0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views9 pages

Sensory Integration and Functional Movement A Guid

Uploaded by

Magee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views9 pages

Sensory Integration and Functional Movement A Guid

Uploaded by

Magee
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

4th International Conference on Arts Language and Culture (ICALC 2019)

Sensory Integration and Functional Movement: A Guide to


Optimal Development in Early Childhood
1 2*
Awalludin , Zarina Akbar
1
KB-TK Labschool Jakarta
2
Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Jakarta
1
[email protected] , 2* [email protected]

Abstract: Sensory integration is a process that occurs naturally and becomes parts of the brain. In this
process, information from all the senses will be managed then given meaning and then filtered whether it
was important or were ignored. This process allowed individuals to behave according to experience and
was the basis for academic abilities and subsequent social behavior. Apart from the five individual senses,
namely the eyes, nose, tongue, ears, and skin, from birth humans are equipped with close senses in charge
of receiving stimuli that come from the body. There are 3 senses that are closest to the child, tactile,
vestibular, proprioceptive. These three senses are fundamental to be the basis for the development of a
healthy child. When these senses function automatically and efficiently, a child will have eyes and ears
and good attention to the world around him. Sensory integration stimulation becomes very important for
the optimization of child development especially in early childhood.

Keywords: sensory integration, early childhood, optimal development

Introduction
In this modern era, seeing children can move on their own without coercion is important. Children
awareness of motion is influenced by the child's brain in receiving and processing sensory information
that is commonly called sensory integration. Sensory integration is produced by occupational therapists to
cope with sensory disturbance or dysfunction. Through assessment, sensory integration can be used as an
alternative test in measuring the relevance of childern who has symptoms of language disorders as a form
of dysfunction. Some cases of dysfunction, for example, children with a diagnosis of attention disorder or
wrong focus on certain objects, hyperactive symptoms, autism developmental disorders, autism spectrum
disorders and learning disabilities. With the application of sensory integration assessments, it can be
handled with motion problems, attention disturbances and focus on certain objects that can be assessed
and can be found that the children developmental motion.
An effort to find out the development of children's movements can be seen through functional
movement screening. Functional movement screening is one of the techniques for referencing the
mapping development of children's movements. To do the screening required several instrument tests
that have been carried out for adults. As previously investigated by Gray Cook (2010) states that the test
instrument of functional movement screening (FMS) can be used as one technique to determine the
natural movements of adults. In Indonesia, there has been no research on the manufacture of test
instruments based on Indonesian children. Through functional movement screening (FMS) and analysis
of sensory integration tests children can find out the development of motor movements in the future and
prevent the development of children's learning disorders.
An understanding of sensory integration can be used as a means to develop the ways of assessing
sensory difficulties with new brain imaging techniques. Difficulties in sensory integration are known as
sensory processing disorders in several senses including proprioception, vestibular and interoception.
Through research, it is expected to be able to find out which organs and joints are inside the small sensory

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.


This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license -http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. 311
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

receptors that tell our brains about body parts . Secondly, through understanding sensory integration, it
can be used as a way to find out the receptors in the canals of our ears to take up positions of movement
and send information to our brains. So we know if we are moving forward our brain uses this information
to plan movements and help us maintain balance. Finally, through a collaborative assessment of
fundamental movement screening and sensory integration can be seen how our bodies tell us, when we
are hungry or full, when our hearts beat fast or when we feel the butterfly sensation.
Based on this background, there are at least some considerations in the preparation of research papers,
as follows: First, there are symptoms of learning development disorders that are influenced by the
difficulty of children sensory processing. Second, there are difficulties in accessing information to the
brain from receptors. Third, motor movements as a basis for children's learning processes. Fourth, to
determine the barriers to the child's physical motor development. Fifth, to find out early the barriers to
motor physical development. Sixth, Functional basic movements of children carried out daily. From the
consideration of the research, the research question of this research is "How do you collaborate sensory
integration with functional movement screening in knowing the learning development of children?

Theoretical Study

Sensory Integration
Sensory integration is the process of recognizing, changing and differentiating sensations from the
sensory system to produce a response in the form of adaptive behavior. According to Mumpuniarti
(2015), stating that sensory integration is the process of organizing, or interconnecting sensory systems to
function correctively, the brain can accurately interpret information. The concept of sensory integration
results from occupational therapist experts and is developed primarily in the occupational therapy
profession, where the theory of sensory integration and its application provides a set of important
knowledge and skills for practitioners around the world.

Figure 1. Sensory Integration Development Williams and Shellenberger (1996)

Sensory integration theory comes from A.Jean Ayres, first described as a concept that requires a lot of
imagination about unexpected phenomena. Sensory integration is also one of the first occupational
therapies produced to provide evidence of the validation of the motoric disorder construction while

312
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

providing direction for strategies that doctors use to correct fundamental sensory problems that affect
performance. Sensory integration is about how our brain receives and processes sesnory information so
we can do the things we need to do in our daily lives.
According to Jean Ayres (1972) sensory integration is defined as a neurological process that regulates
the body's sensation and from the environment and makes it possible to use the body effectively with the
environment. Most people experience the development of sensory integration when they are young. This
is considered as one of the normal developments in the things we do such as; roll over, crawl, walk and
play; for others sensory integration is poorly developed. Therefore, through sensory integration and its
relation to the problem of child movement shows a significant influence. One of the efforts made is to
develop a way to assess the difficulties of child movement by understanding the sensory integration of
children.
Difficulties in sensory integration are known as sensory processing disorders in several senses. In this
case, sensory integration is interested in all 5 senses, namely the sense of seeing, hearing, feeling,
smelling and feeling the touch and 3 other things namely proprioception, vestibular and interception.
While other forms of sensory integration include;

Visual

Vision as a main milestone of the children motor development and put a major
role in all development domains. Vision interprets color, light, movement,
location, body language, facial expressions and the possibility of danger in front
of him. The visual system consists of a 9-eye orcular system and eye muscles
connected to a perceptual system to the brain). This system is experienced by
children aged 0-10 months.
Figure 2. Visual

Auditory

Auditory is the process of sound entry into the external ear and walking into the
canal, and vibrate the eardrum. The vibrations are transformed into chain reactions
that are transmitted to the inner ear such as cochlea, semicircular, canal and
auditory nerve to bring sound vibrations to the brain. Children aged 7-10 months
react to invisible sound. While children aged 11-15 months begin to hear related to
object and are happy with certain sounds and try to imitate. words that will result
Figure 3. Auditory
in reactions of various kinds of shock, distrust, rejection or anger, sadness and
confusion. Various kinds of thoughts and reactions from parents when their child is
decided as a person with hearing impairment, the future of the child and educational contribution is to
deal with stress from family and family members that must be overcome.

Gustatory

Gustatory system is a sensory system that refers to a sense of taste.


According to Cincinati (2017) the gustatory system is more refer to taste word
or sensory oral system or taste system. Symptoms of sensitivity include;
sensitive when brushing teeth (hypersensitive), sensitive to certain foods Figure 4. Gustatory

313
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

(hypersensitive), chewing on foods and exploring textures such as chewing pencils, clothes, often
drooling and loving or having a strong fear of going to the dentist.

Olfactory System
System olfactory is closely related to the sense of smell that automatically
runs when doing daily activities. For example, when we eat, then we will smell
something first. If it smells good, we tend to try. If it smells bad, it will send a
warning that we might not like it or it is dangerous for us to eat. The odor
journey is through chemical receptors with direct neuronal connections to the
limbic system (responsible for emotional memory). That is why our emotions
are bound by the smell of food. Suggested activities include play dough, finger
paint or sensory dough, use scented markers or stickers, make smelly bottles Figure 5. Olfactory
with various seasonings or items to introduce new scents, use scented chewing
objects, avoid scented soap, lotions, perfumes and oils.

Table 1. Material from Sensory Integration and Child Copying

Auditory Dialog and


Language
Vestibular Body percept Eye hand
(gravity and Coordination of coordination 
movement) two side of the between hand
body, motor and eye
Vestibular For example planning,
(gravity and posture, eye activity span,
movement) movements, emotional
balance, stability
muscle tone,
gravity
security
Activity level Visual  The ability to
Proprioceptive
Sucking Attention span perception concentrate,
(muscles and
Eating Emotional Purposeful organizational
joints)
stability activity ability
 Self esteem
 Self control
 Confident
Tactile (touch) academic learning
ability specialties
on each side of the
body and brain
Visual (seeing)

314
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

Proprioception

It is our organs and joints have small sensory receptors that tell our
brains where our body parts are. The task of the sensory system is to
receive information about the position of the body through muscles,
ligaments, joints; healthy feeling and balance (Blythe, 2017). For example,
when someone puts a spoon in his mouth, he doesn't need to look at the
Figure 6. Proprioception
spoon to see where the spoon is. The brain will use this information to plan
movements so that it can coordinate our bodies.

Vestibular
Vestibular is the sensory organ in the ear, has a small channel that contains
fluid, where it moves every time we move our heads. The vestibular system is in
charge of providing information about movements, gravity and balance received
through the inner ear. So, these receptors are useful so that our brain uses this
information to plan movements and help us maintain balance (Blythe, 2017.
Interception, which is a fairly new area to be discussed in sensory integration. Figure 7. Vestibular
Interoception is how our body tells us, when we are hungry or full, when our
heart beats fast or when we feel the sensation of a butterfly. A description of the sensory integration of
system perception, vestibular and tactile can be seen in Table 1.
Based on Table 1, it shows that the process of motion or mobility that is a sensory process to provide
body posture adjustment. While stability is a sensory process that aims to maintain a measurable balance
and continue the sensory process in the sense of sight, hearing and touch. Then vestibular (gravity and
movement) such as posture, eye movements, balance, muscle tone, gravity security.
Furthermore Proprioceptive shows the level of activity, attention and emotional stability that is
influenced by some of the child's sensory abilities. The ability to concentrate, organizational ability, self-
esteem, self-control, self-confidence, academic learning ability, specialization of each side of the body
and brain.

Figure 8. Sensory Processing Disorder

In addition to know of the seven sensory systems as sensory integration, there are several sensory
processing dysfunctions or obstacles (sensory dysfunction). Perception and sensory processing
dysfunction as well as interactions and neurological functions produce various limitations of functional
behavior. The purpose of Sherlock's research is to determine the effectiveness of sensory integration

315
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

programs in children with autism. a way is to do sensory integration therapy effectively in caring the
autism children because it helps children to become more independent and participate in daily activities
(Blythe, 2017).

Tactile System

The tactile system is the largest sensory system formed by receptors in the
skin that sends information to the brain on the stimulation of light, touch,
pain, temperature, and pressure. Waiman et.al., (2011), states that the tactile
system consists of two components, namely protective and discriminatory that
work together in performing daily tasks and functions. Hypersensitivity to
stimulation. Tactile, known as tactile defensiveness, can cause misperception
of touch, in the form of a response to withdraw when touched, avoid groups Figure 9. Tactile
of people, refuse to eat certain foods or wear certain clothes, and use the tips
of fingers to hold certain objects.
Sensory integration is widely used as a framework for understanding children's behavior and for
guiding assessments and interventions with children who demonstrate functional challenges based on
sensory processing disorders by providing controlled interactions with a rich sensory environment,
therapists help children improve their ability to process and use sensory input successfully in children's
activities. This is because many children with sensory processing disorders (including motor planning
deficits, poor attention and difficulties in emotional and behavioral regulation) consisting of language and
speech and language skills may encounter children who receive sensory integration services (May-Benson
& Koomar, 2010). As such, it is important for practitioners to understand the key principles and
components of sensory integration (see Tables 2).

Table 2. Sensory Integration Activity Elements


Core Element Descriptions of Attitudes and Behaviors in Sensory
Integration Activities
Giving Sensory Stimulation Giving opportunities for children to experience a variety
of sensory experiences, which includes tactile, vestibular,
and/or proprioceptive; the activities provided involve
more than one sensory modality.
Giving the right challenges Giving challenging activities, not too difficult or too easy,
to evoke’s children’s adaptive response to sensory and
praxis challenges.
Cooperation determines the choice Invite children to play an active role in the process of play
of activities activities, giving opportunities for children to control the
activities, do not set schedule and plan activities without
involving children.
Guiding independent organizations Support and guide children to organize behavior
independently, choose and plan behaviors that suit the
child’s abilities, invite children to take the initiative,
develop ideas, and plan activites.
Support optimal stimulation Guarantee a good environment to achieve or maintain
optimal stimulation, by changing the environment or
activities to attract children’s attention, engagement and
comfort.
Create a play context Creating games that build children’s intrinsic motivation

316
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

Core Element Descriptions of Attitudes and Behaviors in Sensory


Integration Activities
and enjoyment of activities; facilitate or develop object,
social, motor and imaginative games.
Maximizing children’s success Give or modify activities so that children can succeed in
some or all activities, which produces responses to these
challenges.
Guarantee the physical security Ensuring the child is physically safe, using safe
equipment or always accompanied them during play
activities
Arrange room for children Organize equipment and space so that it can motivate
interaction children to choose and be involved in acivities.
Facilititating children’s Respect children’s emotions, give a positive outlook for
togetherness children, establish relationships with children, and create
a climate of trust and emotional security.

Functional Movement Screening (FMS)


Functional Movement Screening (FMS) is designed to identify the difficulty of children's movements
that affect learning development. FMS is structured as an alternative strategy to overcome functional
movement and asymmetry deficits that may be predictive of general conditions and musculoskeletal
injuries, with the ultimate goal of being able to modify the movement deficits identified by individual
exercise prescriptions (Chorba, et.al, 2010). As an indication of the development of motion assessment for
children's check lists is through the process of optimization the function of the muscles and nerves of
human muscles. The six advantages of functional movement skills relate to motion assessment tools,
among others; (1) regarding the output program; (2) the motion product is better than the motion process;
(3) movement skills rather than motor skills; (4) dynamic system approach; (5) non-standard tests; (6) is
the application of technology in the assessment of motor skills in the future.
Functional Movement Screening consists of mobility (human tendency), stability (balance) and
proprioception (awareness of motion). Mobility is range of motion. Stability is related to the joints in the
ankles. Proprioception is an awareness of human motion that directly responds to motion. One of the
mainstay studies of Helen Little and Naomi Sweller (2015) states that motor competence and physical
activity are established for many years in early childhood. Early childhood education settings are an
important context for children's involvement in physically active games. The results of research from
Hellen and Naomi showed that the characteristics of the external environment and the inner environment
have more influence on the external environment or nature in the formation of physical activity and give
freedom to young childern to play, learn to understand the environment and adapt to their environment.
One recent piece of evidence shows that young children seem to have enough opportunities to do
physical activity on weekends. More than 40 percent of Australian children do not meet the recommended
daily physical activity requirements on weekdays (Okeley, et.al, 2009). Therefore early childhood
services provide an important context for supporting children's health and physical well-being.
Some of the general benefits of applying functional movement screening instruments include; (1)
Identifying individuals at risk, who seek to maintain or increase their level of activity. (2) Assist in
program design by systematically using corrective exercises to normalize or improve patterns of
fundamental movements. (3) Provide a systematic tool to monitor the development and development of
movement patterns with changes in injury status or fitness level. (4) Creating a baseline of functional
movements, which will allow ranking and ranking movements for statistical observations. The authors of

317
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

this clinical commentary suggest that screening and analysis of fundamental movements should be
included in pre-season screening and returned to sports testing to determine. (5) increase the ability to
make certain essential movements.
From the seven functional movement screening test instruments, there were 3 FMS assessments that
can be collaborated with sensory integration. First, active straight leg raise. Second, Trunk stability,
push-ups and third, rotary stability. Active straight shows the ability to be able to move flexibly, while
trunk stability and rotary stability try to obtain a balance of motion through a sensory integration process.

Conclusion
Every child born must have different characteristics. When children experience sensory processing
disorders indicate a problem of learning development. Through the analysis of sensory integration theory
collaborated with fundamental movement screening instrument assessment becomes one of the strategies
to prevent sensory processing difficulties and children's learning development. If in previous studies the
difficulty of child movement affects the learning development of children in the classroom and learning
space, then in this study focuses on the difficulty of processing information from receptors in the child's
ear into the brain that experiences obstacles. So through collaboration between FMS and Sensory
Integration, communication and interaction between the body's organs and the child's nervous system can
be connected because of training in processing with the child's basic motion activities.

References
Blythe, S. B. (2017). Attention, Balance, and Coordination: The A.B.C. of Learning Success 2nd Edition.
UK: Steven Brown.
Breslin, M., Morton, J., & Rudisill, E. M. (2008). Implementating A Physical Activity Curriculum into
The School Day: Helping Early Childhood Teachers Meet the Challenge. Early Childhood Edue
J, 35, 429-437. DOI 10.1007/s10643-007-0200-9.
Clark, J. E. (2007). On The Problem of Motor Skill Development. Journal of Physical Education
Recreation & Dance, 78(5), 39-44
Cook, G., Burton, L., Barbara, J., & Voight, M. (2014). Invited Clinical Commentary: Functional
Movement Screening: The Use of Fundamental Movement As An Assessment of Function-Part
1. The International Journal of Sports Physical Theraphy, 9(3), 396-409
Department of Education Western Australia. (2013). Fundamental Movement Skills: Book 1 - Learning,
Teaching, and Assessment.
Department of Education Western Australia. (2013). Fundamental Movement Skills: Book 2 – The Tools
for Learning, Teaching, and Assessment.
Dodge, D., & Colker, L. (1992). The Creative Curriculum For Early Childhood. Washington, DC:
Teaching Strategies Inc.
Karim, A., & Amel, M. (2014). Efektivitas Sensorik Integrasi Program dalam Keterampilan Motorik
pada Anak-anak Autism. The Mesir Journal: Medis-Human Genetis.
Little, H., & Sweller, N. (2015). Affordances for Risk-Talking and Physical Activity in Australian
Chilhood Education Settings. Early Childhood Edue J, 43, 337-345. DOI 10.1007/s.10643-014-
0667-0.
May-Benson, T. A., & Koomar, J. A. (2010). Systematic review of the research evidence examining the
effectiveness of interventions using a sensory integrative approach for children. Am J Occup

318
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 421

Ther, 64, 403–414.


Mumpuniarti. (2015). Perkembangan Sensory dan Hambatannya. Bandung: PPS PLB.
Smith, R. (2007). Understanding Ayres Sensory Integration. USA: AOTA Continuing Education Article.
Waiman, S., Hartono, G., Sekartini, R., & Endyarni, B. (2011). Sensori Integrasi: Dasar dan Efektivitas
Terapi. Jakarta: Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Anak, Fakultas Kedokteran UI.

319

You might also like