Advantages of Company Incorporation
Advantages of Company Incorporation
1) Artificial Person :-A company is an artificial legal person, because, it has been recoginsed
by law as it is being capable of rights and duties. A person is any subject matter other than a
human being to whom the law regards as capable of rights and duties. In other words, company is
created by law and, therefore, it can be dissolved by law only. It has no soul, no flesh and no
body. It is invisible, intangible and it is not in the shape of human body, but its' existence is seen
by the eyes of law. Since, the company is an artificial legal person, the provisions of the
Constitution of India and the Citizenship Act do not apply to company State Trading Corporation of
India v/s. CTO.
2) Separate legal entity or Separate legal existence: A company has a separate legal
existence. It has a separate legal personality or entity which is distinct and independent of its
members who are known as shareholders who compose the company. A company exists in the
eyes of law, and therefore, it is described as an artificial legal person. The incorporation of a
company gives a company a corporate personality which is different from the members or
shareholders of the company. A company upon its incorporation is empowered to acquire, hold
and transfer property in its own name and it is also empowered to sue and can be sued by its own
members. Since, the company has an independent existence any of its member can enter into
contract with the company in the same manner when he enters into contract with any other
individual. Such person is not held liable for the acts of the company i.e. even if he holds the entire
share capital.
Salomon v/s Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897 A.C. 22)-In this case, for the first time the principle
of the separate legal entity or separate legal existence of a company was recognized by the
House of Lords. Salomon & Co. Ltd. was practically owned by Mr. Salomon. In the event of
its liquidation, the question arose whether Mr. Salomon had a right to a prior claim, with
regard to the debentures held by him, over the unsecured creditors of the company. The
unsecured creditors claimed that since Mr. Salomon and the company were one and the
same (as the company was practically owned by Mr. Salomon). Mr. Salomon should be held
personally liable to satisfy their claims. In other words, they should be paid in priority to
Mr. Salomon. It was held by the House of Lords that, once the company was incorporated,
it became a separate person in the eyes of law. Such company being a separate person,
was independent from Mr. Salomon Even though Mr. Salomon was virtually the holder of all
the shares of the company, he was also a creditor secured by debentures and, therefore,
Mr. Salomon was entitled to repayment in priority to unsecured creditors of the company
which had acquired a separate legal existence or separate legal entity.
3) Perpetual Succession: The word "Perpetual Succession" means that, even if the
membership of the company keeps changing from time to time, such change does not affect the
company's continuity or does not affect the continuous existence of the company. In other words,
as soon as the company is duly incorporated, it becomes, in the eyes of law, a separate person
independent from its members. Therefore, the changes in its membership by death, insolvency,
mental disorder or retirement of its members, their transfers, etc. do not affect the continuous
existence of the company. The company never dies. The life of the company does not depend
upon the life of its' members. The company is created by process of law and can be put to an end
by a process of law only. Members may come and go, but the company can go on forever (until
dissolved by process of law). Therefore, the company remains in existence even if all its human
members of a private company, while in general meeting, were killed by a bomb blast, the
company was survived even in such situation. (L.C.B. Gower has cited the above example in his
book "Modern Company Law" p.76 (3 ed. 1969).
2
4) Limited Liability:
The term "Limited Liability" means that the liability of members of the company is limited to the
unpaid value of the shares. In other words, the members are liable to the value of the shares
purchased by them. The extent of limited liability can be understood with the following example, if
the face value of a share in a company is Rs.100/- and the member has already paid Rs.70- and
the member can be called upon to pay Rs.30/- per share during the existence of the company.
When the liability is limited to the extent of the value of share, a company is called "company
limited by share". When the liability is limited to the extent of the guarantee, a company is called
"company limited by guarantee". A company limited by guarantee means, the liability of the
members of the company is limited to such amount which the members may undertake to
contribute to the assets of the company in the event of liquidation of company. In other words,
each member promises to pay a fixed amount in the event of liquidation of company or in case of
its' winding up. This fixed sum of money or amount is called "guarantee".
5) Transferable Shares:
Shares of the company are considered as goods under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. Shares of a
member in a company are movable property, which is transferable in the manner stipulated in the
Articles of Association of the company. The transferability of shares allows the member of the
company to sell and purchase in the market openly. In other words, the member of the company
can sell and purchase the shares in the open market and can get back his investment without any
withdrawal of money from the company or get back his money or his investment to the capital
structure of the company.
Lords Blackburn observed that, the object of joint stock companies was that, their shares should
be capable of being easily transferred.
6) Common Seal
The moment a company is incorporated, a company acquires a separate legal entity and it is
regarded as artificial legal person. A company has no soul, flesh and body and, therefore, it is
incapable of signing documents for itself. A company performs acts through natural persons who
are the directors of a company. Since a company is incapable to sign, the law has made provision
for the use of common seal below the signature of the directors, the Company is not liable for such
contracts. In other words, in the absence of a common seal affixed below the signature of the
Directors on the document of contract, the contract will not be legally binding on the company.
7) Separate Property:
A company has a separate legal entity and it is an artificial legal person which is different and
distinct from its members. And therefore, a company is capable of enjoying, owing or disposing of
the property in its own name, because, a company is the owner of its capital and assets. The
members of a company commonly known as shareholders of a company, are not the owners of
the property of a company -
8) Capacity to Sue:
9) Finance:
3
A company is such a business organization, which may raise huge fund with the help of shares
and debentures by public subscription. The public financial institution finds easy and beneficial to
lend their resources willingly to a company as compared to other forms of business organizations.
A company grants the facility of borrowing and giving security with a floating charge and this is
also one of the important advantages of incorporation.
According to the Section 43 of the The Companies Act, 2013 the Kinds of share capital are as
follows:-
The share capital of a company limited by shares shall be of two kinds, namely
(ii) with differential rights as to dividend, voting or otherwise in accordance with such rules as
may be prescribed; and
Provided that nothing contained in this Act shall affect the rights of the preference shareholders
who are entitled to participate in the proceeds of winding up before the commencement of this Act.
(i) 'equity share capital', with reference to any company limited by shares, means all share
capital which is not preference share capital;
(ii) "preference share capital" limited by shares, means that part of the issued share capital of
the company which carries or would carry a preferential right with respect to:
(a) payment of dividend, either as a fixed amount or an amount calculated at a fixed rate,
which may either be free of or subject to income -tax; and
(b) repayment, in the case of a winding up or repayment of capital, of the amount of the share
capital paid-up or deemed to have been paid-up, whether or not, there is a preferential right to the
payment of any fixed premium or premium on any fixed scale, specified in the memorandum or
articles of the company;
(a) that in respect of dividends, in addition to the preferential rights to the amount specified in
sub-clause (a) of clause (ii), it has a right to participate, whether fully or to a limited extent, with
capital not entitled to the preferential right aforesaid;
4
(b) that in respect of capital, in addition to the preferential right to the repayment, on a winding
up, of the amounts specified in sub-clause (b) of sub-clause (ii), it has a right to participate,
whether fully or to a limited extent, with capital not entitled to that preferential right in any surplus
which may remain after the entire capital has been repaid.
(1) Introduction:
The Companies Act, 2013, governs the functioning of companies in India. One of its essential
provisions pertains to the Annual General Meeting (AGM). Sections 96 to 137 of the Companies
Act, 2013, elaborate on the rules and regulations concerning AGMs.
(10) Conclusion:
The AGM is a crucial aspect of corporate governance, ensuring transparency, shareholder
participation, and compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. Companies must adhere to the Act's
provisions regarding AGMs to maintain good corporate governance practices.
(11) This short note provides an overview of AGMs under The Companies Act, 2013, including
their purpose, frequency, notice requirements, quorum, agenda, voting procedures, and the
importance of maintaining detailed minutes of the meeting. Companies in India must carefully
5
follow these provisions to meet their legal obligations and ensure transparency and accountability
in their operations.
5) Appointment of Directors
Introduction :-
The Companies Act, 2013, regulates the appointment of directors in India, laying down the
procedures and qualifications for individuals to assume the role of directors in a company.
Sections 149 to 172 of the Act elaborate on the appointment, qualifications, and disqualifications
of directors.
In India, the Companies Act, 2013, distinguishes between private companies and public
companies, primarily under Section 2(68) for private companies and Section 2(71) for public
companies. Here is a comparative overview of the key differences between private and public
companies according to the Companies Act:
3. Transferability of Shares:
a) Private Company (Section 2(68)): Restrictions on the transfer of shares are commonly
imposed by the articles of association. Shareholders' consent is often required for share transfers.
b) Public Company (Section 2(71)): Shares of a public company are freely transferable, and
there are no restrictions on share transfers.
6. Prospectus Requirement :-
a) Private Company (Section 2(68)): Private companies are not required to issue a
prospectus when raising capital.
b) Public Company (Section 2(71)): Public companies must issue a prospectus when making
a public offer of shares or debentures.
7. Commencement of Business:
a) Private Company (Section 3(1)(a)): A private company can commence its business
immediately upon incorporation.
b) Public Company (Section 11(2)): A public company can commence business only after
obtaining a certificate of commencement of business.
8. Statutory Meeting:
a) Private Company: The requirement for a statutory meeting and statutory report does not
apply to private companies.
b) Public Company (Section 165): Public companies are required to hold a statutory meeting
and submit a statutory report.
9. Restrictions on Borrowing:
a) Private Company (Section 180): Private companies have fewer restrictions on borrowing
compared to public companies.
b) Public Company (Section 180): Public companies have stricter borrowing limits and require
shareholder approval for certain borrowings.
These distinctions between private and public companies under the Companies Act, 2013, reflect
varying levels of regulation and transparency requirements, allowing companies to choose a
structure that aligns with their objectives and operational needs.
7
8 The "doctrine of indoor management" in the Companies Act 2013 essentially means that
when dealing with a company, an outsider can assume that the company's internal procedures
and requirements have been followed correctly, as outlined in its Memorandum and Articles of
Association, and they are not required to investigate potential internal irregularities, unless they
have knowledge or suspicion of such issues; this principle is also known as "Turquand's Rule" and
acts as an exception to the doctrine of constructive notice.
Key points about the doctrine of indoor management:
Protection for outsiders:
This doctrine protects third parties who deal with a company in good faith from being adversely
affected by the company's internal management issues.
Based on public documents:
Outsiders are only required to check the company's public documents like the Memorandum and
Articles of Association to verify the scope of the company's authority.
Exception to constructive notice:
Unlike the doctrine of constructive notice, which assumes that outsiders are aware of all company
details, including internal irregularities, the doctrine of indoor management allows them to rely on
the company's apparent authority.
Originating case:
This doctrine stems from the landmark case of "Royal British Bank v. Turquand".
Important considerations:
Good faith requirement:
The protection under this doctrine only applies if the outsider is acting in good faith and has no
knowledge of any internal irregularities.
Limitations:
If an outsider has actual knowledge of a breach of internal procedures or suspects such a breach,
they cannot rely on the doctrine of indoor management
In company law in India, cumulative and non-cumulative notices refer to the notices of a meeting
of a company's board of directors. These notices are issued to inform directors about upcoming
meetings where important decisions are to be made. The specific provisions related to these
notices can be found in the Companies Act, 2013. Let's explore the differences between
cumulative and non-cumulative notices with relevant sections and illustrations:
A cumulative notice is a notice that combines the agenda items of the upcoming board meeting
with those of the subsequent meeting(s). This means that if any item of business is not transacted
at the meeting for any reason, it will be carried forward to the next meeting without the need for a
separate notice.
Section 173(3):
"Where a meeting of the Board could not be held for want of quorum, then, unless the articles
otherwise provide, the meeting shall automatically stand adjourned to the same day at the same
time and place in the next week or if that day is a national holiday, till the next succeeding day
which is not a national holiday, at the same time and place or to such other day and such other
time and place as the Board may determine."
company's financial statements. However, due to a lack of quorum, the meeting cannot be held. In
this case, the agenda item regarding the financial statements will automatically be included in the
agenda for the board meeting scheduled for January 12th, without the need for a separate notice.
A non-cumulative notice is a notice that relates only to a specific board meeting and its agenda
items. If any business remains unfinished or unaddressed at that meeting, it will require a separate
notice for a subsequent meeting where the pending business can be discussed.
Section 173(1):
"The notice calling a meeting of the Board shall specify the place and the date of the meeting and
shall contain the agenda of the meeting."
In summary, cumulative notices combine agenda items from a meeting that could not be held due
to lack of quorum with the agenda of a subsequent meeting. Non-cumulative notices, on the other
hand, relate only to the specific meeting for which they are issued, and any unfinished business
requires a separate notice for discussion at a subsequent meeting. These provisions ensure
transparency and clarity in board meetings and decision-making processes in accordance with the
Companies Act, 2013.
A) Introduction :-
The doctrine of constructive notice is a fundamental principle in company law in India. It implies
that every person dealing with a company is deemed to have constructive notice of the company's
memorandum and articles of association, and therefore, they are bound by the provisions
contained in these documents. This doctrine helps ensure transparency and accountability in
company transactions. Relevant sections of the Companies Act, 2013, provide the legal basis for
this doctrine.
association bind the company and its members to the same extent as if they had been signed and
sealed by each member.
C) Conclusion :-
The doctrine of constructive notice is a critical aspect of company law in India, emphasizing that
individuals and entities involved with a company are deemed to be aware of and bound by the
provisions of its memorandum and articles of association. This doctrine enhances the legal
framework for company transactions, fostering transparency and ensuring that all parties act in
accordance with the company's governing documents.
What is the doctrine of ultra-vires? Introduction: Companies have to borrow funds from time to
time for various projects in which they are engaged. Borrowing is an indispensable part of day to
day transactions of a company, and no company can be imagined to run without borrowing from
time to time. Balance sheets are released every year by the companies, and you will hardly find
any balance sheet without borrowings in the liabilities clause of it. However, there are certain
restrictions while making such borrowings. If companies go beyond their powers to borrow then
such borrowings may be deemed as ultra-vires. What is the doctrine of ultra-vires? Ultra-viresIt
is a Latin term made up of two words “ultra” which means beyond and “vires” meaning power or
authority. So we can say that anything which is beyond the authority or power is called ultra-vires.
In the context of the company, we can say that anything which is done by the company or its
directors which is beyond their legal authority or which was outside the scope of the object of the
company is ultra-vires. Doctrine of Ultra-Vires: Memorandum of association is considered to be
the constitution of the company. It sets out the internal and external scope and area of company’s
operation along with its objectives, powers, scope. A company is authorized to do only that much
which is within the scope of the powers provided to it by the memorandum. A company can also
do anything which is incidental to the main objects provided by the memorandum. Anything which
is beyond the objects authorized by the memorandum is an ultra-vires act. The doctrine of ultra-
vires in Companies Act, 2013 : Section 4 (1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, states that all the
objects for which incorporation of the company is proposed any other matter which is considered
necessary in its furtherance should be stated in the memorandum of the company.
Whereas Section 245 (1) (b) of the Act provides to the members and depositors a right to file a
application before the tribunal if they have reason to believe that the conduct of the affairs of the
company is conducted in a manner which is prejudicial to the interest of the company or its
members or depositors, to restrain the company from committing anything which can be
considered as a breach of the provisions of the company’s memorandum or articles.
1. Shareholders cannot ratify an ultra-vires transaction or act even if they wish to do so.
2. Where one party has entirely performed his part of the contract, reliance on the defense
of the ultra-vires was usually precluded in the doctrine of estoppel.
10
3. Where both the parties have entirely performed the contract, then it cannot be attacked
on the basis of this doctrine.
4. Any of the parties can raise the defense of ultra-vires.
5. If a contract has been partially performed but the performance was insufficient to bring
the doctrine of estoppel into the action, a suit can be brought for the recovery of the
benefits conferred.
6. If an agent of the corporation commits any default or tort within the scope of his
employment, the company cannot defend it from its consequences by saying that the
act was ultra-vires.
1. Void ab initio: The ultra vires acts are null and void ab initio. These acts are not binding
on the company. Neither the company can sue, nor it can be sued for such acts.
[Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Company v. Riche ].
2. Estoppel or ratification cannot convert an ultra-vires act into an intra-vires act.
3. Injunction: when there is a possibility that company has taken or is about to undertake
an ultra-vires act, the members can restrain it from doing so by getting an injunction
from the court. [Attorney General v. Gr. Eastern Rly. Co., (1880) 5 A.C. 473].
4. Personal liability of Directors: The directors have a duty to ensure that all corporate
capital of the company is used for a legitimate purpose only. If such funds are diverted
for a purpose which is not authorized by the memorandum of the company, it will attract
a personal liability for the directors. In Jehangir R. Modi v. Shamji Ladha, [(1866-67) 4
Bom. HCR (1855)], the Bombay High Court held, “A shareholder can maintain an action
against the directors to compel them to restore to the company the funds of the
company that have by them been employed in transactions that they have no authority
to enter into, without making the company a party to the suit”.
A) Introduction :-
Forfeiture of shares is a legal process through which a company cancels the shares of a
shareholder who fails to comply with certain obligations, typically the payment of calls on shares.
The provisions for the forfeiture of shares in India are governed by the Companies Act, 2013.
C) Conclusion :-
Forfeiture of shares is a legal mechanism provided by the Companies Act, 2013, to deal with non-
compliant shareholders who fail to meet their financial obligations, such as the payment of calls on
shares. The process involves sending notices to defaulting shareholders, board resolutions for
forfeiture, and the subsequent cancellation and disposal of forfeited shares. This mechanism helps
companies maintain financial discipline and ensure that shareholders meet their financial
obligations.
13) Quorum
A) Introduction :-
Quorum refers to the minimum number of members required to be present at a company meeting
for the meeting to be considered valid and capable of conducting business. Quorum requirements
are an essential aspect of company law in India and are specified in the Companies Act, 2013.
Below is a short note on quorum in company meetings, including relevant sections and
illustrations:
C) Conclusion :-
Quorum requirements are crucial for ensuring that company meetings have sufficient
participation for meaningful decision-making and deliberations. These requirements
are outlined in Sections 103 and 174 of the Companies Act, 2013, and vary based on
the type of meeting and the company's articles of association. Adhering to quorum
rules is essential to maintain transparency and accountability in the functioning of
companies and to validate the decisions made during meetings.
A) Introduction :-
Equity shares, also known as ordinary shares, represent ownership in a company and
carry voting rights, allowing shareholders to participate in the company's decision-
making. Equity shares are an integral part of company law in India and are governed
by the Companies Act, 2013.
Mr. X has twice as many voting rights as Ms. Y in the company's decision-making
processes.
● MNO Ltd. has excess cash and decides to buy back a portion of its equity
shares from existing shareholders. It follows the procedure outlined in Section 68 to
repurchase its shares.
C) Conclusion :-
Equity shares are a fundamental instrument of ownership in a company, offering
shareholders the right to vote and participate in the company's profits and losses. The
Companies Act, 2013, provides the legal framework for the issuance, voting rights,
and management of equity shares, ensuring transparency and accountability in
corporate governance in India.
.
16) Registration of company
a) Introduction:
The registration of a company is a fundamental step in establishing a legal entity for
conducting business in India. The Companies Act, 2013, prescribes the legal
framework for company registration in India. Below is a short note on the registration
of a company, including relevant sections and illustrative examples:
- This section lays down the basic requirements for the formation of a company,
including having a minimum number of members (2 for a private company and 7 for a
public company).
c) Conclusion:
Registration is a pivotal step in establishing a company in India, and it ensures that
the company operates within the legal framework outlined by the Companies Act,
2013. Compliance with the relevant sections and provisions is essential to maintain
transparency, legal standing, and accountability in corporate operations in India.
A) Introduction:
Transfer and transmission of shares are two essential processes in company law in
India that govern the ownership and transfer of shares from one party to another.
These processes are regulated by the Companies Act, 2013. Below is a short note on
transfer and transmission of shares, including relevant sections and illustrative
examples:
C) Conclusion:
Transfer and transmission of shares are crucial processes that allow for the buying
and selling of ownership interests in a company. These processes are governed by the
Companies Act, 2013, and involve specific procedures and documentation. While
transfers are typically voluntary and involve living individuals or entities, transmission
occurs in cases of events such as death or insolvency, where the ownership of shares
is passed to legal heirs or assignees. Understanding and adhering to the legal
requirements for these processes is essential to maintain transparency and legality in
the shareholding structure of companies in India.
A) Introduction:
The Memorandum of Association (MOA) is a foundational document that plays a
crucial role in the formation and functioning of a company in India. It defines the
company's objectives, powers, and scope of operations. The MOA is governed by the
Companies Act, 2013. Below is a short note on the MOA, including relevant sections
and illustrative examples:
- Section 4(7) outlines the procedure for altering the MOA, which requires
approval from the company's shareholders and regulatory authorities.
C) Conclusion:
The Memorandum of Association is a vital document in the corporate landscape of
India. It sets the foundation for a company's existence by defining its identity,
objectives, and limitations. Complying with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013,
related to the MOA is essential to ensure that a company's operations remain within
the boundaries defined by this document and that any changes are made in a legally
compliant manner.
A) Introduction :
An Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) is a significant corporate event in company
law in India. It is convened by a company outside the regular annual general meeting
to discuss and decide on specific matters that require immediate attention. The
Companies Act, 2013, provides the legal framework for conducting EGMs in India.
Below is a short note on EGMs, including relevant sections and illustrative examples:
C) Conclusion:
EGMs serve as a mechanism for companies to address urgent matters and make
important decisions outside of their regular annual general meetings. The Companies
Act, 2013, outlines the procedures, requirements, and regulations that govern these
meetings to ensure transparency, accountability, and proper decision-making in
corporate affairs in India.