0% found this document useful (0 votes)
417 views5 pages

Written Arguments (Gautam Maru)

Written Arguments of a case

Uploaded by

Kabir Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
417 views5 pages

Written Arguments (Gautam Maru)

Written Arguments of a case

Uploaded by

Kabir Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1

BEFORE THE HON’BLE MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER


DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AT MUMBAI
COMPLAINT NO. 993 OF 2018

Mr. Praveen Ganpat Parab ) … Complainant

Versus

1. M/s. Shivraj Developers )


2. Mr. Milind Sawant )
3. Mr. Gautam Maru ) … Respondents

MEMORANDUM OF WRITTEN ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF


THE RESPONDENT NO.3

The Respondent No.3 abovenamed submits this Written

Arguments, praying to state as follows:-

1. It is submitted that the Complainant has filed the captioned

Complaint under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

before the Hon’ble Maharashtra State Consumer Redressal

Commission at Mumbai, against the Respondents for the reliefs as

more particularly prayed for in the said complaint.

2. It is submitted that the Respondent No.3 has filed his Written

Statement in the above complaint and the Respondent No.2

hereby repeat, reiterate, adopt and confirm each and every

statement, submissions and contentions made in his Written

Statement as if the same are specifically incorporated and

reproduced herein seriatim, and re-affirmed by him as forming part

of this present Written Arguments.

3. It is submitted that the Respondent No.3 by profession is an

agent/broker in real estate and he is doing his said business from

his residential address. It is submitted that there is absolutely no

privity of contract and/or any such undertaking given by the


2

Respondent No.3 either in favour of the Complainant and/or in

favour of the Respondent No.1/Developer at any point of time.

4. It is submitted that the Complainant was in need and in

search of a good flat and he had approached the Respondent No.3

and made a request to help him in search for a good flat. It is

submitted that the Respondent No.3 introduced the Complainant

to the Respondent No.1/Developer and accordingly, the

Complainant had seen the brochure and decided to book one flat.

It is submitted that the Complainant and the Respondent

No.1/Developer had a detailed discussion in the presence of the

Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 with regard to the consideration of said flat

and the consideration was arrived at a total lump-sum amount of

Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs Only). It is submitted that the

Complainant booked the flat for total consideration of

Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees Forty Lakhs Only) in the project of the

Respondent No.1/Developer. It is submitted that the Respondent

No.3 have not taken any such cheque of Rs.6,00,000/- (Rupees Six

Lakhs Only) and cash of Rs.2,51,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty One

Thousand Only) from the Complainant at any point of time.

5. It is submitted that the Complainant had booked (purchased)

a flat bearing Flat No. 1802 on the 18 th Floor in the project known

as “Kalash Apartment”, Kandivali (West), Mumbai, admeasuring

433.99 sq. ft. super area situated at CTS No. 6A(Pt), 467 (Pt),

468 (Pt) and 533 (Pt) of village Malvani Bhabrekar Nagar,

Kandivali (West), Mumbai: 400067 of Revenue Village in the

registration district and sub-district of Mumbai and Mumbai

Suburban, for total sale consideration of Rs.40,00,000/- (Rupees

Forty Lakhs Only). It is submitted that the Complainant had given

cheque and cash amounting to Rs.8,51,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs

Fifty One Thousand Only) directly to Respondent No.1/Developer


3

and as such, the Complainant can demand for refund of the said

amount as well as compensation from Respondent No.1/Developer

and not from the Respondent No.3 under any circumstances.

6. It is submitted that the Respondent No.3 have not received

the alleged legal notice dated 11/09/2018 from the Complainant’s

advocate for alleged deficiency in service and asking for execution

of agreement for sale. It is submitted that the question of issuing

any such legal notice to the Respondent No.3 does not and cannot

arise at all as there is no privitry of contract and/or any such

undertaking given by the Respondent No.3 in favour of the

Complainant at any point of time. It is submitted that when there is

no privity of contract between the Complainant and this

Respondent No.2, definitely the Respondent No32 is not bound and

liable to pay the alleged claim amount and compensation as

claimed by the Complainant.

7. It is submitted that the principle that when an obligation is

founded upon a contract the assent of a person to be bound is at

the root of the matter and is indispensable as the third party is not

an assenting party he cannot be called upon to bear the burden of

the contract. It is a trite principle of law that a person cannot be

subjected to the burden of a contract to which he is not a party.

The principle is firmly established that contractual liabilities cannot

be imposed upon a party who is not a privy to the contract.

8. It is submitted that there was no privity of contract between

the Complainant and this Respondent No.3 and therefore the

Complainant had no right to sue this Respondent No.3 for the

amount claimed in the said complaint.


4

9. It is well established principle of law that a party who is not

privy to the contract, cannot sue for enforcement of the said

contract and the said principle has been laid down by the

English courts from time to time which has been appreciated by

the Indian Courts.

10. In view of the facts and circumstances and in the interest of

justice, equity and good conscience, it is respectfully and humbly

prayed that this Hon’ble Commission may be pleased to take into

consideration the Written Arguments of this Respondent No.3 and

dismissed the complaint of the Complainant and thus render

justice inter alia on the aforesaid grounds.

Place : Mumbai.

Date : ___/08/2019.

[MKS LEGAL ASSOCIATES]


ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NOS. 2 & 3
5

BEFORE THE HON’BLE MAHARASHTRA

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES


REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

COMPLAINT NO. 993 OF 2018

Mr. Praveen Ganpat Parab


… Complainant
V/s
M/s. Shivraj Developers & Ors.
… Respondents

MEMORANDUM OF WRITEN
ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF
THE RESPONDENT NO.3

Dated this _____ day of August, 2019

MKS LEGAL ASSOCIATES


Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3
Off.: 49/493, MHB Colony, 1st Floor,
Opp. Siddhi Sai Mandir,
Mahavir Nagar, New Link Road,
Kandivali (West),
Mumbai: 400067.
Contact No. +91-9004040633.
Email: [Link]@[Link]
Web: [Link]

You might also like