Acute-Chronic Workload Ratio Studies
Uploaded by
pepe grilloAcute-Chronic Workload Ratio Studies
Uploaded by
pepe grilloReference List:
1. Blanch, P and Gabbett, TJ. Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The
acute:chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a player’s risk of subsequent
injury. Br J Sports Med 50: 471–475, 2016.
2. Borg, G. a. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise. [Link] 1982
3. Bourdon, PC, Cardinale, M, Murray, A, Gastin, P, Kellmann, M, Varley, MC, et al.
Monitoring athlete training loads: Consensus statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform , 2017.
4. Brito, J., Hertzog, M., & Nassis, G. P. Do Match-Related Contextual Variables Influence
Training Load in Highly Trained Soccer Players? Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research / National Strength & Conditioning Association, 30(2), 393–9. 2016.
5. Buchheit, M. Applying the acute:chronic workload ratio in elite football: Worth the effort?
Br J Sports Med 51: 1325–1327, 2017.
6. Fanchini, M, Rampinini, E, Riggio, M, Coutts, AJ, Pecci, C, and McCall, A. Despite
association, the acute:chronic work load ratio does not predict non-contact injury in elite
footballers. Sci Med Footb 2: 108–114, 2018.
7. Gabbett, TJ. Debunking the myths about training load, injury and performance: empirical
evidence, hot topics and recommendations for practitioners. Br J Sports Med 54: 58–66,
2020.
8. Gabbett, TJ. The training-injury prevention paradox: Should athletes be training smarter and
harder? Br J Sports Med 50: 273–280, 2016.
9. Gabbett, TJ, Hulin, BT, Blanch, P, and Whiteley, R. High training workloads alone do not
cause sports injuries: How you get there is the real issue. Br J Sports Med 50: 444–445,
2016.
10. Hulin, BT, Gabbett, TJ, Blanch, P, Chapman, P, Bailey, D, and Orchard, JW. Spikes in acute
workload are associated with increased injury risk in elite cricket fast bowlers. Br J Sports
Med 48: 708–712, 2014.
11. Hulin, BT, Gabbett, TJ, Caputi, P, Lawson, DW, and Sampson, JA. Low chronic workload
and the acute:Chronic workload ratio are more predictive of injury than between-match
recovery time: A two-season prospective cohort study in elite rugby league players. Br J
Sports Med 50: 1008–1012, 2016.
12. Hulin, BT, Gabbett, TJ, Caputi, P, Lawson, DW, and Sampson, JA. Low chronic workload
and the acute:Chronic workload ratio are more predictive of injury than between-match
recovery time: A two-season prospective cohort study in elite rugby league players. Br J
Sports Med 50: 1008–1012, 2016.
13. Hulin, BT, Gabbett, TJ, Lawson, DW, Caputi, P, and Sampson, JA. The acute: Chronic
workload ratio predicts injury: High chronic workload may decrease injury risk in elite rugby
league players. Br J Sports Med 50: 231–236, 2016.
14. Impellizzeri, FM, Wookcock, S, McCall, A, Ward, P, and Coutts, A. The acute-chronic
workload ratio-injury figure and its ‘sweet spot’ are flawed. 2019.
15. Impellizzeri, FM, Woodcock, S, Coutts, AJ, Fanchini, M, McCall, A, Vigotsky, AD. Acute
to random chronic workload ratio is ‘as’ associated with injury as acute to actual chronic
workload ratio: time to dismiss ACWR and its components. SportRxiv Preprint DOI
10.31236/[Link]/e8kt4.
16. Lolli, L, Batterham, AM, Hawkins, R, Kelly, DM, Strudwick, AJ, Thorpe, RT, et al. The
acute-to-chronic workload ratio: An inaccurate scaling index for an unnecessary
normalisation process? Br J Sports Med 53: 1510–1512, 2019.
17. Lolli, L, Batterham, AM, Hawkins, R, Kelly, DM, Strudwick, AJ, Thorpe, R, et al.
Mathematical coupling causes spurious correlation within the conventional acute-to-chronic
workload ratio calculations. Br J Sports Med 53: 921–922, 2019.
18. Malone, S, Owen, A, Newton, M, Mendes, B, Collins, KD, and Gabbett, TJ. The
acute:chonic workload ratio in relation to injury risk in professional soccer. J Sci Med Sport
20: 561–565, 2017.
19. McCall, A, Dupont, G, and Ekstrand, J. Internal workload and non-contact injury: A one-
season study of five teams from the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. Br J Sports Med 52:
1517–1522, 2018.
20. McCall, A, Fanchini, M, and Coutts, AJ. The Modern Day Sports Science/Medicine ‘Quest
for the Holy Grail’ Authors: Int J Sports Physiol Perform 1–44, 2017.
21. Mujika, I. The influence of training characteristics and tapering on the adaptation in highly
trained individuals: A review. Int J Sports Med 19: 439–446, 1998.
22. Murray, NB, Gabbett, TJ, Townshend, AD, and Blanch, P. Calculating acute: Chronic
workload ratios using exponentially weighted moving averages provides a more sensitive
indicator of injury likelihood than rolling averages. Br J Sports Med 51: 749–754, 2017.
23. Rodríguez-Marroyo, J. A., & Antoñan, C. Validity of the Session Rating of Perceived
Exertion for Monitoring Exercise Demands in Youth Soccer Players. International Journal
of Sports Physiology & Performance, 10, 404–407. 2015
24. Soligard, T, Schwellnus, M, Alonso, JM, Bahr, R, Clarsen, B, Dijkstra, HP, et al. How much
is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport
and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med 50: 1030–1041, 2016.
25. Suarez-Arrones, L, De Alba, B, Roell, M, Torreno, I, Strütt, S, Freyler, K, et al. Player
Monitoring in Professional Soccer: Spikes in Acute:Chronic Workload are Dissociated from
Injury Occurrence. Front Sport Act Living 2: 75, 2020.
26. Wang, C, Vargas, JT, Stokes, T, Steele, R, and Shrier, I. Analyzing Activity and Injury:
Lessons Learned from the Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio. Sport Med 50: 1243–1254, 2020.
