History Teacher Support Guide
History Teacher Support Guide
The purpose of this support material is to provide teachers with further guidance on putting a
course together, to provide further guidance approaching the teaching and learning of history,
and to provide samples of student responses to both external and internal assessment tasks
with comments from senior examiners to explain why each piece of student work was
awarded that particular mark.
There are a huge number of possible ways to structure a DP history course and teachers are
encouraged to exercise creativity and flexibility when constructing their history course.
The key starting point when putting a course together is for teachers to ensure that they
understand the requirements of the history guide (Diploma Programme History guide
published in 2015 for first assessment in 2017). As the guide contains a significant number of
changes from previous versions, it is vital that both new and experienced history teachers
read the guide thoroughly before designing/ redesigning their history course.
The DP history course provides teachers with a great deal of flexibility and choice over the
topics they select to teach, allowing teachers to adapt the course to best meet the particular
needs and interests of their students. The focus of the course on six key concepts (change,
continuity, causation, consequence, significance, and perspectives) is designed to provide a
conceptual thread which links all of the available topics. This helps to ensure coherence
whichever of the huge variety of topics on offer teachers select, and despite the huge number
of possible combinations of topics. It is though still very important that teachers take the
time to carefully consider their selection and combinations of topics.
Course planning consists of two main stages: firstly developing an overall course outline that
sets out the approach, structure, and outline of the course, and secondly developing specific
unit plans. More advice on unit planning and examples of unit plans can be found in section
1.4 of this TSM.
There are a variety of different ways to approach the creation of a DP history course outline.
Some teachers may choose to focus their course on a particular time period, such as medieval
history, early modern history, or modern history, which then influences their selection of
topics. Other teachers may choose to choose topics from across different time periods, tied
together through a shared focus on a particular region, or on a particular concept such as
identity.
Step 1: Select one prescribed subject
Select one prescribed subject from the list of five (see the "Syllabus outline" section of the history guide).
Each prescribed subject consists of two case studies, each taken from a different region of the world.
Both of the case studies specified for the chosen prescribed subject must be studied.
Internal assessment
For both SL and HL, students must complete a historical investigation for their internal assessment task.
Students can investigate any historical topic of their choice (see the "Internal assessment" section of the
history guide).
Prescribed subjects:
Teachers must choose one prescribed subject from the list of five. Each prescribed subject
consists of two case studies, each taken from a different region of the world. Both of the case
studies specified for the chosen prescribed subject must be studied. For example, prescribed
subject 5 is called “Conflict and Intervention”, and it includes case studies on Rwanda (1990-
1998) and Kosovo (1989-2002). If this prescribed subject is selected, then teachers must
teach both the case study on Rwanda and the case study on Kosovo.
The requirement to study both of the case studies for the chosen prescribed subject provides
an opportunity for students to explore a similar phenomenon in two different regions of the
world. This encourages students to look for similarities and differences between the two case
studies, and to explore why these similarities and differences exist.
To encourage and support teachers with adopting this comparative approach, the two case
studies for each prescribed subject are each broken down into the same three sub-headings.
For example, in the cases of Rwanda and Kosovo each of the case studies looks at the causes
of the conflict, the course and interventions, and the impact. Having the same three sub-
headings for each of the case studies provides a common vocabulary across the two case
studies, which can be help students to see concepts underlying both case studies, such as
causation or conflict. It can also help to deepen students understanding of the similarities and
differences between the two case studies, which can then facilitate more effective transfer of
their historical understanding to other events they may encounter elsewhere in the course.
The prescribed subjects are assessed on paper one, which is a source based examination
paper. Because paper one is primarily a skills focused paper, students are not expected to
demonstrate the same depth of knowledge of the case studies that they would be expected to
demonstrate, for example, of their paper 3 topics. However, they are expected to have studied
each of the case studies in detail.
Each year the paper 1 examination paper will focus on one of the two case studies specified
for each of the prescribed subjects. It is therefore crucial to note that students must have
studied both of the case studies for the chosen prescribed subject in detail, as they will not
know which of the two case studies the examination paper will focus on in that particular
examination session. The selection of which of the two case studies for each prescribed
subject is set for each examination session will be random, and will not follow any pattern
(such as alternating from session to session).
When selecting a prescribed subject some teachers may prefer to opt for a prescribed subject
which links strongly to a topic their students are studying elsewhere in the course, to support
and reinforce their students’ understanding of that topic. Alternatively, because this
component is primarily skills focused, other teachers may decide to use this opportunity to
increase the breadth and diversity of their history course, using the prescribed subject, for
example, as an excellent opportunity to engage students with history from a different time
period.
Teachers must choose two world history topics from the list of twelve provided in the subject
guide. The twelve topics cover a range of time periods (medieval, early modern, and
modern), and are as follows:
Teachers can choose any two of the twelve topics; there are no restrictions on combinations.
Some teachers may decide to choose two topics which allow them to focus on a particular
aspect of history across two time periods, such as topic 1 (society and economy 750-1400)
and topic 4 (societies in transition 1400-1700), both of which have a focus on social history.
Alternatively, some teachers may decide to choose to study two topics from the same time
period, such as topic 9 (evolution and development of democratic states 1848-2000) and topic
10 (authoritarian states in the 20th century), both of which focus on modern history.
The DP history subject guide contains a table for each world history topic outlining the topics
for study and the prescribed content. The tables also include suggested examples. It should be
noted that for this component the examples provided are suggestions only and should not be
taken as prescriptive. Teachers have the freedom to use some of these examples if they
wish, or to replace them with others that more closely meet the needs and interests of their
students.
While teachers have a huge amount of freedom to select which examples they wish to study
with their student, for each topic the subject guide specifies prescribed content which must
be studied. For example, for the topic “causes and effects of 20th century wars” the subject
guide specifies the following prescribed content:
Practices of • Types of war: civil wars; wars between states; guerrilla wars
war and their
impact on the • Technological developments; theatres of war—air, land and sea
outcome
• The extent of the mobilization of human and economic resources
• Territorial changes
• Political repercussions
Some questions will require students to discuss or compare examples from two different
regions of the world. For the purposes of the DP history course the world has been divided
into four regions. They are Asia and Oceania, Africa and the Middle East, Europe, and the
Americas. For example, a question may ask students to compare the causes of two civil wars
that they have studied, from different regions of the world.
It is therefore crucial that teachers ensure that students have covered at least two examples
which can be used to discuss each element of the prescribed content. In the case of the
“causes and effects of 20th century wars” topic outlined above, one element of the prescribed
content is “changes in the role and status of women”. This means that teachers must ensure
that students are able to discuss two examples of wars from two different regions and how
they impacted on the role and status of women.
An effective way to help prepare students for this paper can be to adopt a more thematic
comparative approach to teaching the topics, rather than teaching the examples in isolation or
purely chronologically. For example, a teacher teaching the authoritarian states may decide
that they wish to study four examples: Germany – Hitler, China – Mao, Uganda – Idi Amin,
and Chile – Pinochet. Rather than teaching each example in isolation and simply working
through each example chronologically, teachers may find it more effective to adopt a more
comparative and thematic approach. On this approach teachers would take an element from
the prescribed content for that topic, such as “conditions in which authoritarian states
emerged”, then look at this same element in each of the four examples, taking the opportunity
to draw out similarities and differences between the examples. The teacher would then move
on to another element from the prescribed content, such as “methods used to establish
authoritarian states”, and again explore this same element in each of the four examples, again
taking the opportunity to draw out similarities and differences between the examples.
SL and HL students all study a common core of one prescribed subject, two topics in world
history, and a historical investigation for their internal assessment task. For HL only, teachers
also select one regional option to focus on in depth. For the purposes of the IB course the
world has been divided into four regions: Asia and Oceania, Africa and the Middle East,
Europe, and the Americas.
Teachers select their regional option based on a number of factors. For many teachers it is an
opportunity to tailor the course to meet national or state requirements. Once teachers have
selected which region they wish to focus on, they should then select three topics a choice of
eighteen topics per regional option.
This element of the course is an opportunity for students to undertake in-depth study into the
history of a particular region of the world. This contrasts with the emphasis in the prescribed
subjects and the world history topics, where the emphasis is on exploring and comparing
examples from different regions.
For each topic, the subject guide presents teachers with an introductory paragraph, followed
by a series of bullet points. It should be noted that both the introductory paragraph and the
bullet points constitute the prescribed content for this component. This means that
examination questions on paper 3 may refer to the content indicated by the bullet points, or
content specified in the paragraph of introduction to the topic.
Some paper 3 topics or bullet points allow for a case study based approach, where students
are able to select which countries they discuss. Please note that ONLY topics where this is
clearly indicated in the subject guide allow for this approach, so it is important that teachers
read the subject guide closely.
For example:
then it means that all three named kings (Henry VI, Edward IV, and Louis XI) must be
studied.
Case studies of two of the following: al-Mu'izz (953-975); al-Hakim (996-1021); al-
Mustansir (1036-1094)
then it means that only two of the three named (al-Mu'izz, al-Hakim, and Mustansir) must be
studied. Any two of the three can be chosen.
Case study of any two enlightened despots: policies and their impact; extent of change
The DP history course, as all DP courses and indeed as all IB programmes, focuses on
developing five key areas of ATL skills: thinking skills, communication skills, social skills,
research skills, and self-management skills.
More detailed guidance and resources on these skills are provided in the guidance materials
on Approaches to Teaching and Learning in the Diploma Programme. However, this section
of the TSM provides suggestions of ways in which DP history teachers can help students to
develop these skills during their history studies. The examples provided are intended purely
as suggestions/ to provide useful ideas. They are in no way intended to be prescriptive.
Thinking skills Ensure that students are familiar with the DP history
command terms (listed in the back of the subject guide), and
are clear about what type of thinking is expected of them
when different terms are used
When planning history lessons, identify opportunities to
make links to TOK
Engage students in activities in history lessons which require
higher order thinking (such as analysis and evaluation) rather
than simply requiring memorisation of content
Encourage students to make links and comparisons between
different examples and topics that they study in their history
lessons
Incorporate reflection activities into history lessons (these
could be range from reflective journals to online reflection
using blogs or podcasts)
When asking students to read an article in a history lesson,
try putting them into small groups and asking them to use a
visible thinking routine such as “word, phrase, sentence”
(where they highlight a key word, a key phrase, and then a
key sentence) to help them engage with the text more closely,
and ask students to discuss why they made those particular
selections. (See Ritchhart et al, 2011, Making Thinking
Visible, Jossey Basss)
The DP history course, as all DP courses and indeed as all IB programmes, is underpinned by
six key approaches to teaching which encompass the key values and principles of IB
pedagogy: teaching that is inquiry-based, conceptually focused, contextualized, collaborative,
differentiated and informed by assessment.
More detailed guidance and resources on these areas are provided in the guidance materials
on Approaches to Teaching and Learning in the Diploma Programme. However, this section
of the TSM provides suggestions of ways in which DP history teachers can utilise these
approaches in their teaching. The examples provided are intended purely as suggestions/ to
provide useful ideas. They are in no way intended to be prescriptive.
Teaching focused on conceptual The history course is focused on six key concepts
understanding (change, continuity, causation, consequence,
significance, and perspectives.) When planning
history lessons, try to identify the key concepts
which will be particularly important in that lesson
Try to identify opportunities to make links to
concepts students may also be studying in their
other subjects, such as power or identity
When exploring the causes of a specific historical
event, try to help students understand the wider
concept of causation, and help them to identify
different categories of causes (such as economic
causes, political causes, etc.)
During each history unit try to pose a variety of
different types of questions – factual, conceptual
and debatable
Teaching developed in local and Ensure students realise they have the option to do
global contexts their historical investigation on a local history
topic if it is something which particularly interests
them
Encourage students to appreciate the complexity of
historical events by exploring multiple
interpretations or explanations
Whenever you explore abstract concepts in history,
such as change, be sure to ground them in specific
examples to help students see what they look like
in the real world
Teaching world history provides huge
opportunities to develop international mindedness
in students; in your planning try to explicitly
Throughout the DP history course, students have
the opportunity to explore historical events that
have played a key role in shaping the world today,
deepening their understanding of the complex and
interconnected nature of past and present events.
Try to identify and explore concepts within
historical topics which also have continuing
relevance in the world today, such as power,
inequality, conflict, rights, etc.
All DP history teachers should engage in explicit planning but the IB does not prescribe a
particular format of unit planner that teachers should use. Examples of unit planners are
provided in the guidance materials on Approaches to Teaching and Learning in the Diploma
Programme. This section of the TSM also includes examples of unit plans created by DP
history teachers. These examples are intended to help teachers to reflect on their own
planning, and are not intended to be “model” plans or to prescribe how planning should be
undertaken.
1.5 Sample Lesson Plans
This section of the TSM includes examples of lesson plans created by DP history teachers.
These examples are intended to help teachers to reflect on their own planning, and are not
intended to be “model” lesson plans or to prescribe how lesson planning should be
undertaken.
2.1 Guidance on the IA task
The internal assessment task for both SL and HL requires students to undertake a historical
investigation. This element of the course is an opportunity for students to engage in a deeper
exploration of the methods of history, and for students to reflect on their own experience of
“doing history”. The historical investigation is made of up three sections:
1. Identification and
2. Investigation 3. Reflection
evaluation of sources
Students have a free choice of topic for their historical investigation. The topic need
not be related to the syllabus but it must be historical, and cannot be on an event that
has happened in the last 10 years.
A bibliography and clear referencing of all sources must be included in the
investigation, but are not included in the overall word count.
The investigation must be a written piece and should be the work of the individual
student. Group work is not permitted.
The timing of when to complete the IA task is up to the individual teacher. However,
it is advisable to start the investigation at least three months before the date that
samples must be submitted to the moderators.
The word limit for the historical investigation is 2,200 words. If the word limit is exceeded,
then the teacher's assessment must be based on the first 2,200 words. There is no minimum
word limit for the historical investigation. However, work that falls significantly below the
maximum word limit is unlikely to meet all the stated requirements for the task and is likely
to receive low marks overall.
You will note that there is not a specific criterion relating to/ rewarding the inclusion of a
bibliography. However, clear referencing and a bibliography must be included with every
investigation. The investigation must be the students own work, and all ideas and work of
others must be fully acknowledged. If a student fails to include clear referencing and a
bibliography this is therefore a potential academic honesty infringement.
• Discuss with students the nature of the IA task, and ensure that they are familiar with
the assessment criteria
• Discuss with students the different types of investigation that they could undertake
• Discuss the importance of academic honesty with students before they undertake their
research, and emphasise the importance of using one standard system of referencing
• Help students to create an individual timetable for the different stages of the
investigation; for example, choosing the topic, finishing the first draft, and the due
date for the final version
• Give students feedback on a first draft of their IA (this may be done in sections if
preferred)
• Check the authenticity of the student's final draft, to confirm that, to the best of your
knowledge, it is the student's own work.
• Mark and comment on all internal assessment work, using the assessment criteria
stated in the history subject guide. Don't be hesitant about using the full range of
marks if appropriate, and remember to adopt a "best fit" approach to applying the
markbands.
• If different teachers are involved in the preparation of students, it is vital that internal
moderation is undertaken prior to the submission of marks
2.2 Internal assessment samples with moderator comments
3.1 Paper 1 response samples with examiner comments
3.2 Paper 2 response samples with examiner comments
3.3 Paper 3 response samples with examiner comments