Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Precast Crash Barrier (Concrete Grade: M35)
100 24 4.67
1 Precast Crash Barrier 4.97 Excellent Indirect
200 41.9 5.27
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Diaphragm of PSC Box Girder in Standrd Span at Ch: 298m (Concrete Grade:
M35)
Diaphragm of PSC Box 100 22.2 5.00
1 Girder in Standrd Span 4.66 Excellent Indirect
at Ch: 298m 200 52.3 4.32
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Deck Slab in Standrd Span at Ch: 298m (Concrete Grade: M35)
Deck Slab in Standrd 100 25.5 4.42
1 Span at Ch: 298m 4.44 Excellent Indirect
(Concrete Grade: M35) 200 50.6 4.45
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Concrete (PSC) Standrd Span at Ch: 298m (Concrete Grade: M35)
Concrete (PSC) Standrd 100 25.8 4.38
1 Span at Ch: 298m 4.35 Good Indirect
(Concrete Grade: M35) 200 52.4 4.32
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Soffit in Standrd Span at Ch: 276m (Concrete Grade: M35)
Soffit in Standard Span 100 25.6 4.41
1 at Ch: 276m (Concrete 4.39 Good Indirect
Grade: M35) 200 51.5 4.38
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Deck Slab in Standrd Span at Ch: 291m (Concrete Grade: M35)
Deck Slab in Standrd 100 24.6 4.57
1 Span at Ch: 291m 4.40 Excellent Indirect
(Concrete Grade: M35) 200 53.5 4.24
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
Table - 2
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test Results
Mean
Transi Pulse Concret
Path Pulse Method of
Sl. Structural member / t Velocity e
Length Velocity Transmissio
No. Identification* Time (Km/Sec Quality
(mm) (Km/Sec n
(ms) ) Grading
)
Bearing Pedestal in Obligatory Span at Ch: 206.670m (Concrete Grade: M45)
Bearing Pedestal in
Standard Span at Ch: 100 25.6 4.41
1 4.29 Good Indirect
206.670m (Concrete 200 54.5 4.17
Grade: M45)
Comments on Test Results
The quality grading of structural members at locations specified in the quality grading
column in above table tested is Good to Excellent, which has been graded as specified
in Table 1 of IS 516 Part V/Section 1: 2018.
Note: (i) For Indirect Method the difference could be 0.50 Km/sec as per IS 516: Part
5/sec 1: 2018, Clause 2.4.3.2.5, which has been incorporated
Page / 6
