FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev.

06-Sep-2022

PANGASINAN STATE UNIVERSITY

Urdaneta City, Pangasinan
BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE

J COURSE SYLLABUS
Second Semester, A.Y. 2023-2024

COURSE INFORMATION
COURSE CODE GEE4
COURSE TITLE Global Citizenship
COURSE TYPE □ Lecture □ Laboratory □ Lecture & Laboratory
COURSE CREDIT 3 units
CLASS HOURS 3 hours/week
COURSE PREREQUISITE/
None
CO-REQUISITE
ABEL 3A
M – 3:00pm-4:00pm (synchronous)
W - 3:00pm-4:00pm (TBI 4)
F - 3:00pm-4:00pm (TBI 4)
COURSE SCHEDULE
ABEL 3B
T – 3:00pm-4:00pm (synchronous)
TH – 3:00pm-5:00pm (TBI 4)
UNIVERSITY VISION, MISSION, QUALITY POLICY, INSTITUTIONAL OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES

UNIVERSITY VISION To be a leading industry-driven State University in the ASEAN region by 2030.
The Pangasinan State University shall provide a human-centric, resilient, and sustainable academic environment to produce
UNIVERSITY MISSION dynamic, responsive, and f uture-ready individuals capable of meeting the requirements of the local and global communities and
industries.
EOMS POLICY The Pangasinan State University shall be recognized as an ASEAN premier state university that provides quality education and
satisf actory service delivery through instruction, research, extension and production.

We commit our expertise and resources to produce prof essionals who meet the expectations of the industry and other interested
parties in the national and international community.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 1

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

We shall continuously improve our operations in response to changing environment and in support of the institution’s strategi c
direction.

INSTITUTIONAL OUTCOMES The Pangasinan State University Institutional Learning Outcomes (PSU ILO) are the qualities that PSUnians must possess. These
outcomes are anchored on the f ollowing core values: Accountability and Transparency, Credibility and Integrity, Competence and
Commitment to Achieve, Excellence in Service Delivery, Social and Environmental Responsiveness, and Spirituality – (ACCESS).

Anchored on these core values, the PSU graduates are able to:
1. Demonstrate through institutional mechanisms, systems, policies, and processes which are ref lective of transparency,
equity, participatory decision making, and accountability;
2. Engage in relevant, comprehensive and sustainable development initiatives through multiple perspectives in decisions and
actions that build personal and prof essional credibility and integrity.
3. Set challenging goals and tasks with determination and sense of urgency which provide continuous improvement and
producing quality outputs leading to inclusive growth;
4. Exhibit lif e-long learning and global competency prof iciency in communication skills, inter/interpersonal skills,
entrepreneurial skills, innovative mindset, research and production initiatives and capability in meeting the industry
requirements of local, ASEAN and international human capital market through relevant and comprehensive programs;
5. Display, socially and environmentally responsive organizational culture, which ensures higher productivity among the
university constituents and elevate the welf are of the multi-sectoral communities and;
6. Practice spiritual values and morally upright behavior which promote and inspire greater harmony to project a credible
public image.

GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES PROGRAM OUTCOMES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Articulate a comprehensive and contextualized view of the
English language system and development (PO 19)

Display, socially and environmentally responsive

organizational culture, which ensures higher productivity
among the university constituents and elevate the welf are
of the multi-sectoral communities (PO 5)

Facilitate English language learning in diverse social, Explain how the English language works in the context of historical,
People’s Champion cultural, academic, and prof essional settings (PO 21) social, cultural, and political f actors.

Preserve and promote “Filipino historical and cultural

heritage” (PO 11)

Work ef f ectively and independently in multi-disciplinary and

multi-cultural teams (PO 9)

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 2

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

Demonstrate through institutional mechanisms, system,

policies, and processes which are ref lective of
transparency, equity, participatory decision making, and
accountability (PO 1)

Act in recognition of prof essional, social, and ethical

responsibility (PO 10) Explain clearly and logically how the English language changes in
response to various f actors.
Apply analytical and interpretive skills in the study of texts
Continuous Innovative Learner (PO 14)

Use appropriate theories and methodologies critically and

creatively (PO 17)
Ef f ectively communicate orally and in writing using both
Mother Tongue and English and Filipino (PO 8)
Listen/speak/read/write/view situations, participate ef f ectively in oral
Communicate in English (both oral and written) f luently, communication situations where language systems vary.
accurately and creatively in diverse social, cultural,
academic and prof essional settings (PO 20)
Set challenging goals and tasks with determination and
sense of urgency which provide continuous improvement
and producing quality outputs leading to inclusive growth.
(PO 3)
Teach reading/writing/listening/speaking/viewing skills in f ormal as
Engage in relevant, comprehensive, and sustainable well as non-f ormal settings using best practices in delivering
development initiatives through multiple perspectives in knowledge (e.g. skill-based/content-based/tasked-based) with
decisions and actions that build personal and prof essional appropriate methodologies (audio lingual, independent exploration,
credibility and integrity (PO 2) use of technology, etc.)
Knowledgeable and skilled Articulate and discuss the latest development in the
communicator specif ic f ield of practice (PO 7)

Facilitate English language learning in diverse social,

cultural, academic, and prof essional settings (PO 21)

Participate ef f ectively in oral communication situations Apply and assess the appropriate communication strategies in
where language systems (phonological, morphological, diverse social, cultural, academic, and prof essional settings.
syntactic, semantic) vary (PO 22)

Produce well-written texts f or various academic and Produce a well-documented paper setting f or various needs in an
prof essional purposes (PO 23) academic setting and in the workplace.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 3

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

Exhibit lif e-long learning and global competence

prof iciency in communication skills, inter/interpersonal
skills, entrepreneurial skills, innovative mindset, research
and production initiatives and capability in meeting industry
requirements of local, ASEAN and international human
Community Developer capital market through relevant and comprehensive
programs (PO 4) Engage in English language research relevant to the school and
workplace settings.
Contribute to the generation of new knowledge by
participating in various research and development projects
(PO 24)

Demonstrate research skills specif ic to the sub-disciplines

in the humanities (PO 16)

Civic Literacy and Citizenship Discuss and/or create artistic f orms (PO 15)

Use appropriate theories and methodologies critically and

creatively (PO 17) Enhance literacy development and critical/creative thinking among
students through the use of dif f erent types of texts
Identif y multi-perspectives and interrelations among texts
and contexts (PO 13)

Practice spiritual values and morally upright behavior which

promote and inspire greater harmony to project a credible
public image. (PO 6)
Maintains stature and behavior that upholds the dignity of teaching.
Appraise the role of humanistic education in the f ormation
of the human being and society (PO 18)

Recognize the need f or and demonstrate the ability f or

lif elong learning (PO 12)

COURSE DESCRIPTION
Are we a citizen of the world?” This is the central question that the course will address. It will locate that how we, as individuals, are members of a large global community.
Hence, the course will discuss “what global citizenship is”, and the “rights and obligations” that one must practice. The cou rse will also discuss how “national issues” are of
“global concerns”. By examining social, political, cultural, economic and ecological contexts the course aims to promote acti ve citizenship – the knowledge that we need to
seek, the skills that we need to develop, and the values and attitudes that we need to uphold. It seeks to transf orm existing realities and relationships through global ethical
participation.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 4

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

COURSE OUTCOMES

COURSE OUTCOMES (C0) PROGRAM OUTCOMES CODE (PO)

At the end of the course, the student should be able to: a b c d e f g h i j k l
1. To understand the complex and contested concept of “global citizenship” I I I I I I P I I I I I
2. To understanding the structures of global, national, and local governance as well as the rights,
I I I D P P P I I D P P
duties, and responsibilities of each citizen.
3. To develop critical thinking and constructive analysis by learning about the challenges and
I I P D P P P P I D P P
opportunities of global citizenship.
4. To acknowledge diversities, respect dif f erences, and appreciate multiple identities I I I D P P P I I D P P
5. To be able to apply mediation, negotiation, collaboration, deliberation when discussing various
I I P D P P P P I D P P
global challenges and issues.
6. To ref lect on the consequences of our choices and decisions, engage in civic and active
I I P D P P P D I D P P
participation as well as personal and social obligations.

I. (Introduced) P. (Practiced) D. (Demonstrate)

COURSE LEARNING PLAN

Learning Activities
Course (Synchronous,
Learning Outcomes Topics Hours Learning Materials and Platform Assessment
Outcome/s Asynchronous and
In-person)
• To f amiliarize with the Introduction to the course: 3 Synchronous Synchronous
course. objectives, coverage, policies, • Discussion • Course Syllabus/Course Guide
course requirements • Filling-up of Forms • Final Paper Guidelines
• To discuss university and Survey • PowerPoint Presentation
rules, course syllabus, VMGO • Computer
requirements and Quality Policy In-person • MS Teams
Classroom Policies • Discussion
guidelines, and class
policies.
LMS Orientation In-person
Remote Learning Preferences • Course Syllabus/Course Guide
• Final Paper Guidelines
• Flow Chart in Completing an INC
• Grading Criteria

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 5

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

CO1 • To explore the (Re)Discovering Citizenship 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous

meaning of citizenship A. Def initions of Citizenship • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
• To discuss the B. Dimensions of Citizenship • Reading • Computer Method/
diverging views of C. Theories of Citizenship Assignment • MS Teams Graded
citizenship • Read Bosniak, L. (2008). Recitation
In-person Chapter 1: Divided Citizenships, • Who is and
• To outline the essential
• Discussion pp. 1-16 and Chapter 2: Def ining What is a
components of Filipino
Citizenships. In The Citizen and
citizenship
the Alien: Dilemmas of
Contemporary Membership In-person
• Read Edwards, M. (2015). • Socratic
Chapter 2: A Contested Concept. Method/
In The Limits of Political Graded
Belonging - An Adaptationist Recitation
Perspective on Citizenship and
Society, pp.9-36
• Read O'Byrne, D.J. (2003).
Chapter 1: The Rediscovery of
Citizenship, pp. 1-25 and
Chapter 2: Citizenship and the
Nation-State, pp. 26-50. In The
Dimensions of Global Citizenship
- Political Identity Beyond the
Nation-State.

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV

CO1, CO2 • To contextualize the Globalizing Citizenship 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous

study of global A. Def initions of global • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
citizenship citizenship • Introduction of • Computer Method/
• To identif y the possible B. Dimensions of global Activity No. 1 • MS Teams Graded
meanings of global
citizenship • Reading • Read Byers, Michael (2005, Recitation
C. Approaches of global October 5). Are you a global • Quiz
citizenship citizenship In-person citizen? Really? What does it
• To discuss the
• Read Delanty, mean?. In-person
dimensions and • Socratic
G. (2007). • Read Delanty, G. (2007).
perspectives of global Method/
Chapter 1: Chapter 1: Theorizing citizenship
citizenship in the global age, pp. 15-21. In
Theorizing

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 6

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

citizenship in Globalization and Citizenship: Graded

the global age, The transnational challenge Recitation
pp. 15-21. In Edited by Wayne Hudson and
Steven Slaughter.
Globalization
• Read O’Bryne, J. (2003).
and Chapter 5, pp. 111-132, and
Citizenship: Chapter 9: The Dimensions of
The Global Citizenship, pp. 200-226.
transnational In The Dimensions of Global
challenge Citizenship - Political Identity
Edited by Beyond the Nation-State.
• Read United Nations
Wayne Hudson
Educational, Scientif ic and
and Steven Cultural Organization
Slaughter. (UNESCO). Unpacking
Sustainable Development Goal
• Discussion
4: Education 2030. \
• Preparation f or
• Watch a supplementary video of
Activity No. 1
Evans, Hugh (2016, May 5).
What does it mean to be a
citizen of world? Ted
Conf erences. (16 minutes).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=ODLg_00f 9BE
• Watch a supplementary video of
Nenes, Teo (2020, July 13).
You’re a Global Citizen, You Just
Don’t Know it Yet. Ted
Conf erences. (10 minutes).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=Ztby2esVyTc

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 7

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

CO1, CO2, • To explore the The Challenges of Global 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, concepts of racial, Citizenship • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 ethnic, and national A. Culture and Identities • Reading • Computer Method/
identity, and to Assignment • MS Teams Graded
consider how they are • Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012) What Recitation
related and have In-person is culture? A compilation of • Are We
changed. • Discussion quotations. There Yet?
• Presentation of • Mathews, G. (2000). Chapter 1: Part 1
Activity No. 1 On the meaning of culture. In
Global Culture / Individual In-person
Identity: Searching f or Home in • Socratic
the cultural supermarket, p. 1-29. Method/
• Watch a supplementary video of Graded
Crash Course (2017, November Recitation
21). Race & Ethnicity: Crash • Think-Pair-
Course Sociology #34. and-Share
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=7myLgdZhzjo
• Watch a supplementary video on
Vox (2015, January 13). The
myth of race debunked in 3
minutes. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=Vnf Kgf f CZ7U&t=11s

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To analyze the B. Mobility and Migration 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, political, economic, • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 cultural, and social • Introduction of • Computer Method/
f actors that inf luence Activity No. 2 • MS Teams Graded
global movement of • Reading • Castles, Stephen (2000). Recitation
“International Migration at the • Quiz
population
In-person Beginning of the Twenty First
• Discussion Century: Global Trends and In-person
• Preparation f or Issues.” International Social • Socratic
Activity No. 2 Science Journal 52 (165), pp. Method/
269–281. Graded
Recitation

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 8

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To assess the C. Media, inf ormation and 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, intersectionality of technology • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 media, technology and • Reading • Computer Method/
inf ormation and their Assignment • MS Teams Graded
role in shaping • Read Deibert, Ronald J. (2019) Recitation
democracy and In-person “The road to digital unf reedom - • Are We
society. • Discussion Three painf ul truths about social There Yet?
• Presentation of media”. Journal of Democracy, Part 2
Activity No. 2 30(1), 25-39.
• Tapsell, Ross. 2020. Deepening In-person
the Understanding of Social • Socratic
Media's Impact in Southeast Method/
Asia. © ISEAS Yusof Ishak Graded
Institute. Recitation
http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1185 • Migration
7 Mapping
• Watch a supplementary video of
Ressa, Maria (2021, December
10). Full Speech: Maria Ressa at
the Nobel Peace Prize awarding
ceremony. Rappler.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=m1w3rRRBoq8

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To explain the D. Consumerism and 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, consumerism and Consumption • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 consumer choices in • Computer Method/
the global context. In-person • MS Teams Graded
• Discussion • Belk, R. (2010). Global Recitation
• Introduction of Consumerism and Consumption.
Activity No. 3: Wiley International Encyclopedia In-person
Action Plan of Marketing. • Socratic
• Devinney, T.M., Auger, P. and Method/
Eckhardt, Giana M. (2010).

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 9

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

Chapter 3: Are we what we Graded

choose? Or is what we choose Recitation
what we are?, pp. 37-63. In The
myth of ethical consumer.

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
MIDTERM EXAMINATION 3
ACADEMIC BREAK 3
Total no. of Hours: 27
CO1, CO2, • To identif y the Global Issues and Inequalities 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, multidimensionality of A. Human Rights • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 global inequalities 1. Gender Equality • Reading • Computer Method/
2. Labor Migration Assignment • MS Teams Graded
• To discuss dif f erent 3. Education • Course Syllabus/Course Guide Recitation
approaches on how to In-person • Read Universal Declaration of
bridge global • Discussion Human Rights available at Asynchronous
inequalities • Action Plan https://www.un.org/en/about- • Why is it
• To discuss the ethical Presentation us/universal-declaration-of - Right to
approaches of global (Group 1) human-rights. Protect our
• Encyclical Letter Laudato Sí of Rights?
citizenship
the Holy Father Francis in Care
• To discuss the rights In-person
of our Common Home. Chapter
and responsibilities of 1: What is happening to our • Socratic
global citizen common home?, pp. 15-44 and Method/
Chapter 3: The Human Roots of Graded
Ecological Crisis, pp. 74-101. Recitation
• Read Gasper, D. (2004). • Group
Chapter 3: Ef f iciency & Report
Ef f ectiveness: Mainstream
Development Evaluation in
Theory & Practice, pp. 53-83 and
Chapter 4: Who bears cost and
who reaps benef its?, 85-111,
and Chapter 5: Violence and
Human Security 112, 126. In The
Ethics of Development - f rom
economism to human
development.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 10

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

• Lane, M. (2006). Philosophical

Perspectives on States and
Immigration. Available at
https://tinyurl.com/lanemigration.
• Read Sachs, J. (2015).Chapter
2: An Unequal World, pp. 45-69.
In the age of sustainable
development.

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To identif y the B. Social and Economic 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, multidimensionality of Justice • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 global inequalities 1. Poverty • Reading • Computer Method/
2. Health and Well-Being Assignment • MS Teams Graded
• To discuss dif f erent
• Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Recitation
approaches on how to In-person • What are
5: Ending Extreme Poverty, pp.
bridge global • Discussion 139-180. In the age of Genera-
inequalities • Action Plan sustainable development tional
• To discuss the ethical Presentation • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Struggles?
approaches of global (Group 2) 9: Health f or all, pp. 275-316. In • Quiz
citizenship the age of sustainable
development In-person
• To discuss the rights
• Socratic
and responsibilities of In-person Method/
global citizen • PowerPoint Presentation Graded
• Projector/TV Recitation
• Group
Report
CO1, CO2, • To identif y the C. Environmental Issues 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, multidimensionality of 1. Global Population • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 global inequalities 2. Food Security • Reading • Computer Method/
3. Resilient Cities Assignment • MS Teams Graded
• To discuss dif f erent 4. Climate Change • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Recitation
approaches on how to In-person 6: Planetary Boundaries, pp. • The Root
bridge global • Discussion 181-218. In the age of Cause of
inequalities • Action Plan sustainable development All Evil
Presentation • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter
(Group 3) 10: Food security, pp. 317-354.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 11

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

• To discuss the ethical In the age of sustainable In-person

approaches of global development • Socratic
citizenship • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Method/
11: Resilient Cities, pp. 355-392. Graded
• To discuss the rights In the age of sustainable Recitation
and responsibilities of development • Group
global citizen • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Report
12: Climate Change, pp. 393-
446. In the age of sustainable
development

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To identif y the D. Intercultural Issues 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, multidimensionality of 1. Peace and Conf lict • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5
global inequalities
Resolution • Reading • Computer Method/
Assignment • MS Teams Graded
• To discuss dif f erent
• Harris, E. (2020). What is the Recitation
approaches on how to In-person • Contempor
Role of Nationalism and Ethnicity
bridge global • Discussion in the Russia–Ukraine Crisis? ary Wars
inequalities • Action Plan Europe-Asia Studies,1-21. and
• To discuss the ethical Presentation doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.170 Conf lict
approaches of global (Group 4) 8 • Quiz
citizenship
In-person In-person
• To discuss the rights • Socratic
• PowerPoint Presentation
and responsibilities of
• Projector/TV Method/
global citizen Graded
Recitation
• Group
Report
CO1, CO2, • To discuss current and Emerging Trends and Issues 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, emerging trends A. Digital Economy • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5 B. Digital Nomads • Documentary • Computer Method/
C. Korean Wave Review • MS Teams Graded
• Mancinelli, F. (2020). Digital Recitation
In-person nomads: f reedom, responsibility • Reaction
• Documentary and the neoliberal order. Paper
Viewing Inf ormation Technology &

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 12

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

Tourism. doi:10.1007/s40558-
020-00174-2.
• Perzanowski, Aaron and Schultz,
J. (November 4, 2016). The End
of Ownership: Personal Property
in the Digital Economy - Chapter
1 (Introduction). MIT Press, The
End of Ownership: Personal
Property in the Digital Economy;
ISBN: 9780262035019, Available
at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=28935
22
• Kim Bok-rae (2015 October).
“Past, Present and Future of
Hallyu (Korean Wave)”.
American International Journal of
Contemporary Research, 5(5).
https://tinyurl.com/kimbok-rae
• Gunjoo Jang and Won K. Paik
(2012). Korean Wave as Tool
f or Korea’s New Cultural
Diplomacy. Advances in Applied
Sociology, 2(3).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.
2012.23026.

In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
CO1, CO2, • To identif y the political Practicing Active Citizenship 3 Synchronous Synchronous Synchronous
CO3, CO4, and economic actors A. Global Governance • Discussion • PowerPoint Presentation • Socratic
CO5, CO6 that govern and B. Global Civil Society • Computer Method/
f acilitate international
In-person • MS Teams Graded
• Discussion • Read Sachs, J. (2015). Chapter Recitation
relations
1: What is sustainable
• To discuss possible development?, pp. 1-42. In the In-person
solutions to address age of sustainable development. • Socratic
current global • Read O’Bryne, J. (2003). Method/
challenges Chapter 5, pp. 111-132, and Graded
Recitation

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 13

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

• To explain the how Chapter 10: Active Citizenship

global citizenship Today, pp. 227-243. In The
provide insights into Dimensions of Global Citizenship
- Political Identity Beyond the
our lives and Nation-State.
experiences.
In-person
• PowerPoint Presentation
• Projector/TV
WRITING PERIOD 3
FINAL EXAMINATION 3
SUBMISSION OF REQUIREMENTS AND INTERVENTION 3
Total no. of Hours: 27

COURSE REFERENCES AND SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS

A. Books C. Electronic Sources
1. Bosniak, L. (2008). The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. 1. Byers, Michael (2005, October 5). Are you a global citizen?
Princeton University Press. Really? What does it mean? Available online at
2. Edwards, M. (2015). The Limits of Political Belonging - An Adaptationists Perspective on https://tinyurl.com/michaelbyers.
Citizenship and Society. Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Lane, M. (2006). Philosophical Perspectives on States and
3. Gasper, D. (2004) The Ethics of Development: From Ecotourism to Human Development. Sage
Publications Immigration. Available at https://tinyurl.com/lanemigration.
4. Devinney, T.M. Auger, P. and Eckhardt, G.M. (2010). The myth of ethical consumer. 3. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2012) What is culture? A compilation of
Cambridge University Press. quotations. Available at GlobalPAD Open House
5. Encyclical Letter Laudato Sí of the Holy Father Francis in Care of our Common Home (2018, https://tinyurl.com/culandiden.
June 18). 4. United Nations Educational, Scientif ic and Cultural
6. Hudson, W. and Slaughter S. (2007). Globalization and Citizenship: The Transnational Organization (UNESCO). Unpacking Sustainable
Challenge. Routledge.
7. Gordon M. (2000) - Global Culture Individual Identity_ Searching f or Home in the Cultural Development Goal 4: Education 2030. Available online at
Supermarket. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/sdg4educ.
8. O'Byrne, D.J. (2003). The Dimensions of Global Citizenship - Political Identity Beyond the 5. Universal Declaration of Human Rights available at
Nation-State. Frank Cass & Co. Ltd https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of -
9. Sachs, J. (2015) The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press. human-rights.
10. Salazar-Parrenas, R. (2015). Servants of Globalization - Migration and Domestic Work (2nd 6. Crash Course (2017, November 21). Race & Ethnicity: Crash
Edition). Stanf ord University Press.
Course Sociology #34. YouTube.
B. Textbook/ Journal Articles https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7myLgdZhzjo
7. Evans, Hugh (2016, May 5). What does it mean to be a citizen
1. Belk, R. (2010). Global Consumerism and Consumption. Wiley International Encyclopedia of of world?. Ted Conf erences. (16 minutes).
Marketing. doi:10.1002/9781444316568 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODLg_00f 9BE .

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 14

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

2. Deibert, Ronald J. (2019). The road to digital unf reedom - Three painf ul truths about social 8. Nenes, Teo (2020, July 13). You’re a Global Citizen, You Just
media. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0002 Don’t Know it Yet. Ted Conf erences. (10 minutes).
3. Gunjoo Jang and Won K. Paik (2012). Korean Wave as Tool f or Korea’s New Cultural https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztby2esVyTc
Diplomacy. Advances in Applied Sociology, 2(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2012.23026 9. Ressa, Maria (2021, December 10). Full Speech: Maria
4. Kim Bok-rae (2015 October). “Past, Present and Future of Hallyu (Korean Wave)”. American Ressa at the Nobel Peace Prize awarding ceremony.
International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(5), 154-160. Rappler. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1w3rRRBoq8
5. Perzanowski, Aaron and Schultz, Jason, The End of Ownership. MIT Press, 2016, Case Legal 10. Vox (2015, January 13). The myth of race debunked in 3
Studies Research Paper No. 2020-24, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3573549 minutes.YouTube.
6. If you are able to browsed and read until here, message me thru MS Teams. Identif y your Course https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnf Kgf f CZ7U&t=11
and Section enrolled. I will give you a bonus point. Do not tell the others .

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

Major Requirements Minor Requirements

• Major Exams (Midterm and Final) • Activities
• Final Paper • Assignment
• Quizzes
***Note: If you miss at least one of the major requirements, • Reading Assignment
you will automatically incur an incomplete grade. • Attendance
• Class Participation

RUBRIC FOR SOCRATIC METHOD/GRADED PARTICIPATION

SCORE CRITERIA

• Initiates discussion on issues related to class topic

• Comments are always insightf ul and constructive; contributions are relevant and encourage deeper examination of the topic
5
• Listens attentively when others speak, as evidenced by comments that build on the remarks of others; that is, the student hea rs what others say and
contributes to the dialogue
• Contributes well to the discussion, able to asks questions and responds to direct questions
4 • Comments are mostly insightf ul and constructive
• Listens and appropriately responds to the contributions of others .
• Seldom volunteers but responds to direct questions
3 • Contributions are always relevant
• Is of ten inattentive and needs reminder of f ocus of class. Occasionally makes disruptive comments while others are speaking.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 15

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

• Few contributions to class discussions; seldom volunteers but responds to direct questions
2 • Contributions are sometimes of f -topic
• Is of ten inattentive and needs reminder of f ocus of class. Occasionally makes disruptive comments while others are speaking.
• Tries to respond when called on but does not of f er much
• Contributions are of ten of f -topic or distract f rom discussion
1
• Does not listen to others; f requently speaks while others are speaking or does not pay attention while others are speaking; d etracts f rom discussion; sleeps
and such
Revised and adopted from https://www.smu.edu/-/media/Site/Law/faculty/teaching -resources/Class-Participation-Rubric.pdf and https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/examples/courselevel -
bycollege/cfa/tools/participationrubric-cfa.pdf.

RUBRIC FOR READING ASSIGNMENT/ THINK-PAIR-AND-SHARE ACTIVITY/ ESSAYS IN EXAMS/ FINAL PAPER

CRITERIA EXCELLENT (100%) VERY GOOD (90%) GOOD (85%) NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (75%)

Presents accurate inf ormation Presents accurate inf ormation and Presents some accurate inf ormation Presents incomplete and
and insightf ul ideas whenever complete ideas. and some ideas. inaccurate inf ormation and ideas.
Knowledge and
necessary.
Understanding
Questions are answered thoroughly. Some questions are not answered. Most of the questions are not
(40 points)
Questions are answered answered.
thoroughly and ef f ectively.
Expresses ideas supported Expresses ideas supported by some Expresses ideas supported by a f ew Ideas are not supported by
Thinking Inquiry
ef f ectively by relevant pieces of relevant pieces of evidence and relevant pieces of evidence and relevant pieces of evidence and
(35 points)
evidence and rationales. rationales. rationales. rationales.
The message is overtly The message is organized. The readers The organization of the message is The message is so disorganized
organized. The author helps the have no dif f iculty understanding the mixed up and random. The readers you cannot understand most of
readers understand the sequence and relationships among the must make some assumptions about the message.
Organization sequence and relationships of ideas in the statements. The ideas in the the sequence and relationship of
(15 points) ideas by using organizational paper can be outlined easily. ideas.
aids such as announcing the
topic, using transitions, and
summarizing.
There are no technical writing There are only f ew technical writing There are many technical writing There too many technical writing
mistakes committed. mistakes committed such as misspelling, mistakes committed. mistakes committed.
Technical punctuation, or grammatical lapse.
Writing All ref erences are properly Most of the ref erences are not cited Ref erences are not cited
(10 points) cited. There are a f ew ref erences that are not properly. properly.
cited properly.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 16

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

RUBRIC FOR MIGRATION MAPPING

CRITERIA EXCELLENT (100%) VERY GOOD (90%) GOOD (85%) NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (75%)

The mapping exceptionally The mapping provides accurate and The mapping provides good pieces The mapping provides only a
provides accurate and complete inf ormation about the history of inf ormation about the history of f ew numbers of accurate
complete inf ormation about the of migrants, the reasons of their migrants, the reasons of their inf ormation about the history of
Content
history of migrants, the migration, and the actual or possible migration, and the actual or possible migrants, the reasons of their
(30 points)
reasons of their migration, and problems they experienced. problems they experienced. migration, and the actual or
the actual or possible problems possible problems they
they experienced. experienced.
The content is supported by an The content is supported by an The content is supported by a map The content is supported by a
accurate map that shows the accurate map that shows the route of with f ewer details about the route of total inaccurate and incomplete
Graphics and
detailed route of the migrants. the migrants. the migrants. There are also some map.
Supporting
inaccuracies f ound in the map.
Materials The map is also creative, The map is creative and easy to
(20 points) engaging, and easy to interpret.
interpret.
The presenters were able to The presenters were able to clearly The presenters were able to discuss The presenters were nervous
conf idently and clearly discuss discuss important and relevant important and relevant inf ormation and disorganized leading to the
important and relevant inf ormation about the migrants. about the migrants. inability to discuss important
Presentation inf ormation about the migrants. and relevant inf ormation about
(20 points) They were able to use their supporting They, however, sometimes f orget to the migrants.
They were able to use their materials. use their supporting materials.
supporting materials They did not use their
ef f ectively. supporting materials.
Ability to The presenters can answer Most of the answers to the presenters There are only a f ew answers f rom Presenter cannot answer the
Answer questions substantially and are clear and relevant. the presenters that can be considered questions substantially and
Questions relevantly. substantial and relevant. relevantly.
(10 points)
There are no technical writing There are only f ew technical writing There are many technical writing There too many technical writing
Technical mistakes committed. mistakes committed such as misspelling, mistakes committed. mistakes committed.
Writing punctuation, or grammatical lapse.
All ref erences are properly Most of the ref erences are not cited Ref erences are not cited
(10 points)
cited. There are a f ew ref erences that are not properly. properly.
cited properly.

Revised and adopted from https://www.scribd.com/document/395499876/Migration -Project-Rubric .

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 17

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

RUBRIC FOR ACTION PLAN PAPER

CRITERIA EXCELLENT (100%) VERY GOOD (90%) GOOD (85%) NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (75%)

The description of the project is The description is clear and generally The description is not clear and hard The description is not clear and
clear, concise, and easy to easy to understand with a f ew to understand. cannot be understood.
Program/Project
understand. exceptions.
Description
The goals of the project are vaguely The goals of the project are not
(30 points)
The goals of the project are The goals of the project are clearly stated and explained. stated and explained.
clearly stated and explained. stated.
The signif icance of prioritizing The signif icance of prioritizing the social The signif icance of prioritizing the The signif icance of prioritizing the
the social problem is properly problem is described. social problem is vaguely described. social problem is not described.
Social Problem described.
Rationale There are many supporting evidence There are f ew supporting evidence There are no supporting
(25 points) There is a vast number of presented. presented. evidence presented.
supporting evidence (statistics,
data, etc.) presented.
The presenters were able to The presenters were able to clearly The presenters were able to discuss The presenters were nervous
conf idently and clearly discuss discuss important and relevant important and relevant inf ormation and disorganized leading to the
important and relevant inf ormation about the migrants. about the migrants. inability to discuss important
Presentation inf ormation about the migrants. and relevant inf ormation about
(25 points) They were able to use their supporting They, however, sometimes f orget to the migrants.
They were able to use their materials. use their supporting materials.
supporting materials They did not use their
ef f ectively. supporting materials.
Ability to The presenters can answer Most of the answers to the presenters There are only a f ew answers f rom Presenter cannot answer the
Answer questions substantially and are clear and relevant. the presenters that can be considered questions substantially and
Questions relevantly. substantial and relevant. relevantly.
(10 points)
There are no technical writing There are only f ew technical writing There are many technical writing The essay is written inf ormally
mistakes committed. mistakes committed such as misspelling, mistakes committed. and poorly. There too many
Technical punctuation, or grammatical lapse. technical writing mistakes
Writing All ref erences are properly Most of the ref erences are not cited committed.
(10 points) cited. There are a f ew ref erences that are not properly.
cited properly. Ref erences are not cited
properly.
Revised and adapted from https://blogs.ubc.ca/mscarnegie/files/2017/04/Pandoras-Promise-Marking-Rubric.pdf

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 18

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

RUBRIC FOR DOCUMENTARY REVIEW/REACTION PAPER

CRITERIA EXCELLENT (100%) VERY GOOD (90%) GOOD (85%) NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (75%)

Purpose of the Clear understanding of the f ilm Good understanding of the f ilm and its Some understanding of the f ilm and Basic understanding of the f ilm
Film and its purpose. purpose. its purpose. and its purpose.
(30 points)
Well-developed and supported Has a developed opinion on whether the Opinion provided but provides a Has virtually no opinion about the
Personal Film opinion on whether the f ilm f airly f ilm f airly portrayed both sides of the limited explanation on the f airness of f ilm or has an opinion on if the
Evaluation portrayed both sides of the controversy; ref ers to relevant examples the f ilm; ref ers to examples f rom the f ilm was biased or not; makes no
(30 points) controversy; ref ers to specif ic & f rom the f ilm. f ilm that are not that relevant. ref erences to any examples f rom
relevant examples f rom the f ilm. the f ilm,

The message is overtly The message is organized. The readers The organization of the message is The message is so disorganized
organized. The author helps the have no dif f iculty understanding the mixed up and random. The readers you cannot understand most of
readers understand the sequence and relationships among the must make some assumptions about the message.
Organization sequence and relationships of ideas in the statements. The ideas in the the sequence and relationship of
(20 points) ideas by using organizational paper can be outlined easily. ideas.
aids such as announcing the
topic, using transitions, and
summarizing.
There are no technical writing There are only f ew technical writing There are many technical writing The essay is written inf ormally
Technical
mistakes committed. mistakes committed such as misspelling, mistakes committed. and poorly. There too many
Writing
punctuation, or grammatical lapse. technical writing mistakes
(20 points)
committed.

GRADING AND ASSESSMENT

Computation f or Midterm Grade Computation f or Final Term Grade

40% Midterm Examination 40% Midterm Examination
30% Attendance/Recitation/Quizzes 30% Attendance/Recitation/Quizzes
30% Homebased Requirements/Online Exercises 30% Homebased Requirements/Online Exercises

Computation of Final Grade

(Midterm Grade + Final Grade) / 2

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 19

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

COURSE POLICIES AND EXPECTATIONS

1. GENERAL. Students are expected to f ollow rules as indicated in the Student’s Handbook. You may access it on this link https://bit.ly/StudentHandbookPSU.
2. RESPECTFUL CLASS ENVIRONMENT. Students are expected to behave respectf ully during classes. Any student who acts disruptive and inappropriate will be
penalized f or their behavior.
a. Put your phone on silent during class meetings;
b. There is no need to ask permission to use the restroom.
c. You are welcome to bring f ood and beverages
d. During online meetings, observe proper netiquettes.
e. Be kind to each other and to yourself . Reach out when you need help or extend help when you possibly can.
f. Respect each other’s opinion (when posting to a comment/ disagreeing to a point raised in the discussion) and avoid personal or insulting remarks.
g. Overall, strive to create a saf e space f or everybody. Any f orm of bullying or discrimination will not be tolerated.
3. LEARNING PLATFORMS. MS TEAMS will be primarily tool f or communication and f or the submission of requirements.
4. LEARNING RESOURCES. All ref erences and reading materials will be uploaded in the MS Teams.
5. SUBMISSIONS. Written activities and other class related submissions must be uploaded in the assignment tab of MS Teams within the given deadline, unless instructed
otherwise. On-time submission of requirements is encouraged, but leniency will be observed. Late submission will still be accepted until the end of the semester with
no point deduction except f or the Final Paper (please see the guidelines f or the f inal paper). However, special quizzes and exams must be taken not more than a week
af ter the set schedule. It is the responsibility of the students to reach out to the instructor if they missed a quiz or an e xam. For major exams, an application f or special
exam must be submitted to secure another schedule.
6. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY. All f orms of cheating are strictly prohibited. Any student caught doing suspicious things will automatically receive zero p oints f or that said
requirement and will be penalized in accordance with university regulations.
7. PLAGIARISM. This is considered another f orm of cheating. It is a serious of f ense. Students are advised to properly give citations in th eir papers and presentations.
Forgetting to cite texts and images will be severely dealt with in accordance with university regulations. This serves as your f irst warning. The second warning, zero
score f or the particular activity (if you are caught plagiarizing). Third and f inal warning, an automatic f inal grade of 5.00 (Non-negotiable). Hence, bef ore submitting,
subject your work to any platf orm or application to prevent such. At most 25% of direct quotations will be accepted. For more inf orma tion on how to properly cite texts
and materials (using American Psychological Association), see https://owl.purdue.edu/index.html and / or watch https://tinyurl.com/allaboutplagiarism. You may also
ref er to the Plagiarism Code here https://bit.ly/PlagiarismCodeGEE4. Also, read the Student Handbook Article XIV f or more inf ormation.
8. ATTENDANCE AND DROPPING. For the entire semester, you must not exceed to ten (10) unapproved absences f rom the class without any valid reason. Dropping
and changing subjects must conf orm to the university policies.
9. PARTICIPATION IN GROUPWORKS. This class do not tolerate f ree-loaders. If majority of the members of the group decided to remove a member due to lack of
cooperation and responsiveness, the removed member will have to work on the task alone within the given schedule. Failure to do so will result to a score of zero for
the said task.
10. APPEALS. Appeals f or penalties, scores, and/or f inal grade is highly encouraged, especially if an obvious mistake is evident. To write an appeal, send the instructor a
message using any of the given communication platf orm. State your concerns politely. Provide evi dences if possible.

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 20

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

11. CONSULTATION. Always communicate with the instructor f or any related concerns and seek consultation whenever necessary. You may reach the instructor through
MS Teams or the provided e-mail address. Contact Number and Facebook Messenger will only be used f or emergency purposes.
12. HEALTH PROTOCOLS. COVID is not yet over. If you f eel sick, rest. You will be excused in class. When at the campus, observe the necessary health protocols.

REVISION HISTORY
DATE OF
REVISION NUMBER DATE OF REVISION HIGHLIGHTS OF REVISION
IMPLEMENTATION
• Replaced the class activities.
• Provided rubrics f or the new class activities.
2022-01 September 9, 2022 September 19, 2022 • Added and removed a f ew numbers of learning materials.
• Added a f ew and more specif ic class policies.
• Revised the computation of grades (based on the new BOR approved assessment)
• Inclusion of new vision and mission.
2023-01 August 14, 2023 August 22, 2023 • Addition of new resources
• Removal of Asynchronous in the activities and learning materials

PREPARATION AND REVIEW NAME SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED

Prepared by the: J. AXEL C. ARENAS
Faculty (Stand-alone Program)
August 14, 2023
JOAN ELIZABETH G. IBAY
Adopted and Enhanced by:
RODOLFO M. BANIQUED JR. fEB

Reviewed by the Committee f or Common ERWIN O. ESTRELLA, EdD August 17, 2023
Programs
ENGR. REX B. BASUEL August 17, 2023

FREDERICK F. PATACSIL, PhD August 17, 2023

Endorsed by the Council of Deans and Department Chairs on: August 17, 2023

FACULTY CONTACT INFORMATION

NAME Rodolf o M. Baniqued Jr.
DESIGNATION Instructor I
E-MAIL ADDRESS rodolf [email protected]

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 21

 FM-AA-CIA-13 Rev. 06-Sep-2022

CONSULTATION SCHEDULE Tuesday (8:00am to 5:00pm)

OFFICE LOCATION PSU Urdaneta City Campus, SAS Building, 3 rd f loor, Rm. 301, General Education Department

Adopted and Enhanced by: Checked by: Recommended by: Approved:

RODOLFO M. BANIQUED JR. JOHN PAUL M. FLORES ERWIN O. ESTRELLA, EdD ROY C. FERRER, PhD

Faculty Department Chairperson College Dean Campus Executive Director

Certified for Campus/University Utilization for A.Y. 2023-2024

WEENALEI T. FAJARDO, PhD MANOLITO C. MANUEL, EdD

Director f or Curriculum and Instruction Vice President f or Academic and Student Af f airs

COURSE SYLLABUS IN GEE4 – GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP 22