PP ALL+In
PP ALL+In
T
required for students to progress to college composition
he past 10 years have seen a major shift in English from as many as nine semesters to a maximum of five
and English as a Second Language (ESL) place- and as few as three. To maximize students’ language
ment and pedagogy in California’s Community acquisition within this truncated timeframe, Cuyamaca
Colleges (CCC), driven by a developmental education faculty developed the new pedagogically-based Accel-
reform movement known as acceleration. Popularized erated Language Learning (ALL) program.
by the faculty-led California Acceleration Project (CAP),
the acceleration movement focused on reducing or Corresponding Author
eliminating prerequisite pathways in English and math Guillermo Colls, MA, English as a Second Language
due to a decade’s worth of state-wide data showing Cuyamaca College
that each level of remediation statistically reduced a 900 Rancho San Diego Parkway | El Cajon, California 92019
student’s chances of ever reaching or completing the Email: [email protected]
14
JOURNAL OF COLLEGE ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAMS
The Pedagogical Makeover monitor model (Lei & Wei, 2019), and his ideas on
The legislation shortening ESL sequences in language acquisition have inspired many approach-
California highlighted the need for a revised curric- es to teaching English to non-native speakers. The
ulum that maximizes language acquisition in much curriculum outlined in this article is no exception.
less time. Pressure arose for a methodology that Krashen’s theories were not universally accepted
optimizes the limited time given for students to from the onset. The general complaint against them
reach the necessary English proficiency to proceed was the lack of empirical evidence to support the
with college-level academic work. New methodolo- claims or the inability to test some of the ideas (Cook
gies to teach adult language learners are somewhat & Cook, 1993; Ellis, 1994; Greg, 1984; McLaughlin,
rare these days compared to the many such meth- 1987; Zafar, 2009).
odologies that appeared in the 60s and early 70s However, in a review of Krashen’s theories
(Celce-Murcia, 2014). However, recommendations and the criticisms against them, Lei and Wei (2019)
to adjust the ESL curriculum continue to emerge. For concluded that:
example, Baranowska (2020) presented research This theory has played a crucial role in fa-
suggesting teachers increase their adaptation of cur- cilitating the teaching of second language
rent technologies like videos and subtitles, and Ellis all over the world, and some effective
(2020) suggested a makeover to more teaching methods have been based
modular curriculums in ESL and En- For over 50 years, on [Krashen’s] main claims in the
glish as a Foreign Language teaching. theory for facilitating the learners
The ongoing pursuit of more research has to better acquire the second lan-
effective and quicker methods of guage. Despite various criticisms
teaching English language learners so demonstrated that from all perspectives, Krashen’s
they can partake fully in the opportu-
nities presented by their new culture
language teaching Monitor Model has played a signifi-
cant role in the field of second lan-
and language has resulted in what is done best when guage acquisition and second lan-
we, the authors, are calling Accelerat- guage teaching. (p. 1463)
ed Language Learning (ALL). Our ALL following broad For over 50 years, research
program incorporates elements that has demonstrated that language
have long been present in optimal lan- communicative teaching is done best when follow-
guage teaching. This remodeled class-
room practice has proven to be both
principles that ing broad communicative principles
that practice language in settings
practical and highly effective with ESL practice language where the words are meaningful
students at the community college for a student. This communicative
level for the past 5 years at Cuyamaca in settings where approach (Canale & Swain, 1980)
College in El Cajon, California. has been a principal philosophy
After briefly reviewing liter- the words are in language teacher training pro-
ature pertaining to communicative
approaches to language teaching and
meaningful for a grams, and the techniques associ-
ated with this approach have pro-
learning, this article will set out the student. duced dynamic, student-centered
course structure, content, and in- methodologies such as the natural
structional strategies we have used to demonstrate approach (Krashen & Terrell, 1988), communica-
how and why ALL has worked so well with today’s tive language teaching (Hymes, 1979), silent way
students at Cuyamaca. (Gattegno, 1972), suggestopedia (Lozanov, 1978),
content-based instruction (Mohan,1986), total
Background From the Last 50 Years physical response (Asher, 1969), and the even
Krashen, citing Smith (1988), put it this way: more recent teaching proficiency through read-
Our problem in language education, as Frank ing and storytelling (Lichtman, 2015).
Smith has pointed out, is that we have con- Unfortunately, in contrast to the emphasis
fused cause and effect. We have assumed that on communicative approaches in ESL teacher-train-
we first master language ‘skills’ and then apply ing programs, most actual ESL classrooms and text-
those skills to reading and writing. But that is books have continued to emphasize explicit gram-
not the way the human brain operates. Rather, mar instruction as key to language learning (Admin,
reading for meaning, reading about things that 2022). While an argument can be made for the im-
matter to us, is the cause of literate language portance of grammar in language comprehension
development. (Krashen, 2004, p. 150) and production, the necessity of explicit, front-load-
Krashen’s model, referred to in early literature as the ed grammar instruction does not necessarily follow.
15
SPRING 2024 | VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 2
Much as children do when learning their native importance of Krashen’s input studies, including the
language, adult language learners engage myri- idea that reading is the most important language
ad strategies apart from rote practice of grammar input of all (Krashen, 2004). This focus on implicit
rules, such as reading and listening without explicit rather than explicit teaching characterizes the ALL
instruction, and all of these combine to produce a methodology.
knowledge of grammar.
The Instructional Cycle
Implicit Learning The process of instruction in ALL centers on
Thus, the growing dissatisfaction with explic- authentic reading assignments with scaffolded ac-
it teaching approaches has culminated in linguistic tivities to engage students in making meaning from
investigator Van Patten’s conclusion: “Language is these challenging texts and to support students in
too abstract and complex to teach and learn explic- producing texts of their own. The instructor’s role is
itly” (2020, p. 19). His meaning, simply put, is that not to lecture or otherwise direct the input and sub-
rules and paradigms in a language do not express sequent learning but rather to facilitate the activi-
what actually is in the mind of speakers and listen- ties that allow students to become architects in the
ers, and therefore, we cannot ‘teach’ a language decoding of the input—the learning—mostly with
outside the constructed framework we have made. the help of their fellow students.
It takes engagement in language to learn it, and this The ALL instructional cycle (see Figure) is
is the focus of communicative techniques that aspir- flexible enough to allow teachers the latitude to
ing language teachers take much trouble to learn— find what Krashen has currently relabeled from his
but which are too often abandoned in language original comprehensible input to the optimum in-
classrooms. put (Krashen, 2020). While Krashen does not define
We propose to restore a best-practice ap- the parameters of this optimum input, he insists
proach to teaching English as a Second Language. it is out there to discover. In ALL, determining this
We call on language programs to exchange their measure is accomplished through class cooperation
textbooks for real-world reading content and to fol- to achieve an understanding of new language and
low an instructional cycle that embraces nearly all ideas together. In a typical semester, this cycle can
of the communicative techniques that institutional be repeated several times.
conventions have unintentionally repressed. Our The activities and practice mentioned in the
ALL model has the advantage of being structured cycle are interactive exercises whose underlying
like the English composition courses in place at most principles are borrowed directly from those
8 commu-
California community colleges, and it centers the nicative methodologies enumerated above. A text is
Figure Figure: The ALL Instructional Cycle
The ALL Instructional Cycle
Pre-reading
collaborative
activity (oral)
Instructor feedback as Guided reading
students start the next assignment
cycle’s reading steps
Quiz on readings
Draft 1 and
vocabulary
Collaborative Collaborative
practice (oral):
practice: Pre- Building analysis &
Writing synthesis
16
weekly for 3 hours). The curriculum requires the novel The Circuit: Stories from the Life of a
JOURNAL OF COLLEGE ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAMS
read, discussed and broken down for meaning, and English Composition within three years. While only
then synthesized into a written and oral response. 17% of students in our spring 2013 cohort persisted
To make it easier on students, longer texts are often through and passed all five levels of ESL plus English
broken down into three or more parts, resulting in Composition in their sixth term (fall 2015), 34% of
the cycle within the cycle, before continuing to the our spring 2016 cohort made it through the 4-lev-
written portion of the curriculum. el ALL program plus English composition within five
A 6-week curriculum segment that follows semesters (by spring 2018), with some (12% of the
the ALL instruction cycle, including readings and starting cohort) doing so in just three semesters (by
activities, is available by emailing either Guillermo spring 2017). The new program, therefore, showed
Colls ([email protected]) or Laurie Woods a marked acceleration in language learning as mea-
([email protected]) These materials are used sured by total throughput through transfer-level En-
in Cuyamaca College’s intermediate ESL level, which glish.
meets 6 hours per week (twice weekly for 3 hours). Students in the ALL cohort also demonstrat-
The curriculum requires the novel The Circuit: Sto- ed a remarkable leap in writing proficiency, further
ries from the Life of a Migrant Child (Jimenez, 1997). demonstrating this method’s efficacy in prepar-
All lessons are based on the community language ing students for success in college composition. To
learning style (La Forge, 1971). demonstrate the dramatic difference
A pre-reading activity initiates
the ALL instructional cycle. Students
Students in the in student writing at the end of just
one semester in an intermediate-level
work in groups to interpret and re- ALL cohort also ALL class, we compared final compo-
spond to a series of questions without sitions from a student enrolled in the
input from the instructor. Students in demonstrated traditional ESL program and a student
each group explain the questions to enrolled in the pilot ALL programs.
each other and come up with answers a remarkable These began the semester at the same
before sharing their answers with levels of English composition profi-
the other groups. Only after the full
leap in writing ciency.
community of students has processed proficiency, Both papers were given a grade
their question-and-answer combina- of B in the respective classes. The two
tions does the instructor come in to further compositions we analyzed came from
verify conclusions, which then sparks classes with the same instructor. This
another round of group discussions. demonstrating this instructor had taught Cuyamaca’s in-
To view a sample lesson from the cur-
riculum, see the Appendix. method’s efficacy termediate, five-level-below-transfer
course for many years and continued
This lesson uses the following ALL Instructional Creative Common Licensing
Cycle components:
• Pre-Reading Collaborative Activity
• Guided Reading Assignment
• Homework This work is licensed under Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
19