80°七巨
Section l, Module 1: Reading and Writing 28:52
.“·
么
Directions v 三 Annotate More
团
匠
In Bolivia, use of solid 扣 el (e.g., coal, wood) as a sl1are of total household fuel use fell by 日口 Mark for Review
圈-,—·——,·—'—-——-————一 邑］
1nore than half benvee11 2000 and 2015� such shifts are typically explained by appeal to the
energy ladde1: a n1odel hol 血g that fuel choice is mediated n1ainly by household iJ1con1e Based on the text, tl1e author would 1nost lil<ely a 阻ee 邓th ivhich statement about
(specifically. higl1-technology fi1els clisplace solid fuels as iI1cornes rise). Richard llosier a11d household incon1e?
、
Jeffrey Do\Jvd's study of 和 el use il1 Zimbab,[Link] sho\l\rs how reductive tl1is model is. ho\•vever:
although incorne of cotrrse constrained 扣el choice, several factors, including the difficulty
of acc匣l...i11g fuel sources, iI诅uenced decisions.
@ It can expl呴 some but not all of the differences in 和el choice across
households.
\- J
®- Jt is often said to influence household fuel choice but actL1ally,does not.
©
＼ ，
It affects household fuel choice but not for the reasons assun1ecl by the energy
ladder model.
\- 4
@ It co11stl""ains the a1nount of fuel households 11se but not the type of fuel they
use.
——，一——一——一——一——— 一一—一·一—一——一———一—一——————————一 —一——·———————
^］
l
[ Question9of27
