0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views3 pages

06 - Performance - Task - 1 - Prof - Issue Ramos

Uploaded by

sean12albert
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views3 pages

06 - Performance - Task - 1 - Prof - Issue Ramos

Uploaded by

sean12albert
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

IT2222

Performance Task
Justice is Served
Objective:

At the end of the exercise, the students should be able to:

 Evaluate a legal case on information systems and technology based on accuracy and validity.

Requirements:

 Internet Connection
 MS Word

Instructions: (60 points)

 Research the legal cases below involving information systems and technology.
 Choose one (1) legal case and provide a detailed summary.
 Accomplish the guide questions by evaluating the legal case based on the following:
o Validity of the case/complaint
o Accuracy of the result

 Elaborate on the answer in no less than five (5) sentences.

Legal Cases on Information Systems and Technology

Oracle America, Inc. copyright infringement


ISPs vs. California’s Net Neutrality Law
case vs. Google LLC

Departing IT Staff in India locked with non-


Facebook-Cambridge Analytica Data Breach
compete clauses

Chosen Legal Case: ISP vs California net neutrality law

Summary: California's net neutrality law, enacted in 2018, goes back to the existing rules that make it
unlawful for internet service providers to slow down, block, or curry favor with internet access for
payment. California's law has been a hallmark response to the state level regarding federal net
neutrality protections scrapped by the FCC in 2017. The California regulations rank among the toughest
in the United States and are aimed at preserving the open internet for customers. Critics include ISPs
and various trade groups that argue it unfairly restricts them and would stifle innovation and
infrastructure investment in networks. The law sparked a legal battle, but in 2022, a federal court
allowed it to continue to remain in effect, the most significant victory for net neutrality supporters to
date.

06 Performance Task 1 *Property of STI


Page 1 of 3
IT2222

Guide Questions:

1. Was the cause of the case valid in terms of presented proof and argument?
ANS: Supporters of the California net neutrality law introduced the measure as a need to protect consumers and
maintain an open internet. They were concerned that if this kind of law didn't exist, internet providers would start
to slow down access to certain websites, block content, or charge extra for fasterr Internet access.
2. Was the result of the case reasonable based on fairness and logic?

ANS: The result was fair due to the court wanting to protect the clients and avoiding such interest, so i believe
that the court's decision was correct and fair in terms of logic.

3. How would you apply the pointers to avoid legal problems in this case?

ANS: i would simply not be too greedy, and prioritize the needs of the people and do our service as intended to
avoid such malicious activities and to prevent data lost to the wrong hands

06 Performance Task 1 *Property of STI


Page 2 of 3
IT2222

GRADING RUBRIC:
Performance Standards Points
The summary details the events and the conclusion of the case. 15
The student provided a justified explanation. 3 items x 10 points
The student explained the answer in no less than five (5) sentences. 3 items x 5 points
TOTAL 60

06 Performance Task 1 *Property of STI


Page 3 of 3

You might also like