Ethics in Governance and Corruption Insights
Ethics in Governance and Corruption Insights
ARC-Ethics In Governance
Sunday, July 8, 2018 12:21 PM
• The six perceived governance quality measures, each an aggregate of a number of sub-
measures, are:
a. voice and accountability;
b. absence of political instability and violence;
c. Government effectiveness;
d. reasonableness of the regulatory burden;
e. the rule of law; and
f. the absence of graft.
Of these, the last two are the most directly significant in the context of ethical
governance.
○ ‘Rule of law’ measures whether crime is properly punished or not; enforceability of
contracts; extent of black market; enforceable rights of property; extent of tax
evasion; judiciary’s independence; ability of business and people to challenge
government action in courts etc.
○ ‘Absence of graft’ measures relative absence of corruption among government,
political and bureaucratic officials; of bribes related to securing of permits and
licences; of corruption in the judiciary; of corruption that scares off foreign
investors.
Introduction
Discuss the main reasons for corruption and abuse of office in our society.
According to ARC Report, these been aggravated by three factors-
1. a colonial legacy of unchallenged authority and propensity to exercise power arbitrarily
2. enormous asymmetry of power in our society- 90% in unorganized sector with low wages
and job uncertainty. Of the organized sector, 70% are employed by govt. Even the lowest
govt servant is much better off than significant section of society. Such asymmetry reduces
societal pressure to conform to ethical behavior and makes it easy to indulge in
corruption.
3. Third, as a conscious choice, the Indian state in the early decades after Independence
chose a set of policies whose unintended consequence was to put the citizen at the mercy
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=FB3AEA73149A580A%211515&authkey=%21AHx9kCb31WChTrk&page=View&wd=target%28GS4.one%7… 1/6
03/11/2022, 17:15 OneNote
of the State. License, Quota, Permit Raj. Over presence of state in several sectors enhanced
opportunity of corruption.
It is generally recognized that monopoly and discretion increase the propensity to corruption
while competition and transparency reduce corruption. Discuss.
Monopoly and discretion- from pervious answer. Another factor which increases corruption is
over centralization. The more remotely power is exercised from the people, the greater is the
distance between authority and accountability.
Competition and Transparency
• As competition came in and choice expanded, corruption plummeted. Telephones, steel,
cement, sugar and even two-wheelers are among the many sectors, which have seen
enhanced supply and choice, reducing or even eliminating corruption.
• Similarly, wherever technology and transparency have been introduced, corruption has
been significantly contained. Computerization and access to information have made many
services from railway reservation to issuing of driving licenses increasingly free from
corruption
Every democracy requires the empowerment of citizens in order to hold those in authority to
account. Elaborate.
[Can also include above answer in its entirety along with following]
• Right to Information,
• effective citizens’ charters,
• opportunity and incentives to promote proactive approach of citizens, - Citizen Feedback
in Swachhata Sarvekshan
• stake-holders’ involvement in delivery of public services, - social audit law of Mehgalaya
• public consultation in decision making and - National policies, laws,
• social auditing,
are some of the instruments of accountability that dramatically curbed corruption and promoted
integrity and quality of decision making.
"Perhaps the most important determinant of the integrity of a society or the prevalence of
corruption is the quality of politics". Do you agree?
• If politics attracts and rewards men and women of integrity, competence and passion for
public good, then the society is safe and integrity is maintained.
• But if honesty is incompatible with survival in politics, and if public life attracts undesirable
and corrupt elements seeking private gain, then abuse of authority and corruption become
the norm.
• In such a political culture and climate, desirable initiatives (such as competition,
transparency, legal initiatives) will not yield adequate dividends. Competition and
decentralization certainly reduce corruption in certain sectors. But source of demand for
corruption for illegitimate funds in politics is not addressed , then other avenues of
corruption will be forcibly opened up.
• As a result, even as corruption declines in certain areas, it shifts to other, sometimes more
dangerous, areas in which competition cannot be introduced and the state exercises a
natural monopoly eg, Defense deals, Allocation of public resources such as mines,
spectrum, etc
• What is needed with liberalisation is corresponding political and governance reform to
alter the incentives in politics and public office and to promote integrity and ethical
conduct.
Discuss the forms of corruption. Do you think liberalization has only shifted corruption from
coercive to collusive form? Give example.
[define what corruption is ]
Coercive Corruption-
• In a vast majority of cases of bribery, the citizen is a victim of extortion and is compelled to
pay a bribe in order to get a service to which he is entitled.
• Experience has taught most citizens that there is a vicious cycle of corruption operating
and they often end up losing much more by resisting corruption.
• Delays, harassment, lost opportunity, loss of precious time and wages, uncertainty and, at
times, potential danger of loss of life or limb could result from resistance to corruption and
non-compliance with demands.
• In such cases, the citizen is an unwilling victim of coercive corruption.
Collusive Corruption-
• But there are several cases of collusion between the bribe giver and corrupt public servant.
In such cases of collusive corruption, both parties benefit at immense cost to society.
• Examples-
○ Awarding of contracts for public works and
○ procurement of goods and services,
○ recruitment of employees,
○ evasion of taxes,
○ substandard projects,
○ collusive violation of regulations,
○ adulteration of foods and drugs,
○ obstruction of justice and concealing or doctoring evidence in investigation
are all examples of such dangerous forms of corruption.
Impact of Liberalization-
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=FB3AEA73149A580A%211515&authkey=%21AHx9kCb31WChTrk&page=View&wd=target%28GS4.one%7… 2/6
03/11/2022, 17:15 OneNote
As the economy is freed from state controls, extortionary corruption declines and collusive
corruption tends to increase. We need to fashion strong and effective instruments to deal with
this growing menace of collusive corruption, which is undermining the very foundations of our
democracy and endangering society.
"Ethics in Governance cant be achieved just by ethical public servants." What do you understand
by this statement?
[First discuss why ethical public servants- elected and appointed- are necessary]
• Ethics in governance, however, has a much wider import than what happens in the
different arms of the government.
• An across-the-board effort is needed to fight deviations from ethical norms. Such an effort
needs to include corporate ethics and ethics in business;
• There is need for ethics in every profession, voluntary organization and civil society
structure as these entities are now vitally involved in the process of governance.
• Finally, there should be ethics in citizen behaviour because such behaviour impinges
directly on ethics in government and administration
Ethical Framework
"India was fortunate that high standards of ethical conduct were an integral part of the freedom
struggle. Unfortunately, ethical capital started getting eroded after the transfer of power."
Elaborate.
[Elaborate on high ethical conduct by Mahatma Gandhi, resignation of congress on declaration
of war, upholding values by constituent assembly, etc.]
Decline post-independence-
1. Excesses in elections
○ in campaign-funding,
○ use of illegitimate money,
○ quantum of expenditure,
○ imperfect electoral rolls,
○ impersonation,
○ booth-capturing,
○ violence,
○ inducements and
○ intimidation,
2. floor-crossing after elections to get into power and
3. abuse of power in public office became major afflictions of the political process over the
years.
4. Criminalization
Analyze the components of Ethical Framework of Behaviour of Public Servants. Also comment of
the difference in approach required to tackle declining ethics at lower level vs higher levels in
administration.
The role of ethics in public life has many dimensions. At one end is the expression of high moral
values and at the other, the specifics of action for which a public functionary can be held legally
accountable.
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=FB3AEA73149A580A%211515&authkey=%21AHx9kCb31WChTrk&page=View&wd=target%28GS4.one%7… 3/6
03/11/2022, 17:15 OneNote
It is desirable and possible to govern the conduct of those who occupy positions in the lower
echelons and exercise limited or no discretion through simplification of processes, more
transparency, use of technology, and so on.
But the higher the echelon in public service, the greater is discretion and laws/rules/regulations
cannot comprehensively cover all possible situational responses. Therefore the qualities outlined
by Nolan Committee becomes more important for people holding higher positions.
The credibility of a disciplinary body in respect of any profession depends upon how they deal
with cases of delinquency involving serious misconduct. Elaborate.
Supreme Court made this observation. [Disciplinary body is a body in a specific domain
entrusted with the responsibility to ensure high standards of ethical conduct within that
domain.]
The members of such profession- be it accounting, law, medicine, or any other vocation-
besides having a duty to serve their profession faithfully, also owe a duty to the society which
has vital public interest.
The disciplinary bodies are guardians of due administration of justice. They are entrusted with
requisite power and rather a duty while supervising the conduct of the members of the given
profession, to inflict appropriate penalty when members are found to be guilty of misconduct.
Thus their credibility depends on how they discharge justice, failing which has a tendency to
erode the credibility and reputation of the said profession and the punishment, of course, has to
be commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct.
Social Infrastructure
Discuss the importance of civil society in bringing ethics in governance. Give Examples. Also
suggest measures to improve civil society participation in governance.
Civil Society has played an important role in improving ethics in governance by creating
mechanisms, and in some cases legislations, that improves the quality of governance through
increasing transparency, accountability, and citizen participation. Following substantiates this
hypothesis-
• Parivartan, an NGO based in Delhi, used the Right to Information law to expose corruption
in the Public Distribution System by insisting on access to stock registers maintained by
fair price shops.
• The Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) in Rajasthan, a well-known NGO, started
uncovering corruption in local public works by gaining access to employment rolls,
vouchers, beneficiary lists. This led to Raj govt legislating on social audit requirement.
• Utilization of PIL instrument effectively to bring about change. For eg, Association for
Democratic Reform used it for disclosure of criminal, financial and educational background
of the candidates contesting election.
• Lokpal Movement- by Anna Hazare and India Against Corruption was successful in passing
of the legislation for creation of lokpal.
In the United States, the False Claims Act makes it possible for interested citizens to approach
any court in any judicial district for recovery of the proceeds of corruption.
Under the Federal False Claims, any person who has knowledge about a fraud committed by
another person or entity, may file a law suit on behalf of the Federal Government.
However, often under pressure of competition, media doesn’t verify the allegations and puts the
information in public domain. Occasionally such cases are motivated. Moreover, the corporate
ownership model of media is vulnerable to not report cases that impacts the interests of the
owners.
Systemic Reforms
Eg,
1. The Agricultural Produce Marketing Act, 1972, of Madhya Pradesh permitted only the
traders in the officially designated mandis to buy the produce of the farmers. The officials
of the Mandi Samitis and the traders formed a monopsonistic nexus to cheat the farmers
by paying them less than the fair price of their produce.
2. Railway Ticket booking
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=FB3AEA73149A580A%211515&authkey=%21AHx9kCb31WChTrk&page=View&wd=target%28GS4.one%7… 5/6
03/11/2022, 17:15 OneNote
"One mechanism that can help in promoting transparency and creating confidence in public
contracting is the use of integrity pacts". Elaborate
• The term refers to an agreement between the public agency involved in procuring goods
and services and the bidder for a public contract to the effect that the bidders have not
paid and shall not pay any illegal gratification to secure the contract in question.
• For its part, the public agency calling for bids commits to ensuring a level playing field and
fair play in the procurement process.
• An important feature of such pacts is that they often involve oversight and scrutiny by
independent, outside observers.
• Such pacts have contributed significantly to improved transparency and public confidence
in the manner in which major deals in Government and public sector organizations are
concluded.
• Many national legal systems now give considerable weightage to such pacts.
Discuss the concept of risk management and preventive vigilance in public administration. Also
highlight the challenges involved.
• The risk of corruption in government depends on the nature of the office and its activity
and the character of the person holding that office. An office having more discretion and
more public interface is more vulnerable to corruption than an office in which there are no
discretionary powers.
• This implies that it may be possible to classify various positions in government as ‘high risk
of corruption’, ‘medium risk of corruption’ and ‘ low risk of corruption’.
• Eg, the post of a tax assessing officer or an inspector at a border checkpost could be
classified as a ‘high risk position’, whereas the position of an official at an enquiry counter
is a ‘low risk position’.
• Similarly, individual government servants vary in their level of integrity, ranging from those
who indulge in outright extortion to those who are absolutely upright.
• A risk management system to prevent corruption should seek to minimize risk by ensuring
that ‘low risk personnel’ should hold ‘high risk jobs’ and vice versa.
Challenges-
• Risk profiling of government officials poses a challenge in the sense that the present
system of performance evaluation discourages a reporting officer from giving anything
‘adverse’.
• Moreover, categorizing an official as ‘high’ risk based on an adverse rating by one
reporting officer may not be fair (unless a glaring misconduct has come to notice).
• It would, therefore, be better if risk profiling of officers is done by a committee of ‘eminent
persons’ after the officer has completed ten years of service, and then once in every five
years.
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=FB3AEA73149A580A%211515&authkey=%21AHx9kCb31WChTrk&page=View&wd=target%28GS4.one%7… 6/6