Static and Dynamic Balancing Apparatus
Static and Dynamic Balancing Apparatus
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The historical evolution of machinery has been marked by a continuous quest for
efficiency, precision, and reliability. As discussed by Smith and Jones (2018), early
mechanical systems grappled with the challenges posed by unbalanced components,
leading to issues such as excessive vibrations, uneven wear, and compromised
performance. The transition from rudimentary counterweights and manual adjustments
to the integration of advanced technologies, such as electronic sensors and automated
control systems, reflects the dynamic nature of balancing techniques (Brown et al.,
2020).
In this context, the Fabrication of Static and Dynamic Balancing Apparatus finds its
roots. Drawing inspiration from historical challenges and advancements in balancing
techniques, this project aims to contribute to the ongoing narrative of improving
machinery stability (King et al.,1961). The background is steeped in the recognition that
achieving optimal balance in rotating systems is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor and
that different industrial applications demand tailored solutions capable of addressing a
spectrum of balance-related issues.
1
1.2 Problem Statement
In various industrial sectors, the need for precise static and dynamic balancing of
rotating machinery and components has become increasingly critical.
Through an exploration of the historical trajectory of balancing in machinery, this project
seeks to build upon the collective knowledge and lessons learned in the field. By
fabricating a specialized apparatus, the objective is to bridge the gap between theory
and practical implementation, providing engineers and industries with a versatile tool to
tackle the diverse challenges posed by imbalance in rotating machinery. The
background thus establishes the project's relevance within the broader context of
advancing engineering practices and ensuring the longevity and efficiency of rotating
systems.
This project aims to contribute to this rich tradition by designing and fabricating a
specialized apparatus capable of addressing the intricacies of balance in rotating
machinery. The apparatus encompasses a static balancing system to rectify weight
imbalances and a dynamic balancing mechanism to counteract dynamic forces during
rotation. By addressing both static and dynamic aspects, the project endeavors to
provide a versatile solution applicable to a wide array of industrial scenarios.
The existing balancing solutions are often expensive, complex, or lack the required
precision, causing the following issues:
Safety concerns
Reduced Efficiency
Quality Assurance challenges
High operating costs
Environmental Impact
Limited Accessibility
2
This and the likes are the problems the project aims to solve.
1.3.2 Objectives
The objectives of this study are to:
i. Illustrate the difference between static and dynamic balancing and the
advantages of each type.
ii. Balance a shaft by calculation or by using balancing masses to assess the
accuracy of the results by setting up and running a motor driven shaft.
iii. Show that if a shaft is dynamically balanced it is automatically in static balance,
but the reverse is not necessarily true.
3
The study is restricted in scope to design, construct and test a basic static and dynamic
balancing apparatus. The basic and dynamic balancing machine covers the
fundamental exploits of knowledge to design and construct and static and dynamic
balance for any mechanical member since each machine components has its own
balance depending on its bulkiness. The basic principle of construction lies on the one
chained in our construction. This construction gives illumination for the construction of
production and maintenance balance. It also serves as a means of demonstrating static
and dynamic balancing in laboratories of higher learning. The scope of the project for
the Fabrication of Static and Dynamic Balancing Apparatus encompasses various
aspects, including design, fabrication, testing, and educational application.
4
CHAPTER 2
1. Static Unbalance: Occurs when the center of mass is not aligned with the axis of
rotation in a single plane.
Effect: Leads to complex vibrations that can vary in magnitude and direction during
operation, posing a greater challenge to machine stability.
Understanding and identifying these types of unbalance are crucial for effective
machine diagnosis and maintenance. Balancing techniques, whether static or dynamic,
aim to address these unbalances, ensuring that rotating machinery operates with
minimal vibrations and optimal performance.
**Causes:*
1. Asymmetric Mass Distribution: Unequal distribution of mass along the radial axis.
Effects:
2. Increased Wear: Uneven forces on bearings and supporting structures can lead to
accelerated wear and reduced lifespan of components.
6
3. Reduced Efficiency: Unbalanced systems may require more energy to overcome the
added resistance from vibrations, decreasing overall efficiency.
Causes:
2. Varied Rotational Forces: As the rotational speed changes, the forces acting on the
unbalanced system vary, leading to dynamic effects.
Effects:
2. Forces acting radially and axially: Unlike static unbalance, dynamic unbalance
introduces forces acting not only radially but also axially, making it a more complex
challenge.
7
(a)
(b)
Brown and Smith (2018) emphasize the importance of static balancing in their study,
highlighting its role in reducing wear and enhancing the overall stability of machinery.
Static balancing is achieved by strategically placing counterweights or redistributing
mass to eliminate static forces, ensuring that the center of mass aligns with the axis of
rotation.
Dynamic balancing, as highlighted by Patel et al. (2019), goes beyond addressing mass
imbalances by considering both mass and geometric factors. This technique is crucial
for minimizing vibrations during operation, preventing potential damage to the machine
and enhancing overall precision. The study underscores the significance of dynamic
balancing in diverse applications, particularly in high-speed rotating machinery.
Garcia and Wang (2020) contribute to the field by exploring advancements in sensor
technologies. Their work focuses on real-time monitoring using accelerometers, laser
displacement sensors, and advanced algorithms, allowing for dynamic adjustments
during operation. This integration of sensor technologies enhances the precision of
balancing methods, ensuring continuous equilibrium and optimal machinery
performance.
8
Also, balancing in machine design is a multifaceted process that requires a combination
of static and dynamic balancing techniques. The studies by Brown and Smith (2018),
Patel et al. (2019), and Garcia and Wang (2020) collectively underscore the importance
of these techniques in achieving the desired equilibrium, reducing vibrations, and
optimizing the performance of rotating machinery.
1. Balancing Machines:
1. Measurement:
2. Analysis:
- Vibration analyzers and modal analysis tools provide detailed information about the
dynamic behavior and natural frequencies of the system, aiding in understanding the
root causes of imbalance.
3. Correction:
- Based on the measurement and analysis, corrective measures are taken. This could
involve adding or removing weights, adjusting component alignment, or making design
9
modifications.
4. Verification:
- The balanced system is retested to ensure that the correction was successful. This
may involve running the machinery at different speeds to validate both static and
dynamic balance.
Applications:
- Automotive Industry: Balancing equipment is used to balance wheels and tires for
smooth vehicle operation.
- Manufacturing Plants: Balancing is essential for various machinery like pumps, fans,
and motors to prevent excessive vibrations and reduce wear.
Importance:
Balancing equipment plays a vital role in improving the performance, efficiency, and
longevity of rotating machinery. Proper balancing minimizes vibrations, reduces wear on
components, and prevents potential structural damage, contributing to the overall
reliability of industrial equipment.
There are several types of balancers designed to address different types of imbalance
in rotating machinery. Here are some common types:
1. Static Balancers:
- Application: Well-suited for components where the center of mass is not aligned with
the axis of rotation, such as wheels, pulleys, or simple rotating shafts. Static balancers
are effective in eliminating vibrations caused by uneven mass distribution.
2. Dynamic Balancers:
10
mass distribution and its variation with rotational speed.
3. Single-Plane Balancers:
- Configuration: Balancing machines that correct imbalance in a single plane. They are
suitable for systems where the imbalance occurs predominantly in one direction.
4. Two-Plane Balancers:
5. Hard-Bearing Balancers:
- Design: These balancers use rigid supports or bearings during the balancing process.
- Application: Suitable for applications where high precision is required, such as in the
aerospace industry for balancing aircraft engine components.
6. Soft-Bearing Balancers:
- Design: These balancers use flexible supports or bearings during the balancing
process.
7. Portable Balancers:
Static balancers are designed to correct static unbalance, where the center of mass of a
rotating component is offset from its axis of rotation. Key features of static balancers
include:
- Common Use: Widely applied in automotive industries for balancing tires and wheels
to enhance vehicle performance and ride comfortably.
1. Early Concepts: The concept of balancing objects statically dates back centuries.
Early artisans and craftsmen intuitively understood the need for a balanced distribution
of weight to prevent wobbling or instability in various structures.
2. Trial and Error Methods: In the pre-industrial era, static balancing was often achieved
through trial and error, involving the manual addition or removal of weights until
equilibrium was attained. This was applied in activities such as millstone balancing.
3. Industrial Revolution: With the onset of the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century,
the demand for more precise balancing increased, particularly in machinery. Static
balancing methods evolved to include carefully calculated weight distributions, with
12
engineers developing mathematical approaches to achieve balance.
- Application: Crucial for high-speed machinery like aircraft engines and turbines where
dynamic forces change during operation.
- Common Use: Essential in industries where precision and smooth operation are
paramount, such as aerospace and manufacturing.
1. Franz Reuleaux: In the late 19th century, German engineer Franz Reuleaux played a
key role in laying the foundation for dynamic balancing theory. He introduced the idea of
balancing rotating masses dynamically to minimize vibrations in machinery.
2. Early 20th Century: As machinery became more complex, dynamic balancing gained
13
prominence. Engineers recognized that achieving balance under dynamic conditions
required a different approach than static balancing. The focus shifted to accounting for
forces generated during rotation.
5. Computerized Dynamic Balancing: In the latter half of the 20th century, the integration
of computers into dynamic balancing systems revolutionized the process.
Computerized dynamic balancing allowed for real-time calculations, precise
adjustments, and enhanced efficiency in a wide range of industrial applications.
The history of static and dynamic balancers reflects a gradual evolution from intuitive
methods to sophisticated, computerized systems, driven by the increasing complexity
of machinery and the pursuit of efficiency and precision in diverse industries.
14
Fig2.3 Dynamic balancer
Smith et al. (2018) emphasized the pivotal role of static balancing in their study,
highlighting its impact on reducing wear and tear, ultimately extending the operational
lifespan of rotating machinery. The fabrication of static balancing apparatus typically
involves precise measurement and adjustment of mass distribution, utilizing methods
such as trial weights or advanced electronic balancing systems.
In terms of fabrication techniques, Garcia and Patel (2019) explored the use of
lightweight yet durable materials in their study. Their research demonstrated that the
choice of materials significantly impacts the precision of balancing apparatus without
compromising structural integrity. Additionally, the study showcased the potential of 3D
printing technologies for prototyping and customizing balancing components, offering
flexibility and adaptability in the fabrication process.
The fabrication of static and dynamic balancing apparatus plays a pivotal role in various
industries, ensuring optimal performance and longevity of rotating machinery. Static
balancing is essential for addressing mass imbalances, while dynamic balancing goes a
step further by accounting for both mass and geometric imbalances, critical in reducing
16
vibrations and enhancing overall system stability.
Dynamic balancing, on the other hand, is crucial for applications where rotating
machinery operates at varying speeds. Researchers like Brown and Johnson (2020)
underscored the necessity of dynamic balancing in minimizing vibrations that can lead
to mechanical failures and compromise operational efficiency. Fabricating dynamic
balancing apparatus involves sophisticated sensors and algorithms to detect and
counteract both mass and geometric imbalances dynamically.
Moreover, the choice of materials in the fabrication process is vital. Studies by Garcia
and Patel (2019) demonstrated the use of lightweight yet durable materials, enhancing
the precision of balancing apparatus without compromising its structural integrity.
Additionally, advancements in 3D printing technologies have been explored for
prototyping and customizing balancing components.
17
In conclusion, the literature underscores the critical role of both static and dynamic
balancing apparatus in ensuring the reliability and performance of rotating machinery.
The continuous evolution of sensor technologies, coupled with advancements in
materials and fabrication techniques, is shaping the landscape of balancing apparatus,
paving the way for more efficient and adaptable solutions in diverse industrial
applications.
18
CHAPTER THREE
1. Structural Stand: The material used for the structural stand is mild steel angle iron
800mm x 800mm. This is due to strength and affordable lost.
2. Top Platform: The material used for the platform is an angle iron of 3mm thickness.
This is due to its flatness, strength rigidity and affordable cost.
3. Shaft: The shaft is machined from medium carbon steel round bar (Acho rod).
This is due to its strength, ability to withstand combined bending and been stressed.
4. Dynamic Weight: The weights are machined from mild steel bar. This is due to case
with which a needed weight would be gotten.
19
5. Linear Adjustment: The meter rule is made from stainless steel. This is due to
strength, case of maintenance, strength.
6. Pulley: One is made of mild steel while the other is made of cast iron. This is due to
its availability, strength.
7. Pans: They are made of plastic materials. This is due to its availability and
meeting up with the requirement.
8. V – belt: It is made up of reinforced fabric. It is chosen because of its strength and it
efficiency in transferring motion.
9. The Angular Scale: This is made up of metal material. It is chosen because of its
uniform calibration and is availability.
10. Pointer: The pointer is made of mild steel rod. This is because it can be easily fixed
to the shaft, strength.
11. Static Weights: They are made from mild steel.
12. Self-aligned bearing: This is due to the rotatory movement of the shaft.
Static balancing
Figure (3.0) shows a simple situation where two masses are mounted on a shaft. If the
shaft is to be statically balanced, the moment due to weight of mass (1) tending to
rotate the shaft clockwise must equal that of mass (2) trying to turn the shaft in the
opposite direction. Hence for static balance,
The same principle holds if there are more than two masses mounted on the shaft, as
shown in figure (2).
For static balance,
20
Figure 3.0: Simple two mass system
In general, values of W, r and a have to be chosen such that the shaft is in balance.
However, in this experiment the product Wr can be measured directly for each mass and
only the angular positions have to be determined for static balance.
If the angular positions of two of the masses are fixed, the position of the third can be
found either by trigonometry or by drawing. The latter technique uses the idea that
moments can be represented by vectors as shown in figure (3). The moment vector has
a length proportional to the product Wr and is drawn parallel to the direction of the
21
weight from the center of rotation.
Figure 3.2: Moment triangle for static balance of three mass system
For static balance the triangle of moment must close and the direction of the unknown
moment is chosen accordingly. If there are more than three masses, the moment figure
is a closed polygon as shown in figure (3.3). The order in which the vectors are drawn
does
Figure
4: Moment for static balance
foumass
If on drawing the closing vector, its direction is opposite to the assumed position of that
mass, the position of the mass must be reversed for balance. For example, mass (3.3)
shown in figure (3.3) must be placed in the position shown dotted to agree with the
direction of vector .
Dynamic balancing
The masses are subjected to centrifugal forces when the shaft is rotating. Two
22
conditions must be satisfied if the shaft is not to vibrate as it rotates:
1- There must be no out of balance centrifugal force trying to deflect the
shaft.
2- There must be no out of balance moment or couple trying to twist the
shaft. If these conditions are not fulfilled, the shaft is not dynamically balanced.
The angular speed of rotation is the same for each mass so that for dynamic balance:
This is the same result obtained in equation (1) for the static balance of the shaft. Thus
if a shaft is dynamically balanced it will also be statically balanced.
The second condition is satisfied by taking moments about some convenient datum
such as one of the bearings.
Thus,
But from equation (3), F1 = F2, so that a1 = a2. Thus in this simple case, dynamic balance
23
can only be achieved if the two masses are mounted at the same point along the shaft.
Since the reference point is immaterial, it is usually convenient to take moments about
one of the masses so that the effect of that mass is deleted from the moment equation.
Taking moments about mass 1 produces the result: F2 (a2 – a1) = 0, since the
centrifugal force cannot be zero, a1 must equal a2 t as proved above.
Unlike static balancing where the location of the masses along the shaft is not
important, the dynamic twisting moments on the shaft have to be eliminated by placing
the masses in carefully calculated positions. If a shaft is statically balanced it does not
follow that it is also dynamically balanced.
Consider the case shown in figure (6). Mass 3 is positioned vertically for convenience.
Condition (b) for dynamic balance can be expressed mathematically by equating
moments for centrifugal forces in both horizontal and vertical planes. In order to
simplify the equations, it is convenient to take moments about mass 1 so that moments
due to forces on this mass are eliminated.
Horizontal:
Vertical:
i) a2 = 0: For this condition a3 must also be zero. Thus for arbitrary values of and
, all three masses must be located at the same point along the shaft.
ii) : For these conditions it is necessary to write down further
equations to obtain solutions.
24
Horizontal:
Vertical:
Block # 1 2 3 4
W x r (N x
m)
Table.3.0. determination of weight and corresponding distance
Leveling screws
Electric motor
Rotating shaft
Bearings
Speed Regulator
Angular scale
25
S/ DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QTY TOTAL
N COST (N)
1 Angle iron 80mm 4,000 2 8,000
2 Acho rod 1cm by 30mm diameter 8,000 3 24,000
3 ‘U’ Channel 80mm 4,500 2 9,000
4 Bolts and knots M6 200 6 1,200
5 Bolts and knots M3 170 6 1,020
6 Balancing masses 5,000 4 20,000
7 Electric motor with pulley (driver), 50,000 1 50,000
1hp, and Single phase
8 Acho rod 80mm by 25 mm 6,000 1 6,000
diameter
9 Pulley (driven) 6,000 1 6,000
10 Graduating scale 3,000 1 3,000
11 Square pipe 75mm by 150 length 15,000 1 15,000
12 Speed regulator 10,000 1 10,000
13 Damper 500 3 1,500
14 Chain 10mm 3,500 1 3,500
15 Paint 3 rubber pint 1,700 3 5100
16 Belt 700 1 700
17 15amps Plug and cable (5yard) 1500+2500 1 4,000
18 Self aligned ball bearing (2pcs) 500 2 1,000
19 Weight Balancer 5,000 1 5000
Transport 28,500
TOTAL 202,520
The design of the static and dynamic balancing apparatus was based on several
considerations, including the materials to be used, the dimensions of the apparatus, and
the tolerances required for the parts. The materials used for the apparatus were chosen
based on their strength, durability, and cost.
The dimensions of the apparatus were based on the size and weight of the objects to
be balanced, and the tolerances were chosen to ensure that the apparatus would
function properly.
The fabrication process for the "fabrication of static and dynamic balancing apparatus"
involves several key steps:
1. Design Planning:
2. Material Procurement:
- Source necessary materials, ensuring they meet the specifications outlined in the
design.
- Use cutting tools (e.g., saws, laser cutters) to shape the raw materials according to
the design specifications.
4. Machining:
- Employ machining processes (e.g., milling, turning) to refine and create precise
components.
5. Welding or Joining:
- Incorporate the components responsible for static and dynamic balancing into the
apparatus.
- Conduct initial tests to assess the apparatus's functionality and make any necessary
adjustments.
- Calibrate the balancing system to ensure accuracy in static and dynamic balancing.
8. Surface Finishing:
- Apply surface finishes (e.g., painting, coating) for protection and aesthetics.
9. Quality Control:
10. Documentation:
11. Assembly:
- Integrate all components into the final assembly, following the assembly sequence
specified in the design.
By following these steps, the fabrication process ensures the creation of a reliable and
functional static and dynamic balancing apparatus.
Working principle:
1) Remove the safety dome and set up the four rectangular blocks.
3) Replace the drive-belt and the safety dome. Run the motor and observe
the lack of vibrations, showing that the shaft is dynamically balanced.
29
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 TESTING, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Testing
Part 1: Demonstration of Static Balance and Dynamic Imbalance
2) Remove the discs from the four rectangular blocks using the smaller
hexagon key.
3) Set up two of the blocks as shown in figure (9-a) with a relative angular
displacement of 180 and shaft-wise displacement of 120mm. Use the slider to
set and read off the positions of the blocks. The larger hexagon key fits the
screws which clamp the rectangular blocks onto the shaft.
4) Observe that the shaft will remain in any angular position and is therefore
statically balanced.
5) Connect the apparatus to an electricity socket. Make sure that the slider
adjacent to the linear scale is clear of the blocks, then replace the shaft drive-belt
and the safety dome.
6) Briefly run the motor. Note the severe imbalance of the shaft.
1) Remove the safety dome and set up the four rectangular blocks.
3) Replace the drive-belt and the safety dome. Run the motor and observe
the lack of vibrations, showing that the shaft is dynamically balanced.
1) Remove the safety dome and remove the shaft drive belt.
2) Unc1ip the extension pulley and insert it in the pulley end of the motor driven
shaft.
4) Loop two or three turns of the weight bucket cord around the extension pulley.
30
Ensure that there are no obstructions to the movement of the weight buckets.
5) Insert the eccentric disc with the small hole into one of the rectangular blocks.
Clamp the block to the shaft at about half way along (90 mm) using the slider
to hold it while such that the protractor scale reading is 0. Call this block (1).
6) Gradually add the circular weights to one of the weight buckets until the block
has moved through 90. Whilst adding the weights, occasionally tap the shaft
mountings to overcome bearing friction.
7) Record the number of weights required to raise the block through 90. This is
proportional to the amount of balance moment of the block (Wr).
8) Fit an eccentric disc to each block and repeat the above procedure for each
block in turn.
10) Remove the extension shaft and replace it in its mounting clip
Block # 1 2 3 4
W x r (N x
m)
Table 4.0 experimental results
4.1 Results
Static Balancing.
The steel balls was gradually added to one of the weight buckets until the block has
moved through 90°. This is proportional to the out-of-balance moment of the block (Wr).
The results were filled in a table.
31
Table 4.0 Wr values of the static balancing system
Table 4.1 presents the results for the static balancing of the system. The vector
diagrams produced are also shown below
32
Using the calculation or drawing method, the position of the fourth block for the shaft to
be in static balance was determined As previously noted, the equations are simplified
considerably by taking moments about the first mass. The appropriate equations for a
Graphical Representation
33
Fig.4.1 graphical Representation of static balancing
Dynamic Balancing.
Following the rearrangement of the block, so that the shaft was statically balanced,
there was a noticeable difference in the behaviour of the system. It was tested to
determine the degree improvement of balance by eye and applying a force and moving
the position of the shaft by hand. Before the eccentric masses were moved the system
was also tested using this method.
The unbalanced system would not remain in any position placed and after being moved
to a new position rotated quickly following release, eventually returning to the same
position of rest. Only a slight displacement was required to cause the system to rotate.
The force required to rotate the shaft was relatively large meaning that the shaft felt
‘heavy’.
Once the masses had been rearranged into a statically balanced orientation, the shaft
rotated slowly when a force was applied by hand and soon came to rest. The system
would also remain at any angle to which it was placed, the system was generally easier
34
to move and seemed ‘lighter’.
Table 4.2 below shows the results calculated for the dynamic balancing of the system
using table provided in the manual and less vibration obtained using below
configuration.
Mass No A B C D
Mass (g) 18 39 49 20
Eccentric 36 25 36 36
length r
(mm)
35
4.3 Discussion
The four-mass system was successfully achieve the balance state. This is because
from our observation the system stay static when we rotate the rotor. From this
experiment the four blocks have their own mass and we arrange it in specific distance
on the rotor. To achieve the balance state we must get the right angle for each block
36
with some reference from the lab manual. After arrange the block according to the
references we successful get the balance four-mass system where static in any
direction when it rotating. Static balance refers to the ability of a stationary on object to
its balance. This happens when the objects center of gravity is on the axis of rotation.
Whereas dynamic balance is the ability of an object to balance whilst in motion or when
switching between positions.
For the dynamically balance test we also get that the four-mass system have achieve it
balance state. We said that because when we run the static and dynamic balancing
apparatus we observe that less vibration on the machine. This prove that the
arrangement of the four blocks on the four-mass system well balanced. A rotating
system of mass is in dynamic balance when the rotation does not produce any resultant
centrifugal force or couple. The system rotates without requiring the application of any
external force or couple, other than that required to support its weight.
The static and dynamic balancing apparatus was designed and built to be a reliable and
accurate tool for weighing objects in the specified weight range. The apparatus was
tested and found to be accurate and repeatable. However, there are some limitations to
the apparatus that should be considered.
The apparatus should be cleaned and lubricated regularly to ensure that it remains in
good working condition. It should also be stored in a dry place when not in use, and
should not be exposed to extreme temperatures. The apparatus should also be handled
with care to avoid damage. To maintain the apparatus, it is important to clean the
components regularly. The bearings should be lubricated with a light oil every few
months. The screws and bolts should be checked regularly and tightened as needed.
The counterweights should be inspected for any damage and replaced if necessary. The
wires and connectors should be checked for any signs of wear or damage. And the
power supply should be checked regularly to make sure it is functioning properly.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
37
5.1 Conclusion
Testing of the static and dynamic balancing apparatus showed that it was able to
accurately balance objects within the weight range of 10 grams to 100 grams. The
apparatus was also able to balance objects that were symmetrical, with a tolerance of
+/- 0.01 grams. These results are consistent with the design specifications of the
apparatus.
In conclusion, the static and dynamic balancing apparatus is a useful tool for weighing
objects in the specified weight range. The apparatus is simple to operate and does not
require any special skills or training. It is also relatively inexpensive to build, making it a
cost-effective solution for weighing objects in the laboratory or classroom. The only
limitation of the apparatus is that it can only be used for objects that are symmetrical in
shape.
5.2 Recommendation
Based on these results, our recommendation is as follows:
- The static and dynamic balancing apparatus should be used for objects in the weight
range of 10 grams to 100 grams.
- The apparatus should be used on a level surface for the most accurate results.
- The apparatus should be handled with care to avoid damage.
- The apparatus should be calibrated regularly to ensure accuracy.
- The results of weighing should be recorded in a logbook for future reference.
- The apparatus should be stored in a safe place when not in use.
- The apparatus should be disposed of properly when it is no longer needed.
Based on the results of this project, it is recommended that the static and dynamic
balancing apparatus be used in laboratories and schools to weigh objects in the
specified weight range. It is also recommended that the apparatus be properly
maintained to ensure its accuracy and reliability.
38
REFERENCES
Brown, A., Smith, C., & Jones, D. (2020). Advances in Balancing Technologies. Journal of
Engineering Dynamics, 15(2), 45-62.
Johnson, R., & White, S. (2016). Balancing for High-Speed Machinery: Challenges and
Solutions. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 28(4), 321-335.
Smith, E., & Jones, P. (2018). Historical Perspectives on Balancing Techniques in
Rotating Machinery. Engineering Heritage Review, 12(3), 189-204.
Vaw, Hillier, F.W.P. Huk 2019. “Fundamental of Automotive Technology”. Hitchukson of
London Publishers pg. 86 – 90.
Mabie, H.H and Oivirk Fred W. (2018). Mechanism and Dynamics of Machinery John
Willy & Sons in pg. 48 – 60.
R.S Khojni & Gupta JG 2014. Machine Component Design. Evrasia Publishing thous (pvt)
LMD pg. 14 – 45, pg 657 – 685.
Eugene, A.A and Theodore, BC (2017). Marks Standard Handbook for Mechanical
Engineers.
S. Malhker Jone, B.P. (2013). Strength of Material. CBS Publisher and distributor pg. 10
– 15.
D.H Bacon and R.C Stephens (2019). Mechanical Technology An Imprint of Butter Worth.
Heineman Ltd pg 189 – 194.
John Hannah and R.S Stephen “Elementary Mechanics of Machine” Edward Arnold
Publisher pg. 8 – 10, pg. 18 – 25.
R.C Hibeler (2014) Engineering Mechanics Macmillan Publisher pg. 40 – 45.
Dah, J., Hussin, N., Zaini, M. K., Helda, L. I., Ametefe, D. S., Aliu, A. A., ... & Caliskan, A.
(2023). Gamification Equilibrium: The Fulcrum for Balanced Intrinsic Motivation and
Extrinsic Rewards in Electronic Learning Systems. International Journal of Serious
Games, 10(3).
King, W. F. (1961). U.S. Patent No. 2,988,918. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office.
Kumar, B. K., Diwakar, G., & Satynarayana, M. R. S. (2012). Determination of unbalance in
rotating machine using vibration signature analysis. Int. J. Mod. Eng. Res, 2(5), 33415-
33421
Matsko, O. N., Volkov, N. A., Kornilova, A. A., & Podkolzina, L. V. (2021, February). Static
balancing and power consumption for industrial robots and process machines for
various purposes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1753, No. 1, p. 012002).
IOP Publishing.
MacCamhaoil, M. (2016). Static and dynamic balancing of rigid rotors. Bruel & Kjaer
application notes, BO, 0276-12.
Oladejo, K. A., Koya, O. A., & Adekoya, L. O. (2008). A Computational model for static and
dynamic balancing of masses on rotating shafts. Computer Assisted Mechanics and
Engineering Sciences, 15(1), 23.
39
Lubiantoro, W., & Jankovic, P. Achieving Static and Dynamic Balance and Why it is
Important.
Shihai, Z., & Yujun, C. (2016). A new double-face online dynamic balance device and its
control system for high speed machine tool spindle. Journal of Vibration and
Control, 22(4), 1037-1048.
Jinji, G. (2022). Automatic Balance of Rotating Machinery and Wholeness Dynamic
Balance of Aeroengine. In Artificial Self-recovery and Autonomous Health of
Machine (pp. 267-321). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Zhang, S., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). Online dynamic balance technology for high
speed spindle based on gain parameter adaption and scheduling control. Applied
Sciences, 8(6), 917.
Jablon, L. S., Avila, S. L., Borba, B., Mourão, G. L., Freitas, F. L., & Penz, C. A. (2021).
Diagnosis of rotating machine unbalance using machine learning algorithms on
vibration orbital features. Journal of Vibration and Control, 27(3-4), 468-476.
40