Protopic
Protopic
Pr
Protopic®
tacrolimus ointment
1 INDICATIONS
Acute Treatment
Protopic, both 0.03% and 0.1% for adults and only 0.03% for children aged 2 to 15 years is
indicated as a second-line therapy for short and long-term intermittent treatment of moderate to
severe atopic dermatitis in non-immunocompromised patients, in whom the use of conventional
therapies are deemed inadvisable because of potential risks, or who are not adequately
responsive to or intolerant of conventional therapies.
Maintenance Therapy
Protopic is also indicated for maintenance therapy to prevent flares and prolong flare-free intervals
in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis experiencing a high frequency of flares (i.e.,
occurring 5 or more times per year) who have had an initial response (i.e., lesions cleared, almost
cleared or mildly affected) with up to 6 weeks of treatment with twice daily Protopic.
For additional safety information, please refer to the WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Section.
1.1 Pediatrics
Pediatrics (2 to 15 years): Protopic, 0.03% strength only, is indicated for use in children aged 2
to 15 years. The safety and efficacy of Protopic have not been established in pediatric patients
below 2 years of age, and its use in this age group is not recommended.
Geriatrics (≥ 65 years of age): In Phase 3 studies, 405 patients ≥ 65 years old received Protopic.
The adverse event profile for these patients was consistent with that for other adult patients.
2 CONTRAINDICATIONS
Adults (age 16 and over): Protopic (tacrolimus ointment) 0.03% and 0.1%.
Pediatrics (2-15 years of age): Protopic (tacrolimus ointment) 0.03% only.
3.3 Administration
Each affected region of the skin should be treated with Protopic until lesions are cleared, almost
cleared or mildly affected. Thereafter, patients who have a high frequency of flares (≥ 5 times per
year) are considered suitable for maintenance treatment. At the first signs of recurrence (flares)
of the disease symptoms, twice daily treatment should be re-initiated.
The use of Protopic under occlusion has not been studied; therefore occlusive dressings are not
recommended.
Acute Treatment
Protopic 0.03% and 0.1% should be applied topically morning and evening twice daily as a thin
layer to affected areas of skin, including the face, neck and eyelids. If no improvement occurs
after 6 weeks of therapy or in case of disease exacerbation, Protopic therapy should be
discontinued and patients should consult their physicians.
Maintenance Therapy
Patients who have a high frequency of flares (≥ 5 times per year) and are responding to up to 6
weeks of acute treatment with tacrolimus ointment twice daily are suitable for maintenance
therapy. Protopic 0.03% or 0.1% should be applied once daily twice a week. There should be 2
to 3 days between applications (e.g., Monday and Thursday). Protopic should be applied as a
thin layer to the areas of the skin normally affected by atopic dermatitis (including the face, neck
and eyelids).
If signs of flares reoccur, twice daily treatment should be reinitiated (see Acute Treatment).
After 12 months, a review of the patient`s condition should be conducted by the physician and a
decision taken whether to continue maintenance therapy in the absence of safety data for
maintenance therapy beyond 12 months. In children, this review should include suspension of
treatment to assess the need to continue this regimen and to evaluate the course of the disease.
If you forget to use Protopic as directed, apply it as soon as possible, then go back to your regular
schedule.
Protopic is not for oral use. Oral ingestion of Protopic may lead to adverse effects associated
with systemic administration of tacrolimus. If oral ingestion occurs, medical advice should be
sought.
For management of a suspected drug overdose, contact your regional poison control centre.
Protopic is a white to slightly yellowish ointment for topical use. Each gram of Protopic contains
(w/w) either 0.03% or 0.1% of tacrolimus.
Protopic 0.03% and 0.1% (w/w) are available in laminate tubes of 30, 60 and 100 grams.
General
Prolonged systemic exposure to calcineurin inhibitors has been associated with an increased risk
of infections, lymphomas and skin malignancies. These risks are associated with the intensity
and duration of immunosuppression. Therefore, Protopic should not be used in
immunocompromised adults and children.
While a causal relationship has not been established, cases of skin malignancy and lymphoma
have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including Protopic. The
use of Protopic should be avoided on pre-malignant and malignant skin conditions. Some
malignant skin conditions, such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), may mimic atopic
dermatitis.
If signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis do not improve within 6 weeks of twice daily treatment,
Protopic treatment should be discontinued and patients should be re-examined by their healthcare
provider and their diagnosis be confirmed.
Patients should minimize or avoid natural or artificial sunlight exposure during the course of
treatment, even while Protopic is not on the skin. It is not known whether Protopic interferes with
skin response to ultraviolet damage.
The safety of Protopic ointment has not been established beyond one year of non-continuous
use.
Immune
In clinical studies, cases of lymphadenopathy were reported and were usually related to infections
and noted to resolve upon appropriate antibiotic therapy. The majority of these cases had either
a clear etiology or were known to resolve. Transplant patients receiving immunosuppressive
regimens (e.g. systemic tacrolimus) are at increased risk for developing lymphoma; therefore,
patients who receive Protopic and who develop lymphadenopathy should have the etiology of
their lymphadenopathy investigated. In the absence of a clear etiology for the lymphadenopathy
or in the presence of acute infectious mononucleosis, discontinuation of Protopic should be
considered. Patients who develop lymphadenopathy should be monitored to ensure that the
lymphadenopathy resolves.
Immunocompromised Patients
The safety and efficacy of Protopic in immunocompromised patients have not been studied.
Renal Insufficiency
Post-marketing cases of acute renal failure have been reported in patients treated with Protopic.
Systemic absorption is more likely to occur in patients with epidermal barrier defects especially
when Protopic is applied to large body surface areas. Caution should also be exercised in patients
predisposed to renal impairment.
Sexual Health
Reproduction
Reproductive toxicology studies were not performed with tacrolimus ointment. In studies of oral
tacrolimus no impairment of fertility was seen in male and female rats. Tacrolimus, given orally
at 1.0 mg/kg to male and female rats, prior to and during mating, as well as to dams during
gestation and lactation, was associated with embryolethality and with adverse effects on female
reproduction. Effects on female reproductive function (parturition) and embryolethal effects were
indicated by a higher rate of pre-implantation loss and increased numbers of undelivered and
nonviable pups. When given at 3.2 mg/kg, tacrolimus was associated with maternal and paternal
toxicity as well as reproductive toxicity including marked adverse effects on estrus cycles,
parturition, pup viability, and pup malformations.
Skin
The use of Protopic may cause local symptoms of short duration, such as skin burning (burning
sensation, stinging, soreness) or pruritus. Localized symptoms are most common during the first
few days of Protopic application and typically resolve as the lesions of atopic dermatitis heal.
Protopic has not been studied for its efficacy and safety in the treatment of clinically infected
atopic dermatitis. Patients with atopic dermatitis are predisposed to superficial skin infections.
Treatment with Protopic may be associated with an increased risk of varicella zoster virus
infection (chickenpox or shingles), herpes simplex virus infection, or eczema herpeticum. In the
presence of infections, the balance of risks and benefits associated with Protopic use should be
evaluated.
The use of tacrolimus ointment is not recommended in patients with a skin barrier defect such
as Netherton's syndrome, lamellar ichthyosis, generalized erythroderma or cutaneous Graft
Versus Host Disease. These skin conditions may increase systemic absorption of tacrolimus.
Post-marketing cases of increased tacrolimus blood level have been reported in these
conditions. Oral use of tacrolimus is also not recommended to treat these skin conditions. The
safety of Protopic has not been established in patients with generalized erythroderma.
There are no studies on the use of Protopic in pregnant women. Reproduction studies were
carried out with systemically administered tacrolimus in rats and rabbits. Adverse effects on the
fetus were observed mainly at oral dose levels that were toxic to dams. Tacrolimus at oral doses
of 0.32 and 1.0 mg/kg during organogenesis in rabbits was associated with maternal toxicity as
well as an increase in incidence of abortions. At the higher dose only, an increased incidence of
malformations and developmental variations was also seen. Tacrolimus, at oral doses of 3.2
mg/kg during organogenesis in rats, was associated with maternal toxicity and caused an
increase in late resorptions, decreased numbers of live births, and decreased pup weight and
viability. Tacrolimus, given orally at 1.0 and 3.2 mg/kg to pregnant rats after organogenesis and
during lactation, was associated with reduced pup weights. No reduction in male or female fertility
was evident.
6.1.2 Breast-feeding
6.1.3 Pediatrics
Protopic 0.03% may be used in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.
The safety and efficacy of Protopic have not been established in pediatric patients below 2
years of age, and its use in this age group is not recommended.
Four hundred and five (405) patients ≥ 65 years old received Protopic in Phase 3 studies. The
adverse event profile for these patients was consistent with that for other adult patients.
7 ADVERSE REACTIONS
In normal volunteer dermal safety studies, Protopic was neither phototoxic, nor photoallergenic,
nor a contact sensitizer.
Overall, 14,828 patients treated with Protopic were evaluated in phase 3 studies and the
cumulative topical exposure from the market experience is estimated to be 24 million patient
years.
Spontaneous cases of T cell lymphomas, other types of lymphoma, and skin cancers have been
reported in patients using tacrolimus ointment. However, overall experience from clinical trials,
data from large post-authorization safety studies and post-marketing surveillance has failed to
establish a causal relationship between topical use of tacrolimus and malignancies.
Because clinical trials are conducted under very specific conditions, the adverse reaction rates
observed in the clinical trials may not reflect the rates observed in practice and should not be
compared to the rates in the clinical trials of another drug. Adverse reaction information from
clinical trials is useful for identifying drug-related adverse events and for approximating rates.
Treatment
Other adverse events reported in this clinical trial included flu-like symptoms, folliculitis,
headache, allergic reaction, skin erythema, maculopapular rash, nausea, diarrhea and
paresthesia. None of these adverse events showed a significant difference in incidence among
the treatment groups. Herpes simplex, a less common adverse reaction (<5%), was more frequent
in patients treated with Protopic compared to 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate group.
As in the adult study, skin burning and pruritus comprised the most common application site
adverse events and tended to occur only during the first few days of treatment in this pediatric
comparator study. In this study population, 21.1% of patients in the 1% hydrocortisone acetate
group, 38.1% of patients in the 0.03% Protopic group, and 36.6% of patients in the 0.1% Protopic
group experienced an application site adverse event. There was a marked decrease in the
The incidence of other adverse events that may be associated with treatment was similar among
all study groups and included flu-like symptoms, fever, abdominal pain, increased cough, rhinitis,
diarrhea and headache.
Table 1: Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (≥3% in Any Treatment Group)
COSTART Term Adult Pediatric
Vehicle Tacrolimus Tacrolimus Vehicle Tacrolimus
(N=212) 0.03% 0.1% (N=116) 0.03%
% (N=210) (N=209) % (N=118)
% % %
Skin burning* 26 46 58 29 43
Pruritus* 37 46 46 27 41
Flu-like symptoms* 19 23 31 25 28
Allergic reaction 8 12 6 8 4
Skin erythema 20 25 28 13 12
Headache* 11 20 19 8 5
Skin infection 11 12 5 14 10
Fever 4 4 1 13 21
Infection 1 1 2 9 7
Cough increased 2 1 1 14 18
Asthma 4 6 4 6 6
Herpes simplex 4 4 4 2 0
Pharyngitis 3 3 4 11 6
Accidental injury 4 3 6 3 6
Pustular rash 2 3 4 3 2
Folliculitis* 1 6 4 0 2
Rhinitis 4 3 2 2 6
Otitis media 4 0 1 6 12
Sinusitis* 1 4 2 8 3
Diarrhea 3 3 4 2 5
Urticaria 3 3 6 1 1
Bronchitis 0 2 2 3 3
Vomiting 0 1 1 7 6
Maculopapular rash 2 2 2 3 0
Rash* 1 5 2 4 2
Abdominal pain 3 1 1 2 3
Fungal dermatitis 0 2 1 3 0
Gastroenteritis 1 2 2 3 0
Alcohol intolerance* 0 3 7 0 0
Acne* 2 4 7 1 0
Skin disorder 2 2 1 1 4
Vesiculobullous rash* 3 3 2 0 4
Maintenance
In the two Phase 3, multi-centre, double-blind, vehicle-controlled 12-month studies the nature and
incidence of adverse events were consistent with the established safety profile of Protopic.
Table 2 describes the most frequently reported adverse events (≥3%) that occurred in the Phase
3 study in adults.
Table 3 describes the most frequently reported adverse events (≥3%) that occurred in the
Phase 3 study in pediatrics.
The incidence of herpes zoster (chickenpox) occurred less frequently in patients treated with
vehicle (0 cases) and Protopic 0.1% (1 case) than in patients treated with Protopic 0.03% (4
cases).
The following adverse reactions have been reported from post-marketing surveillance for Protopic
ointment 0.1% and 0.03%. Since these events are reported voluntarily from a population of
uncertain size it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal
relationship to drug exposure.
Neoplasms: lymphomas, skin neoplasms (basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and
melanoma)
Infections: bullous impetigo, osteomyelitis, septicemia, local skin infection regardless of specific
etiology
Renal: Acute renal failure in patients with or without Nertherton’s syndrome, renal impairment
8 DRUG INTERACTIONS
8.1 Overview
Formal topical drug interaction studies with Protopic have not been conducted. Based on its
minimal extent of absorption, interactions of Protopic with systemically administered drugs cannot
be ruled out, but are unlikely to occur.
Patients should minimize or avoid exposure to natural or artificial sunlight (tanning beds or UVA/B
treatment) while using Protopic.
The exact mechanism of action of tacrolimus in atopic dermatitis is not known. However, It has
been demonstrated that tacrolimus inhibits T-lymphocyte activation by first binding, an
intracellular protein, FKBP-12. A complex of tacrolimus-FKBP-12, calcium, calmodulin, and
calcineurin is then formed and the phosphatase activity of calcineurin is inhibited. This effect has
been shown to prevent the dephosphorylation and translocation of nuclear factor of activated T-
cells (NF-AT), a nuclear component thought to initiate gene transcription for the formation of
lymphokines (such as interleukin-2, gamma interferon). Tacrolimus also inhibits the transcription
for genes which encode for IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, GM-CSF, and TNF-α, all of which are involved in the
early stages of T-cell activation and have been postulated to play significant roles in the
pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Additionally, tacrolimus has been shown to inhibit the release
of pre-formed mediators from skin mast cells and basophils, and to downregulate the expression
of FcεRI on Langerhans cells.
Application of tacrolimus ointment (0.03% - 0.3%) did not affect cutaneous pigmentation in
micropigs. Tacrolimus ointment does not affect collagen synthesis, reduce skin thickness or
cause skin atrophy in humans.
In pharmacodynamic Study FG-06-17, the effects of 0.1% and 0.3% Protopic, vehicle, and 0.1%
betamethasone valerate ointment (a known atrophogenic corticosteroid) on collagen synthesis
were evaluated in unaffected skin of atopic dermatitis patients and in healthy volunteers.
Exposure to 0.1% or 0.3% Protopic under occlusion over 7 days did not result in reduced collagen
synthesis or skin thickness relative to vehicle control, demonstrating that Protopic does not
produce skin atrophy. In contrast, similar exposure to the steroid ointment significantly reduced
both parameters relative to Protopic and vehicle.
Protopic at concentrations ranging from 0.03% - 0.3% was evaluated in six patch test studies.
The studies compared Protopic with vehicle, other marketed formulations used to treat
inflammatory dermatoses (calcipotriene, hydrocortisone, and betamethasone valerate ointments)
or with another control substance (sodium lauryl sulfate). Ointment (0.12 g) was applied to 3 cm2
areas of intact skin on the back of each healthy volunteer. Irritation was graded by the investigator
using a 5-point scale (0=No sign of irritation to 4=erythema with edema and blistering). Taken
collectively, these studies demonstrated that Protopic, relative to these other products, was not
inherently irritating, sensitizing, phototoxic, nor photoallergenic when applied as ointment to intact
skin.
Tacrolimus blood concentrations following the topical application of Protopic were determined for
both healthy volunteers and patients in 13 clinical studies.
A pharmacokinetic study in 21 adult patients with atopic dermatitis demonstrated that tacrolimus
is absorbed into the systemic circulation following single or repeated application of tacrolimus
ointment in 0.1% concentration. Peak tacrolimus blood concentrations ranged from undetectable
to 20 ng/mL. A blood concentration of 20 ng/mL was detected in two patients in both the single
dosing group and the multiple dosing group, both of whom had severe disease and were applying
ointment to almost the entire body. These concentrations were transient and decreased to 2.9
ng/mL (72 hour) and 3.9 ng/mL (day 7), respectively. Eight pediatric patients (5 to 12 years of
age), with moderate atopic dermatitis, received 0.3% tacrolimus ointment. Peak tacrolimus blood
concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 3.28 ng/mL. Similarly to the adult results, these peak
concentrations were transient. There was no systemic accumulation of tacrolimus in both adult
and pediatric patients.
Although a direct determination of bioavailability was not performed, a comparison of area under
the curve (AUC) data following topical administration to historical AUC data after oral and
intravenous administration indicates that the bioavailability of tacrolimus ointment applied to
damaged skin (atopic dermatitis) relative to oral administration is <3%; the absolute bioavailability
is <0.5%. This limited systemic exposure diminished with repeated application, concurrent with
improvement of skin condition. Despite prolonged and repeated topical application for periods of
up to 1 year, there is no evidence based on blood concentrations that tacrolimus accumulates
systemically.
In pharmacokinetic Study 94-0-008 in adult and pediatric atopic dermatitis patients, tacrolimus
was absorbed into the systemic circulation following single or repeated application for 8 days of
0.3% Protopic to affected skin. (Note: this concentration is 3 to 10 times that of the commercial
product). Although a direct determination of bioavailability has not been made for Protopic, a
comparison of AUC0-24 data from this study with historical data after oral and intravenous
administration of Prograf® (tacrolimus capsules, tacrolimus injection) to healthy volunteers
indicated a relative bioavailability of <3% and an absolute bioavailability of <0.5%. This limited
systemic exposure diminished with repeated application, concurrent with improvement of skin
condition. There was no evidence of systemic accumulation. One adult patient in this study had
a blood concentration ≥5 ng/mL (9.42 ng/mL at 6 hours postapplication on Day 1); the tacrolimus
blood concentration for this patient decreased over time and was 0.45 ng/mL on Day 11 (3 days
after last ointment application). The highest individual tacrolimus blood concentration in a
pediatric patient was 3.28 ng/mL 4 hours postapplication on Day 1; the blood concentration for
this patient was 0.54 ng/mL at 8 hours postapplication on Day 1.
In the pharmacokinetic/safety Study FJ-106 and the 10 clinical studies in which blood samples
were collected, tacrolimus blood concentrations above 0.5 ng/mL were isolated events and
tended to decline with repeated application, concurrent with the clinical improvement of atopic
dermatitis lesions. In these 11 studies, the highest individual tacrolimus blood concentration was
≥5 ng/mL in less than 2% (29/1681) of patients. For these few patients, it is important to note that
these concentrations following topical application were isolated values representing the highest
individual concentration. In contrast, the targeted range (5-20 ng/mL) in transplant patients
represents recommended trough concentrations to be maintained for the patient’s lifetime.
Not applicable.
None required.
12 PHARMACEUTICAL INFORMATION
Drug Substance
Structural formula:
H
HO
H3CO
H H CH3
H
H3C O
H
HO H
O
N H
H O H2O
O O CH3
CH3
H3C OH
O H
H
H H H
H3CO OCH3
Acute Treatment
Maintenance Therapy
Race (%)
Dosage, route of Number of Black/
Mean age
Study # Trial design administration and Subjects Gender Caucasian/
(Range)
duration (N) Oriental/
Other
FG-506-06-40 Randomized, 0.1% tacrolimus 80 31.0 ± 11.8 M = 45% 1.3/
(Adult) double-blind, ointment, topical; (17-65) F= 55% 92.5/
multi-centre, Acute Treatment: up 5.0/
vehicle to 6 weeks; 1.3
controlled. Maintenance
Treatment: 12
months
Vehicle, topical; 73 31.8 ± 11.1 M = 39.7% 1.4/
Acute Treatment: up (17-74) F= 60.3% 98.6/
to 6 weeks; 0.0/
Maintenance 0.0
Treatment: 12
months
Race (%)
Dosage, route of Number of Black/
Mean age
Study # Trial design administration and Subjects Gender Caucasian/
(Range)
duration (N) Oriental/
Other
FG-506-06-41 Randomized, 0.03% tacrolimus 78 6.8 ± 3.9 M= 47.4% 5.1/
(Pediatric) double-blind, ointment, topical; (2-15) F= 52.6 83.3/
multi-centre, Acute Treatment: up 9.0/
vehicle to 6 weeks 2.6
controlled. Maintenance
Treatment: 12
months
Vehicle, topical; 75 6.9 ± 4.6 M= 46.7 8.0/
Acute Treatment: up (2-15) F= 53.3 78.7/
to 6 weeks 5.3/
Maintenance 8.0
Treatment: 12
months
Acute Treatment
In the adult study, FG-506-06-018, 384 patients were treated with Protopic. The primary endpoint
of evaluation, the mEASI, a composite score including the physician assessment of individual
signs and symptoms, affected body surface area (BSA) and the patients’ assessment of itch,
demonstrated a substantial improvement during the treatment period for all 3 treatment groups.
No significant difference in the improvement of symptoms was observed in patients treated with
either 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate or 0.1% Protopic, upon completion of the three-week study
duration.
In the pediatric study, FG-506-06-019, 367 patients between the ages of 2-16 were treated with
Protopic. As in the adult study, mEASI was the primary endpoint evaluated. Patients treated with
Protopic (0.03% and 0.1%) demonstrated a two-fold decrease in mEASI compared to patients
treated with 1% hydrocortisone acetate, which proved to be statistically significant. Approximately
50% more patients in the Protopic group experienced more than a moderate improvement in the
severity of their eczema and completed the study as compared to patients in the hydrocortisone
group. A greater improvement was also observed for the Protopic treatment groups compared to
the hydrocortisone acetate group for all symptoms experienced by the patients excluding
lichenification, which was similar for all treatment groups upon completion of this 3-week study.
In these studies, patients applied either Protopic 0.03%, Protopic 0.1% or vehicle ointment twice
daily to 10% - 100% of their BSA for up to 12 weeks.
In all three studies, a significantly greater (p <0.001) percentage of patients achieved success (>
90% improvement) based on the Physician’s Global Evaluation of clinical response (the pre-
defined primary efficacy end point) in both Protopic treatment groups compared to the vehicle
treatment group. Overall, Protopic 0.1% was more effective than Protopic 0.03% in adult patients
(97-0-035, 97-0-036). This difference was particularly evident in patients with severe disease at
baseline, patients with extensive BSA involvement, and black patients. However, all the analyses
demonstrated that there was no significant difference in efficacy between the 0.1% and 0.03%
Protopic in pediatric patients (97-0-037). Improvement was usually observed within the first week
of therapy.
As a result of the significant impact atopic dermatitis can have on a patient’s life, hindering social
interaction, lowering self-esteem, leading to work/school absenteeism, negatively affecting family
interactions, and producing sleep disturbances and emotional distress, a quality of life
questionnaire was completed by patients/ parents/guardians in five pivotal studies. The pediatric
patients in these studies treated with 0.03% or 0.1% Protopic had statistically significant
improvement in their quality of life compared with vehicle treated patients or those treated with
hydrocortisone acetate. In adults, statistically significant improvements in the quality of life were
observed in patients treated with 0.1% Protopic compared with those treated with the 0.03%
Protopic concentration.
Table 6: Physician’s Global Evaluation at the End of Treatment- Pediatric Study 97-0-037
Primary Endpoints Treatment Group
Vehicle, n=105 Protopic 0.03%, n= Protopic 0.1%,
112 n=113
Cleared 4 (3.8%) 14 (12.5%) 13 (11.5%)
Excellent Improvement 4 (3.8%) 28 (25.0%) 35 (31.0%)
Marked Improvement 10 (9.5%) 23 (20.5%) 19 (16.8%)
Moderate Improvement 13 (12.4%) 20 (17.9%) 25 (22.1%)
Slight Improvement 19 (18.1%) 15 (13.4%) 12 (10.6%)
No Improvement 27 (25.7%) 10 (8.9%) 7 (6.2%)
Worse 28 (26.7%) 2 (1.8%) 2 (1.8%)
Maintenance Therapy
Pivotal Phase 3 Atopic Dermatitis Trials FG-506-06-40 (Adult) and FG-506-06-41 (Pediatric)
The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in maintenance treatment of moderate to severe
atopic dermatitis was assessed in 306 patients in two Phase 3 multicentre clinical trials of similar
design, one in adult patients (≥ 16 years) and one in pediatric patients (2–15 years). In both
studies, patients with active disease entered an open-label period (OLP) during which their
affected lesions were treated with tacrolimus ointment twice daily for up to 6 weeks until
improvement had reached a predefined score (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] ≤ 2, i.e.,
clear, almost clear or mild disease). If patients did not respond to treatment, they were
discontinued from the studies. Thereafter, patients entered a double-blind disease control period
(DCP) for up to 12 months. Patients were randomised to receive either tacrolimus ointment (0.1%
adults; 0.03% children) or vehicle, once a day twice weekly on Mondays and Thursdays.
During the DCP, if a disease exacerbation occurred, patients were treated with open-label
tacrolimus ointment twice daily for up to 6 weeks until the IGA score returned to ≤ 2. Those
patients who did not achieve an IGA score of ≤ 2 were withdrawn from the study. The patients
that achieved an IGA score of ≤ 2 returned to double-blind treatment in the DCP.
The primary endpoint in both studies was the number of disease exacerbations (DE) requiring a
“substantial therapeutic intervention” during the DCP, defined as an exacerbation with an IGA of
3–5 (i.e., moderate, severe and very severe disease) on the first day of the flare, and requiring
more than 7 days of twice daily treatment. Both studies showed significant benefit with twice
weekly treatment with tacrolimus ointment with regard to the primary endpoint over a period of 12
months (Table 7). The median number of disease exacerbations requiring a substantial
intervention (adjusted for length of time at risk) was 1.0 in the tacrolimus arm versus 5.3 in the
vehicle arm (p < 0.001) in the adult study and 1.0 in the tacrolimus arm versus 2.9 in the vehicle
arm (p < 0.001) in the pediatric study.
Table 8. Frequency of Disease Exacerbations (DE): Studies FG-506-06-40 (Adult) and FG-506-06-
41 (Pediatric)
Frequency of Number of Patients (%)
Disease Adult, ≥ 16 years Pediatric, 2-15 years
Exacerbations Tacrolimus 0.1% Vehicle Tacrolimus Vehicle
(DE)* N = 80 N = 73 0.03% N = 75
N = 78
0 39 (48.8) 13 (17.8) 36 (46.2) 16 (21.3)
1 (0.5 - <1.5) 9 (11.3) 7 (9.6) 8 (10.3) 10 (13.3)
2 (1.5 - <2.5) 10 (12.5) 5 (6.8) 10 (12.8) 11 (14.7)
3 (2.5 - <3.5) 5 (6.3) 3 (4.1) 10 (12.8) 8 (10.7)
In the adult study, the median time to the first disease exacerbation requiring a substantial
intervention was 142 days in the tacrolimus arm versus 15 days in the vehicle arm (p < 0.001).
The mean percentage of days of disease exacerbation treatment was 16.1% (±23.6%) in the
tacrolimus arm versus 39.0% (±27.8%) in the vehicle arm (p < 0.001).
In the pediatric study, the median time to the first disease exacerbation requiring a substantial
intervention was 217 days in the tacrolimus arm versus 36 days in the vehicle arm (p < 0.001).
The mean percentage of days of disease exacerbation treatment was 16.9% (±22.1%) in the
tacrolimus arm versus 29.9% (±26.8%) in the vehicle arm (p < 0.001).
The application of tacrolimus ointment once daily, twice per week as a maintenance treatment did
not lead to an increase in the total average per day tacrolimus ointment use compared with vehicle
group when both maintenance and disease exacerbation treatment use were combine.
The JOELLE study was based on existing data in Denmark, Sweden (national databases), the
Netherlands (PHARMO database network) and the United Kingdom (Clinical Practice Research
Datalink (CPRD)), combining datasets within each country to gain information about
demography, dispensing or prescription of medications, and diagnoses. The primary objective
was to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for skin cancer as malignant melanoma (MM)
and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and for any type of lymphoma as Hodgkin lymphoma
(HL), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) except cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and CTCL
The APPLESTM study was a 10-year observational cohort study of children, adolescents and
young adults who initiated treatment with tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis before the
age of 16 years. Over 8,000 patients were enrolled in North America and Europe between 2005
and 2012, and 7,954 patients were eligible for analysis. Enrolment criteria were very liberal, and
treatment during enrolment was unrestricted, to represent real-life use conditions. The study
focused on detection and documentation of any malignancy or potential malignancy which
would then be reviewed by an independent expert committee. The calculated incidence rate for
malignancy observed in the study was compared to the incidence rate in the background
population in the country of residence of the same age, sex and in the United States, also race.
At time of study termination 1,176 subjects had completed 10 years of follow-up and a total of
44,629 PYRS had accumulated. Half of the participants were observed for 6.4 years or longer.
The median total exposure to tacrolimus ointment before and during enrolment was 330 grams.
A total of 6 malignancies were observed, giving a point estimate of 1.01 for the Standardised
Incidence Ratio with a 95% confidence interval of 0.37 to 2.20. The events were one chronic
myeloid leukaemia, one alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, one carcinoid tumour appendix, one
spinal cord neoplasm, one malignant paraganglioma, and one spitzoid melanoma. No
lymphomas or NMSC were observed. The APPLESTM study results did not show any
association between treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical tacrolimus during childhood and
risk of cancer.
14 NON-CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY
In the micropig, a single topical application of 14C-tacrolimus (0.1% under occlusion for 24 hours)
was found to have approximately 1% of the bioavailability of a single IV dose (1 mg/kg).
In the 52-week topical study with Yucatan micropigs, no macroscopic or microscopic changes
were considered to be related to the application of tacrolimus ointment (0.03%–3%); all changes
noted were also associated with application of the vehicle.
Tacrolimus ointment (0.03% to 3%) did not induce contact hypersensitivity or photosensitization
in guinea pigs, or cutaneous phototoxicity in albino hairless mice. It also did not elicit skin
depigmentation in Dark Yucatan miniature swine.
Photocarcinogenicity/Carcinogenicity
Two photocarcinogenicity/carcinogenicity studies were performed. In a 2-year dermal
carcinogenicity study in B6C3F1 mice, no important macroscopic or microscopic changes
occurred at the site of tacrolimus ointment application (0.03% - 3%). Only five animals had skin
tumors as follows: one male, vehicle control; two females, 0.03%; one male and one female 0.1%.
Lymphoma was observed in this study. In all treatment groups, the incidence of lymphoma was
higher in females than in males. The incidence of lymphoma for males and females was within
published ranges for control mice of this strain for the vehicle and 0.03% tacrolimus ointment
groups. In the 0.1% tacrolimus ointment group, the incidence of lymphoma was significantly
increased compared with study controls for males (Peto analysis, p<0.001) and numerically
higher for females. The lymphoma result is likely related to high systemic exposure resulting
from a high cutaneous absorption. Rodents are known to have a much more permeable skin than
man and other animal species and these animals were also shaved which damages the skin
barrier (stratum corneum). High systemic exposure in the higher concentration tacrolimus
ointment groups is supported by the dose-related mortality with classic signs of systemic toxicity
(decreased body weight, decreased food consumption, tremors, etc.) and pharmacokinetic
parameters (e.g., AUC,) evaluated in parallel toxicokinetic groups.
Genotoxicity
No evidence of genotoxicity was seen in bacterial (Salmonella and E. coli) or mammalian
(Chinese hamster, lung-derived cells) in vitro assays of mutagenicity, the in-vitro CHO/HGPRT
assay of mutagenicity, the in-vivo clastogenicity assays performed in mice, or the unscheduled
DNA synthesis assay in rodent hepatocytes.
The reproductive toxicity of tacrolimus was evaluated in Segment I (rats), Segment II (rats and
rabbits) and Segment III (rats) studies. Orally (gavage) administered tacrolimus altered
reproductive function in female animals and reduced offspring viability during reproductive toxicity
studies with rats (Segment I, fertility; Segment II teratology; and Segment III perinatal and
postnatal toxicity) and rabbits (Segment II teratology). Male reproductive behaviour was only
slightly altered. The changes in reproductive parameters observed during these studies included
increased copulatory intervals, decreased implantation, increased loss of fetuses, fewer births,
and smaller litter sizes. No reduction in male or female fertility was evident. Adverse effects in
offspring whose mothers received tacrolimus during pregnancy included markedly reduced
viability and slightly increased incidence of malformation.
Carcinogenicity studies have been carried out with systemically administered tacrolimus in male
and female rats and mice. In the 80-week mouse study and in the 104-week rat study no
relationship of tumour incidence to tacrolimus dosage was found.
A 104-week dermal carcinogenicity study was performed in mice with tacrolimus ointment (0.03%
- 3.0%), equivalent to tacrolimus doses of 1.1-118 mg/kg or 3.3-354 mg/m2/day. Mortality for
animals dosed with 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0% tacrolimus ointment exceeded 60% prior to the end of 104
weeks of treatment. Consequently, only tissues from untreated and vehicle-treated animals and
animals dosed at 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment were evaluated microscopically. In the
study, the incidence of skin tumor formation was minimal, similar to historic controls, and not
associated with the topical application of tacrolimus ointment. However, in males and females
treated with 0.1% ointment, the incidence of pleomorphic lymphoma in males (25/50) and females
(27/50) and the incidence of undifferentiated lymphoma in females (13/50) was elevated. Peto
mortality-prevalence test indicated that the increased incidence of lymphomas in males and
In a 52-week photocarcinogenicity study, the median time to onset of tumor formation was
decreased in hairless mice following chronic topical dosing with concurrent exposure to UV
radiation (40 weeks of treatment followed by 12 weeks of observation) at a tacrolimus ointment
concentration of ≥ 0.1% (equivalent to tacrolimus doses of ≥ 1.9 mg/kg or ≥ 24.5 mg/m2). Even
though the biological significance of this finding to humans is not clear, patients should minimize
or avoid exposure to natural or artificial sunlight.
Pr
PROTOPIC®
tacrolimus ointment
Read this carefully before you start taking Protopic® and each time you get a refill. This leaflet
is a summary and will not tell you everything about this drug. Talk to your healthcare
professional about your medical condition and treatment and ask if there is any new
information about Protopic®.
Acute (Flare) Treatment: Protopic® is used to treat eczema flares in adults and children age 2
years and older. These patients must not have a weakened immune system.
Prevention (Maintenance Therapy): If you have a high frequency of eczema flares (5 or more
times per year), Protopic® can be used to prevent these flares from coming back. It may also be
used to increase the length of time between flares.
Only use Protopic® to treat eczema that has been diagnosed by a doctor. Do not use Protopic®
to treat any other skin condition for which it was not prescribed.
To help avoid side effects and ensure proper use, talk to your healthcare professional
before you take Protopic®. Talk about any health conditions or problems you may have,
including if you:
Have a weakened immune system
Are using any other type of skin product
Have any skin infections that have not healed on the areas to be treated with Protopic®
Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant or breast-feeding
Skin infections: Patients treated with Protopic® may experience skin infections. These patients
may also be more likely to develop chicken pox, shingles, or cold sores. If your skin becomes
infected, see your doctor.
Sunlight: Avoid sunlight and sun lamps, tanning salons, and treatment with UVA or UVB light.
If you need to be outdoors after applying Protopic®, wear clothing that protects the treated area
from the sun. In addition, ask your doctor what other type of protection from the sun you should
use.
Tell your healthcare professional about all the medicines you take, including any drugs,
vitamins, minerals, natural supplements or alternative medicines.
Usual dose:
Most people find that a pea-sized amount squeezed from the tube covers an area about the size
of a 5-centimeter circle.
Treating eczema:
Apply Protopic® to the affected areas of the skin twice a day, in the morning and evening (about
12 hours apart).
Protopic® usually begins to provide relief from the symptoms of eczema within a few weeks.
If you do not notice an improvement in your eczema within the first 6 weeks of treatment or if
your eczema gets worse, tell your doctor.
After 12 months of treatment, see your doctor so that they can assess your eczema and
determine if you should keep using Protopic®.
Overdose:
Do not swallow Protopic®. If you do, call your doctor immediately. Oral ingestion of Protopic® may
lead to adverse effects not associated with the use of tacrolimus on the skin.
In case of drug overdose, particularly accidental oral ingestion, contact a health care
practitioner, hospital emergency department or regional Poison Control Centre immediately,
even if there are no symptoms.
Missed Dose:
If you forget to use Protopic® as directed, apply it as soon as possible, then go back to your
regular schedule. If you forget to use Protopic®, do not apply twice as much Protopic® the next
time you use it.
These are not all the possible side effects you may feel when taking Protopic®. If you experience
any side effects not listed here, contact your healthcare professional.
Reactions at the application site (stinging, a burning feeling, or itching) for the first few
days of application, which typically resolve as the skin heals
Increased sensitivity of the skin to hot or cold temperatures
Skin tingling
Fever, headache, or muscle pain
Flu-like symptoms (common cold, congestion, upper respiratory infection)
Acne
Swollen or infected hair follicles
Upset stomach
While you are using Protopic®, drinking alcohol may cause the skin or face to become flushed or
red and feel hot.
If you have a troublesome symptom or side effect that is not listed here or becomes bad
enough to interfere with your daily activities, talk to your healthcare professional.
You can report any suspected side effects associated with the use of health products to
Health Canada by:
NOTE: Contact your health professional if you need information about how to manage your
side effects. The Canada Vigilance Program does not provide medical advice.
Storage:
Store between 15°C and 30°C. Keep out of the reach and sight of children. Do not use after the
expiry date.