0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views43 pages

Data Center Containment Best Practices Final

Uploaded by

Metzemog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
105 views43 pages

Data Center Containment Best Practices Final

Uploaded by

Metzemog
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Data Center Containment Best Practices: Key

Considerations to Maximize ROI

Lars Strong, Senior Engineer and Company Science


Officer, Upsite Technologies
Airflow Management Awareness Month

 June 7th – Data Center Containment Best Practices: Key Considerations to


Maximize ROI
Lars Strong, Senior Engineer and Company Science Officer, Upsite Technologies

 June 14th – How Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Can


Optimize Data Center Performance
Lars Strong, Senior Engineer and Company Science Officer, Upsite Technologies
Tracy Collins, Vice President of Sales, Americas, EkkoSense

 June 21st – Data Center Risk Management: The Importance of Mitigating


Risk to Maximize Resiliency
Mark Acton, Independent Consultant, Non Executive Director, EkkoSense

 June 28th – How Modernization and New Digital Demands Have Impacted
(and Changed) The Data Center
Bill Kleyman, Executive Vice President of Digital Solutions, Switch
Speaker Background

 Thought leader and recognized expert on data center


optimization with over 20 years of experience
 Certified US Department of Energy Data Center Energy
Practitioner (DCEP) HVAC and IT Specialist
 Presented on various topics around the world:
 How IT Decisions Impact Facilities: The Benefit of Mutual
Understanding
 Designing, Deploying and Managing Efficient Data
Centers
 Myths of Data Center Containment
 Understanding the Science Behind Data Center Airflow Lars Strong, P.E.
Management Senior Engineer and
 Data Center Cooling Efficiency: Understanding the Company Science Officer,
Science of the 4 Delta T’s Upsite Technologies
Agenda

 The 4 R’s of Airflow Management™


 Lesser Known Row Airflow Management Best Practices
 Data Center Containment Best Practices
 The Science of Data Center Containment
 Modular Containment vs. Rigid Containment
 Containment Installation Considerations
 Matching Cooling Capacity with IT Load
 Cooling Optimization
 Fan Laws
 The Four Delta T’s (ΔT)
 Questions
The 4 R’s of Airflow Management

 With so many variables affecting airflow within a


data center, it can be daunting to know where to
start and how to get the most out of airflow
management improvements

 The 4 R’s of Airflow Management™ is a holistic


methodology for identifying and implementing
changes to optimize the data center’s cooling
infrastructure and realize energy savings

 The 4 R’s are: the Raised Floor, the Rack, the Row,
and the Room
Row Airflow Management

 Improving cold aisle and hot aisle separation at


the row level is “Row Airflow Management”

 Gaps underneath cabinets

 Gaps between cabinets

 Open aisle-ends

 Open space above hot or cold aisles


Row Airflow Management Configurations

 For hot aisle containment this generally involves


utilizing the ceiling plenum as an exhaust air
return path, ducting cooling units to the ceiling
plenum, installing doors on the ends of hot aisles
and baffles or a full chimney to the ceiling

 For cold aisles this involves installing doors on the


ends of cold aisles and baffles or a full roof over
the cold aisle
Typical Hot and Cold Aisle Configuration
With Poor Airflow Management

 We want to go from this:

HOT COLD HOT COLD


AISLE AISLE AISLE AISLE
Ideal Hot and Cold Aisle Configuration
With Good Airflow Management

 To this:

HOT COLD HOT COLD


AISLE AISLE AISLE AISLE
Lesser Known Row Airflow Management Best Practices
Block Open Spaces Underneath Racks

 Usually ranging in size from half an inch to two inches, this space
allows IT equipment exhaust air to travel underneath the rack and
ultimately back into the IT equipment air inlets
Block Open Spaces Underneath Racks

 To address this, blocking these open spaces with Under Rack Panels
is an easy and cost-effective solution that can have a profound impact
on reducing IT equipment inlet temperatures
Seal Spaces in Cabinet Rows

 There are many cases where


large gaps in between
cabinets are present and have
not been sealed off

 These gaps are usually due to


a building column or a
cabinet that has been
removed
Seal Spaces in Cabinet Rows

 To address this issue,


blocking off any open space
in between cabinets, whether
it’s just a couple inches or a
few feet, with Rack Gap
Panels or sealing foam will
dramatically impact IT
equipment intake
temperatures at a reasonable
cost

Rack Gap Panel


Seal Spaces at the Ends of Cabinet Rows

 In cases where there is a


missing cabinet at the end of
an aisle, causing uneven aisle
lengths, an Adjustable
Mounting Post or a custom-
sized rigid panel to make up
the offset/difference is
necessary to be able to install
aisle-end doors

Adjustable Mounting Post w/ Rack Gap Panel


Data Center Containment Best Practices
Install Aisle-End Containment Doors

 Cabinets at the ends of rows are the most vulnerable to increased


IT equipment intake temperatures because of the large potential for
hot exhaust air to wrap around the ends of rows

 Whether applied to hot or cold aisles, aisle-end doors yield huge


benefits by eliminating exhaust air recirculation or the premature loss
of conditioned air

 Aisle-end doors are an effective solution that can be applied in


singularity and still be extremely effective in reducing IT equipment
intake temperatures and creating the opportunity for optimization
Aisle-End Containment Examples

Swing Doors Bi-Directional Doors and Sliding Doors Single Hinge Doors Curtains
Install Top-of-Rack Containment

 Typically deployed in situations of high cabinet densities or when the


highest possible efficiency is desired

 In cold aisles, this involves some form of partitions, baffles, or roofing


over the aisle to contain conditioned supply air

 In hot aisles, a configuration of baffles or duct work runs from the hot
aisle to the returns of the cooling units
Top-of-Rack Containment – Cold Aisle Examples

Rack Top Angled Baffles

Ceiling with Rigid Panels


Top-of-Rack Containment – Hot Aisle Examples

Rack Top Vertical Baffles

Chimney with Rigid Panels


Top-of-Rack Containment – Cooling Unit Examples

Cooling Unit Extension

Cooling Unit Extension


The Science of Data Center Containment
Hot Aisle vs. Cold Aisle Containment – Benefits

Hot Aisle Containment


 Open area of room is the “cold” environment
 Leakage from raised floor openings in the larger area of the room goes
into the cold space
 Generally more effective, more likely to be implemented fully
 Hot aisle containment will be more forgiving for network racks and
stand-alone equipment
 Hot aisle containment can perform well in a slab environment
 With a well-designed space, a standard grid fire suppression system could
be installed around a hot aisle containment array of barriers and meet code
 Enables more surface area / building mass for “cold storage” in cold area
Hot Aisle vs. Cold Aisle Containment – Benefits

Cold Aisle Containment


 Generally easier to implement
 Only requires doors at aisle ends and cap on top
 Generally less expensive to implement
 Cold aisle containment is typically going to be easier to retrofit in an
existing data center
 Cold aisle containment doesn’t absolutely need to be on a raised floor,
but it typically is because of challenges associated with delivering
supply air to the contained space(s)
Hot Aisle vs. Cold Aisle Containment – Challenges

Hot Aisle Containment


 Requires a contained path for air to flow from the hot aisle back to the
cooling units
 Generally more expensive
 May require modifications to fire suppression system, more gas
required
 High temperatures in the hot aisle create uncomfortable conditions for
technicians working on IT gear
Hot Aisle vs. Cold Aisle Containment – Challenges

Cold Aisle Containment


 Remainder of data center becomes the hot aisle and that space should
be dramatically hot
 There may not be any space with a suitable temperature profile for
equipment that for whatever reason is not compatible with living in the
containment arrangement
 Conditioned air leaking from the raised floor enters the exhaust air
paths returning to cooling units
 Requires consideration of fire suppression system (drop away panels,
mechanical system opens ceiling upon smoke detection)
Rigid Hot Aisle Containment

 Requires full ducting of racks to the


ceiling plenum as well as ducting the
returns of CRAC/CRAH units to the
same overhead plenum

 Requires installation crew for


construction – either internal crew
with required skill set or experienced
3rd party or vendor
Modular Hot Aisle Containment

 Offers the core benefits of hot aisle


containment with greater flexibility
and at a lower cost

 Doors and baffles attach


magnetically, eliminating the need
for 3rd party installation

 Can be installed, removed, and re-


installed by on-staff team members
Rigid Cold Aisle Containment

 Utilizes aisle-end doors and optional


drop-away “roof” panels that cap
the cold aisle for complete cold-aisle
containment

 Requires installation crew for


construction – either internal crew
with required skill set or experienced
3rd party or vendor
Modular Cold Aisle Containment

 Offers the core benefits of cold aisle


containment with greater flexibility
and at a lower cost

 Doors and baffles attach


magnetically, eliminating the need
for 3rd party installation

 Can be installed, removed, and re-


installed by on-staff team members
Matching Cooling Capacity with IT Load (Cooling Optimization)
What is Cooling Optimization?

 Cooling optimization is the process of making adjustments to the cooling


system controls to improve energy efficiency resulting in reduced operating
costs, improve cooling capacity, and deferred capital expenditure

 Provide appropriate IT equipment intake air conditions and redundant cooling


capacity, with the lowest possible flow rate of conditioned air at the warmest
possible temperature

 Cooling optimization is often an iterative process of making adjustments to


controls, allowing the system to equalize, and then making additional
adjustments, and so on

 Each time additional airflow management improvements are implemented, or


significant IT equipment changes occur, there are opportunities for refining
the cooling optimization
Why is Cooling Optimization Important?

 Without cooling optimization, airflow management improvements are


primarily an expense

 Cooling optimization is the only way to achieve a return on investment


from airflow management improvements

“ You can’t purchase efficiency… Efficiency has to be managed.”


How Cooling Optimization Works

 This figure shows typical


airflow patterns before
airflow management and
cooling optimization
How Cooling Optimization Works

 This figure shows typical


airflow patterns after airflow
management, but before
cooling optimization
How Cooling Optimization Works

 This figure shows typical


airflow patterns after both
airflow management and
cooling optimization

 Conditioned airflow supplied


by the cooling unit has been
reduced by 50% (from 10
units to 5 units)
Fan Laws

 Airflow is directly proportional to fan


speed
 If the fan speed is reduced by 10%, the
flow rate will decrease by 10%

 Pressure is proportional to the fan


speed squared
 If the fans speed is reduced by 10%,
pressure will decrease by 19%

 Fan energy consumption is proportional


to the fan speed cubed
 If the fan speed is reduced by 10%, the
energy consumption will decrease by
27%
Fan Energy Savings

 10-30 ton (105 kW) cooling units


 10 hp (7.5 kW) fan motors
 $0.10/kWhr

Fan speed Energy Energy Total Energy Cost of


Fan Motor Size # of Cooling Savings
Reduction Reduction Reduction/Unit Reduction Electricity
(kW) Units ($/Year)
(%) (%) (kW) (kW) ($/kWhr)

10% 27.1% 7.5 2.0 10 20.3 0.1 $ 17,805

25% 57.8% 7.5 4.3 10 43.4 0.1 $ 37,983

50% 87.5% 7.5 6.6 10 65.6 0.1 $ 57,488


The Four Delta T’s (ΔT)

1. Though IT equipment
2. IT equipment exhaust to
cooling unit
3. Through cooling unit
4. Cooling unit supply to IT
equipment intake
The Four Delta T’s (ΔT)

1. Though IT equipment
2. IT equipment exhaust to
cooling unit
3. Through cooling unit
4. Cooling unit supply to IT
equipment intake
Key Takeaways

 Row level airflow management is not all about containment – there are
other areas in the row such as underneath cabinets and in between
adjacent cabinets that need to be sealed to manage airflow at the row
level effectively
 Modular containment is extremely effective at reducing IT equipment
intake temperatures
 In situations when cabinet densities are high enough, or a high level of
efficiency is desired, full hot or cold aisle containment is necessary
 Optimization needs to be part of your airflow management
improvement process – provide appropriate IT intake air temperatures
with the lowest fan speeds and warmest set points possible
Questions?
Lars Strong Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Upsite Technologies
info@[Link]
888.982.7800 YouTube Instagram Upsite Blog

You might also like