Early Childhood ELL Teacher Guide
Early Childhood ELL Teacher Guide
I. Introduction
V. Resources
Catalogues.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Websites ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18
Professional Development Books ........................................................................................................................................................................... 19
Logan Square Neighborhood Association
INTRODUCTION
This Teacher and Leadership Guide is intended as a resource for Early Childhood administrators, teachers
and other educators who work with children who are developing English proficiency. The primary aim of this
resource guide is to present information and recommendations about best practices in addressing the needs
to English language learners (ELLs) and their families.
Young children benefit cognitively from learning more than one language. For ELLs, transitioning from their first language to English
before they have a strong foundation in their mother tongue can have long-lasting negative academic and linguistic effects. Early
childhood teachers should understand that acquiring more than one language does not delay the acquisition of English or interfere
with academic achievement in English when both languages are supported. On the contrary, research on children who acquire English
after their home language has been developed, show that young children have the capacity to learn more than one language during the
primary school years and that this bilingual ability offers long-term academic, cultural, and economic advantages. Neuroscientists and
psycholinguists point to the positive effects of learning two languages during the infant-toddler years and also to the human brain’s
broad capacity to learn multiple languages. In addition, young children learning two languages have more neural activity in the parts of
the brain associated with language processing. This increased brain activity can have long-term positive effects on cognitive abilities,
such as those that require focusing on the details of a task and knowing how language is structured and used.
Young ELLs with extended learning opportunities in their home language consistently outperform those who attend English-only
programs on standardized tests in English during the middle and high school years. Research shows the link between high quality
preschool programs and higher academic achievement in school, lower special education referral rates, higher rates of high school
graduation, and increased college attendance. Implementation of appropriate education practices is especially important for PK ELLs.
Research-based principles for educating PK ELLs (Garcia, Jensen and Scribner 2009)
• Academic support for young children in their native language improves long-term English acquisition.
• PK ELLs who are immersed in English instead of participating in bilingual or ESL programs show decreases in reading
and math achievement, higher high school dropout rates, and lower test scores.
• Neuroscientists and psycholinguists have established that oral language is the foundation for reading acquisition and
that reading skills must be built on a strong oral language base.
Terminology
Many terms are used to refer to children who are not yet proficient in the English language. As with all labels, none of these terms
reflect 100% the complexity of children who are not native born speakers of English. Below is a brief review of the terms as well as
other terminology to refer to programs and the language itself.
Students
English Language Learners ELL Widely used term. May be perceived as too focused on English rather than
on bilingual mature of ELLs.
Dual Language Learner DLL Recent term used in early childhood education to refer to ELLs as a more
accurate representation of children’s bilingualism. Problematic because it is a
term associated with Dual Language Programs.
Emergent Bilingual EB Recent term used by some to refer to the bilingual nature of ELLs who are
developing English.
Limited English Proficient LEP Used by the government. No longer used by educators because of negative
inference to “limitations”
Students with interrupted SIFE Older ELLs who have had limited or no schooling, typically refugees or formal
education students from rural areas.
Language
English Language Development ELD Used by WIDA for English language standards.
Programs
Transitional Bilingual Education TBE Programs that include native language for instruction (plus ESL). IL law
requires that schools/centers that have more than 20 children of the same
language offer TBE
Transitional Program TPI Programs that include ESL. IL law requires that schools/centers that
of Instruction have more than 20 children of the same language offer TBE
English as a Second Language ESL Instructional programs guided by WIDA standards that use ESL strategies.
Dual Language Education DLE Program that aims to develop both the L1 and L2. Two-way dual programs
have English native speakers and native speakers of a LOTE. In one-way dual
programs all children are LOTE speakers.
Demographics
The number of school-age children will increase by 5.4 million from 2005 to 2020 and the main growth will come from children
of immigrant families (Fry 2008). Children with English language learning needs represent a large and growing share of the PK-12
student population.
There are 207,417 ELLs in Illinois, an increase of about 10,000 students from SY 2011. Chicago Public Schools has the largest number
with almost 70,000 ELLs. Just sixteen years ago, ELLs were at about 100,000; thus during this time, the ELL population has nearly
doubled. More than 144 languages were spoken by ELLs in 2011, with Spanish spoken by 81% of ELLs. The other nine languages with
the largest numbers of speakers were Polish, Arabic, Urdu, Tagalog, Korean, Gujarati, Cantonese, Vietnamese, and Russian. Spanish is
the predominant language spoken by ELLs in Illinois. The majority of ELLs were in the early childhood grades PK-3 with 63% (Bilingual
Education Programs and English Language Learners in Illinois: SY 2012 Statistical Report).
Illinois will see a continued increase in ELLs as more districts identify PK ELLs for bilingual/ESL instruction. From 2010 to 2011, there has
been a dramatic increase in the number with more than 17,000 PreK ELLs identified as receiving services. Based on trends, there are
probably at least another 40,000 PK ELLs eligible for pre-school bilingual and ESL services. This number
is based on the fact that there are over 31,000 ELLs at the K level (Illinois Advisory Council on Bilingual Distribution of ELLs by
Education Report, 2013). Grade Band in Illinois
The majority of ELLs are Latino and represent almost half of all Latino children (45%) in Illinois schools. GRADE % ELLS
Many factors, such as poverty, lack of English proficiency, and lack of access to social support systems
PK 9%
place Latino children at higher risk of academic underachievement than other groups. Latino students
K-3 55%
have the largest high school dropout rate in the United States and have experienced an alarming rate
4-6 18%
of school failure. Access to linguistic and culturally responsive Early Childhood programs is essential to
7-8 8%
narrow the achievement gap for Latino ELL children.
9-12 10%
Under 23 Illinois Administrative Code Part 228 Transitional Bilingual Education, children who are ELLs must be identified by
administering a home language survey and conducting an English language proficiency screening process for children who come from
a language background other than English. PK programs must offer a language instruction program for ELLs. Article 14C-3 of the Illinois
School Code requires that one of two types of programs be provided for all PK-12 grade ELLs:
When 20 or more ELLs of the same language are enrolled in the same school or attendance center. TBE programs must provide
instruction in the home language and ESL. TBE teachers are required to be licensed and have bilingual endorsement. Bilingual teachers
must demonstrate proficiency in their target language and in English.
When 19 or fewer ELLs of the same language enrolled in a school or attendance center. TPI programs must include instruction or other
assistance in a student’s L1 to the extent necessary as determined by the student’s level of English language proficiency. TPI services
may include, but are not limited to, instruction in ESL, language arts in the student’s home language, and history of the student’s native
land and the United States. TPI teachers must hold teacher licensure and ESL endorsement.
1. Comes from a home where a language other than English is spoken by the student and/or by the student’s parent,
guardians, or anyone else who resides in the household; and
2. Does not demonstrate English language proficiency in a research-based English language proficiency screening
procedure that is developmentally appropriate for the student.
All children identified as coming from homes where a language other than English is spoken on the home language survey must be
screened with the WIDA MODEL to determine ELL status and placement in the TBE/TPI program in K. Children who were identified as
ELL in PK but meet the State English proficiency standard when screened for K should be enrolled in the same manner as other students
who demonstrate English proficiency on the WIDA MODEL.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Illinois Law for PK (for more information see ISBE 2014,
http://www.isbe.net/bilingual/pdfs/preschool_faq092611.pdf
1. Which PK programs are included under the Transitional Bilingual Education rules?
All PK programs for children ages 3-5 administered by a public school district, including PK programs that are subcontracted by districts
to community organizations and PK programs that districts administer regardless of the source of funding for the programs.
Families of all PK children new to the school/center must be given the home language survey (HLS) by the first day the student starts
to participate in the program. The HLS contains two questions. If the answer to one or both of the questions is “yes” then the school/
center must screen the child for English language proficiency.
3. How does the program determine whether children are are proficient in English in PK?
The district must establish standard English language proficiency (ELP) research-based screening procedures to determine English
language proficiency level, minimally in the domains of listening and speaking. This can include an established assessment such
as the pre-IPT.
• Be culturally and linguistically appropriate for the children being scre ened;
• Include one or more observations using culturally and linguistically appropriate tools;
• Use multiple measures and methods (home language assessments; verbal and nonverbal procedures; various activities, settings,
and personal interactions);
• Involve family by seeking information and insight to help guide the screening process without involving them in the formal
assessment or interpretation of results; and
• Involve staff knowledgeable about PK education, child development, and first and second language acquisition.
• Screening procedures may be modified to accommodate the special need of children with IEPs.
The district must notify the parent in writing that the child has been placed in a TBE or TPI program within 30 days after the beginning
of the school year or 14 days after enrollment in the program during the middle of the school year. The notification letter must be in
English and the home language of the child and must address the areas required under Section 14C-4 of the Illinois School Code.
• To provide bilingual instruction to PK children, a teacher must hold Early Childhood license with a bilingual endorsement
or both an Early Childhood license and a Type 29 provisional certificate.
• To provide ESL instruction to PK children, a teacher must hold an Early Childhood license with a bilingual or ESL endorsement or
both an Early Childhood license and a Type 29 provisional certificate.
6. By July 1, 2016 are all PK teachers required to hold a bilingual or ESL endorsement?
No, only PK teachers who provide native language/ESL instruction to ELLs must hold the appropriate endorsement.
What happens when teachers tell parents (who don’t speak English well) to speak English at home:
Concepts known in the native language can be transferred to English. Concepts already learned in the native language do not have to
be re-learned in English so children only have to learn the new terms in English. For example, if I know what dinosaurs are in Spanish,
I don’t have to relearn the concept, only the English language associated with dinosaurs. Academic and language skills in the native
language transfer to English.
Cognates
A cognate is a word that has similar meaning, spelling and pronunciation in two or more languages. Spanish and English share many
cognate words. Teachers should be aware that although cognates are common between Spanish and English, Spanish speaking ELLs
may not necessarily know the word and concept in the native language. For example, a child may not know the word “triangulo” in
Spanish so this won’t be transferred to triangle in English. For the cognate strategy to be effective, ELLs need to already know the
concept and word in the native language before it can be transferred. There are also some false cognates that sound the same but
have different meanings, such as exit and exito.
Replaces the native language with English Add English to the native language
Transitional Bilingual Dual Language
Maintenance
Developmental
Enrichment
INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES
Effective instructional practices for young ELLs are based on constructivist instructional Active engagement & learning
approaches. Constructivist approaches engage children in critical thinking and problem Authentic learning
solving, are connected to content areas, and rely on meaningful learning activities. Learner-centered
Constructivist instruction includes: Meaningful tasks
Interactive learning
The following instructional approaches and methods make up some of the best practices Problem-based learning
that should be included in quality ELL education programs. Critical thinking activities
Integrated curriculum
Hands-on learning
Language & Literacy: Content and Literacy: Multisensory learning
Culturally-Responsive Instruction
Including the experiences, prior knowledge, and abilities that ELLs bring to school should be used as bridges for developing language,
academic competence, and positive self-esteem. Understanding each student’s background is essential for teachers to make the
most appropriate instructional choices for ELLs. Culturally-responsive instruction includes the use of children’s native language in the
classroom print and instructional materials, such as books and songs. Incorporating children’ cultures in the lessons is also beneficial
for ELLs who will be more receptive to school when they see that their background is valued and respected.
Balanced Literacy: Instructional approaches that develop literacy skills by incorporating a number of activities including: read-aloud,
shared reading, independent reading, interactive reading, phonological awareness, shared writing, modeled writing, interactive writing
and independent writing. Shared reading and writing are typically done with the whole class.
Read-Aloud: An activity where teachers or children read aloud to the class. Hearing the material allows children to listen to ideas and
vocabulary they may not be ready to read on their own and introduces them to new genres.
Retelling: Recall of something heard or read, usually in the order in which it was presented. As a method of assessment, it allows the
teacher to make judgments about the student’s ability to construct meaning.
Shared Reading and Writing: An interactive reading and writing experience where children join in the reading of a big book or other
enlarged text or join in the writing of a collaborative text. In shared reading, typically a pattern language or predictable text is read
multiple times while each reading attends to certain literacy skills. In shared writing the teacher and children write a story, report, or
poem together while also attending to literacy skills.
Talk/Think-Aloud: Explicit modeling in which the teacher orally explains the cognitive process in accomplishing a task (explains his/her
own thinking aloud). The teacher might say “Let’s see, to draw a flower I should start in the center of my paper and draw a circle, then I
can draw the petals with several circles connected to the circle in the middle”.
Cooperative/Collaborative Groups: Student arrangement in which positive interdependence and shared responsibility for completing
tasks are established among group members. This type of organizational structure encourages heterogeneity (both academic and
linguistic), shared leadership, and social skills development. Cooperative learning relies on intergroup strategies such as:
Think-Pair-Share: An activity in which children think about a topic provided by the teacher. Then, children pair-up with one another
to discuss their thoughts on the topic. Finally they share their thoughts with the class.
Inquiry-Based Learning: An approach to teaching and learning in which children deepen their understanding of the underlying
principles of a domain by conducting investigations. These investigations typically include asking questions, making predictions,
gathering evidence, and constructing explanations. Example of inquiry-based learning include engaging in the process of scientific
inquiry (the life cycle of butterflies) or research (gathering information and visuals about their families).
Interdisciplinary Teaching: Integrating the subject matter from two or more disciplines, such as English and Social Studies, often using
themes such as inventions as overlays to the study of different subjects.
Learning Centers: Stations setup for children to work collaboratively or individually on projects that are either content-focused or
literacy-focused.
Modeling: When clear examples are provided to children of what is expected of them. Learners need to see and hear what a developing
product looks like. A thoughtful teacher of ELLs models or “walks” children through various activities designed to increase competencies.
Scaffolding: Teacher support for learning and student performance of tasks through instruction, modeling, questioning, and feedback.
Scaffolding activities provide support for learning that can be removed as children demonstrate increasing independence. These
supports are gradually withdrawn as the student gains proficiency, transferring more and more responsibility to the child. The child
is assisted by others and is able to achieve more than he or she would be able to do alone.
Sheltered Instruction: An approach to teach second language learners that integrates language and content. This approach provides
ELLs access to academic content and promotes the development of the second language.
Total Physical Response (TPR): Generally labeled TPR, this approach was pioneered by James Asher and involves the teacher’s skillful
use of the command system of language to develop receptive language. Children respond physically rather than verbally and speech
emerges naturally. TRP uses explicit speech and visual and physical clues to help children comprehend second language input. For
example, the teacher can tell the children: “Pick a red crayon, take it to the table and put it next to the green paper” or “take three
steps back then take one step to the side, and jump two time”
Instructional Materials
Brown Bear, Brown Bear Down By the Bay Caps for Sale
The Carrot Seed Over in the Meadow The Gingerbread Man
The Chick and the Duckling Five Little Monkeys The Great Big,
Chicka Chicka Boom Boom Five Little Ducks Enormous Turnip
Do You Want to Be My Friend? I Know an Old Lady Hattie and the Fox
The Enormous Watermelon What’s the Weather Like ay? It Looked Like Spilt Milk
Goodnight Moon Ten in the Bed The Little Red Hen
Have You Seen My Cat? Teddy Bear, Teddy Bear The Very Hungry Caterpillar
Is Your Mama a Llama? Down by The Bay The Three Billy Goats Gruff
Zoo Looking Baby Beluga The Three Little Kittens
Who Took the Cookies Shake My Sillies Out The Three Bears
from the Cookie Jar? The Wheels on the Bus The Three Little Pigs
The Hungry Caterpillar Eensy Wincey Spider Henny Penny
WIDA Standards guide teachers’ instruction and includes the social, instructional, and academic language children need to engage
with peers, educators and the curriculum in schools.
Standard Abbreviation
Early English Language English language learners communicate information, ideas, and The language of
Development Standard 1 concepts necessary for success in the area of Social and Emotional Social and Emotional
Development Development
Early English Language English language learners communicate information, ideas and The language of Early
Development Standard 2 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Language Development
Early Language Development and Literacy and Literacy
Early English Language English language learners communicate information, ideas, and The language of
Development Standard 3 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Mathematics
Mathematics
Early English Language English language learners communicate information, ideas, and The language of Science
Development Standard 4 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of
Science
Early English Language English language learners communicate information, ideas, and The language of Social
Development Standard 5 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Studies
Social Studies
Early English Language English Language learners communicate information, ideas and The language of Physical
Development Standard 6 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Development
Physical Development
Standard Abbreviation
Early Spanish Language Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts The language of
Development Standard 1 necessary for success in the area of Social and Emotional Development Social and Emotional
Development
Early Spanish Language Dual language learners communicate information, ideas and The language of Early
Development Standard 2 concepts necessary for academic success in the content area of Language Development
Early Language Development and Literacy and Literacy
Early Spanish Language Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts The language of
Development Standard 3 necessary for academic success in the content area of Mathematics Mathematics
Early Spanish Language Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts The language of Science
Development Standard 4 necessary for academic success in the content area of
Science
Early Spanish Language Dual language learners communicate information, ideas, and concepts The language of Social
Development Standard 5 necessary for academic success in the content area of Studies
Social Studies
Early Spanish Language Dual Language learners communicate information, ideas and concepts The language of Physical
Development Standard 6 necessary for academic success in the content area of Development
Physical Development
Age Clusters
Because there are significant developmental differences between 2.5-year-olds and 5.5-year-olds, both linguistically and
cognitively, WIDA differentiates language development according to age clusters. According to WIDA, typically developing
3-year olds (monolingual or bilingual) cannot be expected to comprehend or produce language of the same complexity as that
of 5-year-olds. The age clusters take this cognitive and linguistic “threshold” into account by defining specific language criteria
for each of the following age groups:
Language Domains
The WIDA ELD include two language domains—receptive (what children understand and read) and expressive (what children can say
and write). According to WIDA, these oral language domains encompass the listening and speaking skills ELLs will need and use across
all six standards. Children learning a second language typically understand more than they can express so it is important to pay special
attention to receptive language skills. Although early literacy includes listening, speaking, reading, and writing, children rely mostly
on oral language skills when participating in reading and writing activities at this early age. Thus, reading and writing have been
incorporated into the receptive and expressive language domains of the E-SLD framework. (From WIDA Early Language Development
Standards, 2013)
The WIDA ELD standards have been adapted to fit the unique characteristics of young children’s developing linguistic abilities during
the early preschool years. The features of social, instructional, and academic language are outlined for two language criteria: linguistic
complexity and language usage.
• Linguistic complexity refers to the quantity and variety of language used by children at the discourse level. Language features such
as the length of utterances/interactions and how children understand and express their ideas are included in this category.
• Language usage refers to the types and use of structures, phrases, and words. Some features in this language criterion are: choice
of intonation to convey meaning, types and variety of grammatical structures, match of language forms to purpose, specificity of
word/phrase choice (vocabulary) and comprehensibility of language (forms, conventions, and fluency).
WIDA describes instructional support in terms of sensory, graphic, and interactive scaffolds for language development. Sensory
and graphic supports such as using manipulatives, realia, visuals, graphic organizers provides ELLs contextualized scaffolds for easier
processing of new information. Interactive supports such as having children work in small groups and pairs provides them opportunities
to use the target language while processing new information and concepts.
Model performance indicators (MPIs) provide examples of how children are able to process or produce language within specific
socio-cultural contexts at the three levels of early English language development within each age cluster.
An MPI strand consists of the three language levels of early English language development for a given topic and language domain, from
Entering (1) through Bridging (5). The horizontal MPI strands illustrate the progression of language development for a given age cluster.
MPI strands provide a consistent structure for early care and education practitioners to use when scaffolding or assessing children’s
language across a wide range of learning activities and environments. Figure H provides a sample MPI strand for the E-ELD Standard 6:
The Language of Physical Development, ages 4.5–5.5.
Cognitive Function: Children at all levels of English language development DEMONSTRATE body movements associated with actions
of animals.
Imitate body movements of animals Perform body movements of animals in Perform body movements of animals
in songs according to oral commands songs according to oral directions with a in songs according to extended oral
with a physical model (e.g., “Move like a phusical model (e.g., “Leap high and far descriptions with an oral prompt (e.g.,
frog”, “Gallop like a horse”) like a frog”, “Gallop faster than a horse”, “Put your arms together to make the
“Move slower than a sloth”) elephant’s trunk. Now swing your trunk
back and forth like an elephant”)
Topic-Related Language: Children at all levels of language development interact with developmentally appropriate words and
expressions, such as horse, sloth, gallop, leap, far, faster/slower, “Back and forth”, “_______than a ___________________.”
MPIs
Language functions: describe how children will process or produce language. Children at all language levels can engage in higher level
thinking according to their developmental capacity. The number and complexity of language functions used by children increases as
language develops.
Content Stem (Topic): related to the content in state Early Learning Standards and Head Start’s Child Development and Early Learning
Framework. The content stem denotes WIDA’s view that English language development should always be integrated within early
childhood standards-based curriculum and play-based instruction.
Cognitive Function: offers information on the cognitive demand of the particular activity. The cognitive function is a reminder to
educators that children need access to the same level of thinking challenge as their peers regardless of their language development.
WIDA ELD standards provide a developmentally-sound framework for supporting, assessing and instructing young ELLs, which align to
WIDA ELD Standards for K-12 and corresponds to IL Early Learning Standards. The ELD standards provide a consistent and congruent
framework for supporting and assessing the language growth of young ELLs through age appropriate, standards-based content from
early PK through Grade 12. The ELD standards correspond to Early Learning Standards, Head Start’s Child Development and Early
Learning Framework, to support, instruct, and assess language development of young ELLs.
RESOURCES
Catalogues Websites
Phone: 773.384.4370
Fax: 773.384.0624
lsna.net