Water Geopolitics
Water Geopolitics
NEELY HABY
AUGUST 2024
Strategic Insight
About the author
Neely Haby produced this research while a visiting scholar at Stanford University’s Center for International
Security and Cooperation. She is currently an analyst at US Indo-Pacific Command and received her
Masters degree in International Affairs from the George H.W. Bush School of Government and Public Service
at Texas A&M University. Opinions expressed in this article are her own and do not reflect the positions or
policies of the US Department of Defense.
Acknowledgements
Thank you to internal reviewers at ASPI and also to external reviewers for their feedback on previous drafts
of this report. Thanks to Brian Eyler, Mahima Sikand, and Arzan Tarapore, and to Nathan Ruser at ASPI for
the satellite imagery work and analysis he has contributed to this report.
About ASPI
The Australian Strategic Policy Institute was formed in 2001 as an independent, non‑partisan think
tank. Its core aim is to provide the Australian Government with fresh ideas on Australia’s defence,
security and strategic policy choices. ASPI is responsible for informing the public on a range of strategic
issues, generating new thinking for government and harnessing strategic thinking internationally.
ASPI’s sources of funding are identified in our Annual Report, online at www.aspi.org.au and in the
acknowledgements section of individual publications. ASPI remains independent in the content of the
research and in all editorial judgements. It is incorporated as a company, and is governed by a Council
with broad membership. ASPI’s core values are collegiality, originality & innovation, quality & excellence
and independence.
ASPI’s publications—including this paper—are not intended in any way to express or reflect the views of
the Australian Government. The opinions and recommendations in this paper are published by ASPI to
promote public debate and understanding of strategic and defence issues. They reflect the personal views
of the author(s) and should not be seen as representing the formal position of ASPI on any particular issue.
Funding
No specific funding was received to produce this report.
NEELY HABY
AUGUST 2024
CLIMATE &
SECURITY
POLICY CENTRE Strategic Insight
Important disclaimer
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in relation to the subject
matter covered. It is provided with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering any
form of professional or other advice or services.
This publication is subject to copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of
it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or
otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission.
Enquiries should be addressed to the publishers. Notwithstanding the above, educational institutions
(including schools, independent colleges, universities and TAFEs) are granted permission to make copies
of copyrighted works strictly for educational purposes without explicit permission from ASPI and free
of charge.
ASPI
Level 2
40 Macquarie Street
Barton ACT 2600
Australia
Facebook.com/ASPI.org
@ASPI_org
Contents
Executive summary 4
Political control through water infrastructure 5
Strategic flooding 6
Population manipulation through water restriction 8
The People’s Republic of China doesn’t give water for free 8
Recommendations9
Conclusion11
Notes11
Acronyms and abbreviations 12
Executive summary
The Tibetan Plateau is the largest source of freshwater in with the river at relatively lower altitude after it. Such a
the Indo-Pacific region, supporting a staggering 1.35 billion project would be able to power a 50-gigawatt hydropower
people, a fifth of the world’s population.1 Of the five major station (that could provide 300 billion kilowatt hours of
rivers flowing from the plateau, China has established electricity a year). It would be the largest hydropower
a system of hydroelectric dams on the two largest: the project in history—about three times the size of the Three
Mekong River flowing through Southeast Asia, and the Gorges Dam (Figure 1).8
Brahmaputra River flowing through India and Bangladesh.
The scale and location of the proposed Great Bend
Beijing’s reach for lofty climate initiatives as the biggest
Dam will substantially increase China’s influence in the
energy consumer on the planet has made it the largest
border region and expand its capacity to store and
hydropower producer in the world, giving it extensive
withhold or release water in India. Hydro-hegemony isn’t
influence and power over lower riparian nations – that is,
a foreign concept to India, which in many cases benefits
those downstream on rivers – through water control.2
from holding a favourable position upstream from its
China’s climate pledge is to peak in carbon emissions neighbours. However, as the lower riparian nation on the
before 2030. Its ‘14th Five Year Plan for a Modern Energy Brahmaputra, New Delhi is unable to shape water politics
System’ details its strategy in energy from 2021 to 2025, as it has on other parts of its border, most notably with
a timeframe it describes as a critical period for ensuring Pakistan on the Indus River.
China’s energy security.3 Energy shortages experienced by
This report assesses the geopolitical impact of a possible
the country over the past three years have encouraged a
dam at the Great Bend of the Brahmaputra. In particular,
balanced approach to its low-carbon transition, detailed
it examines the dam as a potential source of coercive
in the plan as a coordinated, ‘supplies guaranteed’,
leverage China may gain over India. A dam there would
large-scale expansion of renewables.4 The plan runs
create four likely strategic effects: it would very likely
parallel to the building of hundreds of new coal-fired
consolidate Beijing’s political control over its distant
power plants to insure the country against recurring
borderlands; it would create the potential for massive
blackouts.5 China is pushing to match thermal energy
flooding as a tool of violence; it may affect human
expansion with a rapid enlargement of renewables to
settlement and economic patterns on the Indian side of
maintain its eco-friendly façade.
the border, downstream; and it would give Beijing water
The Brahmaputra River, nicknamed the ‘highest river in the and data that it could withhold from India as bargaining
world’, exists as a hydropower goldmine because water leverage in unrelated negotiations.
flow and the steepness of elevation drop determine the
To mitigate those challenges and risks, the report
amount of available energy in moving water.6 The greatest
provides three policy recommendations for the Indian
point of hydropower potential on the Brahmaputra is the
Government and its partners in Australia and the US. First,
Great Bend, which is a point on the river in China where the
it recommends the establishment of an open-source,
water takes a sharp turn, dropping 3,000 metres through a
publicly available data repository, based on satellite
gorge before gushing cross-border into Arunachal Pradesh,
sensing, to disseminate information about the physical
India.
impacts of the Great Bend Dam. Second, it recommends
The Chinese Government has for years toyed with the idea that like-minded governments use international legal
of a massive dam at the Great Bend, and, in 2020, in the arguments to pressure Beijing to abide by global norms
midst of a military crisis on the Line of Actual Control (LAC), and conventions. Third, it recommends that the Quad—the
it announced its latest plan for a massive hydropower informal group comprising Australia, India, Japan and the
plant on the Brahmaputra.7 A possible hydropower project US—use its humanitarian assistance and disaster relief
would involve a tunnel that cuts through terrain, linking (HADR) guidelines to begin to share information and build
the river at relatively higher altitude before the Great Bend, capacity for dam-related contingencies.
4| THE GEOPOLITICS OF WATER: HOW THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER COULD SHAPE INDIA–CHINA SECURITY COMPETITION
Figure 1: 3D satellite modelling showing the ‘Great Bend’ and where China is proposing to cut through the mountain to create a tunnel for
its proposed hydropower plant. The possible diversionary route outlined on this map is based on topographical analysis undertaken by
Nathan Ruser and is illustrative of an option only
6| THE GEOPOLITICS OF WATER: HOW THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER COULD SHAPE INDIA–CHINA SECURITY COMPETITION
However, in 2017 and again in 2020 during border The Bogibeel Bridge cuts three hours off of the travel time
clashes between Chinese and Indian troops on the LAC, from Delhi in central India to Dibrugarh in Upper Assam,
Beijing temporarily ceased its sharing of water data with reducing the travel distance by hundreds of kilometres.29
New Delhi.26 Since then, sharing has been sporadic,
The bridge is designed to support the transport of armed
increasing distrust and stoking Indian fear.27 Further, the
forces, including heavy equipment such as main battle
memorandum of understanding expired in 2023. Although
both countries are working to renew the agreement, the tanks.30 The key to India’s defence on its border with China,
primary issue remains: the document isn’t legally binding.28 Bogibeel Bridge is just one example of a strategic asset
that remains vulnerable to raging floodwaters. If it were
This fear is rational for India. Dams in upper riparian
washed away, or completely submerged, India’s defence
nations are a source of significant threat if those states
release water at the wrong time. Hydroelectric systems could be severely compromised.
constructed on the Brahmaputra allow China to calculate In addition to physical access, crucial lines of
water releases to compound floods in the region. From a
communication can also be severed by floods. In 2022,
humanitarian perspective, releasing water at the wrong
floods in India knocked down cellphone towers and power
time could mean losses of lives and more homelessness in
regions such as Assam and Arunachal Pradesh (Figure 3). lines, cutting off communications to millions of people
in the northeast and making evacuations extremely
From a national-security perspective, floods could
difficult.31 The Indian Army has openly discussed its
threaten Indian access to the LAC. The Indian Government
struggle to conduct rescue operations as floods disrupt
is investing large sums of capital to build bridges, roads
and railways to its border with China. In 2018, Prime telephone connections.32 India’s defence of the LAC,
Minister Modi inaugurated the sixth, and longest, road and and locals who live in and around the river basin, remain
rail bridge across the Brahmaputra in northeastern India. critically vulnerable to floods.
8| THE GEOPOLITICS OF WATER: HOW THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER COULD SHAPE INDIA–CHINA SECURITY COMPETITION
Government, most likely targeting the LAC. Conversation Even more, China is leveraging food and water insecurity
is currency when it comes to the Chinese Government. in the region as an opening to provide relief efforts and
Dialogue on responsible water management between aid that vulnerable South Asian countries can’t refuse48—a
these two disputing countries will come at a cost to India. vicious cycle that inherently reduces the sovereignty of
China doesn’t give such opportunities for free. some of India’s closest neighbours. China can be the
problem and solve the problem, intertwining its affairs
More broadly, Chinese actions on the Brahmaputra can with those on its periphery to amplify its influence.
influence how other nations in the region view India.
Lastly, as China tips the scale of power in the border
China’s efforts in Bangladesh only irritate the failed Teesta
region further off balance, even the perception that the
Water Agreement between New Delhi and Dhaka.46
People’s Republic of China can weaponise water on the
The agreement to formalise the sharing of river water
LAC holds political and strategic value. Introducing plans
and resources fell short because of domestic political
for the Great Bend Dam, spotlighting its extraordinary
opposition, from the Indian state of West Bengal.47 Those power-generating capacity, contributes to this narrative of
actions tarnish India’s reputation as a responsible upper intimidation. To account for the risk, India must factor in
riparian nation and increase Chinese influence in the this Chinese capability whether it’s leveraged or not. That
region. In this context, China has offered to step in and deep distrust increases the potential for miscalculation
finance Bangladesh’s own unilateral efforts to better and misunderstanding, simultaneously increasing the risk
manage the Teesta. of conflict.49
Recommendations
As a lower riparian state, India has some structural media, researchers and other civil-society groups with
disadvantages that expose it to the geopolitical and high-quality data that’s otherwise difficult to access. For
humanitarian risks highlighted above. Despite those India, the information will put it in a better position to
disadvantages, India can use two of its relative strengths— navigate negotiations on the border and engineer water
technology and foreign partners—to offset China’s coercive management to protect military assets and downstream
leverage if China goes ahead with plans to build the Great communities. For Bangladesh, it will help to identify the
Bend Dam. root of its water problems, giving Dhaka a more informed
perspective when engaging with China on water projects.
1. India’s partners should establish an open-source and
In this instance, India and Bangladesh are put in a position
publicly available satellite-based data repository.
to speak truth to power to replace lost leverage in being the
Technology can serve as a catalyst for responsible lower riparian nations.
water management by initially replacing the need The model for this program is the ongoing project in
for bilateral cooperation for access to water data. To Southeast Asia on the Mekong River: the Mekong Dam
do that, a civil-society group or consortium could Monitor.50 The monitor is an open-source platform built out
establish an open-source satellite-based data collection by Stimson and Eyes on Earth Inc., and funded by the US
program to expose China’s infrastructure building and State Department, US foundations and individual donors,
water manipulation on the Brahmaputra River. If the that uses remote sensing, satellite imagery and GIS analysis
data repository were to be established by a reputable to provide near-real-time reporting and data downloads
civil-society group or groups, it could more credibly on water levels in reservoirs along the Mekong. The data
claim to be a politically neutral service, not subject to the is then fed into an easily accessible online application and
policy settings of India or any other interested party. Such translated into local languages for downstream countries
a data service would help both India and Bangladesh to receive early warning prior to sudden releases of water
understand the extent to which they’re being affected by China. Furthermore, it establishes a baseline for water
by Chinese actions upstream; and it would also provide levels annually, so that slight increases in water restrictions
10 | THE GEOPOLITICS OF WATER: HOW THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER COULD SHAPE INDIA–CHINA SECURITY COMPETITION
Conclusion
China has its own reasons for rapidly expanding its some of India’s best assets in countering the potential
hydropower infrastructure on the Brahmaputra and coercive leverage China may gain wouldn’t require
considering a massive new dam at the Great Bend, significant resources. India’s most effective options rest in
but such infrastructure will also give it added coercive taking advantage of relatively affordable and accessible
leverage against India. For its part, India is already deeply technology, and by harnessing the power of collective and
concerned by China’s growing military and dual-use coordinated action with like-minded partner states and
infrastructure near the LAC, so new Chinese activity at the civil-society institutions. Those options would not only
Great Bend will only reinforce India’s prior biases on the help to offset China’s new leverage but would also help
need to pour resources and attention into defending itself New Delhi to avoid the trap of pouring scarce national
on its northern border. However, as this report has shown, resources into defending itself from Chinese coercion.
Notes
1 Eleanor Albert, ‘Water clouds on the Tibetan Plateau’, Council on Foreign 11 Robert Barnett, ‘China is building entire villages in another country’s
Relations, 9 May 2016, online. territory’, Foreign Policy, 7 May 2021, online.
2 ‘An energy sector roadmap to carbon neutrality in China’, IEA 50, 12 China Power Team, ‘How is China expanding its infrastructure to project
International Energy Agency, September 2021, online; China Power Team, power along its western borders?’, Center for Strategic and International
‘How is China’s energy footprint changing?’, China Power, Center for Studies, 16 March 2022, online.
Strategic and International Studies, 16 February 2016, online; Madhumitha 13 Office of the Secretary of Defense, Military and security developments
Jadganmohan, ‘Largest hydropower producing countries in 2022’, Statista,
involving the People’s Republic of China, 2021, Department of Defense,
31 January 2024, online; Brian Eyler, Regan Kwan, Courtney Weatherby,
US Government, 2021, online.
‘How China turned off the tap on Mekong water’, Stimson, 13 April 2022,
14 Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, ‘Did China create new facts on the ground
online.
along the LAC with India?’, The Diplomat, 12 November 2021, online;
3 ‘14th Five Year Plan: Modern Energy System Planning (2021–2025)’, Climate
Nathan Ruser, Baani Grewal, ‘The latest flashpoint on the India–China
Change Laws of the World, March 2022, online; Jiang Yifan, Gao Baiyu, Sam
border: zooming into the Tawang border skirmishes’, ASPI, Canberra, no
Geall, ‘China’s five year plan for energy: one eye on security today, one on a
date, online; Nathan Ruser, Baani Grewal, ‘A 3D deep dive into the India–
low-carbon future’, China Dialogue, 23 June 2022, online.
China border’, ASPI, Canberra, no date, online.
4 John Kemp, ‘Reset by drought, China turned to coal to keep lights on’,
Reuters, 21 July 2023, online. 15 Robert Haddick, ‘Salami slicing in the South China Sea’, Foreign Policy,
3 August 2012, online.
5 Lauri Myllyvirta, Qi Qin, Xing Zhang, Flora Champenois, ‘China’s new coal
power spree continues as more provinces jump on the bandwagon’, Center 16 Ibu Sanjeeb Garg, ‘Why India should be worried about China’s Lalho dam’,
for Research on Clean Air and Energy, 29 August 2023, online. Mint, 18 October 2016, online.
6 Catherine, ‘Top six rivers rising from the Tibetan Plateau’, Great Tibet 17 Mark Giordano, Anya Wahal, The water wars myth: India, China and the
Tour, 20 October 2023, online; Energy Administration and Information, Brahmaputra, US Institute of Peace, 8 December 2022, online.
‘Hydropower explained’, US Government, 20 April 2023, online. 18 Stanley W Dziuban, ‘Implications of artificial flooding in military
7 Shan Jie, Lin Xiaoyi, ‘China to build historic Yarlung Zangbo River operations’, Society of American Military Engineers, 1950, online.
hydropower project in Tibet’, Global Times, 29 November 2020, online; 重磅 19 US Mission to the United Nations, ‘Remarks at a UN Security Council
丨雅鲁藏布江下游水电开发决策敲定,规模近6000万千瓦,相当于“再造 meeting on the situation in Ukraine resulting from the destruction of the
3个三峡”[Breaking news: The decision on the development of hydropower Kakhovka Dam’, 6 June 2023, online; ‘Parliament calls on NATO to invite
in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River has been finalised, with Ukraine to join the alliance—news’, European Parliament, 15 June 2023,
a scale of nearly 60 million kilowatts, equivalent to ‘rebuilding three Three online; James Glanz, Marc Santora, Pablo Robles, Haley Willis, Lauren
Gorges’], The Paper, 28 November 2020, online; Shan Jie, Cao Siqi, ‘Yarlung Leatherby, Christoph Koettl, Dmitriy Khavin, ‘Why the evidence suggests
Zangbo River hydropower project nailed with the passing of 14th Five-Year
Russa blew up the Kakhovka Dam’, New York Times, 16 June 2023, online.
Plan, but won’t be completed soon’, Global Times, 13 March 2021, online.
20 Judy Shin, ‘The Mekong River unrest: the battle for water’, Earth.Org,
8 The tunnel could reportedly carry 2,000 cubic metres of water a second,
15 May 2020, online; Peter Bosshard, ‘China’s dam-building will cause more
with a drop in altitude of 2,800 metres. Yang Yong, ‘World’s largest
problems than it solves’, The Guardian, 4 March 2011, online.
hydropower project planned for Tibetan Plateau’, Dialogue Earth, 5 March
2014, online; Mark Doman, Katia Shatoba, Alex Palmer, ‘A mega dam on the 21 ‘China country rating’, Climate Action Tracker, 22 November 2023, online.
Great Bend of China’, ABC News, 29 August 2022, online. 22 TM Krishnamurti, ‘Indian monsoon’, Britannica, 26 February 2024, online.
9 ‘Hydropower 101: Transmission, from dam to doorstep’, Peninsula Light 23 Akshit Sangomla, ‘Climate crisis in north east India: what is behind water
Co., 1 July 2020, online. scarcity in the region’, Down to Earth, 9 September 2021, online.
10 Water Science School, ‘Hydroelectric power: advantages of production 24 Arunachal24 Team, ‘Floods wreck havoc in Arunachal, Assam and Sikkim:
and usage’, US Geological Survey, 6 June 2018, online. road washed away, tourists stranded’, Arunachal24, 16 June 2023, online.
12 | THE GEOPOLITICS OF WATER: HOW THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER COULD SHAPE INDIA–CHINA SECURITY COMPETITION
WHAT’S
YOUR
STRATEGY?
Stay informed via the field’s leading think tank,
the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
facebook.com/ASPI.org
@ASPI_org
Supported by