0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

Youssef H. Serhal : Abstract

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
43 views6 pages

Youssef H. Serhal : Abstract

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

International Journal for

Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)


Open-Access Journal ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
DOI https://doi.org/10.69792/IJHS.24.1.8 No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4276-9080

Examining the Impact of Work-Life Balance on Satisfaction, Productivity, and


Performance Among Faculty and Staff Members in Higher Education
Institutions: The Case of Lebanese Private Sector.
Youssef H. Serhal * Admissions Department, Modern University for Business and
Science, Beirut, Lebanon. [email protected]

Abstract:
A major concern faced by many employees in numerous countries in several sectors due to the present dynamic, busy, and demanding
business environment is Work-Life Balance. Maintaining an equilibrium between work and life is an issue that is gaining increasing
recognition because of its considered importance to organizations and employees. In contrast, the deprivation of work-life balance
(WLB) has drawbacks on the way employers estimate success in many matters. The research’s main objective is to study how work-
life may impact faculty and staff members in Lebanese private higher education institutions (HEIs) and to identify if attaining a high
level of satisfaction, performance, and productivity is associated with a better work-life balance. Besides, the moderating effect of
perceived organizational support was also studied. To obtain the results, a mono-method quantitative research approach for the
collection and analysis of data was employed. A self-directed survey questionnaire was distributed randomly among staff and faculty
members working in Lebanese private universities. A total of 130 responses were gathered. For the purpose of revealing the
relationships between the variables, SPSS software version 25 and Process SPSS Macro version 3.4 were used. The research’s
findings showed that a relationship between work-life balance, and employees’ satisfaction, productivity, and performance exists.
However, there was no evidence to support the idea that organizational support moderates the way WLB affects other variables. The
findings encourage private HEIs in Lebanon to implement or reinforce existing practices that focus on WLB to attain better employee
job satisfaction, productivity, and performance.

Keywords: Work-Life Balance, Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, Job Productivity, Higher Education, Private Universities,
Perceived Organizational Support..

Received: 05/01/2024 Accepted: 11/04/2024 Proofreading: 28/04/2024 Available online: 30/06/2024


Introduction expenses related to recruitment, and training costs
In present work environments that are busy and (Russell & Bowman, 2000).
demanding, obtaining work-life balance is becoming a As businesses strive to remain sustainable and
more significant topic. It is especially important for competitive in today's world, human resource
faculty and staff members at private universities in management (HRM) has become increasingly critical.
Lebanon since they must manage both their personal and The active involvement and commitment of employees
professional lives in a highly challenging way. The are key to achieving these goals. Accordingly, many
intricate nature of academic and administrative tasks, organizations have implemented various high-
which frequently entail long working hours, high job performance HR practices and strategies to enhance
expectations, and vast duties, can substantially employee job performance. These practices include
negatively impact employee performance, productivity, career development programs, performance evaluations,
and satisfaction at work (Diego-Medrano & Ramos, compensation structures, teamwork, and training
2021). initiatives. Among these and given its impact on
The search for achieving WLB on a global level remains enhancing employee performance, prioritizing WLB is
ongoing, yet a universally accepted definition of this particularly important (Banu & Sundharavadivel, 2019).
concept continues to be difficult to pin down. The Achieving a professional and personal life balance is
achievement of a healthy WLB is influenced by various crucial to reducing absenteeism and turnover rates of
aspects of a person's life, and its outcome can have far- employees. Creating a supportive work environment that
reaching consequences across society. However, there supports employees' well-being and allows them to
are some potential disadvantages accompanying WLB manage both their work and personal commitments
that can affect both workers and employers. For effectively is vital. This strategic approach not only
employees, these drawbacks may manifest themselves as strengthens employee loyalty but also boosts overall
a decline in job and life satisfaction levels, issues related productivity. Research shows that employees who
to mental and physical health, and insufficient experience minimal stress in both their personal and
performance within the organization (Guest, 2002). professional lives are more likely to sense work
Employers who fail to pay attention to WLB may face a satisfaction, show consistent commitment to the
decline in work performance, an increase in absenteeism organization, and engage in supportive organizational
and sick leave instances, as well as high turnover rates, behaviours. Therefore, organizations must prioritize

*Corresponding Author:| Email: , . [email protected]


Copyright©2022 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License
74
International Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)
ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024

WLB to cultivate a satisfied and productive workforce confidentiality, including informed consent and secure
(Fleetwood, 2007). data storage and transmission protocols.
This study aims to study the influence of Work-life
balance on job satisfaction, productivity, and Research Findings
performance as well as the moderating effect of Table 1 shows the sociodemographic traits of the
perceived organizational support in Lebanese private participants involved in the study. 130 participants were
higher education institutions. The present study has involved, and all are employed in private universities in
several important aspects. First, it adds to the body of Lebanon. Most of the participants were aged between 31-
evidence on the notions of work-life balance, job 40 years old (45=34.6%), female (87=66.9%), and
satisfaction, productivity, and performance. The results Lebanese (100%). Most of the participants were residing
can help university administrators, policymakers, and in Mount Lebanon (49=37.7%) and the majority were
human resource specialists create and put into practice married with kids (53=40.8%), more than any other
efficient interventions and practices that support WLB marital status. More than half of the participants have
and raise performance, productivity, and job satisfaction. obtained a university degree, with 69=53.1% of them
Additionally, it can serve as a roadmap for the creation holding a master’s degree and 45=34.6% of them having
of interventions and programs targeted at enhancing a Doctorate. The majority of the participants were
WLB and creating a supportive workplace. employed in the other universities category (72=55.4%)
Methodology holding the highest percentage, followed by MUBS
The current study adopts a positivist methodology, (38=29.2%), LAU (6.9%), and AUST (6.2%). The
heavily relying on experimental and manipulative Others category concerning the nature of the
techniques (Cohen, 2006), which involves formulating employment scores (51=39.2%) followed by
and testing hypotheses, along with the processes of (48=36.9%) of the participants who were instructors,
validation and falsification. A quantitative method for while other titles take the rest. Furthermore, (81=62.3%)
data collection and analysis is adopted in this approach, of the participants were full-timers at the universities
aiming to generate hypotheses, test them, and contribute they work at, and (49=37.7%) were part-timers. It is
to existing knowledge (Arif & Farooqi, 2014). worth noting that (83=63.8%) were faculty members, the
Furthermore, the research perspective involves deductive rest were either working in administrative departments or
reasoning and methodologies characterized by high holding positions in both academic and administrative
structure and large sample sizes, aiming to strengthen the ones. As for the years of experience, more than half of
reliability of findings. This approach entails acquiring the respondents have less than 5 years of experience
theories from existing literature and testing them through (70=53.8%), followed by 5-10 years of experience
data collection, experiments, or surveys, followed by (33=25.4%), and lastly those who have more than 10
statistical analysis to draw conclusions (Sinval & years (27=20.8%). Additionally, most participants have
Marôco, 2020). The chosen methodology for this study an income between 500$ and 1000$ (48=36.9%).
is a mono-method quantitative research approach, Finally, equal percentages were recorded by participants
focusing on investigating the correlation between work- when asked if they are the sole source of income for their
life balance, job satisfaction, productivity, and families (50% Yes, 50% No).
performance of faculty and staff members in private Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of the
universities in Lebanon. To ensure representation from participants (N=130).
Variable N (%)
various Lebanese private universities, a simple random Gender
sampling technique was adopted, providing equal Male 43 (33.1%)
Female 87 (66.9%)
opportunities for participation. Data collection utilized a Age in years
structured online survey distributed via email and social 18 – 25 15 (11.5%)
26 – 30 25 (19.2%)
media platforms, with participants recruited from 31 – 40 45 (34.6%)
personal networks and databases of Higher Education 41 – 50 38 (29.2%)
51 and above 7 (5.4%)
Institutions (HEIs). The survey encompassed validated Nationality
scales and questions related to work-life balance, job Lebanese 130 (100%)
Other 2 (1.3%)
satisfaction, productivity, performance, and perceived Area of residency
Beirut 27 (20.76%)
organizational support. Statistical analysis using SPSS Mount Lebanon 49 (37.69%)
software involved descriptive analysis, Pearson South 7 (5.38%)
North 9 (6.92%)
correlation, linear regression analyses, and moderation Bekaa 30 (23.07%)
effects testing, adhering to a significance threshold of Akkar 0
Baalbeck-Hermel 2 (1.5%)
p<0.05 (Smeltzer et al., 2016; De Menezes & De Paula Nabatiyeh 4 (3.07%)
Xavier, 2018). Ethical considerations were paramount, Kserwen-Jbeil 2 (1.5%)
Marital status
with measures in place to ensure participant rights and Married with kids 53 (40.8%)
Married without kids 14 (10.8%)
Single 46 (35.4%)

75

*Corresponding Author | Email-. [email protected]


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License.
International Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)
ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024

Widowed 3 (2.3%)
Divorced 8 (6.2%)
Table 2: Description of the scales used in the study.
Mean ± Minimu Maximu Media Cronbac
In a relationship 6 (4.6%)
SD m m n h alpha
Educational level
Work-Life Balance 3.52±0.95 1.20 6.46 3.46 0.850
Highschool diploma or lower 3 (2.3%)
The Short Index of
Vocational/technical license (vocational 18.11±3.9
2 (1.5%) Job Satisfaction 7.00 25.00 18.00 0.772
institute) 2
(SIJS)
Bachelor’s degree 11 (8.5%) The Short Version
Master’s degree 69 (53.1%) of the Self-
Doctorate 45 (34.6%) Assessment Scale
4.10±0.72 1.80 5.00 4.05 0.950
Current job title of Job
Instructor 48 (36.9%) Performance
Assistant/associate professor 31 (23.8%) (SJOP)
Others 51 (39.2%) The Survey of
Nature of current employment Perceived
4.66±1.60 1.00 7.00 5.00 0.928
Full time 81 (62.3%) Organizational
Part-time 49 (37.7%) Support
University working on Employee
26.20±6.4
MUBS 38 (29.2%) productivity 13.00 40.00 25.00 0.806
7
AUST 8 (6.2%) (IAPT)
LAU 9 (6.9%)
LIU 3 (2.3%)
AUB 4 (3.06%) Table 3 represents the correlation between work-life
Others 72 (55.4%) balance and the dependent variables of job satisfaction,
Role in the organization
Faculty member (Academic departments) 83 (63.8%) productivity, and performance. The analysis shows a
Staff member (Administrative departments) 32 (24.6%) negative correlation, r = -0.28 (Figure 2) indicating that
Faculty and Staff 15 (11.5%)
Years of experience the work-life balance scale was negatively correlated
Less than 5 years 70 (53.8%)
5 – 10 years 33 (25.4%)
with the satisfaction scale (SIJS). Also, r = -0.317 (Figure
More than 10 years 27 (20.8%) 3) shows another negative correlation with the
Monthly income
˂ 500$ 45 (34.6%) performance scale (SJOP). Likewise, r = -0.429 (Figure
500$-1000$ 48 (36.9%) 4) represents a negative correlation with the productivity
> 1000$ 37 (28.5%)
Family relies on as a source of household scale (IAPT).
income
Yes 65 (50.0%) Table 3: The Correlation between Work-Life Balance, Satisfaction, Performance, and
No 65 (50.0%)
Productivity .
Satisfac Perfor Product
The description of the mean, minimum, maximum, tion mance ivity
(SIJS) p- (SJOP) (IAPT)
p- p-
median, and Cronbach alpha are displayed in the below va
Variable Correla Correla val Correla val
lu
table (table 3). The work-life balance assessment scale’s tion
coeffici
e tion
coeffic
ue tion
coeffici
ue

mean score was 3.52±0.95, this score means that ent ient ent
0. <0.
respondents have moderate work-life balance. The Work-Life
-0.282 00 -0.317
<0.
-0.429 00
Balance 001
Cronbach's alpha of 0.850 proposes good internal 1 1
SJIS: The Short Index of Job Satisfaction; SJOP: The Short Version of Self-
consistency for the items in this scale. Moreover, the Assessment Scale of Job Performance; IAPT: Productivity during a Working
Day.
mean of the Short Index of Job Satisfaction (SIJS) was
18.11±3.92 denoting that the participants have a high
level of job satisfaction. The Cronbach's alpha of 0.772
suggests acceptable internal consistency. The Short
Version of Self-Assessment Scale of Job Performance
(SJOP) scored 4.10±0.72 meaning that those who
participated also experienced high levels of job
performance. The Cronbach's alpha of 0.950 signifies a
high internal consistency. Similarly, Employee
productivity (IAPT) (26.20±6.47) confirmed a high level
of job productivity as well. The 0.806 Cronbach's alpha
score means acceptable internal consistency. Contrary,
moderate organizational support was proven as the mean
score was 4.66±1.60. The Cronbach's alpha of 0.928
reveals excellent internal consistency in this case.
Figure 1: Pearson correlation analysis between The
Work-Life Balance and the Short Index of Job
Satisfaction (SIJS).

76

*Corresponding Author | Email-. [email protected]


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License.
International Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)
ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024

there exists an equivalent decrease of 0.922 units in SIJS,


0.248 units in SJOP, and 2.615 units in IAPT.
Table 4: First Multivariable Linear Regression.
Taking employee productivity, performance, and job satisfaction as the dependent
variable and the work-life balance as the independent variable
Model 2: Model 3:
Model 1:
Performance Productivity
Satisfaction (SIJS)
(SJOP) (IAPT)
p- p-
p-
UB (95% UB (95% va UB (95% va
valu
CI) CI) lu CI) lu
e
e e
-0.922 (- -0.248 (- <0 -2.615 (- <0
Work-Life 0.00
1.575; - 0.372; - .0 3.622; - .0
Balance 6
0.270) 0.123) 01 1.608) 01
The three models were adjusted over age, marital status, monthly income, Nature of
current employment, Family relies on as a source of household income, and current job
title.
UB: Unstandardized Beta, CI: Confidence interval; SIJS: The Short Index of Job
Satisfaction; SJOP: The Short Version of Self-Assessment Scale of Job Performance;
IAPT: Productivity during a Working Day.

The regression analysis taking the employee


Figure 2: Pearson correlation analysis between The
outcome variables as the dependent variables moderated
Work-Life Balance and the Short Version of the Self-
by the Support provided by the institution is shown in
Assessment Scale of Job Performance (SJOP).
Table 5. The results indicated that no moderation effect
was found in all three models, the interaction effect
between the Support provided by the institution and the
Work-Life Balance was not significant (p-value>0.05 for
all).
Table 5: Second Multivariable Linear Regression.
Taking employee productivity, performance, and job satisfaction as the dependent variable and the
work-life balance as the independent variable moderated by the support provided by the institution
Model 1: Satisfaction Model 2: Model 3: Productivity
(SIJS) Performance (SJOP) (IAPT)
p
-
UB p- v
p-
(95% UB (95% CI) val UB (95% CI) a
value
CI) ue l
u
e
<
-0.735 (- 0.
Work-Life -0.200 (- 0.0 -2.392 (-3.421; -
1.378; - 0.025 0
Balance 0.330; -0.070) 03 1.363)
0.091) 0
1
Figure 3: Pearson correlation analysis between The 1.160
<
0.
Support provided 0.107 (0.033; 0.0 1.618 (1.027;
Work-Life Balance and Job Productivity (IAPT). by the institution
(0.790;
1.530)
<0.001
0.182) 05 2.210)
0
0
The relationship between work-life balance and three key Work-Life
1
0.
0.076 (-
dependent variables: job satisfaction (Model 1), job Balance *
Support provided
0.280; 0.671
0.008 (-0.063;
0.080)
0.8
12
-0.037 (-0.608;
0.533)
8
9
0.433)
performance (Model 2), and employee productivity by the institution 7
UB: Unstandardized Beta, CI: Confidence interval; SIJS: The Short Index of Job Satisfaction; SJOP: The
(Model 3) was investigated and presented in Table 4. The Short Version of Self-Assessment Scale of Job Performance; IAPT: Productivity during a Working Day

three models were adjusted over age, marital status,


monthly income, Nature of current employment, Family Discussion
relies on as a source of household income, and current The first hypothesis (H1) that declares a correlation
job title. For Model 1 (Satisfaction - SIJS) was exists between achieving a healthy equilibrium between
investigated, UB = -0.922, with a 95% confidence work and personal life and the overall satisfaction of
interval (CI) that ranges from -1.575 to -0.270. The faculty and staff members within privately owned
associated p-value is 0.006, indicating a statistically Lebanese universities was confirmed in Chapter 4,
significant negative relationship between work-life especially in the Multivariable Analysis as it was
balance and job satisfaction. Similarly, for Model 2 approved that both work-life balance and job satisfaction
(Performance - SJOP), UB = -0.248 (95% CI: -0.372 to - are negatively correlated. This relation has also been
0.123), and the p-value is <0.001, suggesting a confirmed in several previous studies, researchers agreed
significant negative association between work-life that through skillful management of their work and
balance and job performance. In Model 3 (Productivity - personal lives, employees experience higher and
IAPT), UB = -2.615 (95% CI: -3.622 to -1.608), and the improved job satisfaction (Rani et al., 2011; Kamran et
p-value is <0.001, indicating a significant negative al., 2014). Likewise, others concluded that an increase in
impact of work-life balance on employee productivity. work-life balance positively relates to work satisfaction
Overall, for each increase in the work-life balance unit, (Aziz-Ur-Rehman & Siddiqui, 2020; Znidaršič & Marič,
2021). This correlation might be attributed to various

77

*Corresponding Author | Email-. [email protected]


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License.
International Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)
ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024

factors, for instance, the mitigation of stress and burnout. and job satisfaction, performance, and productivity
Lebanon has been facing economic challenges and (Medina-Garrido et al., 2023). This can be linked to the
geopolitical instability, which has led to a high-stress variation of institutional practices as Lebanese private
work environment. Skillful management of work-life universities may vary regarding their work-life balance-
balance aids employees in mitigating stress and related organizational practices, policies, and support
preventing burnout, contributing to higher job mechanisms. As employees' experiences differ
satisfaction (Tavassoli & Sunyer, 2020). significantly, the diverse approaches among institutions
The results showed that work-life balance and could lead to inconsistencies in the moderating effect.
productivity are negatively correlated, meaning that the This discussion dove into the relationship between work-
lower the work-life balance is, the lower the productivity life balance, employee outcomes, and organizational
associated with it. Thus, the second hypothesis (H2) is support. The confirmed hypotheses highlight negative
also confirmed, which states that a correlation exists correlations between work-life balance and job
between the equilibrium of work and personal life and satisfaction, productivity, and performance. It’s
the overall productivity displayed by employees. It is noteworthy that despite demographics and employment
confirmed by diverse studies that whenever employees adjustment, the correlations remained the same.
maintain a healthy work-life balance, they are more However, the impact of institutional support as a
likely they be productive (Karman et al., 2014). This moderator wasn’t proven. This underscores the
relationship might be linked to enhanced focus and importance of recognizing diverse organizational
concentration. In other means, the socio-political doubts approaches in shaping these dynamics.
in Lebanon may result in distractions and impact
employees' focus. Thus, a balanced work-life Conclusion
equilibrium allows employees to concentrate on their In conclusion, this study aimed to understand the
tasks in a better manner, leading to an increase in relationship between work-life equilibrium, employee
productivity levels (Bloom et al., 2006). outcomes (Satisfaction, Productivity, and Performance),
A strong correlation exists between the equilibrium of and organizational support in private HEIs in Lebanon,
work and personal life and the overall performance of employing a mono-method quantitative approach.
employees. This is the third hypothesis in this study (H3) Hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 were confirmed, showing a
and like the previous hypotheses, it is also has been correlation between work-life balance, satisfaction,
confirmed. This correlation was displayed in Chapter 4 performance, and productivity, while organizational
as work-life balance and job performance are proven to support had no moderating influence. However,
be negatively correlated in this study. Previous research limitations such as the mono-method approach, sample
has also approved this hypothesis, their results implied size, and cross-sectional design may impact
that employee performance is positively and generalization. Recommendations include prioritizing
significantly affected by work-life balance, meaning that work-life balance initiatives, implementing training
increasing the work-life balance is associated with higher programs, and stress management. Further studies could
employee performance (Banu & Sundharavadivel, 2019; explore cultural factors, leadership styles, and employee
Beauregard & Henry, 2009; Mendis & Weerakkody, demographics. Practical implications highlight the
2018;). This relation can be understood through importance of work-life balance initiatives for employee
numerous factors, mainly employees’ adaptability and satisfaction and productivity in private universities,
resilience. Despite the unpredictable nature of the while theoretical implications suggest integrating
Lebanese environment, those who can navigate both various theories to address work-life dynamics
work and personal life demands, establish adaptability effectively.
and resilience. In the face of challenges, these qualities
positively influence performance (Susanto et al., 2023).
On the other hand, the final hypothesis (H4): the
role of the institution plays a significant part in
influencing how work-life balance impacts job
satisfaction, productivity, and performance for faculty
and staff members working in private universities in
Lebanon is not confirmed in this study. The results have
shown that no moderation effect was found in all three
models (SIJS; SJOP; IAPT) the interaction effect
between the Support provided by the institution and the
Work-Life Balance was not significant. However,
perceived organizational support has been shown to have
a role in moderating the influence of work-life balance

78

*Corresponding Author | Email-. [email protected]


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License.
International Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHS)
ISSN (Online): 2945-4271
No. 1 | Issue 1| June. 2024

References Lanka: a mediation model. Kelaniya Journal of Human


Resource Management, 12(1), 72.
Arif, B., & Farooqi, Y. A. (2014). Impact of Work Life Balance https://doi.org/10.4038/kjhrm.v12i1.42
on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Rani, S., Kamalanabhan, & Selvarani. (2011). Work/life
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and balance reflections on employee satisfaction. Serbian
Engineering, 5(9). Journal of Management, 6(1), 85–96.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324646756 https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm1101085r
Aziz-Ur-Rehman, M., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). Relationship Russell, G., & Bowman, Lyndy. (2000). Work and family:
between Flexible Working Arrangements and Job Current thinking, research, and practice (Report No. 54).
Satisfaction Mediated by Work-Life Balance: Evidence Department of Family and Community Services.
from Public Sector Universities Employees of Pakistan. Sinval, J., & Marôco, J. (2020). Short index of job satisfaction:
SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–38. Validity evidence from Portugal and Brazil. PLoS ONE,
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3510918 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231474
Banu, A. S., & Sundharavadivel, G. (2019). A Relationship Smeltzer, S. C., Cantrell, M. A., Sharts-Hopko, N. C., Heverly,
Between Work-Life Balance. International Journal of M. A., Jenkinson, A., & Nthenge, S. (2016).
Human Resource Management and Research, 9(2), 53– Psychometric analysis of the work/life balance self-
58. assessment scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement,
Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2006). Work- 24(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.24.1.5
life balance, management practices. In International Susanto, P.C., et al. (2023). Analysis of Work-Life Balance and
Differences in the Business Practices and Productivity of Resilience: For Support Employee Performance in
Firms (Vol. Volume). Chicago: University of Chicago Logistics Company. International Journal of Integrative
Press. (pp. 15-54). Sciences, 2(5), 535–554.
De Menezes, F. S., & De Paula Xavier, A. A. (2018). https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v2i5.4186
Development, Validation, and Reliability Testing of the Tavassoli, T., & Sunyer, A. (2020). Employee work-life
Brief Instrument to Assess Workers› Productivity during balance, satisfaction, and burnout in Iran and Spain.
a Working Day (IAPT). Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 779–791.
Negocios, 20(2), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8384
https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v20i2.3764 Worley, J. A. (2006). A Factor Aanalytic Study To Evaluate
Diego-Medrano, E., & Ramos, L. (2021). Examining the The Structure Of The Survey Of Perceived
Work-Life Balance of Faculty in Higher Education. Organizational Support [Degree of Doctor of
International Journal of Social Policy and Education, Philosophy]. Oklahoma City University Oklahoma.
3(3), 27–36. www.icpknet.org Znidaršič, J., & Marič, M. (2021). Relationships
Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why Work-Life Balance Now? between Work-Family Balance, Job Satisfaction, Life
International Journal of Human Resource Management, Satisfaction, and Work Engagement among Higher
18(3), 387–400.
Education Lecturers. Organizacija, 54(3), 227–237.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167441
Guest, D. E. (2002). Perspectives on the study of work-life https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2021-0015
balance. Social Science Information, 41(2), 255–279.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018402041002005
Henry, L. & Beauregard, A. (2009) ‘Making the link between
work-life balance practices and talent attraction’, Human
Resource Management Review, 46(3), pp. 97–108.
Kamran, A., Zafar, S., & Ali, S. N. (2014). Impact of work-life
balance on employees productivity and job satisfaction
in private sector universities of Pakistan. Lecture Notes
in Electrical Engineering, 242 LNEE(VOL. 2), 1019–
1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40081-0_86
Medina-Garrido, J.A., Biedma-Ferrer, J.M., & Bogren, M.
(2023). Organizational support for work-family life
balance as an antecedent to the well-being of tourism
employees in Spain. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism
Management, 57, 117–129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.08.018.
Mendis, M. D. V. S., & Weerakkody, W. A. S. (2018). The
impact of work life balance on employee performance
with reference to telecommunication industry in Sri

79

*Corresponding Author | Email-. [email protected]


Copyright © 2024 The Author(s): This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License.

You might also like