ASSESSMENT BRIEF
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Unit Title Introduction to Logistics & Supply Chain Management
Lecturer Nguyen Truong Vinh Phu
Assessment Type Report
Restrictions on Length 1,000 (+/ 10%) words
Individual/Group Individual
Assessment Weighting 50%
Issue Date: 14 Nov 2024
Hand In Date: 28 Nov 2024
Mode of Submission: On-Line
ASSESSMENT TASK
You are required to research how a chosen organization gain competitive advantages through information
technology integration in supply chain by analysing the impacts of IT utilization on its supply chain
processes: (1 of 3)
- Order fulfilment
- Logistics
- Supplier relationship management
PLEASE NOTE:
- You are NOT allowed to reference lecture slides in this assignment and instead should seek original
sources.
- No AI
- The use of large sections of text (cutting and pasting) from another person’s work (this includes other
students work, textbooks and web pages), is not acceptable.
- All submitted assignments are checked by Turnitin and similarity ratio over 25% is not acceptable.
- You work must be presented in a report format, must contain at least 05 good quality references (i.e.
reports, books, academic journals) must be well structured and clearly outlined.
- The report must be referenced in accordance with the APA System.
REPORT FORMAT
The report should be word processed in size 12 font, line spacing 1.5.
The following should be included:
o Title page
o Contents page
o Introduction
o Findings
o Conclusion
o Reference list
GRADE MARKING
A (8.5 - 10) B (7.0 – 8.4) C (5.5 – 6.9) D (4.0 -5.4) F (0-3.9)
Information Exceptional depth of In depth Some good Limited Very limited
Research and investigation, of SCM investigation, of investigation of investigation of discussion with
Analysis of practice within SCM practice within SCM practice SCM practice within substantial
Industry Practice organisations and use organisations. within organisations. inaccuracies.
of evidence to support organisations No attempt to
SCM theory. discussed in research SCM
reasonable detail, practices within
but lacking depth. the industry.
Recommendations Exceptional critical Very good critical Good justification Some justification No justification or
Justification and discussion that discussion that was and critical but evidence rather evidence to
Conclusions included appropriate well justified and discussion but weak in places. support advice. No
justification, strongly supported by limited in places or Lacking in critical critical discussion.
supported by relevant appropriate evidence lacked appropriate discussion Weak or No conclusion. No
evidence with a very and a very good supporting inappropriate recommendations.
strong conclusion. conclusion. Highly evidence. Good conclusion.
Exceptional level of Relevant conclusion. Good Attempted
recommendations. recommendations. and Relevant recommendations
recommendations. without much
relevance.
