
Hypotonia
Disorders of inhibition Chorea of the consensus document demonstrates the ability to
Myoclonus reach common definitions between clinicians and
Tics researchers from different fields. We expect that similar
Tremor
Disorders of execution Weakness projects will need to be undertaken in order to define
Bradykinesia hyperkinetic disorders, negative symptoms, and other
Dystonia components of childhood motor impairment. There has
Ataxia
Disorders of planning Apraxia recently been an attempt to re-evaluate the classification
Developmental coordination disorder of cerebral palsy, and this has led to a consensus
Poorly differentiated control statement of algorithms for classification of subtypes of
Disorders of sensation
this particular disorder [38].
532 Movement disorders
Perhaps the most exciting advances in the treatment of References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have
childhood motor disorders have come from non-medical been highlighted as:
.
interventions. There has long been concern that ..
of special interest
of outstanding interest
strengthening a hypertonic muscle could potentially
lead to a worsening of symptoms. However, in children 1 Misbahuddin A, Warner TT. Dystonia: an update on genetics and treatment.
with spasticity this does not seem to be the case and in Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14:471–475.
fact there is no clear relationship between spasticity and 2 West A, Periquet M, Lincoln S, et al. Complex relationship between Parkin
mutations and Parkinson disease. Am J Med Genet 2002; 114:584–591.
strength [50,76 . .]. Strengthening exercise can thus lead
3 West AB, Maraganore D, Crook J, et al. Functional association of the parkin
to functional improvement [77,78,79 . .]. It has remained gene promoter with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 2002;
difficult, however, to show that physical therapy is 11:2787–2792.
effective for all children [80]. Some negative symptoms 4 West AB, Lockhart PJ, O’Farell C, Farrer MJ. Identification of a novel gene
linked to parkin via a bi-directional promoter. J Mol Biol 2003; 326:11–19.
including lack of coordination or balance can be
5 Valente EM, Brancati F, Ferraris A, et al. PARK6-linked parkinsonism occurs
improved with training that involves the necessity of in several European families. Ann Neurol 2002; 51:14–18.
maintaining posture on an unsteady base. A particular 6 Bentivoglio AR, Cortelli P, Valente EM, et al. Phenotypic characterisation of
example is the use of hippotherapy (horseback riding) autosomal recessive PARK6-linked parkinsonism in three unrelated Italian
families. Mov Disord 2001; 16:999–1006.
for children with impairments of trunk strength and tone
7 DeStefano AL, Lew MF, Golbe LI, et al. PARK3 influences age at onset in
[81,82]. The use of thin neoprene or Lycra vests may Parkinson disease: a genome scan in the GenePD study. Am J Hum Genet
improve trunk stability and reaching in some children 2002; 70:1089–1095.
[83,84]. Maintenance of activity and participation in age- 8 Back SA, Han BH, Luo NL, et al. Selective vulnerability of late
.. oligodendrocyte progenitors to hypoxia-ischemia. J Neurosci 2002; 22:455–
appropriate activities is thus likely to be an extremely 463.
important component of functional improvement. It is This remarkable work provides the foundations for a new understanding of the
relationship between prematurity, periventricular leukomalacia, and cerebral palsy.
possible that part of the effectiveness of this approach is
9 Bandmann O, Wood NW. Dopa-responsive dystonia: the story so far.
in fact due to functional reorganization of motor areas in . Neuropediatrics 2002; 33:1–5.
the brain. The most convincing example of this comes This elegant summary of recent research on dopa-responsive dystonia underlines
the importance of testing for this diagnosis in any child with an unexplained motor
from the use of constraint therapy, in which an artificial disorder.
restriction of the ‘good’ arm of a stroke patient may lead 10 Bandmann O, Valente EM, Holmans P, et al. Dopa-responsive dystonia: a
to improved function of the plegic arm along with clinical and molecular genetic study. Ann Neurol 1998; 44:649–656.
enlargement of the cortical representation [85,86]. 11 Bandmann O, Marsden CD, Wood NW. Atypical presentations of dopa-
responsive dystonia. Adv Neurol 1998; 78:283–290.
Further research is needed to determine if this mechan-
12 Bandmann O, Nygaard TG, Surtees R, et al. Dopa-responsive dystonia in
ism is applicable to children, but early results are British patients: new mutations of the GTP-cyclohydrolase I gene and
promising [87,88]. evidence for genetic heterogeneity. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5:403–406.
534 Movement disorders
13 Pal PK, Leung J, Hedrich K, et al. [18F]-Dopa positron emission tomography 42 Arnold AS, Blemker SS, Delp SL. Evaluation of a deformable musculoske-
imaging in early-stage, non-parkin juvenile parkinsonism. Mov Disord 2002; letal model for estimating muscle-tendon lengths during crouch gait. Ann
17:789–794. Biomed Eng 2001; 29:263–274.
14 Palfi S, Leventhal L, Goetz CG, et al. Delayed onset of progressive dystonia 43 Comella CL, Leurgans S, Wuu J, et al. Rating scales for dystonia. A
following subacute 3-nitropropionic acid treatment in Cebus apella monkeys. . multicenter assessment. Mov Disord 2003; 18:303–312.
Mov Disord 2000; 15:524–530. This paper presents the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale and the Global Dystonia
15 He F, Zhang S, Qian F, Zhang C. Delayed dystonia with striatal CT lucencies scale and compares them with the Burke–Fahn–Marsden dystonia scale [89].
induced by a mycotoxin (3-nitropropionic acid). Neurology 1995; 45:2178– Unfortunately the study did not evaluate the Barry–Albright dystonia scale [44]
2183. which has been tested more extensively in children.
16 Nishiyama N, Yukishita S, Hagiwara H, et al. Gene mutation in hereditary 44 Barry MJ, VanSwearingen JM, Albright AL. Reliability and responsiveness of
progressive dystonia with marked diurnal fluctuation (HPD), strictly defined the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41:404–411.
dopa-responsive dystonia. Brain Dev 2000; 22 (Suppl 1):S102–S106. 45 Bourke-Taylor H. Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function:
17 Segawa M, Nishiyama N, Nomura Y. DOPA-responsive dystonic parkinson- construct validity and correlation with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability
ism: pathophysiologic considerations. Adv Neurol 1999; 80:389–400. Inventory. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003; 45:92–96.
18 Khan NL, Valente EM, Bentivoglio AR, et al. Clinical and subclinical 46 Randall M, Carlin JB, Chondros P, Reddihough D. Reliability of the
dopaminergic dysfunction in PARK6-linked parkinsonism: an 18F-dopa PET Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child
study. Ann Neurol 2002; 52:849–853. Neurol 2001; 43:761–767.
19 Sanger TD, Delgado MR, Gaebler-Spira D, et al. Classification and definition 47 Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Van Eldik N. Test/retest reliability and inter-rater
of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics 2003; 111:e89–e97. agreement of the Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST) for older
children with acquired brain injuries. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2001; 21:59–
20 Saint Hilaire MH, Burke RE, Bressman SB, et al. Delayed-onset dystonia due
67.
to perinatal or early childhood asphyxia. Neurology 1991; 41:216–222.
48 Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, et al. Prognosis for gross motor
21 Burke RE, Fahn S, Gold AP. Delayed-onset dystonia in patients with ‘‘static’’ .. function in cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. JAMA
encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43:789–797.
2002; 288:1357–1363.
22 Campbell SK. Quantifying the effects of interventions for movement disorders This longitudinal study showed that the GMFM and GMFCS rating scales can be
resulting from cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 1996; 11 (Suppl 1):S61–S70. used to make predictions of long-term functional outcomes in children. The five
strata of the GMFCS effectively divide children into categories with differing
23 Lollar DJ, Simeonsson RJ, Nanda U. Measures of outcomes for children and
outcomes as measured by the GMFM.
youth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81:S46–S52.
24 Anthoney TR. Neuroanatomy and the neurologic exam. Ann Arbor: CRC 49 Boyd RN, Morris ME, Graham HK. Management of upper limb dysfunction in
Press; 1994. children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8 (Suppl
5):150–166.
25 Baraduc P, Wolpert DM. Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the
starting posture. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88:973–981. 50 Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Olree KS, Park TS. Ankle spasticity and strength in
children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000;
26 Vetter P, Flash T, Wolpert DM. Planning movements in a simple redundant 42:42–47.
task. Curr Biol 2002; 12:488–491.
51 Campbell WM, Ferrel A, McLaughlin JF, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy
27 Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Flanagan JR. Perspectives and problems in of continuous intrathecal baclofen. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44:660–665.
motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 2001; 5:487–494.
52 Butler C, Campbell S. Evidence of the effects of intrathecal baclofen for
28 Flanagan JR, King S, Wolpert DM, Johansson RS. Sensorimotor prediction spastic and dystonic cerebral palsy. AACPDM Treatment Outcomes
and memory in object manipulation. Can J Exp Psychol 2001; 55:87–95. Committee Review Panel. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42:634–645.
29 Koski L, Iacoboni M, Mazziotta JC. Deconstructing apraxia: understanding
53 McLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Temkin N, et al. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-
disorders of intentional movement after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol 2002; . analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002;
15:71–77.
44:17–25.
30 Butler JA. How comparable are tests of apraxia? Clin Rehabil 2002; 16:389– This paper reviews three randomized trials and shows that rhizotomy combined
398. with physical therapy has a ‘small but statistically significant advantage’ over
physical therapy alone.
31 Maassen B. Issues contrasting adult acquired versus developmental apraxia
of speech. Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23:257–266. 54 Graham HK, Boyd RN, Fehlings D. Does intramuscular botulinum toxin A
32 Wambaugh JL. A summary of treatments for apraxia of speech and review of injection improve upper-limb function in children with hemiplegic cerebral
replicated approaches. Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23:293–308. palsy? Med J Aust 2003; 178:95–96.
33 Nijland L, Maassen B, Van der Meulen S, et al. Coarticulation patterns in 55 Marsden CD, Marion MH, Quinn N. The treatment of severe dystonia in
children with developmental apraxia of speech. Clin Linguist Phon 2002; children and adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47:1166–1173.
16:461–483. 56 Burke RE, Fahn S. Double-blind evaluation of trihexyphenidyl in dystonia. Adv
34 Zoia S, Pelamatti G, Cuttini M, et al. Performance of gesture in children with Neurol 1983; 37:189–192.
and without DCD: effects of sensory input modalities. Dev Med Child Neurol 57 Burke RE, Fahn S, Marsden CD. Torsion dystonia: a double-blind,
2002; 44:699–705. prospective trial of high-dosage trihexyphenidyl. Neurology 1986; 36:160–
35 Maruff P, Wilson P, Currie J. Abnormalities of motor imagery associated with 164.
somatic passivity phenomena in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2003;
58 Hoon Jr AH, Freese PO, Reinhardt EM, et al. Age-dependent effects of
60:229–238.
trihexyphenidyl in extrapyramidal cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurol 2001; 25:55–
36 Wilson PH, Thomas PR, Maruff P. Motor imagery training ameliorates motor 58.
clumsiness in children. J Child Neurol 2002; 17:491–498.
59 Jankovic J, Beach J. Long-term effects of tetrabenazine in hyperkinetic
37 Wilson PH, Maruff P, Ives S, Currie J. Abnormalities of motor and praxis movement disorders. Neurology 1997; 48:358–362.
imagery in children with DCD. Hum Mov Sci 2001; 20:135–159.
60 Jankovic J, Orman J. Tetrabenazine therapy of dystonia, chorea, tics, and
38 Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe. A collaboration of cerebral palsy other dyskinesias. Neurology 1988; 38:391–394.
surveys and registers. Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE). Dev
Med Child Neurol 2000; 42:816–824. 61 Heggarty H, Wright T. Tetrabenazine in athetoid cerebral palsy. Dev Med
Child Neurol 1974; 16:137–142.
39 Nordmark E, Anderson G. Wartenberg pendulum test: objective quantifica-
tion of muscle tone in children with spastic diplegia undergoing selective 62 Jankovic J. Treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders with tetrabenazine:
dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44:26–33. a double-blind crossover study. Ann Neurol 1982; 11:41–47.
40 Jobin A, Levin MF. Regulation of stretch reflex threshold in elbow flexors in 63 Asher SW, Aminoff MJ. Tetrabenazine and movement disorders. Neurology
children with cerebral palsy: a new measure of spasticity. Dev Med Child 1981; 31:1051–1054.
Neurol 2000; 42:531–540.
64 Swash M, Roberts AH, Zakko H, Heathfield KW. Treatment of involuntary
41 Dietz V. Neurophysiology of gait disorders: present and future applications. movement disorders with tetrabenazine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1972;
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 103:333–355. 35:186–191.
Pediatric movement disorders Sanger 535
65 Brunstrom JE, Bastian AJ, Wong M, Mink JW. Motor benefit from levodopa in 78 Damiano DL, Quinlivan J, Owen BF, et al. Spasticity versus strength in
spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Ann Neurol 2000; 47:662–665. cerebral palsy: relationships among involuntary resistance, voluntary torque,
and motor function. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8 (Suppl 5):40–49.
66 Gros C, Frerebeau P, Perez-Dominguez E, et al. Long term results of
stereotaxic surgery for infantile dystonia and dyskinesia. Neurochirurgia 79 Damiano DL, Dodd K, Taylor NF. Should we be testing and training muscle
(Stuttg) 1976; 19:171–178. .. strength in cerebral palsy? Dev Med Child Neurol 2002; 44:68–72.
67 Gros C, Frerebeau P, Privat JM, et al. Stereotaxic surgery of non- This paper and the other by Damiano et al. [78] point out the importance of
Parkinsonian dystonias and dyskinesias [in French]. Neurochirurgie 1976; strengthening exercises in cerebral palsy. These papers present a change in
22:539–552. thinking as many authors had previously been concerned that increasing the
strength in a spastic muscle might worsen spasticity and reduce function.
68 Ghika J, Villemure JG, Miklossy J, et al. Postanoxic generalized dystonia
improved by bilateral Voa thalamic deep brain stimulation. Neurology 2002; 80 Bower E, Michell D, Burnett M, Campbell MJ, McLellan DL. Randomized
58:311–313. controlled trial of physiotherapy in 56 children with cerebral palsy followed for
18 months. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43:4–15.
69 Tronnier VM, Fogel W. Pallidal stimulation for generalized dystonia. Report of
three cases. J Neurosurg 2000; 92:453–456. 81 Sokolov PL, Dremova GV, Samsonova SV. Hippotherapy as a method for
70 Coubes P, Roubertie A, Vayssiere N, et al. Treatment of DYT1-generalised complex rehabilitation of patients with late residual stage of infantile cerebral
dystonia by stimulation of the internal globus pallidus. Lancet 2000; palsy [in Russian]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2002; 102:42–45.
355:2220–2221. 82 Heine B. Hippotherapy. A multisystem approach to the treatment of
71 Coubes P, Cif L, Azais M, et al. Treatment of dystonia syndrome by chronic neuromuscular disorders. Aust J Physiother 1997; 43:145–149.
electric stimulation of the internal globus pallidus. Arch Pediatr 2002; 9
(Suppl 2):84s–86s. 83 Nicholson JH, Morton RE, Attfield S, Rennie D. Assessment of upper-limb
function and movement in children with cerebral palsy wearing lycra
72 Albright AL, Barry MJ, Shafton DH, Ferson SS. Intrathecal baclofen for garments. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43:384–391.
generalized dystonia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43:652–657.
84 Gracies JM, Fitzpatrick R, Wilson L, et al. Lycra garments designed for
73 Albright AL, Barry MJ, Fasick P, et al. Continuous intrathecal baclofen patients with upper limb spasticity: mechanical effects in normal subjects.
infusion for symptomatic generalized dystonia. Neurosurgery 1996; 38:934– Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78:1066–1071.
938; discussion 938–939.
74 Albright AL, Barry MJ, Painter MJ, Shultz B. Infusion of intrathecal baclofen 85 Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, et al. Motor recovery and cortical
for generalized dystonia in cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 1998; 88:73–76. reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a
preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16:326–338.
75 Thompson TP, Kondziolka D, Albright AL. Thalamic stimulation for choreiform
movement disorders in children. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 2000; 86 Levy CE, Nichols DS, Schmalbrock PM, et al. Functional MRI evidence of
92:718–721. cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-
induced movement therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80:4–12.
76 Ross SA, Engsberg JR. Relation between spasticity and strength in
.. individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 87 Willis JK, Morello A, Davie A, et al. Forced use treatment of childhood
2002; 44:148–157. hemiparesis. Pediatrics 2002; 110:94—96.
This paper strengthens the assertions made by Damiano et al. [78 . .] by showing
the lack of a consistent relationship between strength and spasticity in children and 88 Boyd RN, Morris ME, Graham HK. Management of upper limb dysfunction in
adults with cerebral palsy. children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8(Suppl
5):150–166.
77 Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Damiano DL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of
strength-training programs for people with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med 89 Burke RE, Fahn S, Marsden CD, et al. Validity and reliability of a rating scale
Rehabil 2002; 83:1157–1164. for the primary torsion dystonias. Neurology 1985; 35:73–77.