Module- 4

Market Structure
Market structure is a way to categorize and differentiate industries based on the nature and
degree of competition for goods and services. It's a way to understand the characteristics of
different markets, and how external factors affect the operations of firms.
Some factors that determine market structure include: number of buyers and sellers, degree of
product differentiation, pricing power of the producer, barriers to entry, and level of non-price
competition.
The four main types of market structure are:
• Perfect competition: A theoretical possibility where there are many producers and low
barriers to entry
• Monopolistic competition: Also called a competitive market, where there are many
producers and slightly differentiated products
• Oligopoly: A market with few producers and high barriers to entry
• Monopoly: A market with only one producer
Market structure is important for financial analysts to understand when forecasting a firm's
future profit stream.
Perfect Competition
Definition and Features
Perfect competition is a theoretical market structure characterized by several key features:
1. Large Number of Buyers and Sellers: In a perfectly competitive market, there are so many
buyers and sellers that no single buyer or seller can influence the market price. Each firm
is a price taker, meaning they accept the market price as given.
2. Homogeneous Products: All firms produce identical or perfectly substitutable goods. The
products offered by different firms are indistinguishable from one another, so consumers
have no preference for one supplier over another based on the product.
3. Free Entry and Exit: There are no significant barriers to entry or exit in the market. New
firms can enter the market easily if they see profit opportunities, and existing firms can
leave the market without incurring substantial losses if they are not profitable.
4. Perfect Information: All market participants have complete and accurate information
about prices, products, and production techniques. This ensures that buyers and sellers
can make informed decisions.
 5. Price Taker: Firms in a perfectly competitive market are price takers. They cannot
influence the market price of their product. Instead, they must accept the price
determined by market supply and demand.
6. No Externalities: There are no externalities, which means that the actions of buyers and
sellers do not have unintended side effects on third parties.
Determination of Equilibrium Price and Output
In a perfectly competitive market, equilibrium price and output are determined by the
intersection of market supply and demand curves. Here’s a step-by-step explanation:
1. Demand and Supply Curves: The demand curve represents the relationship between the
price of a good and the quantity demanded. The supply curve represents the relationship
between the price of a good and the quantity supplied.
2. Market Equilibrium: The equilibrium price and quantity occur where the demand and
supply curves intersect. At this point, the quantity demanded by consumers equals the
quantity supplied by producers, and there is no tendency for the price to change.
3. Short-Run Equilibrium:
o Firms’ Decision: In the short run, firms will produce where their marginal cost (MC)
equals the market price (P), provided that this price is above their average variable
cost (AVC). If the price falls below AVC, firms will shut down temporarily.
o Profit Maximization: Firms maximize profit by producing at the output level where
MC = MR (marginal revenue). Since firms are price takers, MR equals the market
price.
4. Long-Run Equilibrium:
o Normal Profit: In the long run, firms will enter or exit the market based on
profitability. If firms are making supernormal profits, new firms will enter,
increasing supply and reducing the price until only normal profits (zero economic
profit) are made. Conversely, if firms are making losses, some will exit, decreasing
supply and increasing the price until the remaining firms make normal profits.
5. Adjustment to Equilibrium: Any deviation from equilibrium causes market forces to move
the market back to equilibrium. For example, if there’s excess supply, prices will fall,
leading to a decrease in supply and an increase in demand until equilibrium is restored.
Time Element
• Short Run: The short run is the period during which at least one factor of production is
fixed. Firms can adjust variable inputs (like labor) but cannot change fixed inputs (like
 machinery). In this period, firms can experience economic profits or losses, and the
market may not be in equilibrium.
• Long Run: The long run is the period in which all factors of production can be varied. Firms
can enter or exit the market, and the market can reach a new equilibrium where firms
make only normal profits. Adjustments in the long run ensure that firms produce at a point
where price equals the minimum of average cost (AC), leading to efficient production and
no economic profits or losses.
Indian Examples
1. Agricultural Markets: Indian agricultural markets, such as those for wheat or rice, exhibit
characteristics of perfect competition. There are many farmers (sellers) and buyers (e.g.,
wholesalers, traders), products are relatively homogeneous, and there is free entry and
exit for farmers. Prices for these crops are largely determined by market forces of supply
and demand.
2. Wholesale Markets: In wholesale markets for commodities like fruits and vegetables, we
often observe perfect competition features. For example, the APMC (Agricultural Produce
Market Committee) markets in India, where numerous farmers and traders interact,
exhibit competitive behavior. However, these markets may sometimes experience issues
like price fluctuations and lack of transparency, diverging from the ideal of perfect
competition.
3. Retail Markets: In some sectors like retail, the competition is less than perfect due to
brand differentiation and varying levels of market power. For instance, branded goods in
the consumer electronics market often do not exhibit perfect competition because of
brand loyalty and differentiated products.
Perfect competition example
A resident visits a large farmers' market with 100 tomato sellers. He notices that the
sellers are profitable and wants to enter the market. His startup costs are low, as he buys
affordable gardening supplies and begins growing tomatoes in his backyard. Since he
uses the same garden techniques and local soil, he produces tomatoes identical to the
ones the sellers grow. He sells his tomatoes at the same price and makes a decent profit.
When he tries to raise his prices, he notices he doesn't sell as many. That's because
buyers choose the more affordable tomatoes that are of the same quality. When the
resident tries to lower his prices below the market's average price, he sells more, but
can't cover his expenses. He realizes that he only has about a 1% market share, meaning
the ideal price is the market average.
In summary, while perfect competition is a useful theoretical model for understanding market
dynamics, real-world markets often have deviations from this ideal. In India, while some
agricultural and wholesale markets approximate perfect competition, other markets with
differentiated products or significant barriers to entry and exit do not.
Imperfect Competition: Monopoly
Features of Monopoly
A monopoly is a market structure where a single firm dominates the entire market, making it the
sole producer of a particular good or service. Key features of a monopoly include:
1. Single Seller: The monopoly market has only one seller or producer who controls the
entire supply of the product or service. This firm is the market.
2. Unique Product: The product or service offered by the monopoly is unique and has no
close substitutes. This uniqueness gives the monopolist significant control over the
market.
3. High Barriers to Entry: High barriers to entry prevent other firms from entering the
market. Barriers can be legal (patents, licenses), technological (control over technology or
resources), or economic (high startup costs).
4. Price Maker: The monopolist is a price maker rather than a price taker. The firm can
influence the price of the product by adjusting the quantity it produces.
5. Lack of Close Substitutes: There are no close substitutes for the monopolist’s product,
giving the firm significant market power.
6. Imperfect Information: In a monopoly, the information available to consumers and
potential competitors may be imperfect, as the monopolist controls the market and may
influence information flow.
Determination of Equilibrium Price and Output
In a monopoly, the equilibrium price and output are determined by the monopolist’s profit-
maximizing behavior. Here’s a step-by-step explanation:
1. Demand Curve: The monopolist faces the market demand curve, which shows the
relationship between the price and the quantity demanded. Unlike a competitive firm, the
monopolist's demand curve slopes downward, indicating that to sell more, it must lower
the price.
2. Marginal Revenue (MR) Curve: For a monopolist, the marginal revenue curve lies below
the demand curve. This is because to increase sales, the monopolist must lower the price
not just on additional units but on all units sold, reducing marginal revenue.
 3. Marginal Cost (MC) Curve: The monopolist will produce at the output level where
marginal cost equals marginal revenue (MC = MR). This is the point where the firm
maximizes its profit.
4. Price Determination: After determining the profit-maximizing output level, the
monopolist sets the price by referring to the demand curve. The price is higher than the
marginal cost at this output level, leading to supernormal profits.
5. Profit Maximization: The area of supernormal profit is represented by the difference
between total revenue and total cost at the profit-maximizing output level. This area is
generally above the average cost curve.
Price Discrimination
Price discrimination occurs when a monopolist charges different prices to different consumers for
the same good or service, based on their willingness to pay. Price discrimination can be classified
into three types:
1. First-Degree Price Discrimination: Also known as perfect price discrimination, this occurs
when a firm charges each consumer the maximum price they are willing to pay. This
requires detailed knowledge of each consumer’s willingness to pay. For example, in a
custom tailoring business, the tailor may charge each customer based on their willingness
to pay.
2. Second-Degree Price Discrimination: This involves charging different prices based on the
quantity consumed or the product version. For example, bulk purchasing discounts or
different pricing for premium versions of a product. In India, utility companies sometimes
charge lower rates for higher consumption to incentivize large-scale usage.
3. Third-Degree Price Discrimination: This occurs when different consumer groups are
charged different prices based on observable characteristics such as age, location, or time
of purchase. For instance, movie theaters in India often offer discounted tickets for
students and senior citizens.
Indian Examples
1. Utility Services: Indian utility sectors, such as electricity and water supply, often operate
as monopolies in many regions. For example, state electricity boards or municipal water
suppliers typically have no competition in their areas. They set prices and output levels
based on their cost structures and regulatory frameworks.
2. Pharmaceutical Industry: Certain pharmaceutical companies in India may exhibit
monopolistic tendencies, especially with patented drugs. For example, a company holding
the patent for a life-saving drug can set high prices due to lack of competition and high
barriers to entry for other firms.
 3. Public Sector Enterprises: Some public sector enterprises, like Indian Railways, historically
operated as monopolies in their respective sectors. While reforms and competition have
increased in some areas, these entities often had significant control over pricing and
output.
4. Telecommunications: In some regions, a single telecommunications provider might have
a dominant position, leading to monopoly pricing. However, this sector has seen increased
competition over time, reducing monopolistic control.
5. Taxi Services: In cities like Mumbai or Delhi, traditional taxi services operated as
monopolies in the past. With the advent of ride-sharing apps like Ola and Uber, the market
has become more competitive, though price discrimination strategies are still used by
these companies.
Monopolistic example
Electricity company Swift Enterprise invests millions of dollars into installing power lines
throughout a town. The power lines connect to all residential homes, and it's inefficient for other
companies to install power lines next to the existing ones. Since the area has no competitors,
residents who want to power their homes via electricity pay for Swift Enterprise's services. Swift
Enterprise theoretically has complete market power and could set its prices relatively high. The
government regulates its business practices, though, to prevent it from setting unfair prices.
In summary, while perfect competition is a theoretical ideal, monopolistic markets are
characterized by single sellers, unique products, and high barriers to entry. The monopolist
determines equilibrium price and output by equating marginal revenue and marginal cost, and
engages in various forms of price discrimination to maximize profits. Indian examples of
monopoly include utility services and pharmaceutical industries, though many sectors have seen
increasing competition over time.
Duopoly
Features of Duopoly
A duopoly is a type of market structure where two firms dominate the market and are the primary
sellers of a particular product or service. Key features include:
1. Two Firms: The market is controlled by two dominant firms, each of which has a significant
share of the market. The actions of one firm directly impact the other.
2. Interdependence: The two firms are interdependent in their decision-making. Each firm's
pricing, output, and marketing strategies affect the other firm's profits and market
position.
 3. Strategic Behavior: Firms in a duopoly often engage in strategic behavior, anticipating and
reacting to the actions of their rival. This includes decisions on pricing, production levels,
and marketing strategies.
4. Barriers to Entry: There are typically high barriers to entry that prevent new firms from
entering the market and competing with the existing duopolists. These barriers can be
economic, technological, or legal.
5. Potential for Collusion: Due to the small number of firms, there is a higher potential for
collusion or cooperative behavior to maximize joint profits, although this is often illegal or
regulated in many countries.
Indian Examples of Duopoly
1. Airline Industry: In the early 2000s, Indian airlines like Jet Airways and Kingfisher Airlines
(before its closure) were dominant players in certain segments of the market, particularly
in international flights. Although the market has since expanded, duopolistic conditions
existed in specific routes or service categories.
2. Telecommunications: In the early 2000s, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone (then Hutchison
Essar) were significant players in the Indian mobile telecommunications market. They had
a strong influence on pricing and service offerings, although the market has since become
more competitive with the entry of other players like Reliance Jio.
Oligopoly
Features of Oligopoly
An oligopoly is a market structure where a small number of firms have significant market power
and influence over prices and output. Key features include:
1. Few Sellers: The market is dominated by a small number of firms, each of which has a
large market share. The actions of each firm significantly affect the others.
2. Interdependence: Firms in an oligopoly are highly interdependent. Each firm's decisions
on pricing, output, and other factors depend on the anticipated reactions of its
competitors.
3. Barriers to Entry: There are significant barriers to entry that prevent new firms from
entering the market and competing effectively with the existing firms. These can include
high capital requirements, economies of scale, and brand loyalty.
4. Non-Price Competition: Firms often engage in non-price competition, such as advertising,
product differentiation, and improved customer service, to gain a competitive edge
without changing prices.
 5. Collusive Behavior: Oligopolistic firms may collude, either formally or informally, to set
prices or output levels to maximize joint profits. This can take the form of cartels or other
cooperative arrangements.
6. Price Rigidity: Prices in an oligopoly are often stable due to the kinked demand curve
phenomenon, where firms are reluctant to change prices due to the anticipated reactions
from competitors.
Indian Examples of Oligopoly
1. Automobile Industry: In India, the automobile industry has been dominated by a few
major players like Maruti Suzuki, Tata Motors, and Hyundai. These firms influence pricing,
product features, and market trends in significant ways.
2. Steel Industry: The Indian steel industry is an oligopoly with major players like Tata Steel,
JSW Steel, and Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) dominating the market. These firms
have substantial control over prices and production levels.
3. Cement Industry: Major cement producers in India, such as UltraTech Cement, ACC, and
Ambuja Cements, dominate the market. These companies have substantial influence over
pricing and production in the industry.
Oligopolistic example
ABC Airlines is one of four airlines that operates in a country. Thanks to high startup costs
that involve airplanes, airports and runways, no other providers enter the market. ABC
Airlines and one of its competitors offer mid-priced flights and maintain consistent ticket
costs. The third airline has more expensive tickets because it specializes in luxury travel,
and the fourth airline is the most affordable option because it specializes in budget
flights. These four airlines dominate the market and offer ticket prices that are consistent
with the services they provide.
Price Rigidity and the Kinked Demand Curve
Kinked Demand Curve Model
The kinked demand curve model explains why prices in an oligopoly tend to be stable or rigid. It
assumes that:
1. Kink in Demand Curve: The demand curve faced by an oligopolist is assumed to have a
kink at the current price level. This kink occurs because firms believe that if they increase
prices, their competitors will not follow, leading to a loss in market share. Conversely, if
they decrease prices, competitors will follow, leading to a price war with reduced profits.
 2. Asymmetric Response: Firms believe that competitors will respond differently to price
increases compared to price decreases. They anticipate that their rivals will match price
decreases but not follow price increases.
3. Price Stability: Due to this asymmetric response, firms are discouraged from changing
prices. If a firm raises its price, it expects to lose a significant share of the market, and if it
lowers its price, it expects a price war. As a result, prices tend to remain stable.
Indian Examples of Price Rigidity
1. Telecom Industry: In the Indian telecom sector, major players like Airtel, Jio, and Vodafone
Idea have engaged in aggressive price competition, but prices have shown rigidity due to
the fear of a price war. Despite occasional price increases, companies have often been
reluctant to make significant price changes.
2. FMCG Sector: In the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector, companies like
Hindustan Unilever and Nestlé often maintain stable prices for essential products. Price
rigidity is observed due to the competitive nature of the market and the risk of losing
market share if prices are altered significantly.
Cartels and Price Leadership Models
Cartels
A cartel is an agreement between firms in an oligopoly to collude and coordinate their actions to
control prices and output to maximize joint profits. Cartels are illegal in many jurisdictions due to
their anti-competitive nature.
1. Features: Cartels involve firms agreeing on prices, output levels, or market shares. They
work to restrict competition and increase profitability by reducing supply and raising
prices.
2. Examples: Historically, there have been instances of cartels in various industries. For
instance, in the Indian cement industry, there have been allegations and investigations
into cartel behavior among major cement producers.
Price Leadership
Price leadership is a form of informal collusion where one dominant firm (the price leader) sets
the price for the industry, and other firms (the price followers) adopt the same pricing strategy.
The leader typically has significant market share or influence.
1. Features: In price leadership, the leader firm sets the price, and other firms in the industry
follow suit. The leader may use its market power to influence prices and ensure stability
in the market.
 2. Examples: In India, companies like Maruti Suzuki have historically been seen as price
leaders in the automobile industry. Maruti Suzuki’s pricing decisions often influence the
pricing strategies of other car manufacturers.
In summary, duopoly and oligopoly are market structures characterized by limited competition
and significant market influence by a few firms. Duopolies involve two dominant firms, while
oligopolies involve a small number of firms. Price rigidity in oligopolies can be explained by the
kinked demand curve model, and cartels and price leadership models illustrate how firms may
cooperate or follow a leader to stabilize prices and maximize profits. Indian examples highlight
how these concepts manifest in various industries, such as telecommunications, automobiles,
and cement.
Monopolistic competition is a type of market structure characterized by a blend of monopoly
and competitive elements. It’s widely observed in various sectors, including retail, restaurants,
and services. Let's delve into its key features, product differentiation, price and output
determination, and measures of market concentration/power, with a focus on Indian examples.
1. Features of Monopolistic Competition
1.1. Many Sellers: In monopolistic competition, there are numerous firms in the market, each
with a relatively small share. This contrasts with monopoly (one seller) and perfect competition
(many sellers with identical products).
1.2. Product Differentiation: Each firm offers a product that, while similar to others, is distinct in
some way. This differentiation can be based on quality, features, branding, or customer service.
1.3. Free Entry and Exit: There are no significant barriers to entry or exit in the market. New firms
can enter the market if they perceive profit opportunities, and existing firms can exit if they are
not profitable.
1.4. Some Control Over Prices: Due to product differentiation, firms have some degree of pricing
power. They can influence prices to an extent, unlike in perfect competition where firms are price
takers.
1.5. Non-Price Competition: Firms often compete through advertising, branding, and improving
customer service rather than just changing prices.
Indian Example: The Indian restaurant industry exemplifies monopolistic competition. Each
restaurant offers a unique dining experience, cuisine, ambiance, or service, distinguishing itself
from competitors. New eateries frequently open, while others may close based on their
profitability.
2. Product Differentiation
2.1. Definition and Importance: Product differentiation involves making a product distinct from
others to attract customers. This could be through branding, features, quality, or other attributes.
In monopolistic competition, differentiation is crucial as it allows firms to gain some degree of
market power.
2.2. Methods of Differentiation:
• Quality: For instance, Tata Motors differentiates its vehicles through various features and
build quality.
• Branding: Companies like Patanjali have built strong brand identities in the Indian
consumer goods market.
• Features: In the smartphone market, companies like Samsung and Xiaomi offer distinct
features in their devices to appeal to different customer preferences.
3. Determination of Price and Output
3.1. Short-Run Equilibrium: In the short run, a firm in monopolistic competition can make
supernormal profits or incur losses. The firm maximizes profit by setting its output level where
marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR). The price is determined by the demand curve
at this output level.
3.2. Long-Run Equilibrium: In the long run, the entry of new firms in response to supernormal
profits will shift the demand curve for existing firms' products leftward (i.e., demand decreases).
This continues until firms earn normal profits (zero economic profit). At this point, the firm’s
demand curve is tangent to its average cost curve (AC), and there’s no incentive for firms to enter
or exit the market.
Indian Example: Consider the Indian apparel market, where brands like FabIndia and Raymond
offer differentiated products. In the short run, these brands might earn supernormal profits due
to their unique offerings and customer loyalty. However, in the long run, if new brands enter the
market, the demand for these established brands may decrease until they only earn normal
profits.
4. Measures of Market Concentration/Power
4.1. Concentration Ratios: These ratios measure the market share held by the largest firms in the
industry. For instance, the concentration ratio might show the percentage of market share
controlled by the top 4 or 8 firms.
4.2. Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI): This index provides a more precise measure of market
concentration by summing the squares of the market shares of all firms in the market. A higher
HHI indicates higher market concentration.
4.3. Market Power: Market power refers to the ability of firms to set prices above marginal cost.
In monopolistic competition, firms have some degree of market power due to product
differentiation.
Indian Example: In the Indian retail market, large players like Reliance Retail and Future Group
have significant market shares, but the market remains fragmented with numerous small and
medium retailers. The concentration ratio and HHI would reveal the extent of market
concentration and the relative market power of these large retailers compared to smaller players.
Monopolistic competition example
Stylized Products starts selling hairbrushes and pays a low startup cost to join the many
competitors that are already in the industry. The market has many hairbrushes, and each has
unique features like firm bristles, rubber-grip handles and sustainable materials. Stylized
Products decides to manufacture hairbrushes that come in unique patterns. Consumers who
want a stylish hairbrush pay a little more for the colorful options, translating to increased sales.
When consumers become more conscious of the environment, the seller of sustainable brushes
sees an increase in sales and raises its prices accordingly.
In summary, monopolistic competition in India is evident in various industries where firms
differentiate their products, have some control over prices, and compete on factors beyond price.
Market concentration and power can be analyzed using concentration ratios and the HHI, offering
insights into the competitive dynamics within these markets.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..