1
How to Have a Better Strategy for Marketing a Fitness Studio in California
This paper describes the approach and structure that will guide the research project,
entitled “Developing Effective Marketing Strategies for Fitness Studios in California, USA.”
There are various factors that determine the choice of research methodology and design,
including the research question, the type of data needed, the available resources, and the
research setting (Bell et al., 2022). The research questions would entail aspects such as
marketing strategies, consumer preferences and behaviors, current marketing practices, use of
social media platforms, and customer feedback and reviews, and how they may influence the
number of customers visiting the fitness studio in California.
Given the research questions, the study will be deductive in nature. According to
Woiceshyn and Daellenbach (2018), deductive research involves the development of
hypotheses or established theories as a starting point, which are then subjected to testing
using empirical data collection and analysis. To answer the research questions, a mixed
methods research design is more suitable. The mixed methods approach entails a combination
of quantitative and qualitative research methods (Bell et al., 2022).
Specifically, the study will employ a sequential explanatory mixed-methods research
design. A sequential explanatory design involves a two-phase research approach. The first
phase is quantitative, where the researcher collects and analyzes numerical data. This is
followed by a second phase that is qualitative in nature, where the researcher collects and
analyzes non-numerical data to help explain and contextualize the quantitative findings
(McKim, 2016). This approach allows the researcher to explore the complexity and context
of the research topic by collecting and analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data
(Mertens & Hesse-Biber, 2012).
3
The quantitative research method will be used to collect numerical data to determine
consumer preferences, behavior, and attitudes towards fitness studios. This will be done using
online surveys, which will reach a large number of participants and help to obtain statistical
data (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009). The quantitative research method will necessitate the
analysis of dependent variables against independent variables, which will be guided by the
theoretical assumptions and hypotheses formulated (Bell et al., 2022). In the context of
marketing a fitness studio, independent variables could include the type of marketing strategy
used, while the dependent variable could be the number of customers visiting the fitness
studio.
In addition, the quantitative method will require data collection using surveys. To
facilitate data collection, the study will also target other fitness studios in California and other
parts of the U.S. The fitness studios will be the units of analysis, while the characteristics of
customers and the frequency of certain types of marketing strategies, such as social media
advertising, billboards, or direct mail campaigns, used by different fitness studios in
California, will be the units of observations. Other possible units of observation could include
the cost of different marketing strategies, the reach of different strategies in terms of the
number of people reached, or the effectiveness of different strategies in terms of the number
of new customers attracted to the fitness studio. The quantitative information derived from
units of observations will be useful for measuring cause-and-effect relationships and
determining the prevalence of particular characteristics or behaviors (Dzwigol, 2020).
The qualitative research method will be used to collect non-numerical data to
understand the motivations, beliefs, and perceptions of customers and industry experts
regarding the marketing strategies used by fitness studios (Valtakoski, 2019). In a qualitative
research methodology, the concepts of units of analysis and units of observation are still
important, but they are approached and defined differently compared to a quantitative study.
4
On the one hand, units of analysis in a qualitative study refer to the broad categories of data
being studied. For example, in this study, the unit of analysis will be the marketing strategies
used by fitness studios or the social dynamics of the customers who frequent these studios.
On the other hand, units of observation in a qualitative study refer to the specific
entities or phenomena that the researcher is examining in detail. In the context of the current
study, the unit of observation will be the conversations between fitness studio staff and
customers, or the interactions between customers within the studio. This method will be
useful for exploring complex and nuanced issues, such as the motivations and perceptions of
customers, and it provides rich, descriptive data that can help inform theory development
(Valtakoski, 2019).
Through a mixed methods research methodology, the research will be able to gain a
holistic view of the marketing strategies used by fitness studios in California and identify the
most effective marketing strategies to help promote fitness studios in the region. Furthermore,
mixed methods will also provide an opportunity to use data triangulation, where findings
from different methods can be compared, contrasted, and validated (Baran, 2016). For
instance, data from social media analytics and customer reviews can be compared to identify
similarities and differences, which can provide a more in-depth understanding of consumer
behavior and preferences.
The mixed-methods research design is more suitable than either a quantitative or
qualitative research design alone. Firstly, a quantitative research design alone would limit the
scope of the research to solely numeric data (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009). While this type of
data is useful in determining consumer preferences and behaviors towards fitness studios, it
does not provide insights into the motivations and perceptions of customers towards these
studios. A mixed-methods approach, on the other hand, can gather both numeric and non-
numeric data to help gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic (McKim, 2016).
5
Secondly, a qualitative research design alone would also have limitations. A
qualitative research design is useful for exploring complex issues and gaining a deeper
understanding of the experiences and perceptions of participants (Bell et al., 2022). However,
it does not provide the same level of generalizability as quantitative data, making it difficult
to draw broad conclusions. A mixed-methods approach can use quantitative data to identify
trends and patterns and then use qualitative data to explore the meaning behind these trends,
providing a more comprehensive and generalizable understanding of the topic (Baran, 2016).
6
References
Baran, R. (2016). How marketers conduct mixed methods research. Mixed Methods Research
for Improved Scientific Study, 65(14), 1-10. [Link]
0.ch010
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods (6th ed.). Oxford
University Press.
Dzwigol, H. (2020). Innovation in marketing research: Quantitative and qualitative
analysis. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 15(1), 128-
135. [Link]
McKim, C. A. (2016). The value of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods
Research, 11(2), 202-222. [Link]
Mertens, D. M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2012). Triangulation and mixed methods research.
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 75-79.
[Link]
Tarka, P., & Kaczmarek, M. (2015). Theoretical and empirical comparative analysis on
quantitative and qualitative marketing researches. Advances in Marketing, Customer
Relationship Management, and E-Services, 137-155. [Link]
4666-6371-8.ch009
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating
quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE
Publications.
7
Valtakoski, A. (2019). The evolution and impact of qualitative research in Journal of
services Marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(1), 8-
23. [Link]
Woiceshyn, J., & Daellenbach, U. (2018). Evaluating inductive vs deductive research in
management studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An
International Journal, 13(2), 183-195. [Link]