Titles Random Random Random
Titles Random Random Random
Abstract
This study aimed to produce ink from Mahogany sawdust tannin. Specifically, it
sought to determine the physical properties of ink using different amounts of glycerol
as mordant; the physical properties of ink using different amounts of glycerol in terms
of color, odor, and pH; the acceptability of the ink in terms of color, odor, and
absorptivity; the best proportion of raw materials in the production of ink; and
whether a significant difference exists in the physical properties of the inks in terms of
pH. The study used the developmental and descriptive method that involved the
production of ink, observation, and testing of the aforementioned properties, as well
as a survey of the acceptability of the ink. One-way Analysis of Variance was used to
determine whether significant difference exists in the pH of the inks produced using
different amounts of glycerol. Findings of the study show that all three sample
proportions were black, had a faint pleasant odor, and the pH values were consistent.
The ink from Mahogany sawdust tannin was acceptable in terms of color, odor, and
absorptivity. The best proportion of the raw materials in the production of ink is 10
milliliters tannin extract, 1 gram ferrous sulfate, 1 gram sodium chloride, 1 milliliter
ethyl alcohol, and 3 milliliters glycerol. It has a darker color compared to the other
two proportions containing 1 mL and 2 mL of glycerol, respectively. There is no
significant difference in pH among the three ink samples containing different amounts
of glycerol. The ink produced from Mahogany sawdust has been found very highly
acceptable.
Bio-note:
Introduction
Tannins, which are used in this study, serve as colorants in the production of
ink. They are pale yellow to light brown and produce a dark color when mixed with
iron salts. Correspondingly, this study has two goals: to produce writing ink; and to
manage solid waste produced by mahogany sawdust. Specifically, this study aimed to
produce ink from Mahogany sawdust tannin. The study further explored its
acceptability among users in terms of color, odor, and absorptivity. The best
proportion of raw materials to produce an acceptable ink was likewise explored.
From Wiley’s online library (1994), tannin was found to be present in wood
dust (sawdust). The tannin concentration of hard- and soft-wood dust was determined
in dust powder and in samples on filters. It varied from 1.6 ± 0.3 mg/g (± SD) for fir,
which is a soft wood, to 80 ± 30 mg/g (± SD) for oak, which is a hard wood. In five
woodworking shops where samples were taken, the concentrations of the total dust
varied from 0.2 to 20 mg/m3, while those of tannins varied from 2 to 341 μg/m3. Hard
woods like oak or mahogany have a higher tannin concentration than soft woods.
To indicate that we have sufficient source of sawdust, and hence tannin, from
the local lumber mills and woodworking industries as the target of this study, Region
6 is ranked the third log-producing region and Negros Occidental is ranked number 6
among the top 10 log-producing provinces in the Philippines with a production of
18,976 cubic meters per year. Of this volume, 1,435 cubic meters is Shorea
negrosensis (www.wood-databasecom).
Background on Tannin
Tannins are also called tannic acid. They are a group of pale yellow or light
brown amorphous substance in the form of powder, flakes, or a spongy mass and they
are widely distributed in plants. The chief uses of tannin are tanning leather, dyeing
fabric, making ink, and in various medical applications. Tannins occur in the roots,
wood, bark, leaves, and fruit of many plants, particularly in the bark of oak species
and in sumac and myrobalan, and also in good quantity among the group of trees that
we know as mahogany.
9
The following score cards were used to determine the acceptability of the ink
in terms of color, odor, and absorpitivity. (Color: 5= Excellent; 4=Very satisfactory;
3=Satisfactory; 2=Unsatisfactory; and 1= Poor; Odor: 5=Very good odor; 4=Good
odor; 3=Acceptable odor; 2=Slightly malodorous; and 1=Repulsive; Absorptivity on
each of the three criteria: 5= Excellent; 4=Very satisfactory; 3=Satisfactory;
2=Unsatisfactory; and 1= Poor).
The different raw materials, tools, and equipment used are listed hereunder.
The materials were the consumables and the tools which consist of the glassware and
metallic wares commonly found in the laboratory.
Table 1
List of Materials Used
Distilled water was used to extract tannin from the sawdust. In order to have
sufficient allowance for evaporation of water heated during the extraction process and
to provide sufficient quantity of the three samples offered to the respondents for
testing, 6 liters was more than enough. Likewise, the quantities of the other materials
used, as shown above, provided enough allowance.
The different tools and equipment in the chemistry laboratory and their
corresponding uses or purposes for this experiment is listed hereunder.
10
Table 2
List of Tools and Equipment Used
Table 3
Bill of Materials
Cost of Materials
Quantity Unit Material and Description Unit Cost Total Cost
1 bottle Distilled water, 6-L bottle 72.50/bottle 72.50
1 m Cheesecloth, 1 meter length 50.00/m length 50.00
Ethyl alcohol, 99%
60 mL 100.00/L 6.00
concentration
60 mL Glycerol, pure 12.50/30mL 25.00
10 g FeSO4, pure 600.00/500 g 12.00
60 g NaCl, ordinary grade table salt 15.00/kg 0.90
100 pcs Bond paper, substance 20 1.00/pc 100.00
1000 g Mahogany sawdust FREE FREE
Total 366.40
Distilled water was obtained from supermarkets. Cheesecloth was obtained from
a good textile store downtown. Ethyl alcohol of 99% concentration was obtained from
certain chemical supply companies, as the local drugstores have such substance in
only 70% concentration. Glycerol was obtained from chemical supply companies and
large drug stores. Table salt was obtained at a public market. Substance 20 bond
paper, of which the quantity prepared for this study was more than sufficient to allow
11
for wastage, was obtained from school and office supply stores. Mahogany sawdust
was obtained from small-scale sawmills and furniture shops near STI WNU.
Mahogany sawdust (100 g) was placed into a 1000-mL beaker. Distilled water
(500 mL) was added. Before heating the mixture of distilled water and Shorea
negrosensis sawdust, it was allowed to stand overnight. The following day, the
mixture was heated on a water bath for 3 hours. The mixture was stirred every 15
minutes while maintaining the temperature between 60°C to 65°C. The Bunsen burner
was removed from the set-up (or turned off) every time the temperature reached 60°C.
The heat of the water vapor from the water bath increased the temperature of the
mixture even after the burner had been removed. Hence, the necessity of removing (or
turning off) the burner from the set-up before the maximum allowable temperature
was reached.
During the extraction process, the color of the liquid phase slowly darkened.
The change in color ranged from light yellow to reddish-brown. After heating for the
required time, the mixture was filtered using cheesecloth. The filtrate, which is the
tannin extract, was collected in another beaker. The presence of tannin in the extract
was confirmed by performing qualitative tests. The beaker containing the tannin
extract was placed on a water bath. Heat was applied to a maximum temperature of
65°C. Most of the water content of the tannin extract was evaporated until a solution
more viscous than the first was obtained.
Physical Examination
The extracted liquid was subjected to physical examination, namely for color,
odor, and taste. The results of these tests are shown in Table 5.
The color of tannin changes when certain iron compounds are added to it.
This phenomenon is the basis upon which this paper, to produce ink from tannin, is
founded. The results of this test are shown in Table 8 below.
Both Fehling’s solution and Benedict’s reagent cause a reduction reaction that
gives precipitates `a characteristic red color on tannin. The results of these tests are
shown in Table 9 below.
After the extracted solution had been verified to be tannin extract, the main
procedure for producing ink from the tannin extract began.
Two more mixtures were made using the same procedure, using 10 mL tannin
extract, 1 g FeSO4, 1 g NaCl, 1 mL ethyl alcohol, and 2 mL glycerol for Sample 2;
and using 10 mL tannin extract, 1 g FeSO4, 1 g NaCl, 1 mL ethyl alcohol, and 3 mL
glycerol for Sample 3. These three samples were kept in separate glass bottles to be
offered to the respondents for evaluation. Table 4 summarizes the constitution of the
three different samples of ink.
Table 4
Preparation of Ink
After the ink was produced, the 3 different samples qualitative tests, namely
test for color and test for odor. For each sample, the color of the ink was observed to
be black and the odor was pleasant. The results of these observations are shown in
Table 5.
13
Determination of pH
To measure the acidity (pH) of the ink, a digital pH meter was used. A pH
number less than 7 indicates an acidic substance, a pH of 7 indicates neutral (7 is the
pH of pure water), and a pH number more than 7 indicates a basic (alkaline)
substance. The results of testing the three ink samples for pH are shown in Table 10.
The ink was stored in glass jars with a lid and kept in separate boxes in a cool
dark location. Many natural inks are not lightfast and will lose color and brilliance if
stored in a sunny location. Also, it was necessary to use glass bottles as there might be
contamination reactions if the ink were stored in containers of other materials, as glass
does not react with almost any kind of substance.
Property Testing
The three different inks produced using different amounts of glycerol were
compared as to color, odor, and absorptivity. The color, odor, and absorptivity had
been evaluated by the respondents using the Likert’s scale of 1 to 5.
Color. This was evaluated by the respondents in the acceptability test using
the Likert’s scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being of poor color and 5 being of excellent color.
Odor. This was evaluated by the respondents in the study, whether the odor
was offensive or not, before and after the ink was applied to paper, using the Likert’s
scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being of offensive odor and 5 being of a pleasing odor.
Absorptivity Test
The three different ink samples offered were used to write on one side only of
separate clean sheets of bond paper. Then three different tests were asked of the
respondents: (a) the time it took for each ink sample to dry; (b) whether the ink marks
on the obverse side of the page smudged when the paper was handled; and (c)
whether the ink bled through the page to be visible on the reverse side. For the
evaluation factors to be used by the respondents, the results were observed carefully
for clarity of stroke, retention of original color, and leftover “halos” or ink bleeding
around the markings on the obverse. The judging factors determined the score or
rating for each kind of ink with 5 as the highest, indicating the ink’s retention on the
paper, and 1 as the lowest.
Statistical Analysis
To facilitate the analysis and interpretation of the results associated with the
different properties tested in the production of ink from tannin, a one-way Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) was used as the statistical tool. One-way ANOVA at 5% level of
significance was used to determine if there was any significant difference in the pH of
the three ink samples. This tool is appropriate because the researcher compared ink in
three proportions: that which had 1 mL, 2 mL, and 3 mL of glycerol, respectively.
This type of research involved single group design, a univariate analysis because only
14
one variable was used in each of the three different proportions. Correspondingly, the
mean was used to determine the validity of the Ink Quality Evaluation instrument as
well as its acceptability.
The tables that following show the results of the qualitative tests to verify
whether the extracted liquid was really tannin. Table 5 presents the results of the
physical examination of the liquid extracted from heating Mahogany sawdust in
distilled water.
Table 5
Results of the Physical Examination of the Extracted Liquid
REPLICATE COLOR
1 Reddish-brown
2 Reddish-brown
3 Reddish-brown
4 Reddish-brown
5 Reddish-brown
The reddish brown color of the extract is one of the characteristics of tannin,
which has a slight woody odor and an astringent taste. These physical characteristics
were demonstrated by the tannin extract. Table 6 shows the reaction of litmus paper to
the liquid that was extracted. An acidic solution turns litmus to red; an alkali (or
basic) solution turns litmus to blue.
Table 6
Reaction with Litmus Paper
The blue litmus paper did not completely turn red when a drop of the tannin
extract was added to it. It simply turned bluish-red, indicating only slight acidity. This
reaction demonstrates one of the properties of tannins. When the process was repeated
using a red litmus paper instead of blue, no change in color was observed. The red
litmus paper remained red. This shows that the tannic extract is acidic. Table 7 shows
15
the color of the precipitates when gelatin, starch, and albumin were added to,
respectively, three separate test tubes of the extracted liquid.
Table 7
Precipitation of Gelatin, Starch, and Albumin
Gelatin, starch, and albumin solutions formed precipitates with the tannin
extract with the colors enumerated in the table. This positive result confirms the
presence of tannin in the extract. Table 8 shows how the extracted solution reacts with
two iron reagents. In fact, mixing tannin with either of these iron compounds is
historically how black ink was made.
Table 8
Reaction with FeCl3 and FeSO4
The green-black precipitate formed with FeCl3 and FeSO4 is another proof that
tannin is present in the extract. Another thing indicated by the color of the precipitate
is the group with which the tannin in the extract belongs. A blue-black color is a
positive test for pyrogallol tannins while a green-black color is for the catechol
groups. Since the color of the precipitate is green-black, the tannin that has been
extracted from Mahogany belongs to the catechol group. The final tests conducted on
the extract were the reduction of Fehling’s Solution and Benedict’s Reagent, the
results of which are shown in Table 9.
16
Table 9
Reduction of Fehling’s Solution and Benedict’s Reagent
The first objective of the study was to determine the physical properties of ink
using different amounts of glycerol in terms of color and pH. Table 10 shows the
results of the qualitative tests conducted to determine the color, odor, and pH of the
ink produced.
Table 10
Qualitative Tests for Ink
In these qualitative tests, the color was visually noted to be black with just the
slightest tinge of brown. With regards to odor, it was faint and just barely perceptible.
The slight odor that can be sensed was pleasant, not offensive. In the test for acidity
on the three ink samples, the pH was consistent. The ink samples were acidic. It was
desirable that the ink must be acidic for optimum absorption on paper.
The second objective of the study was to determine the acceptability of the ink
among the respondents surveyed. Table 11 presents the tabulation of the means
computed from the Acceptability Survey.
17
Table 11
Results of the Acceptability Survey
Very Very
Odor 3.925 Satisfactory 4.00 4.45
Satisfactory Satisfactory
In terms of color and odor, Sample 3 had the highest mean of 4.35 and 4.45,
respectively, which means that it was very highly acceptable. On the other hand,
Sample 1 had the highest mean of 4.39, interpreted as very highly acceptable, for
absorptivity. However, as a whole, Sample 3 obtained the highest average mean of
4.38, which makes it very highly acceptable among the three samples presented to the
respondents.
The third objective of the study was to determine the best proportion of raw
materials used in the production of the ink. Based on the result of the Acceptability
Survey, the best proportion for the ink is 10 mL tannin extract, 1 g FeSO4, 1 g NaCl,
1 mL ethyl alcohol, and 3 mL glycerol.
Table 12
Data on Tests of pH
95% Confidence
Interval for Mean
Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimum Maximum
N Mean Deviation Error Bound Bound
Sample 1 5 1.0800 0.00707 0.00316 1.0712 1.0888 1.07 1.09
Sample 2 5 1.0840 0.01140 0.00510 1.0698 1.0982 1.07 1.10
Sample 3 5 1.0820 0.00447 0.00200 1.0764 1.0876 1.08 1.09
Total 15 1.0820 0.00775 0.00200 1.0777 1.0863 1.07 1.10
18
Table 13
ANOVA Table on Difference in pH Level
Verbal
pH
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Interpretation
No Significant
Between Groups 0.000 2 0.000 0.300
Difference
Within Groups 0.001 12 0.000
Total 0.001 14
This paper found that the best proportion of the raw materials in the
production of ink is 10 milliliters tannin extract, 1-gram ferrous sulfate, 1-gram
sodium chloride, 1 milliliter ethyl alcohol, and 3 milliliters glycerol. As a final point,
this paper found no significant difference in the pH among the inks produced when
different amounts of glycerol were used. This further implies that the absorptivity was
not affected by the change in the amount of glycerol.
This paper found that the best proportion of the raw materials in the
production of ink is 10 milliliters tannin extract, 1-gram ferrous sulfate, 1-gram
sodium chloride, 1 milliliter ethyl alcohol, and 3 milliliters glycerol. As a final point,
this paper found no significant difference in the pH among the inks produced when
different amounts of glycerol were used. This further implies that the absorptivity was
not affected by the change in the amount of glycerol.
Nonetheless, it was also apparent that the resulting ink had such thin
consistency that it is not good for use on felt-tip markers. Further research might
dwell on the possibility of using other binders like gum Arabic, using sawdust
obtained from other trees, and producing colored ink would all prove beneficial to
stakeholders earlier mentioned.
The origin of tannins, their historical evolution, their different types, and
their applications are described by Pizzi (2019). Accordingly, old and established
applications are described, as well as the future applications which are being
developed at present and that promise to have an industrial impact in the future. The
19
Conclusion
This paper aimed to explore the viability of producing ink from Mahogany
sawdust tannin, which was obtained from sawmills and furniture shops in the vicinity
of STI West Negros University in Bacolod City. Since other sawmills used wood
from the same species of Mahogany, it was deemed that sawdust obtained from these
sources was representative of sawdust available from other similar sources. Other raw
materials like ferrous sulfate, sodium chloride, and ethyl alcohol were kept constant
during the formulation of the different samples of ink that were later subjected to
analyses. Findings reveal that the production of ink from the same source is possible
and that the product has been found to be user-friendly in terms of color, odor, and pH
especially if prepared with the best proportion of raw materials. Further analysis
showed that varying the amount of glycerol found no effect on the color, odor, or pH
of the inks produced, and that adding 3 mL glycerol while keeping all of the other
ingredients constant produced the best proportion of ink from Mahogany sawdust.
Further research might dwell on the possibility of using other binders like gum
Arabic, using sawdust obtained from other trees, and producing colored ink would all
prove beneficial to stakeholders earlier mentioned. Finally, it was also apparent that
the resulting ink had such thin consistency (viscosity) that it is not good for use on
felt-tip markers.
References