INTERNSHIP DIARY
SUMMER SEMESTER 2023-24
SUBMITTED FOR
PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE OF
BBA LLB (H.)
SUBMITTED BY
K. Preethi Shivani
BBA-LLB / SEM -2
14770 / 23WU0601005
INTERNED UNDER
Advocate Karanam Prabhakar
(Hyderabad)
SUBMITTED TO
Dr. Aditi Singh,
Associate professor, school of law
SCHOOL OF LAW
WOXSEN UNIVERSITY
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.NO. TITLE Page NO.
1. Acknowledgment 3
2. Table of Statutes 4-5
3. Nature of the Internship Work 6-8
4. Case Index 9
5. Case Detail 10-15
6. Research Output 16
7. Media Page 17
8. Internship Certificate 18
9. Feedback Form by Employer 19
10. Feedback form by Student 20
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to everyone who contributed to my
internship experience. This opportunity has been instrumental in enhancing my
understanding of various aspects of legal practice and has significantly enriched my
knowledge in the field of law.
I would like to extend my special thanks to Mr. Karanam Prabhakar for their
invaluable guidance and support throughout my internship. Their insights into legal
concepts and courtroom procedures have deepened my understanding of practical law
and have motivated me to further pursue my legal studies.
I also appreciate the opportunity to engage with clients, attend court proceedings, and
conduct legal research, which has allowed me to apply theoretical knowledge to real-
life situations. The structured approach to my internship, including various tasks such
as case file reviews, drafting legal documents, and observing court proceedings, has
provided me with a well-rounded experience in the legal field.
Lastly, I am grateful to my peers and colleagues for their camaraderie and support.
The collaborative learning environment fostered during my internship has been
invaluable. I look forward to applying the skills and knowledge I have gained during
this internship in my future academic and professional endeavours.
K. Preethi Shivani
12th august 2024
3
TABLE OF STATUTES
S.NO. Statute Name Nature of Description Section
law
1. Transfer of Property During the 1 [pendency] in any Court Sec. 52
Property Act, Law having authority 2 [ 3 [within the
1882 limits of India excluding the State of
Jammu and Kashmir] or established
beyond such limits] by 4 [the Central
Government 5 ***], of 6 [any] suit or
proceeding 7 [which is not collusive
and] in. which any right to
immoveable property is directly and
specifically in question, the property
cannot be transferred or otherwise
dealt with by any party to the suit or
proceeding so as to affect the rights of
any other party thereto under any
decree or order which may be made
therein, except under the authority of
the Court and on such terms as it may
impose.
2. Hindu Family Law Subject to the provisions of this Act a Sec. 13B
Marriage petition for dissolution of marriage by
Act, 1955 a decree of divorce may be presented
to the district court by both the parties
to a marriage together, whether such
marriage was solemnized before or
after the commencement of the
Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act,
1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that
they have been living separately for a
period of one year or more, that they
4
have not been able to live together and
that they have mutually agreed that the
marriage should be dissolved
3. Limitation Procedural Establishes the time limits for filing Applicable
Act, 1963 Law various legal claims and suits. provisions
4. Negotiable Commercial Where any cheque drawn by a person Sec. 138
Instruments Law on an account maintained by him with
Act, 1881 a banker for payment of any amount of
money to another person from out of
that account for the discharge, in
whole or in part, of any debt or other
liability, is returned by the bank
unpaid, either because of the amount
of money standing to the credit of that
account is insufficient to honour the
cheque or that it exceeds the amount
arranged to be paid from that account
by an agreement made with that bank,
such person shall be deemed to have
committed an offence and shall,
without prejudice to any other
provision of this Act, be punished with
imprisonment for 4 [a term which may
be extended to two years’], or with
fine which may extend to twice the
amount of the cheque, or with both
5. Specific Civil Law Provides for the enforcement of Relevant
Relief Act, individual rights and the remedies provisions
1963 available in civil cases.
5
NATURE OF INTERNSHIP WORK
S. No Nature of work Done Learning Outcome Week
Day 1 Initial Office Visit Received an overview of my role and Week
responsibilities during the internship. 1
Day 2 Case Insights Gained understanding of ongoing cases at the
office.
Day 3 Legal Concepts Discussion Acquired knowledge of key legal concepts
relevant to my internship.
Day 4 Court Visit Observed courtroom proceedings and
procedures.
Day 5 Case File Review Analysed case files to gain insights into
specific cases.
Day 6 Day Off Research on particular case laws and key
legal concepts.
Day 7 Affidavit Drafting Learned about the process and essentials of
drafting an affidavit.
Day 8 Weekly Report Preparation Compiled a report summarizing the previous Week
week’s activities for streamlined final report 2
creation.
Day 9 Court Observation Attended a trial and documented detailed
notes on the case.
Day Legal Research Assisted in researching precedent cases and
10 relevant legal concepts.
Day Petition Drafting Gained insights into the fundamental
11 components of drafting a petition.
Day Judgment Review Summarized judgments from a specific case.
12
Day Court Visit Gained insights into the types of cases
13 handled by different courtrooms in the district
court.
6
Day Client Interaction Took notes on important case-related
14 information during client meetings.
Day Vakalat Drafting Learned the meaning and drafting process of a Week
15 vakalat. 3
Day Weekly Report Preparation Compiled a report summarizing the previous
16 week’s activities for streamlined final report
creation.
Day Client Interaction Participated in client interactions, learning
17 effective client management skills.
Day Case File Review Analysed case files for insights into ongoing
18 cases.
Day Notice Drafting Learned the purpose and procedure for
19 drafting legal notices.
Day Day Off Practice of Notice Drafting
20
Day Court Visit Observed trial proceedings.
21
Day Case Summary Summarized the activities and observations Week
22 from the previous day in court. 4
Day Legal Research Conducted research on legal concepts and
23 statutes for an ongoing case.
Day Weekly Report Preparation Compiled a report summarizing the previous
24 week’s activities for streamlined final report
creation.
Day Client Interaction Engaged in discussions about the appeal
25 process of a case.
Day Case File Organization Managed case files and tracked deadlines for
26 upcoming cases.
7
Day Day Off Gained insights on various
27 key legal concepts.
Day Legal System Overview Gained insights into key legal concepts,
28 including the hierarchy of courts and the
Indian judicial system.
Day Internship Review Participated in a discussion regarding the Week
29 overall internship experience. 5
Day Final Office Visit Attended a feedback session and received a
30 certificate of internship completion.
Day Final Internship Report Preparation Compiled the final report with the assistance
31 of weekly summaries.
(Signature of Internship Supervisor)
8
CASE INDEX
S.NO. CASE Page NO.
1. Pawan Kumar Mukra vs. Sadananda Reddy & others. 9-10
OS 753/2014
2. Challa Mhindar vs. Sarada 11-12
FCOP 1522/2022
3. Nunaswath Jyothi vs. Ramamath Hasli Bhai & Others. 12-14
OS 177/2023
4. SD. Goud vs. Kandikunta Prasad 14-16
OS 1010/2017
CASE DETAILS
9
Case No. 1
OS 753/2014
Pawan Kumar Mukra vs. Sadananda Reddy & Others
Second Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad
V. Bhavani Lakshmi
Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff, Pawan Kumar Mukra, purchased a plot measuring 333.33 square yards in
Czech Colony, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, through a registered sale deed on July 8, 2005. He
has been in possession of the plot since then and fenced it according to the sale deed’s
measurements. The plot is part of a larger property that was divided into five plots, with the
1st Defendant owning an adjacent plot. In January 2012, the Plaintiff began constructing a
residential building on his plot, which the 1st Defendant claimed encroached on his land by
two feet.
The 1st Defendant allegedly trespassed on the Plaintiff’s property, removed the fencing, and
built a compound wall, encroaching two feet into the Plaintiff's land. Despite attempts to
resolve the matter, the dispute escalated, and the Plaintiff filed a police complaint, which was
not acted upon as it was deemed a civil matter. During the ongoing dispute, in January 2021,
the 1st Defendant sold the disputed portion of land to the 4th Defendant.
Cause of Action:
The cause of action arises from the 1st Defendant’s alleged trespass, removal of the Plaintiff's
fencing, and construction of a compound wall encroaching on the Plaintiff's land.
Additionally, the 1st Defendant's sale of the disputed land during the ongoing dispute and the
potential violation of the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property
Act further contribute to the cause of action.
10
My Observation:
In this case, I feel that the Plaintiff, Pawan Kumar Mukra, has been wronged by the actions of
the 1st Defendant, who not only encroached upon the Plaintiff's property but also attempted
to complicate the matter by selling the disputed portion to a third party during the pendency
of the dispute. The fact that the Plaintiff has been in possession of the plot since 2005 and
followed legal procedures to protect his property further strengthens his claim. The
encroachment and subsequent sale appear to be deliberate attempts by the 1st Defendant to
undermine the Plaintiff’s legal rights.
Case Law: In Shreepat vs. Rajendra Prasad & Ors., (2000) 5 SCC 88, the Supreme Court
of India held that when a person in possession of property is dispossessed without due
process of law, they are entitled to restoration of possession through legal action. This case
underscores the importance of protecting the rights of lawful property owners against
encroachment and unlawful dispossession.
Next date of hearing: 27th August 2024
Case No. 2
FCOP 1522/2022
Challa Mahindar vs. Sarada
Family Court Malkajgiri,
Dist. Court Malkajgiri
M. Ranganath Reddy
Facts of the case:
The Petitioners, Challa Mahindar and Sarada, were married on April 21, 2017, in Hyderabad,
as per Hindu rites. The marriage, however, faced significant challenges, leading to
irreconcilable differences and incompatibility issues. Despite efforts at reconciliation,
including counseling and mediation, the couple has been living separately since June 2020.
11
Acknowledging that their differences are irreconcilable, the Petitioners mutually agreed to
seek a divorce by mutual consent. They have also agreed on the terms for the dissolution of
their marriage, including alimony and the withdrawal of legal cases.
Cause of Action:
The cause of action arises from the Petitioners' prolonged separation, irreconcilable
differences, and mutual decision to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent. The legal
proceedings aim to formalize the dissolution of marriage and settle any associated legal
matters.
My Observation
It is unfortunate to see that the marriage between Challa Mahindar and Sarada, despite being
solemnized with great expectations, could not withstand the test of time. Their decision to
seek a divorce by mutual consent is a mature step towards resolving their differences
amicably, without prolonged conflict. Given their inability to reconcile, I feel that the mutual
consent divorce is the most appropriate and dignified resolution. The settlement terms,
including alimony and withdrawal of legal cases, seem fair and considerate of both parties'
future needs.
Case Law: In Sureshta Devi vs. Om Prakash, (1991) 2 SCC 25, the Supreme Court
clarified that mutual consent for divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act must
be voluntary and unambiguous. The case emphasized the importance of both parties being
fully in agreement about the divorce and its terms, reinforcing the principles that appear to be
respected in this case.
Next Hearing Date: Case Disposed
12
Case No. 3
OS 177/2023
Nunaswath Jyothi vs. Ramamath Hasli Bhai & Others.
Additional Dist. Judge Medchal, Dist Court Medchal, Malkajgiri
Srinivas Reddy
Facts of the case:
The case involves a dispute over ancestral property, specifically 6.04 acres of agricultural
land and a two-storied building. The property originally belonged to the Petitioners/Plaintiffs'
great-grandfather, Ramavath Kevla Naik, and was inherited by his son, Ramavath
Ramachandra Naik. Upon his death, the property was left to his wife (Defendant No. 1) and
three sons (Defendants 2 to 4).
The Petitioners, as daughters of Ramavath Ramachandra Naik, claim a share in this ancestral
property. Defendant No. 3, who developed vices, constructed a house on a portion of the land
and is accused of attempting to sell his undivided share without the Petitioners' consent. The
Petitioners seek partition and possession of their shares.
Issues of the case:
The cause of action arises from Defendant No. 3's refusal to partition the ancestral property
and his attempts to alienate his share without the Petitioners' consent. The Petitioners are
seeking legal recognition of their entitlement to a share of the property and an official
partition to secure their rights.
My Observation:
The family dynamics in this case are complex, and it is disheartening to see how the absence
of a formal partition has led to disputes among family members. The Petitioners, as legal
13
heirs, have a legitimate right to their share in the ancestral properties. The actions of
Defendant No. 3, who seems to be attempting to alienate property without proper consent, are
particularly concerning. I believe that the Petitioners are justified in seeking a partition and
the protection of their rights, especially considering the ancestral nature of the property.
Case Law: In Ganduri Koteshwaramma vs. Chakiri Yanadi, (2011) 9 SCC 788, the
Supreme Court ruled that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral property, including
the right to seek partition. This case reaffirms the Petitioners’ entitlement to their share in the
property and highlights the necessity of ensuring equitable distribution among all heirs.
Next Hearing Date: 23rd July 2024
Case No. 5
OS 1010/2017
SD. Goud vs. Kandikunta Prasad
10th Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad
K. Bhuwaneshwari
Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff, SD. Goud, a practicing advocate, was introduced to the Defendant, an ex-MLA
involved in real estate, with the intention of purchasing a residential plot in Bangalore. The
Plaintiff paid Rs. 40,00,000 for the plot in October 2013, but the Defendant failed to execute
a formal sale agreement.
After continued persuasion, the Defendant promised to either repay the amount or allot a flat,
but failed to do so. In May 2014, the Defendant issued two cheques as partial repayment, but
these were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The Defendant also allegedly threatened the
Plaintiff when he demanded repayment. The Plaintiff has filed a suit to recover Rs.
17,14,000, including interest.
14
Cause of Action:
The cause of action arises from the Defendant's failure to execute the sale agreement, the
dishonouring of cheques issued as partial repayment, and the alleged threats made against the
Plaintiff. The Plaintiff seeks legal recourse to recover the amount owed, including interest,
due to the breach of agreement and financial loss incurred.
My Observation:
The Plaintiff, SD. Goud, has been subjected to a series of unfortunate and unethical actions
by the Defendant, an ex-MLA, who seems to have exploited his position to defraud the
Plaintiff. The failure to execute a formal sale agreement, the dishonoring of cheques, and the
threats made against the Plaintiff are clear indications of the Defendant's intent to evade his
obligations. I feel that the Plaintiff is rightfully seeking recovery of his money, and the law
should protect him against such breaches of trust and contract.
Case Law: In M.S. Anirudhan vs. Thomco's Bank Ltd., AIR 1963 SC 746, the Supreme
Court held that issuing a cheque with the knowledge that it will not be honored constitutes an
act of dishonesty and fraud under the Negotiable Instruments Act. This case supports the
Plaintiff's position, reinforcing the legal consequences of the Defendant's actions in
dishonoring cheques and failing to uphold his contractual obligations.
Next Hearing Date: 2nd September 2024
15
RESEARCH OUTPUT
Developing Legal Skills through Internship Experiences: An inevitable
stipulation in the life of every law student
16
MEDIA PAGE
17
KARANAM PRABHAKAR
ADVOCATE
INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that K. Preethi Shivani, a 1st year 2nd Semester student of WOXSEN
UNIVERSITY, HYDERABAD, has successfully completed a 1-month internship
under my guidance, from 01.07.2024 to 31.07.2024. Having completed her Legal
Internship Program, she is now being relieved from her duties.
Throughout the internship, she primarily engaged in observing courtroom proceedings
and procedures, visiting various courts, and acquiring knowledge of key legal
concepts. She also gained experience in drafting legal documents and understanding
the intricacies of legal practice. I found her to be diligent and committed to her work,
consistently demonstrating a strong work ethic. Her conduct during the internship was
exemplary.
Preethi Shivani exhibited a genuine eagerness to learn and a strong ability to grasp
complex legal matters, which was impressive. I appreciate the effort she put into her
tasks and the contributions she made during this period. I wish her continued success
in her future legal career.
Best Regards,
Karanam Prabhakar.
10th August 2024.
18
FEEDBACK FORM
Name of Employer Karanam Prabhakar
Office Address D. No. 1-9-646/1-4, 2nd floor, Beside SBI, Adikmet Rd.
Vidhyanagar, Hyderabad. – 500044.
Contact Number 9849708495
Email Id
[email protected]Name of Student K. Preethi Shivani
Admission Number/Roll Number 23WU0401005
Professional Conduct Satisfactory
Non- Satisfactory
Intern’s response to given Satisfactory
tasks/responsibilities/assignment Non- Satisfactory
s
Would you like to be associated Guest/Special Lecture
with Woxsen University for Sponsorship for academic events
academic purposes MOU
Hiring
Any other Remarks ---
19
FEEDBACK FORM
K. Preethi Shivani
Student Name: _____________________________________ 17/08/2 Program of
Date: __________
BBA-LLB SEM - 2
Student:________________________________Semester:__________________
Intern Under an
Organisation of Internship: ____________________________________________________
Advocate
Karanam Prabhakar
Name/Contact of Internship Supervisor: __________________________________________
[email protected]
Supervisor Email:_____________________________ N/A
Amount of Stipend, if any:________
om
Dr. Aditi Singh
Academic Supervisor: ____________________________
01/07/2024To _______________
Dates of Internship: From ______________ 30/07/2024
Brief description of my internship work:
During my 30-Day internship under an advocate, I was given a thorough introduction to the
practical elements of legal practice, which was supplemented by theoretical instruction. The
internship allowed me to witness and participate in several phases of the legal process, such
as case file analysis, court visits, legal writing, and client interactions.
I also learned about the judicial system's operations, the significance of legal documents, and
the complexities of court procedures. This experience had also helped me to better
comprehend essential legal ideas, improve my research abilities, and get direct experience
with the professional conduct needed in a legal context. Through constant weekly reporting, I
was able to reflect on and synthesize my learning, resulting in the creation of a final
internship report that summarized my whole experience.
Title and the tasks for which I was responsible:
Courtroom Observation
Attending court proceedings, including trials and hearings.
20
Observing courtroom procedures and documenting detailed notes on the cases
observed.
Drafting Legal Documents
Participating in the drafting of various legal documents such as affidavits, petitions,
vakalats, and legal notices.
Understanding and applying the essential components and legal requirements for each
type of document.
Case Insights and Legal Research
Analysing case files to gain insights into specific legal matters.
Conducting research on legal precedents, concepts, and statutes relevant to ongoing
cases.
Was your internship experience related to your major area of study? Tick the appropriate
answer.
Yes, to a large extent Yes, slightly related Not related at all
-- --
Indicate the degree to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.
This experience has: Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Allowed me to explore a
career field in law
Allowed me to apply
classroom theory to practice
Helped me understand Law
better
Expanded my knowledge
about the Profession and
work culture
Helped me develop my
drafting and oratory skills
Given me a chance to
improve my interpersonal
skills
Helped me learn to handle
responsibility and use my
time wisely
Helped me develop new
interests and abilities
Helped me clarify my
career goals
Provided me with contacts
21
that may lead to future
employment
In case, if any of your goals were not accomplished during the internship,
mention the reason?
During my internship, I learned that I was unable to complete a few goals. One of them was
networking—while I had the chance to work directly with my supervising advocate, I had no
exposure to other advocates or insights into their work lives. This hampered my capacity to
expand my network and learn about other techniques within the legal profession.
Furthermore, because the internship focused mostly on civil matters, I did not have any
exposure to criminal law, which was of special interest to me.
My scholastic background, which emphasized theoretical knowledge, did not adequately
prepare me for the practical parts of legal profession. As a result, it was difficult at times to
bridge the gap between what I learned in class and how things work in real life. This made it
difficult to learn fast during real-world encounters. However, these realizations have given
me a clear focus for my future study and growth.
Give suggestions as to how your internship experience could have been
improved. (Could you have handled added responsibility? Would you have
liked more discussions with your academic supervisor concerning your
internship? Was closer supervision needed? Was more orientation
required?)
Here are some suggestions for how my internship experience could have been improved:
1. Taking on More Responsibilities: I believe I could have completed more activities, such
as participating in case discussions or producing legal documents. This would have given
me greater practical experience and confidence in my talents.
22
2. Better Orientation: A more practical orientation at the start of the internship would have
helped me grasp how to apply what I learned in class to real-world circumstances. This
would have made it easy to catch up on the job more quickly.
3. Closer Supervision and input: While I appreciated my freedom, more regular input
from my supervising advocate would have been beneficial. It would have helped me
recognize what I was doing well and where I needed to improve.
4. More Academic Support: Having more talks with my academic supervisor about how to
apply what I learned during the internship to my studies would have been beneficial.
Regular check-ins may have offered more guidance.
23
Academic Supervisor’s Signature Student’s
Signature
24
