0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Additive Manufacturing Methods Comparison

comparison of AM processes from Martin Leary DfAM book

Uploaded by

Bijay Karali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views2 pages

Additive Manufacturing Methods Comparison

comparison of AM processes from Martin Leary DfAM book

Uploaded by

Bijay Karali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

102 Design for Additive

Manufacturi
turing
10,000- DED

MEX
1,000-

PBF-EBM
100
VPP
PBF SLM
MJT BJT
101
10 100 1,000
10,000
Part volume (litres)
Fig. 4.2 Physical part volume versus layer thickness based on reported data for robust
commercial implementations of ISO/ASTM AM classifications at time of writing: Directed
Energy Deposition (DED), Material Extrusion (MEX), Vat Polymerisation (VPP), Powder Bed
Fusion Electron Beam Melting (PBF-EBM), Powder Bed Fusion Selective Laser Melting
(PBF-SLM), Material Jetting (MJT), Binder Jetting (BJT).

1o,.000
DED
1,000 ---

MEX
PBF-EBM
100 PBF-SLMF
MJT BJT

10
VPP
10 100 10,000
1,000
Part volume (litres)
robust
Fig. 4.3 Material
deposition rate versus physical part volume based on reported data 1or
commercial implementations of ISO/ASTM
AM classifications at time of writing: Dir
Energy Deposition (DED), Material Extrusion (MEX), Vat
Fusion - Electron Beam Melting Polymerisation (VPFTOMelting
(PBF-EBM), Powder Bed Fusion Selective Laser Mc
-

(PBF-SLM), Material Jetting (MJT), Binder Jetting (BJT).


103
Detail D F A M

MJT
Opportunity for novel AM
technology development

DED MEX

VPP PBF-EBM BJT


PBF-SLM
Low Moderate High
Support of overhanging geometry
Fig, 44 Material flexibility versus support requirements based on reported data for robust
Commercial implementations of ISO/ASTM AM classifications at time of writing: Directed
Energy Deposition (DED), Material Extrusion (MEX), Vat Polymerisation (VPP). Powder Bed
Fusion Electron Beam Melting (PBF-EBM), Powder Bed Fusion Selective Laser Melting
(PBF-SLM). Material Jeting (MJT), Binder Jetting (BJT).

PBF-EBM
DED
BJT

MEXBBJT MJT
PBF-SLM VPP

Opportunity for novel AM


technology development
10
Metals Polymers Ceramics
Compatible material cdassifncations
Fig. 4.5 Approximate capital installation cost versus available material types based on
data for
reported
robust commercial implementations of ISO/ASTM AM classifications at time of
wnting: Direct Energy Deposition (DED), Material Extrusion (MEX), Vat Polymerization
PP), Powder Bed Fusion Electron Beam Melting (PBF-EBM), Powder Bed Fusion
Selective Laser
Melting (PBF-SLM), Material Jetting (MJT), Binder Jetting (BJT).

You might also like