Humility Marimon-Rrl
Humility Marimon-Rrl
ABSTRACT:
study and customization of
a gender-balanced
technologies
content to meet on thethe way
needs of
sample
students oflearn
302 UK
and students
how
each
Mature
rated students
courseteach transitioning
satisfaction,
institutions
student. This and evolve.
into their
completed
Recent theadvancement
first
technological year of higher
General
redefines
education
Attitudes the
face
towards teacher’s
many AI Scalerole by
advancements
freeing them andeveryday
from the
APA Citation of the PDF used: Assessing student-perceived impact difficulties
(GAAIS),
of using
increasing that affect
comfortableness
speed theirwith
of adopting
artificial intelligence tools: Construction of tasks
AI to focus
motivation,
educational participation
applications, and
new
on technologies
more complex in higher
skills such
a synthetic index of application in higher success.
and course
education Their feelings
satisfaction
are explored of
if AI as
being
inand
education fostering
disconnected
educational critical fromthinking
applicationstheir peers
were
order
creativityto predict the future
and from
adopted.
nature their
higherinstitutions
of Although studentsare
education in a
ABSTRACT:
among
were, onthe key
average, barriers to the
moderately
world
Today, where
a dizzying artificial
process of
Author/Year (APA successful
comfortable
intelligence completion
iswith AI of their
Theme/Subheading/Variable
Reference)
Insights/Findings
convergence
courses.
educational ofpart
Encouraging
of the
values
applications, andfabric
(ABSTRACT)
online
of our universities.
knowledge is takingWe place.
student
course
pinpoint engagement
satisfaction
some amongin
dropped
challenges
Artificial
mature
response Intelligence
students
to their to (AI) isfor
establish
hypothetical
institutions
undoubtedly ofplaying
higher aeducation
Definition of AI Popenici social
adoption.
and connection
student AI learning withinleading
applications their
the that
and Kerr (2017) role. Thissummative
instructors
assigned is and
reflected
peers in
can
grades or
adoption
multiple of
fields these technologies
of human
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. reduce
that
for their
offered
teaching, isolation
wellbeing
learning, and
support
student
(2017). Exploring the activity,
enhance
gave riseeven
their
to the those
‘sense
highestnot
of levels
support,
“thought and administration
of” orStudents
foreseen, such
impact of belonging’.
of
and exploreDuring
discomfort. furtherthe were
directions
artificial intelligence on as logistics,
academic
more yearmanufacturing,
2020/2021,
comfortable with career the
the
for research.
automotive industry, finance,
teaching and learning in Lifelong
support, Learning
formative Centre
course (LLC)
Enhancement of AI (León
(Rodway & Viña, 2017).
& Schepman, medicine,
at the University
support, andetc.administrative
Very important
of Leeds in
León,
2023) G. D. L. C., & Viña, S. topics
the such
UK, decided
support. as machine
Positivetoand pilot an
Negative
M. (2017).P.,La&inteligencia
Rodway, learning,
Schepman, online chat
AI attitudes pattern
platform
predicted recognition,
‘Differ’
the
artificial
A. (2023). The impact of case-based
including
satisfaction reasoning,
a chatbot
difference, ‘Bo’among
after it
with
en la educación
adopting superior. had
AI educational others,
seen
mediation are aviaincorporated
decline in the every
comfortableness use
Oportunidades
technologies onyprojected day of into
programme
with solutions.
applications. Facebook
We
Risk of AI amenazas.
course satisfaction in groups.
recommend To promote
that Higher student
university students. engagement
Education Institutions and monitor. exercise
Computers caution before making major
and Education: Artificial This paper explored
investments the
in AI educational
Intelligence relationship
applications.between chatbots
Effective usage of AI Abbas et al., 2022; Baskara, and flipped learning in an
2023; ew et al., 2022). educational setting. It also
Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., identifies the benefits and
Atwell, E., Bowman, ., drawbacks of using chatbots in
Pickard, T., a flipped learning context and
& Walker, A. (2022). Online the ethical and privacy
chat and chatbots to concerns related to their use
Artificial intelligence in Ouyang and Jiao’s (2021) The first paradigm positions AI
education, the three paradigms Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. as an assistant guiding
(2021). Artificial learning, the second as a tool
intelligence in supporting active student
education: The three collaboration, and the third
paradigms. Computers and empowers
Education: Artificial students to lead their learning.
Intelligence, 2, 100020. ABSTRACT:
https:// sciencedirect.com
doi.org/10.1016/ Artificial intelligence in
j.caeai.2021.100020 education: The three
paradigms
Fan Ouyang, Pengcheng Jiao
Computers and Education:
Artificial Intelligence 2,
100020, 2021
With the development of
computing and information
processing techniques,
artificial intelligence (AI) has
been extensively applied in
education. Artificial
intelligence in education (AIEd)
opens new opportunities,
potentials, and challenges in
educational practices. In its
short history, AIEd has been
undergoing several
paradigmatic shifts, which are
characterized into three
paradigms in this position
paper: AI-directed, learner-as-
recipient, AI-supported,
learner-as-collaborator, and AI-
empowered, learner-as-leader.
In three paradigms, AI
techniques are used to address
SUMMARIZE/
PARAPHRASE
The text highlights the rapid
convergence of values
The paper examines theandrise of
knowledge driven by(AI)
artificial intelligence artificial
in higher
intelligence (AI), which
education, focusing is impact
on its
increasingly influencing
on student learning and various
fields, including logistics,
institutional teaching methods. It
manufacturing,
discusses recentautomotive,
technological
finance, and medicine.
advancements and the Itrapid
emphasizes that AI technologies,
such as machine learning, pattern
recognition, and case-based
reasoning, are being integrated
into solutions across diverse
sectors on a daily basis.
The study by Paul Rodway and
Astrid Schepman investigates the
impact of adopting artificial
intelligence (AI) educational
technologies on university
students' course satisfaction.
Mature students entering higher
education often struggle with
feelings of disconnection from
peers and institutions, which can
hinder their motivation and
success. To address this, the
Lifelong Learning Centre (LLC) at
The paper by Fan Ouyang and
Pengcheng Jiao discusses the
evolution of artificial intelligence
in education (AIEd) and identifies
three paradigms of its
application.
1. AI-Directed, Learner-as-
Recipient: In this paradigm, AI
serves to direct cognitive
learning, where learners
passively receive knowledge and
support.
2. AI-Supported, Learner-as-
Collaborator: Here, AI aids
learning while students actively
engage and collaborate with the
technology.
3. AI-Empowered, Learner-as-
Leader: This paradigm
emphasizes learner agency,
where students take control of
their learning process, informing
AI systems to adapt to their
needs.
Author/Year (APA
Theme/Subheading/Variable Insights/Findings (ABSTRACT)
Reference)
SUMMARIZE/
PARAPHRASE