Emotional Expression on Social Media
By Ojasvi Kaul
In the digital age, social media has become a prominent platform for emotional
expression. While emotions were traditionally expressed face-to-face, the
advent of social media has transformed how we convey and perceive emotions.
This article explores the origins of emotional expression, its evolution on social
media, and the implications for communication and connection.
As we have discussed before, emotional expression refers to the process by
which individuals convey their internal emotional states to others. Historically,
emotional expression involved direct, face-to-face interactions where people
used facial expressions, body language, tone of voice, and spoken words to
convey their feelings. These interactions allowed for nuanced, real-time
responses and fostered deep, personal connections. Emotions like joy, anger,
sadness, and surprise were communicated through smiles, frowns, tears, and
gestures, creating a rich tapestry of human interaction (Ekman, 1999).
With the rise of social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,
and Snapchat, the way we express emotions has undergone significant changes.
These platforms offer new avenues for emotional expression, including text
posts, emojis, gifs, and videos. While these tools have expanded our ability to
share emotions, they also introduce new dynamics and challenges.
Emojis and GIFs: Emojis and GIFs have become popular tools for conveying
emotions online. They offer a quick and visually appealing way to express
feelings, bridging the gap between text and non-verbal cues. However, they
can sometimes oversimplify complex emotions, leading to
misunderstandings (Kaye, Malone, & Wall, 2016).
Text-Based Expression: Social media allows for the articulation of emotions
through text, enabling users to share detailed thoughts and feelings.
However, the absence of vocal tone and body language can result in
ambiguity and misinterpretation (Derks, Fischer, & Bos, 2008).
Visual Content: Photos and videos on platforms like Instagram and Snapchat
provide a powerful means of expressing emotions. They capture moments
and moods that words alone may not fully convey. Nevertheless, the curated
nature of social media content can create unrealistic portrayals of emotions
and experiences (Chou & Edge, 2012).
The shift to expressing emotions on these platforms has both positive and
negative effects on communication and connection.
Enhanced Connectivity: Social media allows people to share their emotions
with a wider audience, fostering a sense of community and belonging as it
provides a platform for support and empathy, particularly during times of
distress (Newman, Lauterbach, Munson, Resnick, & Morris, 2011).
Superficial Interactions: The brevity and impersonal nature of online
communication may hinder deep emotional connections and meaningful
conversations (Turkle, 2015).
Emotional Overshadowing: The pressure to present an emotionally engaging
or dramatic persona can lead to performative behaviors, detracting from
authentic interactions (Marwick & boyd, 2011).
Impact on Mental Health: Comparing one's own emotions and experiences to
the curated, often idealized portrayals of others can lead to feelings of
inadequacy and anxiety (Fardouly, Diedrichs, Vartanian, & Halliwell, 2015).
The evolution of emotional expression on social media has profoundly impacted
how we communicate and connect. While it offers new tools and opportunities
for sharing emotions, it also presents challenges and complexities.
Understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating the digital landscape and
fostering genuine, meaningful connections.
References
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017).
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313-7318.
Chou, H. T. G., & Edge, N. (2012). They are happier and having better lives
than I am: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 117-121.
Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M.
(2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118.
Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in
computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior,
24(3), 766-785.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.),
Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (pp. 45-60). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social
comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women's body
image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38-45.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human
Feeling. University of California Press.
Kaye, L. K., Malone, S. A., & Wall, H. J. (2016). Emojis: Insights, affordances,
and possibilities for psychological science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2),
109-110.
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental
evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on
Twitter. Convergence, 17(2), 139-158.
Newman, M. W., Lauterbach, D., Munson, S. A., Resnick, P., & Morris, M. E.
(2011). It’s not that I don’t have problems, I’m just not putting them on
Facebook: Challenges and opportunities in using online social networks for
health. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported
cooperative work, 341-350.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital
Age. Penguin Press.
