Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property
Overview
What Is Intellectual Property?
Copyrights
Patents
Trade Secrets
Current Intellectual Property Issues 239
Plagiarism
Reverse Engineering
Open Source Code
Competitive Intelligence
Trademark Infringement
Cybersquatting
What Is Intellectual
Property?
ll ec tu al pr op er ty is a te rm us ed
Inte
sc ri be wo rk s of th e mi nd —s uc h
to de
as art, books, films, formulas,
inventions, music, and processes—
th at ar e di st in ct an d ow ne d or
d by a si ng le pe rs on or gr ou p.
create
It is protected through copyright,
patent, and trade secret laws.
Copyright
A copyright is the exclusive right to
distribute, display, perform, or reproduce an
original work in copies or to prepare
derivative works based on the work. Copyright
protection is granted to the creators of
“original works of authorship in any tangible
medium of expression
Copyright Term
Copyright law grants developers exclusive rights to their works
for a set period. Since 1960, the term has been extended 11
times from the original 28 years. The 1998 Copyright Term
Extension Act (Sonny Bono Act) established the following limits:
P r o pe r ty Th e f t
Intellectual
Ethica l B o un d ar i e s
Open Source
Open source code is any program whose source code is made available
for use or modification, as users or other developers see [Link]
basic premise behind open source code is that when many programmers
can read, redistribute, and modify a program’s code, the software
improves. Programs with opensource code can be adapted to meet new
needs, and bugs can be rapidly identified andfixed. Open source code
advocates believe that this process produces better software thanthe
traditional closed model.
Examples: Linux, Apache HTTP, PHP, Perl,Python, or Ruby.
i r m s o r i n d i v i d u a l
Reaso n s t h a t f u r c e
e r s c r e a t e o p e n s o
de v e l o p u g h
code, ev e n t h o
e i v e m o n e y f o r i t ,
they d o n o t r e c
l u d e t h e f o l l o w i n g
inc
p e ct f o r s o l vi n g a
c od e t o e a rn r e s
So m e pe o pl e sh a r e
i n an e l e ga n t w a y .
common problem o urc e c o d e t h a t wa s
e u s e d o p e n s
Some people hav n e e d t o pa y b ac k b y
t he r s a n d f e el t h e
de v el o pe d b y o
he r de v e lo p e r s .
helping ot s o f t w ar e a s pa r t o f a n
i r e d t o de v e l o p
A firm may be requ r o bl e m. I f th e f i r m i s
dd r e ss a c l i en t ’ s p
ag r ee m en t to a el o p t h e
t i me s p e nt t o d e v
o y ee s ’
paid for the empl f t w a r e it s e l f, i t ma y
h a n f o r t h e s o
software rather t en s o ur c e a n d us e i t
n se th e c o d e a s o p
de c id e t o l ic e a s a n
r m’ s e x p e rt i s e o r
t h e f i
either to promote n t i al c li e n t s w it h a
r a c t o t h e r p ot e
incentive to att
similar problem.
d e i n th e h o p e of
op o pe n so u rc e c o
A fir m ma y de ve l s e r’ s
e e s i f th e e nd u
ai n t en a nc e f
earning software m
a ng e i n t he f ut u r e.
needs ch
may b e re l u ct a n t t o
us e f ul co d e bu t
A firm may develop h t d on at e t h e co d e to
i t , a nd so m i g
license and market
the ge ne r al p ub li c
pen Source Licenses
Examples of O
ic Li ce ns e ( GP L)
GNU General Publ
MIT License
Apache License
BSD License software content)
s li ce ns es (f or non-
Creative Common
Competitive Intelligence
Competitive intelligence is legally obtained information that is
gathered to help acompany gain an advantage over its rivals. For
example, some companies have employees who monitor the public
announcements of property transfers to detectany plant or store
expansions of competitors. An effective competitive
intelligenceprogram requires the continual gathering, analysis, and
evaluation of data withcontrolled dissemination of useful information
to decision makers. Competitiveintelligence is often integrated into
a company’s strategic plan and executivedecision making.
e lli ge nc e ca n be
fo r com pe ti tive int
ll th e da t a n ee ded v iew s, as
Almost a o rmation o r in te r
in g pu bli sh ed in f
ed fr o m ex a mi n
collect
n th e fo l lo w in g li st:
outlined i
K o r a n n ua l re p o r ts r t ow ning mo re
• 10- y s ha re h ol d er s who re po
u i s i ti o n — a fili ng b
• An SC 1 3 D a c q mp any
tock i n a p ub l ic co
er c e nt o f c o m m on s
than five p
r q u a rt e r ly r e po r t s
• 10-Q o
• Press releases
ro m ot i o n al m at e r i als
• P
• We b si t es S ta n da rd & P oo r’s
c om m un it y , su c h as a
s b y t h e i n ve s t me nt
• Analyse
stock report
e e t c r e di t re po rt s
• Dun & Bradstr m ers, a nd fo rm er e mp l oy ees
su p p l ie r s , cu st o
• Interviews with
s to m er ser vi ce gr oups
s to co m pe ti to r s’ cu
• Call
i n t he t r ad e pr es s d with
• Articles an d oth er filings associate
l im pa c t st at e me nts
• Envir on men t a
n s io n o r c on s tr uc t ion
a plant expa
• Patents
tive Intelligence:
and Tools for Competi
Software
Rapportive
Crunchbase
CORI
[Link]
[Link]
---
Trademark
Infringement
A trademark is a logo, package design, phrase, sound, or word
that enables a consumer to differentiate one company’s products
from another’s. Consumers often cannot examine goods or services
to determine their quality or source, so instead they rely on
the labels attached to the products.
The Lanham Act of 1946 (also The United States has a federal
known as the Trademark Act, system that stores trademark
Title 15, of the U.S. Code) information;
Merchants can consult this information to
defines the use of a trademark, the
avoid adopting marks that have already
process for obtaining a trademark from the
been taken.
USPTO, and the penalties associated with
trademark infringement.
Merchants seeking trademark protection
apply to the USPTO if they are using the
The law gives the trademark’s owner the
mark in interstate commerce or if they can
right to prevent others from using the
demonstrate a true intent to do so.
same mark or a confusingly similar mark on
a product’s label.
Trademarks can be renewed forever—as long
as a mark is in use.
Nominative fair use
is a defense often employed by the defendant in trademark
infringement cases in which a defendant has used a plaintiff’s
mark to identify the plaintiff’s products or services in
conjunction with its own product or services.
To successfully employ this defense, the defendant must show three
things:
• that the defendant does nothing with the plaintiff’s mark that
suggests endorsement or sponsorship by the plaintiff.
Trademark Cases:
Playboy vs. Apple vs. IGB
Terri Welles: Eletronica:
In Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Terri Welles, IGB Eletronica, a Brazilian company, got the
Terri Welles, a former Playboy Playmate of the rights to the trademark “iPhone” in Brazil in
Year, created a website in 1997 to share her 2008, just as Apple launched their first
photos, promote services, and sell additional iPhone. Later, Apple sued IGB to use the name
content. She used trademarked terms like "Playmate in Brazil. The court allowed both companies to
of the Year" to describe herself. The Ninth use the name "iPhone" in Brazil because Apple’s
Circuit Court ruled that her use of these product had become well-known due to its
trademarks was permissible under the nominative quality, and it would have been unfair to
fair use defense. This allowed Welles to avoid a restrict Apple from using it.
preliminary injunction that would have stopped her
from using these terms on her site.
Cybersquatting
Definition:
Cybersquatting occurs when individuals register domain names with the hope of selling
them to trademark owners at a high price.
Protections and d i n 1 9 9 9, t h i s a c t
Enac t e r s
e
Famous Case allows U . S. t r a d e ma
g
r
n
k o w n
g e f o r e i
to challen e k c i v i l
t t e rs a n d s e
cybersqu a
t o $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 .
dam ag e s u p
1 e - 3
D i s pu t
n- N a m e Famous Example:
D om a i R P ) :
rm UD
Unifo n P o l i cy (
ol uti o
Res r f as t In 1994, a reporter registered
o w s fo
R P a l l v e [Link]. When McDonald’s
N ’s U D x p e ns i
IC AN ly i n e r e
at i v e es w h e later wanted the domain, they
r e l s pu t
and on o f d i
re d or retrieved it in exchange for a
r a t i gi st e
arbit m es a re r e
$3,500 charitable donation.
a in n a .
dom a d f a i t h
d i n b
u se
Th a n k you