0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

For Despina

Law article

Uploaded by

thefdestination
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

For Despina

Law article

Uploaded by

thefdestination
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Volume 27, Number 1, September 2017

UK politics
Historical and legislative landmarks
in the development of Britain’s
constitution
Nick Gallop

This article provides more information relating to the article ‘The UK constitution: key historical
documents’ in POLITICS REVIEW Vol. 27, No. 1, pages 12–13.

While most modern democratic states have experienced some kind of constitutional ‘moment’ in their
recent past — a revolution, liberation or declaration of independence from a colonial power, which has
provided an opportunity to redraw or to formalise political arrangements — Britain has not. Instead,
Britain’s constitutional arrangements are said to have evolved over many centuries to reflect the
deepest values and ideals of its people.

Supporters of Britain’s evolutionary constitution maintain that it has been able to adapt by embracing
changing political circumstances without significant social or political upheaval. Critics argue that
‘unplanned evolution’ has left Britain with outdated institutions, unprotected rights and with a
constitution that is unclear and often unhelpful.

A number of important historical documents contain many of the principles that guide Britain’s
evolutionary constitutional arrangements to this day.

Magna Carta (1215)


The Magna Carta was drawn up over 800 years ago to check the power of the English King and to set
out the basic rights of his subjects.

 Clause 39 declares that ‘no free man shall be imprisoned or deprived of his lands except by
judgement of his peers or by the law of the land’, and is still quoted in the British parliament,
— for instance, in 2008 in opposition to government proposals to detain terror suspects for up
to 42 days without charge.

 Clause 40 states ‘to no one shall we sell, delay or deny right or justice’, asserting the right to a
fair trial and providing the basis for the later Habeas Corpus Act which requires legal authority
for lawful arrest.

 Clause 61 contains one of the earliest demands for an assembly and an expression of the
inextricable link between taxation and representation.

Such ideals of liberty, equality, justice and democracy may seem commonplace now, but in the Magna
Carta we find the medieval origins of many of the principles that occupy us to this day.

Bill of Rights (1689)

Hodder & Stoughton © 2017 [Link]/politicsreview


The Bill of Rights further sets out the limits of royal power, asserting:

 The requirement for regular parliaments sustained by free elections.

 The basic rights of citizens, the primacy of the rule of law and the prohibition of cruel and
unusual punishment.

 The supremacy of Parliament in matters of taxation and legislation.

In addition, Article 9 of the Bill of Rights enshrines in law the principle of parliamentary privilege,
meaning that members can speak freely within Parliament without fear of legal action or arrest. In
2011 John Hemming MP, a long-time opponent of super-injunctions, used parliamentary privilege to
reveal the names of celebrities, bankers and a Welsh NHS trust that had all used privacy injunctions to
cover up their indiscretions.

Act of Settlement (1701)


The Act of Settlement remains one of the main constitutional laws governing the succession to the
throne of the United Kingdom (and indeed those of other Commonwealth states). Although sharing a
monarch since 1603, the Act paved the way for the parliamentary union of England and Scotland in
1707. Among other clauses, the Act prohibits Roman Catholics from acceding to the throne, a feature
which has prompted several challenges in recent years:

 In 1999 the Scottish Parliament passed a motion demanding the repeal of the Act of
Settlement, claiming that it violated the European Convention on Human Rights.

 In Westminster, recent private members’ bills — introduced in 2004, 2009 and 2011 — have
all failed to repeal or amend the Act.

Parliament Acts (1911 and 1949)


The Parliament Acts asserted the supremacy of the House of Commons over the unelected House of
Lords by limiting its legislation-blocking power of veto. Legislation can be passed without the approval
of the House of Lords if it meets the terms of the Act. The 1911 Act limited delay of Money Bills to 1
month and the 1949 Act made further amendments to limit the overall delaying power of the Lords
from 2 years to 1.

The amended form of the 1911 Act has been used just four times since 1949. The most recent
occasion was in the passing of the Hunting Act (2004) which prohibited hunting with dogs.

European Communities Act (1972)


Currently a major source of Britain’s constitutional arrangements lies in the form of European Union
law, stemming from the European Communities Act which legislated for the UK’s accession to the EU
(then known as the European Economic Community) in 1972. The Act has been amended numerous
times to incorporate later legislation, such as the Single European Act (1986) and the Treaty of Lisbon
(2007).

Following the referendum to leave the EU, the European Communities Act is set to be repealed or
amended as part of Britain’s EU exit negotiations.

Hodder & Stoughton © 2017 [Link]/politicsreview


Human Rights Act (1998)
The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) enshrined most of the provisions of the European Convention on
Human Rights (ECHR) in UK law. ECHR guarantees such things as the right to life, the right to liberty
and personal security, the right to a fair trial, respect for private and family life and freedom of peaceful
assembly and association. The HRA requires the British government to ensure that legislation is
compatible with the Convention. UK courts hear cases under the Convention but they cannot
automatically overturn legislation that they deem to be incompatible with its provisions: it is up to
parliament to decide whether or not to amend or repeal the offending statute.

House of Lords Acts 1999 and 2014


The House of Lords Act 1999 abolished the right of all but 92 hereditary peers (i.e. those who inherited
their titles) to sit and vote in the upper house. This was intended as the first stage of the reform
process but further reform has stalled. The Lords now comprises mainly life peers, and no political
party has an overall majority.

The House of Lords Reform Act (2014) gave existing peers the right to retire or resign their seats in
the chamber. This act aimed to slow the increase in the number of those eligible to sit and vote in the
House of Lords. It also allowed peers to be removed as a result of serious criminal offences or non-
attendance. Fifty-eight peers had resigned under the terms of the Act by April 2017, and a further four
were removed as a result of non-attendance.

Devolution
In 1999 power was devolved to new institutions in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, following
‘Yes’ votes in referendums in each nation. The new system was one of asymmetric devolution, rather
than following a standardised blueprint. The devolved bodies were granted different powers and
distinctive features. Devolution was to be a process rather than an event, with further powers devolved
since 1999.

 The Scottish Parliament has primary legislative and tax-varying powers. The Parliament,
together with the Scottish Executive, has sole responsibility for policy on issues such as
education, health and local government. Granting such wide-ranging powers to the Scottish
government, while still allowing Scottish MPs at Westminster to vote on laws that no longer
directly affected their constituents, brought the so-called West Lothian Question into sharp
focus. The Scotland Act (2012) gave the Scottish government the power to vary income tax up
or down by 10% as well as devolving further powers to them — for example, the regulation of
controlled drugs. The Act also allowed the Scottish government to borrow up to £2.2 bn each
year.

 The National Assembly for Wales, commonly referred to as the Welsh Assembly, was initially
weaker than the Scottish Parliament. It had secondary legislative and executive powers, but
no primary legislative authority. This meant that it could only ‘fill in the details’ of, and
implement, legislation passed by the Westminster Parliament in policy areas such as
education and health. The Wales Act (2014) was the UK government’s response to the Silk
Commission’s recommendations on further devolution to Wales. Although it was fairly modest
in scope, the Act did transfer control of some smaller taxes to devolved institutions in Wales.

Hodder & Stoughton © 2017 [Link]/politicsreview


The Act also changed the name of the Welsh executive from the Welsh Assembly government
to the Welsh government.

 The Northern Ireland Assembly was granted legislative powers over a similar range of policy
areas to the Scottish Parliament, but was not given tax-raising powers. Special procedures
were established in the Assembly to ensure cross-community support. These included the
establishment of a power-sharing executive.

Key terms
Habeas corpus The principle that citizens should not be arrested or detained unlawfully.

Rule of law The principle that the law is above everyone and everything. Everyone is subject to the
law and equal before it.

Parliamentary privilege Legal immunity for MPs, protecting them against civil or criminal prosecution
for activities undertaken in the course of their legislative duties.

Questions
1 Explain the term ‘evolutionary constitution’.

2 Review the information on the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights. Explain how and why
historical documents such as these two influence the UK’s constitutional arrangements.

3 Outline two reasons why it has proved impossible to complete further stages of Lords Reform.

4 Explain why, even after devolution, it would still not be accurate to describe the UK as
operating under a federal system. Provide one reason why it might be accurate to use this term.

5 Research up to five other pieces of rights-based legislation enacted in the last two decades,
such as the Freedom of Information Act and the Data Protection Act. Make a list of them and explain
their main points, strengths and weaknesses.

Nick Gallop is headmaster of Stamford School, Lincolnshire

This resource is part of POLITICS REVIEW, a magazine written for A-level students by subject experts.
To subscribe to the full magazine go to: [Link]

Hodder & Stoughton © 2017 [Link]/politicsreview

You might also like